Archives for category: Privatization

A great article in Politico.com by Stephanie Simon acknowledges that the primary election in New York City was a rejection of Bloomberg’s education policies of the past decade. The rejection of corporate reform in New York City has national implications, as NYC was held up as one of the “stars” of the privatization movement. Similarly, the election of the insurgent slate in Bridgeport, Connecticut, showed that the public was reclaiming public education from the corporate reform crew running the state.

While the Network for Public Education did not take a position in the New York City mayoral primary, I personally endorsed Bill de Blasio and wrote articles on Huffington Post supporting his candidacy. De Blasio is the candidate who is likeliest to reject Bloomberg’s intense focus on testing, closing schools, and giving special preference to charter schools. De Blasio issued a press release making it clear that if he is elected mayor, he will place a moratorium on any new charters until there was a process for including the voice of the local community and parents.

The Network for Public Education endorsed the insurgent slate in Bridgeport, and we think we gave them an extra boost to carry them to victory over the machine slate.

Please join the Network for Public Education and help us as we help the candidates for office, especially for local school boards, who want to strengthen our public schools, not privatize them.

Paul Horton, who teaches history at the University of Chicago Lab School, wrote the following essay for this blog:

“Democracy and Education: Waiting for Gatopia?

“John Dewey arrived at the University of Chicago in the middle of the Pullman strike. He wrote his wife, still in Ann Arbor, that he had met a young man on the train who supported the strike very passionately: “I only talked with him for 10 or 15 minutes but when I got through my nerves were more thrilled than they had been for years; I felt as if I had better resign my job teaching and follow him around until I got a life. One lost all sense of the right or wrong of things in admiration of the absolute, almost fanatic, sincerity and earnestness, and in admiration of the magnificent combination that was going on. Simply as an aesthetic matter, I don’t believe the world has seen but a few times such a spectacle of magnificent, widespread union of men about a common interest as this strike business.” (quoted in Westbrook, 87). This sense of “magnificent, widespread union” represented the definition of Democracy to Dewey; it was the very core of his writing, work, and public advocacy.

“Later, after he had moved to Columbia University in New York, he had a major disagreement with a very articulate student, Randolph Bourne, about the media pressure to get involved in WWI. Bourne argued then and later in an unfinished essay entitled, “War is the Health of the State” that states thrived on war because war consolidated the state’s power and allowed it to repress any kind of dissent. Dewey was an outspoken advocate of American entry into World War I, but began to question his support after seeing several of his colleagues at Columbia fired for their outspoken opposition to the War. These serious doubts turned into deep regret when he saw that the Espionage Act was used to repress freedoms of speech and press. Respectable citizens, including many thoughtful journalists and political leaders like Eugene V. Debs were routinely thrown into jail. His serious doubts began to trouble him more deeply as he witnessed the Federal response to the postwar Red Scare of 1919, when many American citizens were deported without constitutional due process. He was so disturbed by all of this that he helped found the American Civil Liberties Union that sought to protect due process and other constitutional rights. (Ryan, 154-99)

“From the early 1920’s forward, Dewey became a vocal and articulate public spokes person for Democracy in all American institutions. He founded and led an AFT local at Columbia and often spoke at labor and AFT functions. He believed with every cell of his body that American Schools had to be the incubator of American Democracy. As the shadow of fascism descended over Europe, he became a fellow traveller with the United Front to defend the world from an ideology that had nothing but for contempt for Democracy or any notion of an open society. For Dewey, education that allowed the organic evolution of free speech and the discussion and respect for all points of view in the classroom inoculated American students from the threat of fascism.

“If he were alive today, Professor Dewey would be shocked by what he would see. In part, Dewey’s whole philosophy of Education was developed to countervail the corrosive influence of capitalism on communities and the gross economic power of giant corporations. He sought to defend individual growth and creativity and nurture the sense of public responsibility that was under assault from the pulverizing individualism of the dominant ideology of big business backed Social Darwinism.

