Paul Horton, who teaches history at the University of Chicago Lab School, wrote the following essay for this blog:
“Democracy and Education: Waiting for Gatopia?
“John Dewey arrived at the University of Chicago in the middle of the Pullman strike. He wrote his wife, still in Ann Arbor, that he had met a young man on the train who supported the strike very passionately: “I only talked with him for 10 or 15 minutes but when I got through my nerves were more thrilled than they had been for years; I felt as if I had better resign my job teaching and follow him around until I got a life. One lost all sense of the right or wrong of things in admiration of the absolute, almost fanatic, sincerity and earnestness, and in admiration of the magnificent combination that was going on. Simply as an aesthetic matter, I don’t believe the world has seen but a few times such a spectacle of magnificent, widespread union of men about a common interest as this strike business.” (quoted in Westbrook, 87). This sense of “magnificent, widespread union” represented the definition of Democracy to Dewey; it was the very core of his writing, work, and public advocacy.
“Later, after he had moved to Columbia University in New York, he had a major disagreement with a very articulate student, Randolph Bourne, about the media pressure to get involved in WWI. Bourne argued then and later in an unfinished essay entitled, “War is the Health of the State” that states thrived on war because war consolidated the state’s power and allowed it to repress any kind of dissent. Dewey was an outspoken advocate of American entry into World War I, but began to question his support after seeing several of his colleagues at Columbia fired for their outspoken opposition to the War. These serious doubts turned into deep regret when he saw that the Espionage Act was used to repress freedoms of speech and press. Respectable citizens, including many thoughtful journalists and political leaders like Eugene V. Debs were routinely thrown into jail. His serious doubts began to trouble him more deeply as he witnessed the Federal response to the postwar Red Scare of 1919, when many American citizens were deported without constitutional due process. He was so disturbed by all of this that he helped found the American Civil Liberties Union that sought to protect due process and other constitutional rights. (Ryan, 154-99)
“From the early 1920’s forward, Dewey became a vocal and articulate public spokes person for Democracy in all American institutions. He founded and led an AFT local at Columbia and often spoke at labor and AFT functions. He believed with every cell of his body that American Schools had to be the incubator of American Democracy. As the shadow of fascism descended over Europe, he became a fellow traveller with the United Front to defend the world from an ideology that had nothing but for contempt for Democracy or any notion of an open society. For Dewey, education that allowed the organic evolution of free speech and the discussion and respect for all points of view in the classroom inoculated American students from the threat of fascism.
“If he were alive today, Professor Dewey would be shocked by what he would see. In part, Dewey’s whole philosophy of Education was developed to countervail the corrosive influence of capitalism on communities and the gross economic power of giant corporations. He sought to defend individual growth and creativity and nurture the sense of public responsibility that was under assault from the pulverizing individualism of the dominant ideology of big business backed Social Darwinism.
“Dewey’s vision is now a major target of major foundations that are funding the push to privatize American Education. Major Wall Street investors and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Eli Broad Foundation, the Walton Foundation, and the Joyce Foundation, among others, are working together with the Obama Administration to destroy what is left of public education in this great country. Combined, these corporations control approximately 50 billion dollars in assests.
“I will not take the time here to unpack the strategic plan coordinated by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and three people within the Department of Education who have turn their strategic plan into a public policy called “The Race to the Top.” You should read Diane Ravitch’s new book to get a clear picture of how this has all been done very legally with the help of the best lawyers that money can buy, millions of dollars thrown at the Harvard Education Department, and with tens of millions of dollars to hire the best Madison Ave. Advertising and PR firms and the best web designers (go to “PARCC” or “Common Core” online). What you need to know is that none of the people behind this plan have any respect for public schools or public school teachers.
“Like Anthony Cody, I have been insulted several times by Secretary Duncan’s Press Secretary and friends of our president who are not open to any imput from experienced teachers. Indeed, I was the subject of a veiled threat from Mr. Duncan’s Press Secretary that I describe here: http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2013/04/paul_horton_of_common_core_con.html.
“In another case, a good friend of the President told me when I protested the Chicago School closings: “who do you think you are kidding, only 7 or 8 percent of those kids have a chance anyway.” Several weeks later when I raised the same subject again, he gave me the Democrats for Education Reform standard line that inner city schools failed because teachers have failed. He was not interested in hearing about poverty and resource starving of schools. I called him on this. The first quote sounded eerily like what Mr. Emanuel communicated to Chicago Teacher’s Union President, Karen Lewis, in a famously closed door, expletive filled meeting.
“What all friends of public teachers and public Education need to understand is that Mr. Duncan and the Obama administration listen to no one on this issue. What Republicans and Tea Party activists need to understand is that this is not about Government corruption, it is about the fact that when it comes to Education issues, we do not have a government. Governments must read and respond to petitions: our Education Department does not seek to communicate with any citizens except by tweeting inane idiocies about gadgets and enterprise. What we have is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation sponsoring the overthrow of the public school system to bulldoze a path to sell billions of dollars of product. Other companies like Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill and Company, and Achieve, Inc. are just coming in behind the bulldozers.
