The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a private nonprofit tasked by Congress with helping preserve historical buildings, sued the Trump administration for tearing down the East Wing of the White House and asked a federal judge for an emergency stop-work order. The judge did not stop work on the new ballroom, but he did order the White House to get approval from the necessary agencies.
In his eagerness to build his gigantic ballroom, Trump bypassed the normal review process for making changes to a historic building.
Trump knew that if he went through the legally-required process, it would take years to get the necessary approvals, and some busybody preservationists might tell him to scale back his grand plans. The new ballroom–at 95,000 square feet– will be almost double the size of the entire White House–which is 55,000 square feet.
So he followed his personal motto: “Stop me if you can.”
Without asking permission he demolished the East Wing. It is gone, finished.
Now he will take his plans to the National Capital Planning Commission, which will hold hearings starting January 8.
Ordinarily, the NCPC review is rigorous and involves multiple hearings before a shovel touches the ground, reviewing esthetic and environmental issues.Trump expects to get done in a few months what customarily takes years of review before any work begins.
The NCPC is led by Will Scharf, the White House staff secretary and Trump’s former personal lawyer, whom the president appointed as commission chair in July, and its members tilt toward Trump. The president appointed two other White House officials to the body, and the commission also includes nine seats apportioned to sitting Cabinet secretaries and other local and federal officials.
Trump’s grandiose plan must also win the approval of the U.S. Commission on Fine Arts. That should not be a problem either, because in October, Trump fired all six members of the Commission. That Conmission (if Trump has appointed new members) will review the proposed ballroom that will replace the East Wing and also Trump’s plan to build an Arc d’Trump.
This is an important development. Our nation needs at least two sensible political parties. A two-party system with vigorous third parties is healthy for our democracy.
When one of our two major parties is captured by an extremists cult, it’s a very bad sign. When that cult revels in cutting ties with our historic allies, in brutalizing immigrants and even citizens who look like immigrants (brown skin color), in sending troops to American cities, in killing people on boats that might or might not be transporting drugs instead interdicting them, in abandoning civil rights laws, and in treating the president as a king to be obeyed and worshipped, that cult is not a normal participant in American politics because it is not bound by the Constitution.
Thus, in my opinion, it is very good news that sane conservatives are abandoning the Heritage Foundation–whose leader was the architect of Project 2025–and joining forces with Mike Pence.
Pence is a conservative through and through, and I disagree with him on most issues. But in 2020, he refused Trump’s direct order to join the insurrection by refusing to certify Biden’s election. Pence certified Biden’s election and was reviled by MAGA for following the Constitution, not Trump. They chanted “Hang Mike Pence” on January 6, 2021, and even built a scaffold outside the U.S. Capitol. Trump shrugged with indifference, and the mob searched for Pence.
More than a dozen staffers at The Heritage Foundation are leaving the conservative think tank to join a nonprofit led by former Vice President Mike Pence as the embattled organization continues to reel from ongoing turmoil.
Advancing American Freedom — founded by Pence in 2021 “to defend liberty and advance policies that build a stronger America” — announced Monday that three senior officials who led the legal, economic and data teams at Heritage would be joining the group next year, along with several members of their teams.
This is good news for the conservative Republican Party and good news for our democracy. Genuine conservatives can’t abide the extremism of MAGA.
I’ll be watching to see what Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger do in the future.
Our President extends Christmas wishes to all, even the “radical left scum.” This is his effort to bring the country together, to extol himself, and to mark a day of Peace and Joy! Who better to celebrate and congratulate than himself?
I’m confused. Yesterday afternoon, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump could not send the National Guard to Chicago. Okay.
But a few minutes later, he mobilized the Louisiana National Guard and ordered it to New Orleans, where serious crime is declining. Jeff Landry, the Republican Governor of Louisiana, was delighted that Trump was sending in the Guard.
Questions:
If the president can’t send the Guard to Chicago, why can he send it to New Orleans?
If Governor Landry thought that New Orleans needed the National Guard, why didn’t he mobilize them himself? Maybe it’s because the federal government will pay part of the costs. But if the need was urgent, it seems the Governor would have acted without delay.
This is a gift article that appeared in Bloomberg News. It describes the dramatic changes that Trump has made by executive order to redirect the flow of money.