“Dewey’s vision is now a major target of major foundations that are funding the push to privatize American Education. Major Wall Street investors and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Eli Broad Foundation, the Walton Foundation, and the Joyce Foundation, among others, are working together with the Obama Administration to destroy what is left of public education in this great country. Combined, these corporations control approximately 50 billion dollars in assests.

“I will not take the time here to unpack the strategic plan coordinated by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and three people within the Department of Education who have turn their strategic plan into a public policy called “The Race to the Top.” You should read Diane Ravitch’s new book to get a clear picture of how this has all been done very legally with the help of the best lawyers that money can buy, millions of dollars thrown at the Harvard Education Department, and with tens of millions of dollars to hire the best Madison Ave. Advertising and PR firms and the best web designers (go to “PARCC” or “Common Core” online). What you need to know is that none of the people behind this plan have any respect for public schools or public school teachers.

“Like Anthony Cody, I have been insulted several times by Secretary Duncan’s Press Secretary and friends of our president who are not open to any imput from experienced teachers. Indeed, I was the subject of a veiled threat from Mr. Duncan’s Press Secretary that I describe here: http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2013/04/paul_horton_of_common_core_con.html.

“In another case, a good friend of the President told me when I protested the Chicago School closings: “who do you think you are kidding, only 7 or 8 percent of those kids have a chance anyway.” Several weeks later when I raised the same subject again, he gave me the Democrats for Education Reform standard line that inner city schools failed because teachers have failed. He was not interested in hearing about poverty and resource starving of schools. I called him on this. The first quote sounded eerily like what Mr. Emanuel communicated to Chicago Teacher’s Union President, Karen Lewis, in a famously closed door, expletive filled meeting.

“What all friends of public teachers and public Education need to understand is that Mr. Duncan and the Obama administration listen to no one on this issue. What Republicans and Tea Party activists need to understand is that this is not about Government corruption, it is about the fact that when it comes to Education issues, we do not have a government. Governments must read and respond to petitions: our Education Department does not seek to communicate with any citizens except by tweeting inane idiocies about gadgets and enterprise. What we have is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation sponsoring the overthrow of the public school system to bulldoze a path to sell billions of dollars of product. Other companies like Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill and Company, and Achieve, Inc. are just coming in behind the bulldozers.

“We must teach the rest of our society that democracy still matters in schools and everywhere else. The time for talking is over! We need to get into the streets and get arrested if necessary. Most importantly every one of us needs to call the same senator or congressman every day until NCLB and RTTT are dead, Arne Duncan does not have control over a penny, and all stimulus money that has yet to be distributed, is given by the Senate Appropriations Committee to the districts around the country that are the most underserved to rehire teachers and support staff. Not a penny should go to charter school construction, IT, administration, or hiring consultants from the Eli Broad Foundation, the Gates Foundation, or McKinsey. Not a penny should go to Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill or any form of standardized testing. All state superintendents who took trips from any Education vendor should resign, and no state should hire an administrator or superintendent at any level who does not have proper accredited certification and ten years of exemplary classroom teaching.

“Now is the time to preserve the legacy of John Dewey and teach the rest of the country about Democracy in Education or wait like sheep for Gatopia to numb us all!”

In this article published at The Daily Kos, the writer describes Bill de Blasio’s forceful demand for a moratorium on new charter “co-locations.”

As the author explains, “co-location” is a euphemism for a hostile appropriation of public space, which is given rent-free to private charter operators, some of which have billionaires on their board.

When a charter school is “co-located” with a public school, “Kids attending then ‘co-located’ neighborhood schools are kicked out of their classrooms and forced into yet more crowded classrooms. Charter schools don’t pay rent, often get the best facilities, and cherry pick the use of ‘shared space’.  They often reject students who don’t fit in their managers’ model of the right sort of student.”

