Archives for category: Trump

If you are a Disney shareholder, let the company know that you do not like its CEO teaming up with Trump for tax cuts for the rich while attacking the rights of blacks, Mexicans, Muslims, and immigrants. They too have families.

Consumer protests work. Do not go to see Disney’s latest movie. Do not buy its products. Use your buying power to say no to Hate.

Iger seems to think he can cozy up to Trump and reap the benefits of tax cuts while distancing himself from divisive issues like the Muslim ban, the Republican gutting of health care and ICE’s expedited deportation of immigrants. Even as Iger seeks exclusive access to the President, he expects the public to believe Disney is above the political fray.

Under a normal administration, it might be possible for a company to pick and choose what elements of a president’s policy agenda to support, and how to collaborate around a fixed set of issues. But this isn’t a normal administration. Right now, there are no sidelines. President Trump poses an unprecedented threat to our democracy and to the American people, and even corporations have to decide whose side they are on.

What Iger and his business analysts don’t seem to have factored in yet is that Disney’s customers, workers, and shareholders have the power to stop the company’s wagons and hold Disney to account.

People’s Action is leading a coalition that has already collected more than 511,000 signatures on a petition calling on Iger to resign from Trump’s board. People’s Action alone collected 76,922 signatures. Those signatures will be presented at a rally outside of the shareholder meeting to highlight the public outcry over Disney’s collaboration with President Trump. You can follow the rally on social media using the hashtags #BadMickey and #LetHimGo.

Greg Tsipusky, a specialist in “post-truth politics” explains why Trump’s base believes his lies.

The media reports what he says, they reports there is no evidence. His base does not read or remember more than what he said and they believe him.

Tsipursky proposes a different way to report honestly and accurately about flat-out lies, like the size of Trump’s inauguration crowd or his loss of the popular vote.

When I visited Notre Dame a few years ago, I had the pleasure of meeting with a class of students preparing to become teachers in a program called ACE (Alliance for Catholic Education). ACE is considered the Catholic version of TFA, but it is far more serious and demanding than TFA. It is not a stepping stone to a job in finance, but a commitment to teach in difficult circumstances at low pay on behalf of a Catholic vision of social justice. The ACE students take classes during their undergraduate years to prepare them to teach; they have mentors while they are teaching; they live in community while teaching; they are paid far less than their counterparts in public schools; they return to Notre Dame for a summer of study; and they take teaching as a serious commitment. Father Scully at Notre Dame, who leads the program, is one of the most inspirational people I have ever met. I was honored to be his host for dinner in my home when he visited New York City, where he said a Mass for a small group of Catholic friends.

All of this is background for you to understand this impassioned letter written by ACE alumni to current ACE teachers.

The letter notes that Trump and DeVos chose to St. Andrew Catholic School in Orlando, where there are ACE teachers. The letter writers warned that Catholic schools should not allow themselves to be used by Trump to advance his policies, which run directly counter to the social justice mission of ACE educators and their mission. They wish it to be known that they do not want ACE or the children it serves to be used to legitimatize hateful policies by the Trump administration.

The letter begins like this:

Dear Leadership of the Notre Dame Alliance for Catholic Education Academies,

We, the undersigned alumni of the Alliance for Catholic Education, write to express our concerns about President Trump’s visit to St. Andrew Catholic School, a Notre Dame ACE Academy, in Orlando, Florida on Friday, March 3, 2017. We also write to offer our prayers for the St. Andrew school leadership, community and particularly the students in this time of unexpected attention.

This visit is an important symbolic moment that should be addressed by advocates of Catholic education. St. John XXIII encouraged unity in essentials, liberty in doubtful matters and charity throughout. We believe the essential unifying principle of serving the least among us is affronted by much of President Trump’s policy and rhetoric. The visit, regardless of its genesis, could be taken as tacit approval within the broader Catholic education community for these policies, including the scapegoating of immigrants, refugees and the economically marginalized in service of a nationalist stance and the targeting of Muslims as enemies of Christianity. Catholic schools have heroically served what Pope Francis has called the bruised, hurting and dirty Church. We fear this visit will associate Catholic schools with policies that violently conflict with their Gospel mission, and therefore ask ACE make a statement affirming our bedrock shared values. Protection of the least of these is the responsibility of us all, and especially those with the platforms to be heard.