“We must teach the rest of our society that democracy still matters in schools and everywhere else. The time for talking is over! We need to get into the streets and get arrested if necessary. Most importantly every one of us needs to call the same senator or congressman every day until NCLB and RTTT are dead, Arne Duncan does not have control over a penny, and all stimulus money that has yet to be distributed, is given by the Senate Appropriations Committee to the districts around the country that are the most underserved to rehire teachers and support staff. Not a penny should go to charter school construction, IT, administration, or hiring consultants from the Eli Broad Foundation, the Gates Foundation, or McKinsey. Not a penny should go to Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill or any form of standardized testing. All state superintendents who took trips from any Education vendor should resign, and no state should hire an administrator or superintendent at any level who does not have proper accredited certification and ten years of exemplary classroom teaching.
“Now is the time to preserve the legacy of John Dewey and teach the rest of the country about Democracy in Education or wait like sheep for Gatopia to numb us all!”

we are in a time when we are seeing privatizing of what should be public functions and institutions. It started large-scale with prisons, and is now reaching heavily into schools. What is important to note is that in private institutions, even if funded by public taxes, constitutional protections that are applicable both in prisons and schools that are fully public do not apply, and a recent appellate court decision made that especially clear with respect to charter schools. Of course, legislatures and Congress COULD insist as a condition of the receipt of tax dollars that constitutional protections – including such basics as due process and freedom of speech – still applied, but have not done so.
Prisons and schools. Somehow I am again reminded of something Eldridge Cleaver expressed while Minister of Information for the Black Panther Party (and I apologize that while I remember the expression, I cannot find a source):
America has the world’s best education system and the world’s most effective prison system. Unfortunately, the education system is the American penitentiary and the prison system is the American public school.
This contradiction is heavily exacerbated by the privatizing of these functions.
My last comment for now is a propos of Mr. Gates. I am a Certified Data Processor and was a Certified Systems Professional until I left the field to become a teacher. That makes me more qualified to comment on his business than he is to comment upon my profession as a teacher. And if he wants to talk about fails, we should talk about Microsoft, which has a history of releasing buggy software, whose executives have a track record of consistent wrongness (Gates was on record both as saying no one would ever need more than 640K of memory, perhaps because that is all MS-DOS addressed at the time, and also that people should really not pay attention to the internet, which was not going to matter all that much) – as a company it became dominant by buying out rivals who often had better products. Mr. Gates, who never attended public school and did not graduate from college, is an expert on education and teaching in a public school context how? Why is it that making a lot of money qualifies one as an “expert” on anything except the field in which one made that money, if even then? If our worship of money is so great, then we should kowtow to decisions like Citizens United that have distorted democracy, we should acquiesce in crushing of unions, and we should begin weighting the votes of people by either their income or the wealth or both, and totally ignore the principle that is supposed to be operable – within the limits of Constitutional protections for rights, we determine things by one man, one vote.
Otherwise, why am I bothering to try to teach adolescents about the American system of government, which presupposes one man, one vote?
LikeLike
Ken,
Great connections. My colleague Bernard Harcourt’s book, The Illusion of Free Markets and all of the work of Henry Giroux establishes these connects with the research in very creative ways. Your masterpiece of a letter that went viral on Valerie Strauss’s blog remains the best single expression the challenges that we face today, and your courage to go back to teaching in the face of the challenges that your household faces is truly an inspiration to us all.
LikeLike
Very strong, Ken, thank you, yes, Gates and the other billionaire boys are using their vast wealth to “overthrow” the public sector in education.
LikeLike
Given Dewey’s well documented connection to the original reform movement that has done so much to ruin our schools, and also given Dewey’s reputation for savaging his critics unfairly, I found this post rather ironic.
LikeLike
It find it ironic that our Secretary of Education and his staff quote Mr. Dewey to support their draconian policies. I defer to Ms. Ravitch on separating Dewey’s legacy from those who misused his ideas. She is the leading authority on this issue.
What killed schools in the 20s was “The Cult of Efficiency.” See Callahan: “Education and the Cult of Efficiency.” We are replaying the same tape now.
The question is: do the schools that the current education reformers seek to create attempt in any way to model democratic ideas?
LikeLike
I’ve cited Callahan’s book approvingly here and on other ‘blogs.
And I completely agree with your point about democracy; we need that for all public institutions.
As for Dewey, having read Diane’s Left Back as well as other histories of school reform, I think the original reformers, like many Progressives, sacrificed democracy at the altar of reform.
LikeLike
I too found the piece full of irony.
The University of Chicago Laboratory School is an amazing institution. A Public School it is not.
Nursery – Grade 5 $25,296
Grades 6 – 8 $27,096
Grades 9 – 12 $28,290
Apparently there are 4 applicants for every open position at the Nursery School level!
LikeLike
Bernie,
We have an AFT Local (2063) at Lab and we have stood in solidarity with CTU. We teachers do not reflect the social class of many of our parents. The Univ. subsidizes tuition and we have graduated lots of kids of hospital workers, carpenters, electricians, painters, and all sorts of skilled craftspeople who work for the University of Chicago. It also might come as a surprise to you that many of our parents share a hostility to Ed Reform. Most of the teachers at Lab are very concerned with standardized curricula and testing. We feel as though we are fighting for Progressive education which is what attracted most of us to teach here. Perhaps Diane should say only that I am a member of AFT Local 2063 and a progressive educator the next time she publishes anything that I have written.