He writes:

The charter school movement was originally a progressive idea – let local parents try to build local alternate schools.  Let a thousand classrooms bloom.  Fair enough.  

But this nice warm hippy concept has been hijacked and industrialized and capitalized and even securitized by the neo-cons.  Bloomberg (not parents) led the push for charter schools here. His cronies at the Department of Education led the revolution from above. By last year there were 125 elementary and middle school charter schools in New York City.  Charter schools now account for over 5% of NYC’ students. But parent demand didn’t create these schools; all were manufactured by administrative fiat. And almost none of these schools were built anew – the space was stolen from neighborhood schools.

And he adds:

Actually almost  all parents would choose the same thing – a sound neighborhood school. And by subsidizing charter schools Bloomberg diverted billions of Dollars that could have made neighborhood schools stronger.

The promise of charter schools was that their existence as an alternative would give parents a choice.  The theory was that management of existing system would make improvements to compete with the new schools.   But in NYC parents aren’t really given a choice. Billions of dollars of real estate has been expropriated from neighborhood schools and given to Charter Schools. The neighborhood schools are robbed in a deliberate effort to make the Charter Schools seem more attractive. It’s only natural that when given the choice between a starved carcass of a neighborhood school or an a shiny new floor in a charter school, some parents choose the latter.  Bloomberg has his thumb on the scale. He has sabotaged neighborhood schools, not strengthened them.

If de Blasio is elected and follows through on his promise to be a mayor for all the children–especially the neglected 95% who do not attend charter schools–he could become a national leader in the fight to restore sanity and common sense to education policy.

The writer says:

De Blasio could be New York City’s next Mayor.  He can use the office to not only reverse Bloomberg’s failed educational policies but as a national podium.  He can fight to end NCLB, to end the “Reign of Testing Terror”, to end the misuse of Charter Schools, and for reasonable universal pre-k.

DINOs like Rahm Emanuel and NY Governor Cuomo still think they should talk about closing failing schools.  Neighborhood schools are being closed in Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, etc. Maybe if New Yorkers elect de Blasio we can also send a message to Congress and Education Secretary Arne Duncan and President Obama.

Progressive Magazine has created a wonderful new website
called Public
School Shakedown
to cover the news about the
privatization movement. Please subscribe to stay informed about the
shams, scams, frauds, boondoggles, and assorted scandals connected
to today’s faux-reform movement. And to keep Public School
Shakedown alive, subscribe to the reborn Progressive Magazine,
which understands what is happening and is helping us to inform the
public.

Jonathan Pelto reports that charter advocates have dumped at least $50,000 into the Bridgeport school board elections in hopes of maintaining a board that will create more charters and defend Paul Vallas.

Expenditures of this magnitude are still fairly rare in school board elections, except in cases where the privatization movement has decided that they want control, like the Louisiana, Indiana, Idaho, and Los Angeles school board races, as well as the charter referenda in Washington State and Georgia.

Where is the money coming from?

Pelto writes:

In this case, A Better Connecticut is claiming that their five largest funders were Education Reform Now Advocacy of New York City, 50CAN Action Fund, Inc. of New York City, Real Reform Now Network, Inc. of Loudonville, New York, Families for Excellent Schools – Advocacy Inc. of New York City and Students for Education Reform (SFER- Action Network Inc.) of New York City.

A Better Connecticut was created at the beginning of this year by ConnCAN, which was created by the original funders behind Achievement First, Inc.

As readers know, Achievement First, Inc. is the large charter school management company that was co-founded by Stefan Pryor who served on Achievement First’s Board of Directors until he resigned to become Governor Malloy’s Commissioner of Education.

Note how many of these groups are not based in Connecticut. Families for Excellent Schools in NYC is funded by the Walton Family Foundation, the Broad Foundation, and other corporate reform activists.

From now on, public officials will be more careful about what they write in emails.

Tom Lobianco, the investigative journalist, hit a treasure trove when he filed a Freedom of Information Act request for government emails.