It’s unlikely that Trump wrote these orders or even understood their implications. He is surrounded by people who know precisely what they are doing: windfalls for the rich.
As has been widely reported, CBS’ “60 Minutes” announced that it would release a program about the notorious prison in El Salvador– CECOT–where the U.S. sent migrant prisoners, who were allegedly hardened criminals, “the worst of the worst.”
The program interviews released prisoners, who describe torture, beatings, and inhumane conditions that would never be permitted in U.S. prisons. It also reviewed records and concluded that few of those sent to CECOT were hardened criminals or terrorists.
Bari Weiss, the editor-in/chief of CBS News, stopped the release of the segment because no one in the Trump administration agreed to respond to it. Critics said that if that was legitimate grounds for blocking a story, the Trump administration could block all critical coverage by refusing to comment.
After CBS was sold to the Ellison billionaires, David Ellison hired Bari Weiss to be editor-in-chief and bought her website “The Free Press” for $150 million. Weiss has no experience in the broadcast industry.
Apparently the show aired in Canada, where a viewer copied it and posted it on Reddit.
Here is the link on Reddit. Decide for yourself whether Weiss was right to stop the show until someone from the Trump administration commented.
The 60 minutes interview that was not aired in the US was aired and recorded in Canada and posted on YouTube. It has since been taken down. No worries though, I screen recorded it.“
See it before it is taken down.
It was originally posted on YouTube but was taken down.
Trump filed a lawsuit against the board of the Pulitzer Prizes in 2022, demanding that it retract any prizes awarded to reporters from The New York Times and The Washington Post who covered the investigation into Trump’s relationship with Russia in his first term.
Trump refers to the episode and the FBI’s investigation as the “Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax.”
The Pulitzer board issued the following response:
A Statement from the Pulitzer Prize Board
The Pulitzer Prize Board has an established, formal process by which complaints against winning entries are carefullyreviewed. In the last three years, the Pulitzer Board has received inquiries, including from former President Donald Trump, about submissions from The New York Times and The Washington Post on Russian interference in the U.S. election and its connections to the Trump campaign–submissions that jointly won the 2018 National Reporting prize.
These inquiries prompted the Pulitzer Board to commission two independent reviews of the work submitted by those organizations to our National Reporting competition. Bothreviews were conducted by individuals with no connection to the institutions whose work was under examination, nor any connection to each other. The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes.
The 2018 Pulitzer Prizes in National Reporting stand.
The case has dragged on. Recently the board of the Pulitzer Prizes announced a new twist. It has asked Trump to provide full records of his medical history, his psychological tests, and his income tax returns since 2015.
Trump might rethink this particular lawsuit. Other groups sued by the litigious Trump should scrutinize the Pulitzer board’s strategy.
The Trump administration is engaged in a war against science and medicine. It has eliminated funding in many crucial areas of research conducted by universities and by the National Institutes of Health. Incalculable damage has been done to set back the search for cures for cancer, Alzheimer’s, heart disease, infectious diseases, HIV, respiratory diseases, and pediatric cancer. People will die because of the ignorance of those who close down ongoing, vital research.
Trump has consistently claimed that “climate change” is a hoax. He has said that the term “climate change” refers to the weather. He hates wind farms and has cut federal funding for them. He has hated wind farms since wind turbines were built near his Trump International Golf Links in Scotland. He sued to block them but repeatedly lost.
Now he is closing down a major hub of climate research.
The Trump administration said it will be dismantling the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, one of the world’s leading Earth science research institutions.
The center, founded in 1960, is responsible for many of the biggest scientific advances in humanity’s understanding of weather and climate. Its research aircraft and sophisticated computer models of the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans are widely used in forecasting weather events and disasters around the country, and its scientists study a broad range of topics, including air pollution, ocean currents and global warming.
But in a social media post announcing the move late on Tuesday, Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, called the center “one of the largest sources of climate alarmism in the country” and said that the federal government would be “breaking up” the institution.
Mr. Vought wrote that a “comprehensive review is underway” and that “any vital activities such as weather research will be moved to another entity or location.”
Scientists, meteorologists and lawmakers said the move was an attack on critical scientific research and would harm the United States.