Our first concern is that this visit has been designed to use the children and school community of St. Andrew as props by an administration that opposes core aspects of their identity. The primary focus of a visit to a Catholic school should be celebrating the mission of that school. Of course, politicians often use community organizations to advance their agendas. Further, past presidents of both party affiliations have visited Catholic schools to celebrate their identity and academic achievement. However, given the incompatibility of President Trump’s agenda with Catholic schools’ mission, we are concerned that this visit takes advantage of Catholic schools, students, families and communities without humanizing or benefiting them. President Trump did not visit a Catholic school during the recent Catholic Schools Week (though he did tweet about it). Why should his first visit to a Catholic school serve to benefit him and his agenda?

Our second concern is this visit could be taken as tacit support of policies that run counter to the mission of Catholic education and attack the very dignity of those served by Catholic schools. As current and former classroom educators, we know for many teachers, children and their families, President Trump’s campaign and administration have placed new stress upon the most vulnerable among us. For those of us in classrooms, we are facing challenging conversations about what the future holds for the children, youth and families we serve. As all those touched by ACE are well aware, many children in Catholic schools are already hard-pressed to maintain focus on their day-to-day learning given the challenges they face due to their race, class, language or country of origin outside of school. We know the St. Andrew community has worked tirelessly for decades to serve marginalized communities in Orlando. But this visit has not been designed to celebrate that fact; instead, it provides a platform for President Trump to showcase his marginalizing policies.

Mercedes Schneider writes that someone at the White House transferred the funding and oversight of the nation’s Historically Black Colleges and Universities from the U.S. Department of Education to the White House.

When I first read this, I laughed out loud. First, because this happened the day after Betsy DeV pointed to HBCUs as a wonderful example of “choice,” when they were in fact created because so few institutions of higher education would admit black students. If anything, they were created because black students had no choice. They were a refuge for black students who wanted higher education and a path to a profession in a deeply racist society.

So, boom, the HCBUs are removed from the oversight of the clueless Ms. DeV. (By the way, if you watched the Senate confirmation hearings, you know that Ms. DeVos prefers to be called Mrs. DeVos.)

But my second reaction was bafflement. The White House is the home of the President and his family. It doesn’t fund or supervise programs. Presumably, the funding will follow the program. But there is no one on the White House staff who can answer a question about federal regulations or the upcoming reauthorization of the Higher Education Act.

Does this mean the White House will take control of every program that one of its cabinet members insults? Will it manage the Great Lakes Restoration Project, whose budget will be cut by EPA de-administrator Scott Pruitt from $300 million to $10 million?

This is one of the nuttier developments in an era of the inexplicable.

Jane McAlevey writes in Alternet that there is method to Trump’s seeming madness. Whenever things get rough, he changes the subject.

This past week, as the media was roasting Jeff Sessions for lying to Congress under oath, Trump changed the subject by tweeting that Obama was wiretapping his phones at Trump Tower. The Sessions matter was dropped, and all the weekend talk shows were obsessed with Trump’s tweet about Obama.

Every tweet Trump bangs out has three primary purposes: 1) to lure most media and pundit discussion away from critical news Americans desperately need; 2) to embolden his base; and 3) to make ordinary people throw their hands up and say, “Just turn it off, I can’t watch it anymore,” or a key variant, “Just turn it off, who even knows who is telling the truth? They are all liars.”

People casually, dismissively or angrily refer to Trump as a pathological liar. That seems clearly to be true. But more dangerous is that he’s a strategic liar. And in the twisted calculations of his handlers, including Steve Bannon, it doesn’t matter one iota if anyone calls Trump a liar, as long as they also come to think of all media and anyone linked to the media—such as journalists, pundits, academics, experts, and think tanks—as liars too.

