The Thought Police lost an important case in Arkansas! Score one for librarians, booksellers, and people who read books! It’s a setback for those who don’t read books, never have, never will.
Doktor Zoom writes on the blog Wonkette:
A federal judge Monday tossed out parts of an Arkansas state law that allowed librarians and booksellers to be sent to prison for up to a year for allowing minors to access “obscene” or “harmful” materials, whatever local officials might decide is “obscene” or “harmful.” Probably gay penguins.
In his ruling, US District Judge Timothy Brooks found that the law, Act 372, violated the First Amendment and also generally sucked, was overly vague, and didn’t provide adequate guidance to libraries and booksellers to help them avoid being arbitrarily prosecuted. The law created a new process for complaints and required libraries (tell you what, just assume “and booksellers” is part of every sentence, OK?) to shelve “harmful” materials in a special adults-only section, although it didn’t mandate that such a section be behind a beaded curtain like at an old video store. A similar law in Idaho — minus the librarian-jailing — is also being challenged in federal court, as are multiple other censorship laws.
Brooks wrote that the law “deputizes librarians and booksellers as the agents of censorship; when motivated by the fear of jail time, it is likely they will shelve only books fit for young children and segregate or discard the rest,” which was of course the point. For all the Mad Moms’ insistence that they only want to protect tiny innocent kids from “obscene” materials, the actual targets of book banning tend to be anything rightwing parents dislike, especially mentions of LGBTQ people, books about race, and sex education.
Not surprisingly, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin said that while he’ll respect the ruling, he plans to appeal, and Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued a statement calling Act 372 “just common sense” because “schools and libraries shouldn’t put obscene material in front of our kids,” so there.
Holly Dickson, executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas, said yippee, now we can poison kids’ minds, destroy the family, and kill God, or at least that’s how wingnuts will interpret what she actually said, which was
“This was an attempt to ‘thought police,’ and this victory over totalitarianism is a testament to the courage of librarians, booksellers, and readers who refused to bow to intimidation…”
To learn more about the court decision, open the link.

So glad to see this. Both the judge and the librarians/booksellers must all have a way to illuminate everyone on the country if they get attacked by Trump’s Maga Dogs. CBK
LikeLike
In every jurisdiction I can think of on a Sunday morning, any sentence short of 365 days is punishable by jail, not prison.
And there’s a VERY big difference between the two.
LikeLike
Please explain that difference. Thanks!
LikeLike
“Jail” is usually limited to housing people who are serving sentences on misdemeanors. The most severe misdemeanors can get you locked up for a year, but no more.
“Prison” is for felony sentences, which can range from a year plus one day to life (and death).
Jail detainees are mainly for bar fight and DUI-level offenses. Prison ranges from felony theft to mass murder.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the explanation. . . learn a little everyday, eh!
LikeLike
Let’s hope we see a multitude of such headlines over the next four years.
LikeLike
Gay penguins, women who think for themselves, people of color who demonstrated for civil rights, just a few examples of those who make rightwing zealots profoundly uncomfortable.
LikeLike