The National Center for Atmospheric Research was originally founded to provide scientists studying Earth’s atmosphere with cutting-edge resources, such as supercomputers, that individual universities could not afford on their own. It is now widely considered a global leader in both weather and climate change research, with programs aimed at tracking severe weather events, modeling floods and understanding how solar activity affects the Earth’s atmosphere.
The center’s research has often proved useful in unexpected places, such as when its studies of downdrafts in the lower atmosphere in the 1970s and 1980s led to development of wind shear detection systems around airports that helped address the cause of hundreds of aviation accidents during that era.
Mark Green is a progressive activist in New York City. He was the city’s Consumer Affairs commissioner, then New York City’s first Public Advocate. He is a lawyer and author.
He writes on his Substack blog,
Trump taking over 250th celebrations of July 4, 1776 is less urgent than going to war with Venezuela over oil or deporting law-abiding immigrants without due process..but it’s maddening and obscene to allow such a Tory to lecture us Patriots about The Story of America. Fyi, this Substack explains why and how to slow down his narcissistic nationalism.
Celebrating Trump on July 4, 2026
Mark Green wrote on his Substack blog:
“It was the most consequential Revolution in history…When you control how people discuss the past, you control how they see the present and imagine the future.” – Ken Burns
It’s bad enough that a raging egomaniac wants to paste his name on physical public assets: a Peace Institute, Washington Arch, “Trump Baby Bonds,” coinage, the Commanders football stadium, the Kennedy Center, and a new White House ballroom larger than the White House itself. But it would be historically obscene for a temporary Oval Office occupant, far closer in philosophy to the Tories than the Patriots, to rewrite the very idea of 1776.
Donald Trump’s irresistible urge to imitate Ozymandias and Caesar should be opposed, mocked, and someday reversed. But until the jury of voters issue their 2026 and 2028 verdicts, that resistance should at least mean rejecting his attempts to view the Semiquincentennial (the 250th anniversary) through the lens of narcissistic nationalism. Instead, we should adhere to the radical principles of the Declaration, Constitution, and Bill of Rights: freedom, rule of law, separation of powers, free speech, and consent of the governed.
In his effort to renounce loyalty to royalty, Jefferson laid out eighteen “facts” in his July 4th Bill of Particulars involving trade, taxes, armies, and courts that justified rebellion against England. Below are eighteen parallel reasons to rebel against Trump’s contemporary power-grab and his attempt to redefine the Story of America for generations to come.
A BILL OF PARTICULARS, July 4th, 2026
1. Sedition January 6, 2021. Trump inspired the worst insurrection since 1861 and later pardoned hundreds of convicted rioters, including Proud Boys and others who assaulted 139 police officers, leading to five deaths. He called it a “day of love.”
2. The Department of Retribution He publicly ordered the DOJ to indict political enemies, leading to humiliating dismissals targeting James Comey and Letitia James (“she’s very guilty of something”). This inverts equal justice by targeting people first and searching for crimes second. Reuters has tallied at least 470 names on what could be considered his vendetta list. The words “retribution” and “vendetta” do not appear in Article 2.
3. “Faithfully execute the laws” Trump interpreted “execute” in his oath literally, engaging in unlawful conduct over 170 times in ten months, according to federal and state courts, while dismantling agency Inspectors General. Replacing the rule-of-law with the law-of-rule led numerous judges from both parties to condemn DOJ deception and hundreds of experienced lawyers to resign.
4. The First Felon President He was found guilty of 34 felonies by a New York City judge and jury for falsifying business records and campaign finance fraud, avoiding prosecution in four other criminal cases largely due to reelection.
5. Pardon Abuse He transformed a constitutional prerogative into a near fourth branch of government, issuing pardons to donors, corporate executives, white-collar criminals, crypto partners, and drug traffickers based not on mercy but on blandly and unspecifically repeating ‘“people have told me they were treated very unfairly. When granting clemency to twelve Members, including the clownish George Santos, he actually admitted all were “loyal Republicans.”
6. Usurpation of Congress Acting as both president and de facto speaker, Trump routinely violates the separation of powers by, for example, governing through executive orders and ignoring Congress’s Article I power to tax. Justice Jackson condemned the “stench” of rulings based not on what’s precedent but who’s president.
