Archives for the month of: July, 2012

A reader reacts to an earlier post and comments on the  Common Core State Standards:

I agree that CC standards alone aren’t the game changer. These types of efforts to rename, reframe, polish, market and sell new initiatives from the top down have a temporary success when some grant-style funding and enthusiasm accompanies it. In the end, though, you are attempting to sculpt whatever clay comes to you with the tools you are allowed. Imagine a baker thrown into a kitchen and told their career will live or die based on some baking standards and evaluations for pies, cakes, cookies, and various pastries. What if that kitchen has little or no flour? A true master might know that there are options (gluten-free), but the results are not typical-they just get the job done. Imagine missing even more of the vital ingredients like sugar, eggs, butter…Again, the job can get done, but if standards, expectations and evaluations (along with state test results) don’t consider how the kitchen is stocked to begin with, then it isn’t an honest system-even if the standards alone are useful. As a teacher, I can make up for the difference a missing “pinch of salt” might make. I can figure out a way to substitute some “ingredients” to help students arrive at a decent final product, that demonstrates their best.
The missing ingredient in most CCLS/reform/evaluation discussion is the fact that not all students come to school “ready”. Even some that do have disruptions in their life that impact how ready they are, temporarily, short term, or maybe long term. There is not much you can do about unforeseen accident or tragedy. But when we have policy that panders to wealthy private interests, feeding a society that promotes self-interest and consumerism, erodes the employment opportunities of the middle class…well, the conversation needs to change. Instead of “Teachers aren’t doing their job”, it needs to be “We need to ask teachers how we can help them and their students cope with an economy we aren’t ready to reform.”

If you want to see a demonstration of the bipartisan consensus around bad ideas, read this interview with former Florida Governor Jeb Bush.

Bush talks about his great success in Florida and his strong support for Governor Rick Scott, who has been wreaking havoc with the lives of Florida’s public school teachers. Of course, Bush is thrilled with this and is probably pulling the strings as the Legislature cracks the whip on their backs.

He is a strong supporter of the Common Core state standards and acknowledges that he intervened with ALEC, the far-right group of state legislators, to persuade them not to denounce the national standards. He defends ALEC and tries to paint the group as a group of “center-right” legislators, not the anti-government, pro-privatization lobby that became famous for promoting “Stand Your Ground” laws and voter suppression laws.

He is very happy with President Obama’s Race to the Top, and why shouldn’t he be? Race to the Top contains everything that pleases rightwing Republicans like Bush. It green-lights more testing and more privatization. And it hammers teachers by tying their fate to test scores.

And of course he is enthusiastic about the “reforms” passed by Governor Jindal in Louisiana, Governor Daniels in Indiana, and others on the far-right.

In your wildest dreams, did you ever imagine a consensus that stretched from Obama to Jindal? Did you ever dream that education would be the issue that would be common ground for a Democratic President and the rightwing of the Republican party?

Another reader shares memories of growing up in the South, before the Brown decision was implemented.

And by the way, I don’t mean to suggest by reprinting these accounts that segregation no longer exists. In some places today, de facto segregation is even more extreme–and unnoticed–than the de jure segregation of the pre-Brown era. As I pointed out to an Internet friend last night on Twitter, in the 1950s, he and I would have never met, never exchanged ideas, never shared the same space. What I didn’t say was that if we had met, I would automatically be his superior because of the color of my skin, not because of anything else. There was a caste system in place, and it was race-based. I do not mean to minimize in any way the persistence of segregation today. It is one of the root causes of low academic achievement, especially when it is linked to poverty. The combination is toxic. Some day, when I have time, I’ll share some of my memories of growing up in the South.

Segregation was my silly mother’s excuse to baptize us Catholic in Atlanta in 1954, when my older brother was ready to start first grade. Did y’all know that the Catholic schools were already desegregated, all that time? New Orleans was the only specific date I could find, just now. It was desegregated in 1948, the year before I was born.When We lived in San Antonio, we attended Our Lady of Sorrows, where we were a minority. My daddy had died, his military life-insurance was tangled up in paperwork for years, and he had set up his meager NCO pension allotment to give a share to his mother and his many young siblings, back in Florida. My mom worked off our tuition as a crossing guard. Our landlady, Mrs. Morales, was always claiming she’d cooked too much, and brought us nutritious and delightful combinations of cornmeal, beans, and every possible local vegetable. There’s so much I could say about the intelligent, creative, and devoted polylingual women who taught me. Oh, my God. I just this second realized, that’s what I’ve always expected of myself as a teacher.And I was in eighth grade at Everett Junior High School in Panama City, Florida, the year it accepted its first black students. I can’t even begin to convey all that. We should all write memoirs, or even novels, so history will know.Each of us who grew up in those momentous decades has a different and specific historical context, depending on our birth year, city, economic level, and the racial identities of our own families. You who aren’t “baby boomers”, stop a minute and realize what Linda Brown’s victory over the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, meant to the other little girls of her generation. We lived it from the inside out, as children, while the fabric of our own selves was being woven.

