Texas Governor Greg Abbott is holding hostage the more than five million students in public schools while he demands vouchers for kids who are already enrolled in private and religious schools. Abbott has refused to increase funding for the state’s public schools unless the legislature approves vouchers, most of which will subsidize the affluent.
Last year, the legislature refused to approve vouchers. Since then, Abbott engineered the defeat of several anti-voucher Republicans. He’s hoping to win approval in the current session. Vouchers will pass easily in the state senate. We will see what happens in the House, where rural Republicans stood against vouchers in the past, before Abbott’s purge.
Abbott is playing Reverse Robin Hood. He is stealing from the poor to pay for the rich. Billionaires like Jeff Yass, the richest man jnnOennstlvsnia, and Betsy DeVos of Michigan, are funding his intransigence with millions in campaign contributions.
The Texas Monthly reports that school superintendents are increasing class sizes, laying off teachers, eliminating electives, and doing whatever they can to keep their doors open.
The article says:
Two years ago, during the 2023 legislative session, superintendents of Texas schools were optimistic that state lawmakers would boost public-education funding. After all, soaring inflation was straining the already meager finances of districts across the state, and lawmakers had at their disposal a $32.7 billion budget surplus. Spending some of that money on the urgent educational needs of the state’s children might have seemed like an uncontroversial proposal.
Instead, the unthinkable happened: Legislators left Austin without putting any significant new money into schools or giving teachers a raise. The consequences have been dire.
Texas’s public schools were already among the most poorly resourced in the country: Our per-student funding is about 27 percent less than the national average. The basic allotment—the minimum amount of funding per student that school districts receive from the state—has been stuck at $6,160 since 2019. That would need to be upped by about $1,400 just to keep pace with rising costs. Public education advocates worry that lawmakers will provide only face-saving increases to the basic allotment in 2025 while diverting billions to private schools.
Many school leaders have had to undertake draconian austerity measures. Nearly 80 percent of districts have reported challenges with budget deficits. Given the stakes, 2025 could be a pivotal year for Texas’s public-education system….
Texas Monthly spoke to a group of superintendents to ask about how they were coping. They all spoke about the budget cuts and unfunded mandates (like requiring the hiring of police officers without providing funding). One superintendent, Jennifer Blaine of Spring Branch, said:
JB, Spring Branch: We don’t have anywhere else to cut. We are cut to the bone. I consolidated everything I could, and I cut everything that I could. If we have to cut further, you’re talking about severely impacting academics in the classroom and, quite frankly, safety and security. Five and a half million kids are in Texas public schools, and I don’t understand how our legislators and our governor don’t see this as a crisis. If we don’t educate these kids to the highest levels and prepare them for postsecondary success, we’re going to crumble as a state. I don’t know where the disconnect is. Education is the great equalizer. But nobody is talking about that, and I think it’s a missed opportunity because this is not going to end well.
The title of the article in the print edition was “A Legislature That Will Spend at Least as Much Per Pupil as Louisiana.”

How can Abbott “refuse to increase funding for the state’s public schools”? Is he vetoing laws that would increase it?
LikeLike
Abbott controls the legislature. He offered to increase funding for public schools last year but only if the legislature approved vouchers. The legislature voted against vouchers, thanks to rural Republicans who opposed vouchers. Abbott defeated most of the GOP anti-voucher guys last fall, using the millions from Yass. He is hoping to get vouchers in the next few weeks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very strange that funding would be controlled solely by the governor. I always thought Texas was a “weak governor” state, as opposed to New York, where executive power is broad and substantive legislation gets stuffed into a budget process largely controlled by the governor.
LikeLike
The governor doesn’t control the funding. The legislature must pass a budget. Abbott and Lt Gov Dan Patrick decide what they want in the budget and the legislature gives them what they want.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Texas has some excellent public colleges that have provided the state with an educated workforce including lots of STEM graduates for industry. If Texas intends to continue to compete in science and technology, it should invest in public education. Canned cyber garbage instruction in public schools is failing to provide young people with a quality comprehensive education, and most voucher schools will be a waste of public funds. Cheap, unaccredited Christian schools, which is what vouchers will pay for, will not prepare young people for a better future. The main beneficiaries of vouchers are the wealthy that use vouchers to subsidize private school tuition those parents can already afford to pay for, and vouchers undermine opportunities for the children of the working class and poor that rely on public education. Texas should not allow outsider billionaires to put the future of its young people at risk because Abbott is corrupt.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Texas is cracking down on its fine public universities by passing laws banning DEI.
LikeLike
This really does usurp the academic freedom that we hold so dear in our universities. Even if I don’t agree with a colleague or “like” that colleague’s research, I absolutely support that colleague’s right to academic freedom. Not surprisingly, a recent AAUP survey shows the continued decline of academic freedom.
LikeLike
The one affluent couple I know in Austin Texas have no interest in sending their child to a private school. They’re very happy with the newly built public school right around the corner from their house. Public schools are the hub of the community. I can’t believe that Texas voters are so uninformed that parents are rioting in the streets about this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I meant to say- Parents are not rioting in the streets.
LikeLike
I was about to comment on this matter. Tennessee does this too. Wealthy suburbs love their schools, and they fund their schools liberally. They have expensive music programs and fancy buses for their wildly successful sports teams. But just down the road, the poor kids in the next county struggle to have the basics, and experienced teachers cross county lines to teach in the wealthy areas, where workload is lighter, and salaries can be thousands more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent point Roy! I’ve noticed this as well. Of course, we also have places like Belle Meade (although not a “suburb” per se) where most of the people who can afford to live there don’t send their children to the public schools in their area.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Same in Missouri.
LikeLike
Wealthy people are often very happy with the public schools they’re zoned for.
LikeLiked by 1 person
First WP said that it couldn’t post my response to Roy. I tried again and it worked.
WordPress is mindf%#k.
LikeLike