Trump and Bannon’s objective is to undermine experts and scientists defending successful social policy and the role of government, just as their allies successfully undercut scientists’ ability to explain climate change by relentless efforts, using highly paid fossil industry experts, to plant seeds of doubt….

As with its depressingly successful strategy of debunking climate science, the new administration’s real goal is to get everyone distracted, doubting everything, all the time, and ultimately disengaging completely because even to try to discuss serious matters with someone who doesn’t already agree with you 1,000 percent feels intimidating, or worse, futile….

Jeff Sessions is a lynchpin to the planned, systematic undermining of the right to vote, as demographic changes further threaten white supremacy. When the extreme free marketers in the corporate class team up with the cultural right-wing in war-room planning sessions, “Get the attorney general’s office 100 percent on our side” is top on their flip-chart lists. The attorney general’s office is crucial to undermine if not destroy voting rights, clean air and water, labor, civil rights, and other equally critical laws.

The attorney general also acts as the defender of the administration, and as such, will play a crucial role in protecting and defending Trump and the crooks and thieves being positioned into key agencies so they can, per Steve Bannon’s words at the Conservative Political Action Conference, “deconstruct the administrative state.” Trump and Bannon truly need Sessions, a racist, homophobic misogynist, in the position at the helm of law enforcement, as attorney general. He covers all their asses.

Crazy. Like a fox.

Every day brings new surprises and new tweets from the president. Most recently, he tweeted that President Obama was tapping his phone lines during the campaign without offering any evidence. Then he tweeted that Arnold Schwarzenegger was a very poor host of “Celebrity Apprentice.” No end to the surprising ideas that rattle his mind in the wee hours. He has insisted that no one in his campaign had any communications with Russian officials, but several have reluctantly admitted this was not true. He fired his National Security Advisor Mike Flynn for lying about his contact with the Russian ambassador, but several other Trump associates have also met with the Russian ambassador, including his son-in-law. It is all very puzzling.

Psychiatrists disagree about how to judge Trump’s mental health. Since 1964, when a number of psychiatrists made negative pronouncements about Republican candidate Senator Barry Goldwater, most follow the “Goldwater rule.” That rule says you cannot diagnose someone you have not personally examined.

However, a substantial number of psychiatrists today believe that the Goldwater rule has been superseded by a “duty to warn.”

Here are examples of both views.

Psychiatrists have appeared on the Lawrence O’Donnell program in MSNBC to defend the “duty to warn.” They believe Trump is unfit to serve as president. They say they have collected 26,000 signatures on their petition.

http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/mental-health-experts-say-trump-is-unfit-to-serve-882688067737

By contrast, I offer this comment sent to me by a psychiatrist who asked to remain anonymous:

In psychiatry, diagnosis opens the possible pathway to treatment informing those us entrusted with the care of another an appropriate and effective approach. There are many different approaches to persons with the same or similar “diagnostic labels.” Psychiatrists have to deal with the complexity of the person, as do other medical fields, but it needs to be more taken into account due to denial, resistance and non-compliance given the relative subjectivity of the field, though this comes with the territory and is not necessarily a hindrance. In most medical fields diagnosis is followed by treatment. Donald Trump, as an obvious understatement, is not a candidate for treatment. Thus the nomenclature of malignant narcissism with insecure, infantile, sociopathic, possibly psychopathic, and grandiose features, along with total lack of personal insight will not be helpful in removing him from office. It would only lead to psychological or psychiatric nomenclature which would be a dead-end in salvaging our democracy. Only a description of his expressions, behavior and actions would possibly be effective. That he has shown massive displays of congenital lying, misogyny, racism, indiscriminately abusive behavior, lack of a conscience, insulting, brazen inaccurate claims, inability to read, nullifying the media that is his source of news, shocking ignorance of his responsibilities, demeaning behavior, ruthlessness, inappropriateness at all levels,; not permitting a follow-up question let alone a completed one but primordially sniffing out whether the questioner idolizes him or is the enemy; incoherent rambling, chaos at the highest level, no incidence of self accountability plus possible financial, national and international improprieties. Not having any respect for other people, the law, our history and the constitution would be a more effective focus for removing this misguided individual before we all enter the history books in collective tragedy.