Injustice and division seem overwhelming, but look around, inside and out, and realize the majesty of what we did accomplish, and what we are. Whatever happens to our children is happening to OUR children.

We are one people.

A survey in Louisiana finds that most schools do not have the technology to support the Common Core online testing that will begin in 2014-2015. This will require a major investment in hardware and infrastructure.

Here is part of the article:

BATON ROUGE — A survey of Louisiana schools shows most lack the technology and facilities needed to conduct online testing that’s to be part of a new Common Core Curriculum to be implemented in the 2014-15 school year.

The Department of Education asked school systems around the state to report the numbers of computers available to students, their operating speed, the type of Internet connections and bandwidth available and where to computers were located, such as in classrooms or computer laboratories.

The “Technology Footprint” shows a shortfall in computers, high-speed Internet connections and facilities in which testing can be conducted.

“We must believe our students and teachers can achieve great things, but they need access to the right technology to do so,” Superintendent of Education John White said in a news release. “We are not there yet. Too few schools are ready for the digital age. If we plan now, and invest our funds wisely, we can change this.”

Only five school systems — Ascension, City of Bogalusa, Red River, St. James and FirstLine Schools of New Orleans — meet the minimum device readiness requirements and only two school systems — Ascension and St. James — meet both device and network readiness guidelines for online testing, it said.

In Caddo Parish, the report said, “currently 3 out of 46 schools have an adequate number of computers that meet current minimum computer hardware specifications for online testing in 2014-15. In order to bring all schools in Caddo Parish up to the minimum testing readiness level of a 7-to-1 student to computer ratio, the district will need to either purchase an additional 2,814 devices and/or upgrade some of the 2,952 computers that potentially could meet the new minimum computer hardware specifications.”

In DeSoto Parish, it read, “currently 1 out of 9 schools has an adequate number of computers that meet current minimum computer hardware specifications for online testing in 2014-15. In order to bring all schools in DeSoto Parish up to the minimum testing readiness level of a 7-to-1 student to computer ratio, the district will need to either purchase an additional 175 devices and/or upgrade some of the 117 computers that potentially could meet the new minimum computer hardware specifications.”

A reader in Indiana makes a prediction about the Common Core standards:

The common core standards will not fundamentally change teaching and learning in this country.  If improving instruction COULD ever be accomplished by handing out a new set of standards, wouldn’t we have already seen great improvements in teaching and learning?  Traditions in schooling are not changed that easily.  Another way to think about this–  We have some really difficult set of standards in Indiana.  Does it mean that our little Hoosiers are getting a superior education because our standard are more rigorous?  Nope.   Ask any Indiana teacher to list the concepts that nobody ever understands, no matter what she tries.  When those standards are tested, a small percent get it correct and the rest do not.   I WISH that the problems that are coming as a result of implementing the CC could be headed off by simply piloting the standards. That won’t work.  The real problem is how students will be assessed on CC standards and how those results will subsequently be used to judge teachers, schools, teacher prep programs, etc.   Don’t we already have a pretty good idea what is going to happen?  It is not going to be pretty.

The Ohio Virtual Academy is making lots of money. And why not? It has a teacher student ratio of 51:1 even though the state pays it for a ratio of 15:1. Only 10% of its state funding went to teachers, and they cleared a profit of 31.5%. What a cool business! Corporate headquarters is bullish; it projects that this will one day be a $15 billion industry. The results aren’t that good, but who cares?

And this cyber charter district is one of the worst performing in the state of Ohio. Its test scores and graduation rates are so low that if it were a public school it would have been shut down by now. But its owner makes big political contribution so no turnaround for this district! Even more important, Governor Kasich spoke at its graduation ceremonies (were they online?) and urged the students to serve their Creator. Because it is such a great school, whose owner “gives back,” the graduation speaker this year was the State Superintendent Stan Heffner.

