Archives for the month of: February, 2013

Our frequent contributor Mercedes Schneider sent the following news in response to a post about Bobby Jindal selling the New Orleans miracle in Virginia:

 

 

From Mary K. Bellisario, VP of St. Tammany Parish School Board (Louisiana) :

The Associated Press at least printed some of the truth about the RSD:

“However, New Orleans schools run by the Recovery School District still have a D grade on average while those outside of New Orleans received an F in the latest round of grades released in October.”

They didn’t print what the School Performance Score (SPS) for the RSD is, or how many schools in the RSD aren’t even reporting their scores because they’re in the re-chartering process due to academic failure. They don’t have to report for three years. This could take that RSD average even lower.

Too bad the AP didn’t go further and print that the RSD — in N.O. and in other parts of the state — still ranks last out of 70 school districts in our state, where they have ranked for the past seven years. This would have put Jindal’s remarks more in perspective.

Last year’s stats show that out of 70 districts only two–the RSD run by BESE, and St. Helena partially run by BESE–were actually “failing” districts. Their reported SPS’s didn’t reach the passing grade.

Last year every other school district in the state — run by locally elected school boards, not BESE — was above “failing.”

But Virginia and other states will not be told that.

The 1% really really really wants to beat Steve Zimmer.

Zimmer is a member of the Los Angeles school board who is up for re-election.

He is a former teacher (and TFA) in Los Angeles.

He is the target of a heavily funded campaign to oust him.

The LA Fund for Public Education (controlled by Superintendent Deasey) has paid for billboards featuring a picture of Zimmer’s opponent, in his district.

The anti-Zimmer forces have so far raised over $1.5 million to knock him out.

Among the contributors to the anti-Zimmer fund: billionaire Eli Broad and Rupert Murdoch employee Joel Klein.

$1.5 million is a huge amount of money for a local school board race.

This one will determine whether LA schools are controlled by supporters of public education or corporate elites.

That is why all friends of public education must support Steve Zimmer.

Tell the elites they can’t buy the schools or the children.

Students in Providence, Rhode Island, will hold a Zombie protest against high-stakes testing outside the Rhode Island Department of Education headquarters on Wednesday afternoon.

State Commissioner Deborah Gist may not be there, as she is participating in a conference at the conservative think-tank American Enterprise Institute in DC on Tuesday with Michelle Rhee about “cage-busting leadership.

The students are the ones in the cage.

They would like to bust out of the cage created by NCLB and Race to the Top.  RI won RTTT funding to make the cage stronger.

They want the freedom to think and the freedom to learn, free of bubble testing and mandates from D.C. and the state.

If you are a parent or student or concerned citizen, support the students of Providence!

Help them bust out of the cage of high-stakes testing.

 

 

MEDIA ADVISORY

 

CONTACT: Aaron Regunberg | Aaron@ProvidenceStudentUnion.org | 847-809-6039 (cell)

“ZOMBIES” MARCH ON DEPT. OF EDUCATION TO PROTEST HIGH-STAKES TESTING

WHAT: Members of the Providence Student Union and other high school students dress as zombies and march from Burnside Park to RIDE, where they will dramatically demonstrate the deathly serious impact that the state’s new high-stakes testing graduation requirement may have on youth in Providence by staging a “die-in.” 

DATE: Wednesday, February 13th

TIME / PLACE:   4:00 p.m. “zombie march” begins at Burnside Park in Providence

4:20 p.m. zombies demonstrate outside of RIDE (on the Westminster Street-side of the Shepard Building)

The event will have strong visuals and chants. Students will be available for interview.

### 

The Providence Student Union is a youth-led student advocacy organization bringing high school students together to ensure youth have a real voice in decisions affecting their education. Learn more at www.providencestudentunion.org.

This is a guest post by Peter DeWitt on a topic that should concern us all.

We lack the infrastructure to be testing factories, and that shouldn’t be our job in the first place.

If the nightly news really wanted to look into the Fleecing of America, they need not look further than the serious fleecing that companies are doing to American schools. At a time when school budgets are being severely cut, many companies are offering to “help” schools and making multi-millions while doing it.

Whether it’s creating products to help in the adoption of the Common Core State Standards or selling schools textbooks that are aligned to high stakes testing, companies are there to meet every possible need of the school system and they are not doing it for free.

As with anything there are pros and cons to the Common Core State Standards. I think the six shifts will be helpful to our thinking as educators and it offers a base to build on. However, what is the most difficult aspect is the fact that schools will be required to buy new textbooks, software and offer professional development at a time when they lack the money to do so. Schools are in a bind because they no longer feel as though they can use products that are not aligned to the core.

We have had the perfect storm of implementing the Common Core and not having the ability to do it properly. Of course, all schools have to do it at a time when they also have to implement the new APPR which includes teacher/administrator evaluation being tied to high stakes testing.