But what does it all mean?

Karen Francisco, the editorial page editor of the Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette, explains it here.

The fix was in. The backroom deals were made. The plan: vouchers and privatization.

New York City mayoral candidate Bill de Blasio attacked the Bloomberg administration’s policy of placing privately managed charter schools in public school buildings. Not only does this cause overcrowding and increased class size, but it creates a two-class system, with privileged charters sited alongside public school students who must make do with less access to their library, their playground, their auditorium.

De Blasio, now leading  in the latest polls, has a strong chance to change the direction of education in New York City, and thus, have a major impact on national education policy. Because he served on a community school board, and he has a child in the public schools, he understands the needs of public schools.

This is the press release opposing the practice of giving away public space to well-funded charters:

From: De Blasio Press <deblasiopress@billdeblasio.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:25 AM
Subject: DE BLASIO BLASTS NEW BLOOMBERG SCHOOL CO-LOCATION PLANS, DEMANDS SPEAKER QUINN SUPPORT A MORATORIUM
To: De Blasio Press <deblasiopress@billdeblasio.com>

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 3, 2013
CONTACT: DAN LEVITAN dan@berlinrosen.com, (646) 200-5315

DE BLASIO BLASTS NEW BLOOMBERG SCHOOL CO-LOCATION PLANS, DEMANDS SPEAKER QUINN SUPPORT A MORATORIUM

Half of New DoE School Co-Location Plans Would Put Schools over 100% Capacity

Speaker Quinn Once Again Sides with Bloomberg by Refusing to Support a Moratorium

De Blasio Renews Call for Moratorium on School Closures until a New Process is in Place

Brooklyn, NY – Public Advocate and Democratic candidate for mayor Bill de Blasio today criticized Mayor Bloomberg’s eleventh-hour efforts to push through deeply divisive school co-location plans, and blasted Bloomberg’s chief ally Speaker Quinn for refusing to call for a moratorium on school co-locations and closures – effectively acquiescing to these eleventh-hour changes.

“If Mayor Bloomberg has his way while his closest political partner Speaker Quinn stays silent, nearly half of the proposed co-location plans will put schools over 100% capacity.  This means larger class sizes for our students,” said de Blasio.  “Bloomberg’s proposals are a cynical effort to lock communities into permanent changes while ignoring community voices, and Speaker Quinn’s refusal to support a moratorium is letting Bloomberg have his way.”

Bill de Blasio is calling for an immediate halt to co-location and closure plans for the remainder of Bloomberg’s term and until a new process can be put in place. Despite years of community opposition and multiple efforts at reforming this deeply broken process, the thirty recently released Educational Impact Statements – the plans that outline significant changes in school utilization – unfortunately represent “business as usual” for Mayor Bloomberg and Speaker Quinn.  Of the proposals released, nearly half will place school buildings over 100% capacity.  In two proposals, when the school is fully phased-in, the buildings will be close to 135% capacity.

This is just the latest example of Speaker Quinn refusing to challenge Mayor Bloomberg, and routinely defending the Bloomberg status quo. When schools faced unfair co-locations and closures due to Department of Education’s lack of community engagement – such as the proposed closure of P.S. 114 in Brooklyn – Speaker Quinn stood on the sidelines. When parents and communities sought real involvement when schools faced disastrous co-locations, particularly during the Brandeis Educational Complex co-location, she was silent. De Blasio, in contrast, led the charge in fighting these wrong-headed policies. And Speaker Quinn praised Joel Klein as schools chancellor.

“The next administration deserves the opportunity to shape the future of the educational system in New York City, not be saddled with another Bloomberg plan offered in the twilight of his term that will last long after he is gone,” said de Blasio.  “Speaker Quinn seems content to stand by and let that happen.  These thirty “schools – nearly half of which will be left overcrowded – deserve better.”