My friend on Twitter, Greg Mild, posted the following information about the school where Governor Kasich and State Superintendent Heffner spoke:

“ECOT in Ohio 2010-11. Enrollment: 12,000+; Withdrawals: 6,738; Dropouts: 3,045; Turned over 81% of students in single year.”

Are you beginning to understand the importance of “Reform”? Do you see the great things it will do to improve our global competitiveness?

Me neither.

A reader writes about growing up in the South. She brings back memories to me of growing up in Houston when it was segregated:

I don’t think PUBLIC schools should be catering to one ethnic or religious group either and I don’t think that schools that do so should receive public money.  I grew up under segregation.  My high school integrated when I was in the 11th grade.  The chemistry teacher asked if I minded being lab partners with  “the colored girl”.  I was never a racist, even having grown up in Birmingham, so of course I didn’t mind and Portia Montgomery and I screwed up our lab experiments all year.

I can see why certain religious or ethnic groups with non-mainstream practices might want to have their own schools.  I don’t have a problem with that as long as we don’t pay for it.  There was a Hebrew School in Atlanta where many Orthodox and Ultra-Orthodox     Jewish children attended. Many lived in the neighborhood around their school and synagogue They wore their special clothing and curled sideburns and hats.  They did not have school on Fridays because of the Sabbath.  I understood that as well as the Kroger grocery with its separation of foods, separate kosher meat department, rabbi butcher, and huge, about 1/3 of the store, Jewish section. The store was also decorated for Hannukah instead of Christmas and their school choir sang Hannukah carols at the store.  My tax money did not go to any of it.  It was fine.

What I cannot see is public schools bowing down to the needs of the religious right or even recognizing particular races or religious groups exclusively or nearly so.  Sometimes it was difficult in my early years in Atlanta Public Schools which, at the time were 90% black for students and 75% for faculty.  There was discrimination against everyone else.  A principal at one middle school made several stereotyped remarks against me as a white person and eventually got rid of me for teaching while white.  She also ran off ALL her white students who were not special ed. She had her eye on one of mine but did not realize he was biracial.  The schools were extremely Afro-centric, at least the ones where I was.  But because I was only at two where there was a problem with racism towards me and because I was liberal, flexible, older, special ed., and married to a black guy, it did not really bother me.  And I learned a whole lot of black history.

This post contains one of the comments on the Minnesota charter story that I missed while my Internet service was down.

It contributes more to the discussion earlier about whether segregation is okay if it is voluntary.

Let me add that I have never supported the creation of public schools (are charters still public schools?) that welcome one race, one cultural group, one point of view, one group to the exclusion of others. I got death threats twenty years ago when I criticized Afrocentrism, and since then I have criticized Hebrew-language charter schools and an Arabic-language public school. My view is that if there is a demand for a foreign language, it should be taught in public school, but should not be the focus of the curriculum; that way tends towards ethnocentricity. I think the way a multicultural, multiethnic society works best is if we all work together and to the extent possible, learn together. That breaks down fear and misunderstanding.

I know that racial and ethnic segregation exists and that many schools are overwhelmingly one-race or nonwhite. That’s a fact. I just don’t like the idea of accepting it and saying it is inevitable. I grew up in the segregated South. I didn’t like segregation. I thought it was humiliating. I’m always happy now to visit the south and see people and children of different races working together. I wish it had always been like that. I don’t want us to accept segregation as a new normal. It should not be. It’s wrong.

Back in January, I re-posted a tweet from Parents Across America founder Leonie Haimson that pointed to a post on a KKK-affiliated web site that cited this Bloomberg News article approvingly. The post’s author argued that the desire for separation was “natural” and praised the charter school movement for making this possible.Days later, still on vacation, I started getting calls from reporters at Michigan media outlets asking for my response to a vitriolic press release from the Michigan Association of Public School Academies (the main charter school trade/lobbying group in Michigan). MAPSA president Dan Quisenberry called my reposting “sickening,” “beyond insulting,” and “beyond outrageous.” Apparently, I had struck a nerve.I have not, and do not, accuse any charter school of breaking the law, though I am suspicious of the motivation of those who start charter schools designed to appeal to one ethnic or religious group. But as to MAPSA’s argument that “the claim itself has absolutely no merit,” they are on thin ice. A number of academic studies have shown that students in charter schools are likely to be in more segregated environments than their counterparts in local public schools in the same area.A recent policy brief on this subject: http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/chartering-equityHere in Michigan, we have charters that describe themselves as “Afrocentric,” that dedicate themselves to the study and celebration of the cultures of the Middle East, that have a clear focus on Latino students, and that advertise a “moral focus” (code for a Christian education, which they only abandoned under threat of lawsuit). How likely is a white family to enroll their child in an “Afrocentric” school; how likely is a Latino family to enroll their child in a school that focuses on Arab and Middle Eastern language and culture? How often will an African American family living in a small city choose to enroll their child in a charter focused on something like “aviation” which is located in a distant, mostly white, suburb and offers no transportation?I have no issue with celebrating different cultural identities and experiences, but I am very concerned that the headlong rush towards charters will only increase the segregation of our nation. We are playing into the hands of those, of whatever ethnicity or religion, who want to turn their backs on community-governed public education and provide segregated enclaves where children need only mix with those most like themselves. In doing so, we put at risk everything we have done to ensure justice, equal opportunity and equal protection for every American.