The bigger issue for schools presently is the idea that next year or the year after that many states will be obligated to have their students complete high stakes testing on-line. For those schools that will dive into on-line assessments next year and those who will be required to hold on-line field tests, they have a lot of preparation to do.

On-line Exams
If you have ever taken a comp exam in college or in post graduate degrees you probably remember going to a testing center to take the exam. We all had to empty out our pockets to make sure we did not bring any accoutrements for cheating purposes. We had to sit at one computer with headphones where we could not talk with anyone and had to raise our hands if we needed a break.

The computers we took the tests on were not ones where you could Google something, and you certainly could not take anything in to the exam room with you. It came close to feeling like you needed a brain scan before you were allowed to take the exam to make sure it was really you. It sounds very adult-oriented or something from a sci-fi movie but that level of security may be coming to a school near you next year.

How will schools do it? We lack the infrastructure to be testing factories, and that shouldn’t be our job in the first place. Many schools gave up computer labs in order to use netbooks or get more desktops in classrooms to use for center-based learning. They have cut teachers and administrators so there are less people to police kids when they are taking the exam. Make no mistake, we have been given the task of policing kids. If you do not think that is part of the job of the teacher, you have not been paying attention.

Open up the first page of any NY State high stakes test, not that you were allowed to keep any because that would be cheating, and you will notice that the first page has a warning for anyone who may cheat. Apparently, many state education departments have such low expectations of us that they need to tell us what will happen if we cheat on the very first page of a test. How will teachers check each and every computer? How will they ensure that kids are not Googling answers? Remember, the stakes are high and students feel the pressures of testing.

Schools presently lack the bandwidth needed to support the number of students who will be taking these exams at the same time. In the future this will be beneficial for schools that want to go BYOD. However, right now there will have to be software updates to make sure students cannot multi-task on other sites at the same time they are taking the on-line assessments. Teachers and administrators need to make sure the computers are “secure.”

We all know that there are many very intelligent people out there waiting to “help” schools meet this need, which will be another cost accrued by districts. Schools are seen by many organizations and companies as the something to invest in but remember that invest has two meanings. As educators we invest our time into students so they can be contributing members of a democratic society. Companies are investing in what we do so they can make money.

A couple of years ago, I wrote a blog about the fact that state education departments want us to teach kids 21st century skills at the same time they make students take 90 minute paper and pencil exams. I guess I need to be careful what I ask for.

Peter Dewitt is an elementary principal in upstate, NY and he writes the Finding Common Ground blog for Education Week. Find him on Twitter at @PeterMDeWitt and http://www.petermdewitt.com.

As we all know, New Orleans has been presented as a national model of school reform: eliminate public schools, open lots of charters staffed by inexperienced young teachers, watch for miraculous results.

But now a major promoter of the all-charter model–the Cowen Institute at Tulane University– has released a brutally frank report saying that things are not really working as hyped.

Kudos to the researchers at Cowen for their candor.

66% of the New Orleans charters are rated D or F, so parents don’t really have enough good choices, the report admits. It seems that the all-charter model does not produce the transformation advertised by Kopp, Rhee, White, Jindal, Duncan, ALEC, et al,

You may be lucky enough (or unlucky enough) to hear Jeb Bush boasting about the “Florida miracle.”

A useful contrast to his spiel is the story of this teacher in Florida, who is leaving a job she loved.

She didn’t want to leave, but it became clear to her and some of her colleagues that the politicians had taken control and squeezed the joy out of teaching and learning.

The politicians “came up with grandiose-sounding programs, such as “No Child Left Behind,” which instead dragged entire schools down. As the schools sank there were calls for more standardized testing and accountability.

“Instead they ended up forcing schools to “teach to the tests,” all but eliminating any subjects not directly on those tests.

“In Hillsborough, money from the outside was used to set up a system of teacher evaluations. That system became a punitive method of penalizing teachers with evaluations that are inconsistent, unfair and, at best, subjective.”

Hillsborough County was one of the recipients of funding from the Gates Foundation to measure its teachers and come up with a new evaluation system. Did it work? Ask this teacher. Excuse me, ask this ex-teacher.

 

Tom Pauken has written a fascinating and informative article about how Texas became the leader of the testing movement and how testing became an instrument to destroy local control.

Pauken is a prominent Republican. He just concluded a term on the Texas Workforce Commission.

He became an outspoken opponent of the testing regime, as he saw that it was bad for students and bad for the workforce.

The only beneficiary of the testing obsession seems to be the testing company Pearson, which won a contract from the Texas legislature for nearly $500 million at the same time that the legislators were cutting $5.4 billion from the schools.

It is heartening that some wise heads in the Texas Republican party are beginning to push back against high-stakes testing because Republicans control the state.

Pauken is still in a minority but he has an important voice. He is a former chairman of the state party.