As Mayor, de Blasio will create real reforms in the co-location process and elevate the voices of parents. He will create a class size reduction plan – not push through plans that contribute to overcapacity. De Blasio will also expand successful parent engagement models and ensure that district superintendent offices are proactively empowering communities with information about their schools. As Mayor, de Blasio will improve Mayoral Control and expand the role of Community Education Councils in decisions relating to co-locations, ensuring greater community influence.  He will make sure all of our schools have great leaders, open 100 community schools over the next four years, and provide universal pre-kindergarten and expanded after school programs by asking the wealthy to pay a little more in taxes.

FACT: Speaker Quinn Refuses to Support a Moratorium on School Closures. City Council Speaker Christine Quinn refused to attend a press conference with public school parents calling for an immediate moratorium on school closings. Quinn said, “I do not support a moratorium [on school closures]”. [NY Post, 1/24/2013; New Yorkers for Great Public Schools, “Quinn Along Among Democrats in Not Supporting Moratorium”, 1/31/2013]

FACT: Key Bloomberg Education Backer Said That Schools Will Probably Still Close if Quinn Became Mayor and That “The Policy Itself May Be Not All That Different [From Bloomberg’s]”. In a Jan 2013 Wall Street Journal story, Joe Williams, executive director of Democrats for Education Reform, praised Quinn’s approach on school closings. The story states, “Williams said schools will probably still close if Quinn ends up leading the city” and that “the policy itself may be not all that different” from Mayor Bloomberg’s proposals. [Wall Street Journal, “In Speech, Quinn Spells Out Education Platform”, 1/15/2013]

FACT: Speaker Quinn Said Bloomberg’s Schools Chancellor Joel Klein Did a “Terrific Job”. According to the New York Times, “She [Quinn] praised the mayor’s selection of Ms. Black’s predecessor, Joel I. Klein, a former federal prosecutor, saying he had done a ‘terrific job.’” [NY Times, “As Candidates Vow to Hire Educator as Chancellor, Quinn Keeps Options Open”, 5/8/2013]

###

NOTE: I cross-posted this piece on Huffington Post. Be sure to leave comments there too.

Two years ago, Kevin Kosar, a former graduate student of mine, conducted an Internet search for the term “failing school.” What he discovered was fascinating. Until the 1990s, the term was virtually unknown. About the mid-1990s, the term began appearing with greater frequency. With the passage of No Child Left Behind, the use of the expression exploded and became a commonplace.

Kosar did not speculate on the reasons. But I venture to say that the rise of the accountability movement created the idea of “failing schools.”

“Accountability” was taken to mean that if students have low test scores, someone must be blamed. Since Bush’s NCLB, it became conventional to blame the school. With President Obama’s Race to the Top, blame shifted to teachers. The solution to “failing schools,” according to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, is to fire the staff and close the school.

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo recently took this idea to an extreme by saying that he wanted a “death penalty” for “failing schools.” His believes that when schools have persistently low test scores, they should lose democratic control.

They should be taken over by the state, given to private charter corporations, or put under mayoral control. In fact, none of these ideas has been successful.

Low-performing school districts in New Jersey have been under state control for more than 20 years without turning them into high-performing districts. Mayoral control in Cleveland and Chicago has been a flop. And private charters typically do no better than public schools, except when they exclude low-scoring students.

Undoubtedly there are some schools where the leadership is rotten and corrupt. In such cases, the responsibility lies with the district superintendent to review the staff and programs, and make significant changes as needed

But these days, any school with low test scores is called a “failing school,” without any inquiry into the circumstances of the school.

Instead of closing the school or privatizing it, the responsible officials should act to improve the school. they should ask:

What proportion of the students are new immigrants and need help learning English? What proportion entered the school far behind their grade level? What proportion have disabilities and need more time to learn? What resources are available to the school? An in-depth analysis is likely to reveal that most “failing schools” are not failing schools, but are schools that enroll high proportions of students who need extra help, extra tutoring, smaller classes, social workers, guidance counselors, psychologists, and a variety of other interventions.