7. Foreign Affairs for “America Alone” While history shows the U.S. succeeds with allies, Trump embraces dictators and threatens to abandon NATO. Nor did he impress Western leaders by predicting Europe’s “civilizational erasure” and dispatching two realtors to negotiate about the Ukraine and Gaza conflicts with strongmen Putin and Netanyahu.
8. Speech Not Free Calling the press “enemies of the people” and belittling journalists who ask tough questions reveals his belief that everyone’s-entitled-to…his opinion. MAGA-style McCarthyism seeks to shake down law firms, universities, news networks, and even individual targets —SNL, Jimmy Kimmel— using the immense power of federal spending and law enforcement.
9. Emolumental Self-Enrichment Despite attacking Hunter Biden, Trump turned the presidency into a personal ATM. Family ventures in crypto, memecoins, and branded properties increased their net worth by an estimated $3.5 billion in 2025, according to The New Yorker.
10. Economic Inequality Wealth disparity now rivals the Gilded Age due to policy choices, not natural law. Shifting trillions from the middle class to the ultra-rich reflects the priorities of Reagan-Trump-Norquist economics, as documented by Piketty, Stiglitz, and Reich.
11. Spurring Violence He governs through menace, encouraging assaults on protesters, failing to condemn mass shootings, and using dehumanizing language repeated by actual mass murderers in, for example, the Pittsburgh synagogue and Buffalo supermarket slayings. Even the suspect in Charlie Kirk’s murder was a Trump supporter who repeated that Biden stole the 2020 election. FBI data shows roughly 80 percent of political murders originate from the Far-Right.
12. Commander-in-Chief Abuse Renaming the Department of Defense the “Department of War” was a tell. Trump invoked fabricated emergencies to deploy troops domestically, treating soldiers as personal enforcers and flirting with war crimes to look like, in Hegseth’s favorite words, “warriors” who favor “lethality not legality.”
13. Racism From “shithole countries” to mass deportations without due process, his rhetoric and policies reflect collective guilt and ethnic scapegoating. If “racism” is considered too strong a word to describe Trump telling all citizens of Somali descent “to go back to your country” and J.D. Vance supporting those who object to non-English speaking neighbors, what’s a better word?
14. Repeated Sexual Misconduct He actively covering up his close ties to Jeffrey Epstein, was accused by dozens of women of sexual abuse, and was found by a civil jury to have raped E. Jean Carroll, resulting in an $80 million judgment.
15. Chronic Indecency Trump openly declares hatred for opponents, refers to them as “scum” and “traitors,” and celebrates their humiliation. After the White House posted a cartoon of a Trump-labeled plane dropping tons of excrement on protesters, renowned Conservative columnist George Will labeled Trumpism a “moral slum.”
16. Opposing the Franchise He supports restricting mail ballots, discarding valid votes, and eliminating the Voting Rights Act, last reauthorized unanimously in 2006 and signed into law by W43..
17. Incorrigible Lying While past presidents lied episodically, Trump normalized deception, producing over 34,000 falsehoods in his first term alone, including claims about a stolen 2020 election. This volume sabotages an informed democracy and ought to persuade voters and judges not to give him the traditional benefit-of-the-doubt of earlier presidents that, as columnist David French put it, “others have earned.”
18. Soft on Fascism Trumpism checks nearly every box of fascism: extreme nationalism, one-man rule, plutocracy, xenophobia, suppression of dissent, lawlessness, and normalized violence. Complaints about the label rang hollow when he told General John F. Kelly that Hitler “did some good things.”
CONCLUSION: Yes to July 4th. But not HIS July 4th.
Individually, many of these abuses justify impeachment or invocation of the 25th Amendment. A compliant Congress and devoted MAGA base make accountability impossible…for now.
Progressive patriots can still resist symbolically by rejecting co-opted celebrations and embracing Enlightenment values of reason, science, and law. Alternatives include:
• Local and state celebrations—which utilize community groups and schools—can explicitly counter historical revisionism. As founding father Benjamin Rush said, “the Revolution never truly ends.” Democracy requires renewal, not Originalism weaponized by power.
• A national coalition, such as “No Kings Days,” should organize a July 4, 2026, alternative with mass participation and prominent public speakers.
• Blunt editorials from major media that dramatically begin on their front pages should reframe Real Patriotism and rise to the unique threat of an American Despot.