What do you think?

Stephen Collinson writes for CNN that the Trump administration’s relationship with Russia is obsessing Washington, and he explains why.

https://apple.news/AypfALO5IS7C2etl03nCqPQ

The administration has given contradictory stories. At one point, Trump said that no one talked to Russian officials, but that wasn’t true.

The administration can’t keep its stories straight. Trump said Jeff Sessions would not recuse himself, and a few hours later, Sessions recused himself.

No one understands Trump’s fawning comments about Putin or the alignment of his foreign policy views with those of Russia.

Many investigations are underway.

Democrats hope the administration gets tied up in knots to slow down its retrogressive agenda.

If you have been following the video contest started by the Netherlands, you know that there is a website called everysecondcounts.eu, where the comedians of many EU countries have made videos directed to Donald Trump. Each of them acknowledges that Trump said in his inaugural speech that “from now on, it’s America First.”

The Netherlands made the first video, saying it’s fine if America is first, but the Netherlands should be second.

Soon there were competing videos from Germany, Lithuania, Italy, Portugal, Lithuania, Slovenia, and many other countries, all making the case why they deserve to be second.

I urge you to watch them. You learn about the humor of each culture, and you see how they see us. Most are very funny. They have a hidden agenda. They reveal our common humanity.

One that’s different and not in the EU comes from Iran. The request is different. Not to be second, but…. see for yourself.

Tom Engelhardt writes in the Nation that Trump’s rise to power was facilitated by the reign of the billionaire class, a tiny class to be sure, but very powerful. He assumes that Trump is a billionaire. If we ever see his taxes, we may learn that his greatest hoax was persuading people he was a billionaire. He once called himself “the king of debt.” He may owe billions. His new job may help him pay down those debts. Strangest thought of all: The Trump Presidential Library. This for a man who proudly doesn’t read books. Maybe his best talk shows ever? The full run of “The Apprentice”? Executive orders? Photographs of detention centers for the millions of immigrants he deported?

In this spooky article, he begins like this:


It’s been epic! A cast of thousands! (Hundreds? Tens?) A spectacular production that, five weeks after opening on every screen of any sort in America (and possibly the world), shows no sign of ending. What a hit it’s been! It’s driving people back to newspapers (online, if not in print) and ensuring that our everyday companions, the 24/7 cable news shows, never lack for “breaking news” or audiences. It’s a smash in both the Hollywood and car accident sense of the term, a phenomenon the likes of which we’ve simply never experienced. Think of Nero fiddling while Rome burned and the cameras rolled. It’s proved, in every way, to be a giant leak. A faucet. A spigot. An absolute flood of non-news, quarter-news, half-news, crazed news, fake news, and over-the-top actual news.

And you know exactly what—and whom—I’m talking about. No need to explain. I mean, you tell me: What doesn’t it have? Its lead actor is the closest we’ve come in our nation’s capital to an action figure. Think of him as the Mar-a-Lego version of Batman and the Joker rolled into one, a president who, as he told us at a news conference recently, is “the least anti-Semitic person that you’ve ever seen in your entire life,” and the “least racist person” as well. As report after report indicates, he attacks, lashes out, mocks, tweets, pummels, charges, and complains, showering calumny on others even as he praises his achievements without surcease. Think of him as the towering inferno of 21st-century American politics or a modern Godzilla eternally emerging from New York Harbor.

As for his supporting cast? Islamophobes, Iranophobes, white nationalists; bevies of billionaires and multimillionaires; a resurgent stock market gone wild; the complete fossil-fuel industry and every crackpot climate change “skeptic” in town; a press spokesman immortalized by Saturday Night Live whose afternoon briefings are already beating the soap opera General Hospital in the ratings; a White House counselor whose expertise is in “alternative facts”; a national-security adviser who (with a tenure of 24 days) seemed to sum up the concept of “insecurity”; a White House chief of staff and liaison with the Republicans in Congress who’s already being sized up for extinction, as well as a couple of appointees who were “dismissed” or even frog-marched out of their offices and jobs for having criticized The Donald and not fessed up… honestly, you couldn’t make this stuff up, or rather only Trump himself can do so. And by the way, just so you know, based on the last weeks of “news” I could keep this paragraph going more or less forever without even breaking into a sweat.