Firing the staff does not turn around a low-performing school. Nor does handing it over to a charter chain. Nor does mayoral control. Most of the time, what we call a “failing school” is a school that lacks the personnel and resources to meet the needs of its students.

Closing schools does not make them better. Nor does closing schools help students. It’s way past time to stop blaming the people who work in troubled schools and start helping them by providing the tools they need and the support their students need.

From a reader who read the emails gathered by investigative
reporter Tom Lobianco of the Associated Press, insights about the
back room discussions to impose “reforms” without talking to
legislators.

 

She wrote:

 

“Todd Huston, Tony Bennett’s Chief of
Staff, Indiana Department of Education is clearly in collusion with
a small circle of deformers to destroy public education in Indiana.
Al Hubbard, a classmate and fundraiser for GWB and David Harris of
the Mind Trust are involved in the plan of destruction. According
to Hutson, “We have to lead the media.” and “If we respond to the
educrats, we will always be on the defensive.”
http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/an-email-timeline-of-indianas-education-reforms
http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/ind_ed/choice.pdf
pg 1 of 3 Al and I have encouraged him to pay attention to ed and
he’s having lunch soon w D Harris. He knows the Mind Trust has
hired commissioned a study that will support Mayor control. pg 3 of
3 4) We have to lead the media. If we respond to the educrats, we
will always be on the defensive. Instead, we should begin a strong
communications effort focused on the major media markets. Our
experience has been that the Indianapolis, South Bend, Evansville
and Lake County papers really desire educational reform and those
are the markets we have to win in. The rural and small town markets
won’t care and could even be persuaded that it might mean more
money for them.
http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/ind_ed/last_nights_agenda.pdf
http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/ind_ed/notes_and_agenda.pdf
http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/ind_ed/agenda_wrap.pdf
http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/ind_ed/meeting_notes.pdf
http://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/auber/bios/miles.pdf
http://inhrcc.com/candidates/37/todd-huston
http://www.indystar.com/VideoNetwork/1334522956001/Matthew-Tully-with-Mind-Trust-CEO-David-Harris

John Wilson, formerly executive director of the NEA, now writes in “Education Week,” where he posed the question above. Which governor ran as a moderate, then revealed himself as an anti-government, anti-teacher, anti-public school extremist as soon as he was elected?

Perhaps you think of Scott Walker in Wisconsin, Paul Page in Maine, John Kasich in Ohio? Or your own governor?

No, says Wilson, the prize for the Most Deceptive Governor of all goes to Pat McCrory of North Carolina. He had been a decent mayor of urbane Charlotte, giving no hint of his radicalism . He did not campaign on a platform of destroying public education, restricting the right to vote, restricting access to abortion, and appointing inexperienced cronies to fat government jobs.

Yet he has turned out to be the governor of ALEC’s dreams, using the one-party control of government to implement a radical agenda of privatization.

“Educators know his deception very well. He campaigned as a supporter of public schools and teachers; yet he signed an appropriation bill that cut over 5,000 teachers and almost 4,000 teacher assistants, eliminated pay to teachers who earn a masters degree in the future, and refused to provide a pay increase to the state’s teachers, despite the fact that they are close to being the worst paid in America. Governor McCrory supported legislation that reduced textbook funding to $15 per student even though a reading textbook in elementary school costs $35. Hundreds of millions of dollars were cut from programs that affected the services of students directly.”

While cutting public schools, McCrory has signed legislation for more charter schools and for vouchers. His senior education advisor, be it noted, is a TFA alumnus named Eric Guckian, who formerly worked for New Leaders for New Schools and is a devotee of charters and digital education. But obviously no fan of public schools or experienced teachers. Guckian joins the constellation of TFA leaders such as Michelle Rhee, John White of Louisiana, and Kevin Huffman who seek to dismantle public education and the teaching profession.