For those morbidly interested, the MAPSA press release, and our response, can be found here:
http://www.miparentsforschools.org/files/KKK%20COMPARISON%20PRESS%20RELEASE.pdf (MAPSA’s attack)
http://www.miparentsforschools.org/files/MIPFS_reacts_MAPSA_release.pdf (our response)

As time goes by, as I learn more about cyber charters, I become more convinced that they are legal fraud.

The last time I wrote something critical about cyber charters, a day or so ago, it was because Pennsylvania approved four more, even though the ones it has get terrible ratings, terrible test scores, terrible everything.

Not surprisingly I received several comments from people who said they are parents of children in cyber charters, and they are very happy.

Right.

And then I saw this article on Twitter a few minutes ago. The FBI is investigating the head of one of the first cyber charters in Pennsylvania.

This guy is usually written up as a great success story, a nationally recognized leader in cyber schooling, an educator who realized that there was something better than a brick-and-mortar school.

Yeah, I guess there is, when your cyber charter is collecting $100 million in revenues every year.

The politicians authorizing these money machines should hang their heads in shame.

I just finished writing about the history of merit pay and I was struck by a simple fact: Merit pay has been tried again and again and again and again, and it died again and again and again and again.

Study after study says it made no difference.

Teachers don’t like it.

It doesn’t raise test scores.

But it never dies.

It is the Undead Policy Idea. It is the Dracula of American education.

Despite the absence of any evidence whatsoever, the U.S. Department of Education got Congress to authorize $1 billion for the Teacher Incentive Fund.

This is a total waste of money.

It should have been spent on early childhood education or pre-natal care for poor women. That would have done some good.

This teacher in Wisconsin has a fresh idea to wed merit pay and choice (I keep saying that the readers of this blog are brilliant):

Sounds like Bill Gates probably thinks highly of Merit Pay schemes. Unfortunately I think we are going to have to ride the storm out for a while in Wisconsin as Scott Walker has put things in place to “pay for performance” based on test scores. In the meantime I’ve been a tryin’ to beat them at their own game (which they don’t like btw). These “corporatizers” really like to sell the choice idea as we all know. I’m trying to get my State Rep. Samantha Kerkman (R), who voted along with the other republicans to end collective bargaining rights and for Scott Walker’s education reform bill, to introduce some choice to our education system if we end up going the merit pay route. I propose that schools in Wisconsin be mandated to provide a 2 tiered pay scale system; one based on merit pay tied to performance on mandated tests and one based on experience and education, you know the status quo way. The catch being that the merit pay system would be substantially higher,,,maybe 10,000 more than the status quo way. However, the status quo teachers would be free from all required standardized testing and would have minimal govt meddling. Of course teachers would be allowed to choose which tier they would like to “volunteer” for and parents would also get to choose which system to put their kids in. At the end of the day we would have choice, accountability, “rewarding” the best teachers by paying them more to raise test scores, etc. We would also know that the status quo teacher at least wasn’t greedy. I’m usually looked at like I’m from outer space when I bring it up. So, then I suggest another radical idea: If you can motivate teachers to teach “better” by rewarding them with more money when they improve test scores, then it would tend to reason that learners (students) would also be motivated by money. So, I ask “why not cut out the middle man”? Isn’t that another basic business model to save money? Why not just pay the kids to raise their test scores? Or perhaps we could combine the two ideas and make this a 3rd choice. Parents could choose from one of the three: 1. teachers compete for big money to raise test scores 2. Teachers get paid mediocre money but the kids compete for big money for raising their own scores 3. Teachers get paid low money but are freed from all testing and govt meddling is minimized. I know where my 5 year old is going; that’s for sure!