Among so many subjects I haven’t even mentioned, including Melania and former wife Ivana—is it even possible that she could become the US ambassador to the Czech Republic?—there are, of course, the Trump kids and their businesses and the instantly broken promises on (such an old-fashioned phrase) their conflicts of interest and the conflicts about those conflicts and the presidential tweets, threats, and bluster that have gone with them, not to speak of the issue of for-pay access to the new president. And how about Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner (another walking conflict of you-know-what), who reputedly had a role in the appointment of the new ambassador to Israel, a New York bankruptcy lawyer known for raising millions of dollars to fund a West Bank Jewish settlement and for calling supporters of the liberal Jewish group J Street “far worse than kapos” (Jews who aided the Nazis in their concentration camps). Kushner has now been ordained America’s ultimate peacemaker in the Middle East. And don’t forget that sons Donald and Eric are already saving memorabilia for the future Trump presidential library, a concept that should take your breath away. (Just imagine a library with those giant golden letters over its entrance to honor a man who proudly doesn’t read books and, as with presidential executive orders and possibly even volumes he’s “written,” signs off on things he’s barely bothered to check out.)

David Cole writes in the New York Review of Books that Trump is “almost certainly” violating the United States Constitution every day that he refuses to divest from his international business empire.

He writes (this is an excerpt):

President Trump almost certainly began violating the Constitution the moment he took the oath of office. It’s true that conflict-of-interest statutes don’t cover the president—not because we don’t care about compromised presidents, but because such statutes generally require officeholders to recuse themselves from decisions in which they have a personal financial stake, and in the president’s case, recusal is rarely a workable option, since there is no alternative decision-maker.

But the Constitution subjects the president to a conflict-of-interest law: the so-called “emoluments” clause. That clause provides that no federal officeholder may, absent express approval by Congress, accept “any present, Emolument,…of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.” It is designed to ensure that federal officials, from the president on down, serve only the interest of the American public, and are not compromised by foreign influence. In 1787, Charles Pinckney of South Carolina proposed the provision at the Constitutional Convention, urging “the necessity of preserving foreign Ministers & other officers of the US independent of external influence.”1 At the Virginia convention to ratify the Constitution, Edmund Jennings Randolph explained that the clause was “provided to prevent corruption.”2

The emoluments clause is a categorical bar against a president receiving payments from foreign states. Recognizing that divided loyalties are difficult to discern, that self-interest is an extremely powerful motivator, and that foreign states may seek to buy influence, the Framers chose to ban all presents or “emoluments…of any kind whatever.”

The sole exception was where Congress expressly authorized a transaction, presumably on the theory that such a public and transparent accounting would reduce the risk of corruption and undue influence. According to the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel in 1981, an “emolument” is any “profit or gain arising from station, office, or employment: reward, remuneration, salary.”3 As the reference to “salary” or “gain” suggests, the prohibition is not limited to outright gifts, but includes payments for services rendered or profit from ordinary business transactions.

What does this mean for Donald Trump? The extent of his business, the Trump Organization, is murky, since it is privately held and Trump has been extremely reluctant to divulge details. But public records establish that his organization is involved in deals and contracts around the globe. Many of those ventures stand to gain from the actions of foreign governments or their agents—including investments involving foreign state-owned companies, government contracts or permits, lease agreements, or even overnight stays or events held at Trump hotels, golf courses, or other properties.

Trump doesn’t care. Apparently, the Republican majority in the Congress doesn’t care either. Once the party of the Constitution, once the party that praised the “original intent” of the Constitution, the party doesn’t care what Trump does, as long as he keeps them in power.

That is why we have to hold them accountable in 2018 and 2020 for this man’s behavior and his infidelity to our laws and Constitution.