His fellow Republicans should listen to him and stop the high-stakes testing that has produced so few gains in the past twenty years and done so much to undermine education quality.

Doing the same thing over and over and expecting to get different results makes no sense.

 

 

Kenneth Bernstein recently retired as a high school teacher of government.

He regularly blogs as Teacherken at the Daily Kos, which is how I met him. He is–and I hesitate to write this–an almost saintly man, deeply devoted to students, teaching, education, and the betterment of humanity.

In this article, written in the journal of the American Association of University Professors, Ken explains to the professoriate that the students of the NCLB generation are woefully unprepared for the intellectual demands of college. The piece appeared in Academe and the original is here. Kudos to Academe for publishing Ken’s important article.

Please do not blame their teachers, he writes. Their teachers were compelled by federal policy to teach to tests that discouraged critical thinking. Even bright students in AP classes, like those he taught, were rewarded for bad writing. Bad writing is expected, promoted, demanded by the AP exams, which determine the reputation of high schools.

This is unquestionably the most remarkable and powerful piece that Ken Bernstein has written. Please read it.

Bookends: On the very first day this blog started, April 24, 2012, I posted a description of a college professor’s reaction to the NCLB generation.

Here is Michelle Rhee, as reviewed by Mercedes Schneider in part viii of her study of the board of the National Council of Teacher Quality.

Mercedes Schneider is a teacher in Louisiana who holds a Ph.D. In statistics and research methods.

Here she is at her best, doing a close examination of the life and work of Michelle Rhee.

I just returned from an amazing week in Cuba. I went there legally, from Miami to Havana.

I wanted to go someplace warm in mid-winter but I didn’t want to sit on a beach in the sun. I wanted to learn. It took quite a lot of digging to discover that the U.S. government has granted licenses to a number of tour agencies to arrange trips to Cuba for U.S. citizens.

Last November, a high school chum in Houston told me she had just returned from Cuba, and she gave me the name of her agent, who is based in New York City. Her name is Myriam Castillo, and I found her via this article in Forbes because she doesn’t have a website. Some of the other agencies that organize people-to-people trips are mentioned in the same Forbes article.

Myriam planned a fantastic week for four of us. It was a customized tour, tailored to our interests in the culture, art, and history of Cuba. We visited museums, went to the homes of established artists, visited art galleries, toured historic sites, saw the countryside, ate wonderful food, and consumed countless mojitos. We were accompanied at various times by an architectural historian, an art historian, and various other experts.

We were excited by the sight of many vintage American automobiles from pre-1959–Chevrolets, Dodges, Oldsmobiles, Plymouths, Buicks–most in beautiful condition. We were amazed by the large number of tourists from Europe, South America, Canada, and yes, the United States. Last year, 400,000 tourists from the U.S. visited Cuba. When we departed the Havana airport on the morning of February 8, ten flights were leaving, and eight were headed for Miami. One of them was an American Airlines flight. Most, like ours, were charters carrying about 150 people.

The architecture of Havana is varied and wonderful, with some beautifully preserved buildings but very many in decrepit condition. A beautiful public square of stunning homes and apartment houses would be adjacent to blocks and blocks of squalid abodes. The magnificent and elegant Italianate mansion that houses an astonishing collection of Napoleonic artifacts is next door to a crumbling and ramshackle mansion built in the same era.

The Cuban people we met were warm and welcoming. The culture is vibrant. The music is fabulous.

Tourism is a major industry, probably the biggest in the country. And yet, the island is isolated in many ways, with no cell phone service and very limited access to the Internet. I was able to log on at a major hotel, but service was spotty.

There is no advertising, few shops, not much to buy, no billboards other than political slogans like “Defend socialism.” Everywhere, one sees Che souvenirs, so many that it seems like revolutionary kitsch.

And yet it seemed to me that Cuba is on the verge of a major transition. It won’t happen overnight but it will happen, it is happening already. A new generation is coming of age. They want opportunity. They want a better life. Little pockets of entrepreneurialism are opening up. Officially, the government owns everything, but there are many inconsistencies. Private restaurants called paladares offer excellent food (and pay heavy taxes). Because of a shortage of hotel space in some cities, many private homes rent rooms to guests. The old world is passing, dissolving, and a new world is beginning, shoots of grass breaking through the concrete.

The embargo seems as antique as the now ancient slogans.The sooner the embargo is lifted, the sooner there will be normal relations between our countries. As it now exists, cruise ships bypass Havana because they are not allowed to visit a U.S. port for six months if they dock in Cuba. Cuba’s isolation from the U.S. has impoverished many Cubans and done nothing to weaken the regime. If we wanted to weaken the regime, we would end the embargo and encourage open exchange among our populations.

We loved our trip. It was beautifully planned. It was educational. It was filled with surprises.

I hope that President Obama lifts the embargo and restores normal relations between our nations. This would be a major legacy for him, ending a dispute that began more than half a century ago. It is time.