We are trying to stand up like everybody else, the biggest irony is that we actually know many of those who created this administration’s policies and feel as though they have betrayed our ideals. The betrayal is personal.
LikeLike
Paul:
Many thanks for your civil response.
You must talk to parents. Why do they chose to go to your school as opposed to the local public schools. Why, to use Albert Hirschman’s potent phrases, have they chosen Exit rather than Voice and Loyalty.
One of the things that surprises me in this discourse is the unilateral attribution of ill-intent to those who seek to reform current education practices – when there is so much evidence that the ultimate customers are voting with their feet and pocket-books. Folks at the Gates Foundation, etc., may or may not be mistaken in their emphasis on standardized testing and their application of business techniques to school districts but I have seen no evidence that they are interested in profits. Repeatedly yelling about profits and the evil Murdoch cabal is a pure distraction from the core issue. I am sure that there are those that want to take advantage of the billions spent in public education but those exist in the public sector as well. I am sure that Murdoch and Pearson wants a bigger share of the education materials market as well, but which publisher doesn’t and I have seen no evidence that CC materials are likely to be more expensive than non-CC materials.
The primary source of friction seems to me is how to ensure ongoing high quality teaching in our schools. Effective teachers are the single most critical factor in education. Teaching requires unique skills and unique personal attributes and it is a very demanding job.
At the same time, it is clear that there is a significant variation in the competence of teachers: There are outstanding ones, there are good ones, there are mediocre ones and there are bad ones. My wife taught modern languages in HS for 10 years and is now teaching at a University. She saw it 30 years ago and she sees it today at the university. We educated three children and we must have interacted with over 100 teachers during the combined 36 years they were taught. Even at highly demanding schools like yours this is true. So my issue remains the same: How can the schools show that they are effectively ensuring high quality teaching, despite limited funding, central office politics, disinterested parents, reluctant learners, violence and lousy home conditions? I do not see anybody denying the relevance of these major obstacles but I do see them being used – like demonizing Gates et al – as distractions and avoidance mechanisms.
Many of those interested in improving education continue to see no effective mechanisms for managing this vital resource and as a result, rightly or wrongly, they have latched on to standardized testing and a core curriculum. Those opposed to this solution need to be championing what they see as a real alternative.
I am not teacher bashing. It makes no sense. I am saying that the US system of teacher selection, training and supervision need to be improved on a systemic basis. There are no magic bullets and there are no cheap solutions. Teachers and their professional associations would be better off leading that effort rather than continuously playing defense.
LikeLike
This whole “Public Education” thing is full of irony.
“Democracy in Education” pretends the institution of Public Schooling
was a product of public debate, as it should be in a democracy.
Public schooling is the product of private discussion. The goal was
and still IS to produce a dependable order for the
Government/Corporate power structure.
Dewey’s Pedagogic Creed statement of 1897:
“Every teacher should realize he is a social servant set apart for the maintenance of the proper social order and the securing of the right social growth. In this way the teacher is always the prophet of the true God and the usherer in of the true kingdom of heaven.”
The “proper” social order, the John Dewey ” new individualism”,
in the name of social efficiency,was backed by, Andrew Carnegie,
John D. Rockefeller, Henry Ford, and J.P. Morgan.
The “New Individualism” was to
transform men and women to function in whatever subsystem they
were placed.
MANY examples are posted here, showing the ACTIONS of
GOVERNMENT are at direct odds with the professed objective
of “Public Education”.
Government Actions define Government Values.
Cryptic: Actions speak louder than words.
LikeLike
Having taught special education in inner city schools in the 70s, I feel we have been walking a tight rope in public education for years and years. Even back then, students did not come first and they did not receive a fair and balanced education. My students came from high rise housing projects where violence was the norm. Faulty I.Q tests were given to get many of them into a special education classroom where oftentimes limited resources were available and limited funds were allocated. I told my students’ parents that to change things they had to speak up. Public Law 94-142 was supposed to ensure that the educational needs of special education students were met and that there would be funds to do just that. We did not receive any funds and were forced to buy or make our own materials. In order to learn how to complete an I.E.P., I had to go to Council on Exceptional Children meetings because the Board of Education or the Teachers Union did not help in this area. Also at that time the Teachers Union I belonged to did not really address any educational issues. It was strictly about salaries and benefits which were necessary but I really feel that they could have done more. There were a few other teachers I interacted with that felt the same way I did but we were too few in number to make a difference. Having grown up in a middle suburban area, I could tell then that the powers to be did not want all children to receive a quality education.
Yes, the so called reformers are excelling the push to limit quality education for poor, minority and special needs children, but we all need to accept some of the blame for not doing enough in the past. That is why I am so proud of the role Teachers Unions and parents are taking along with concerned citizens to ensure we have quality public education programs for all of our children. It is only when we relinquish our responsibilities and power that we lose.
LikeLike
John Dewey was much more of a “Radical” than I ever knew. Incredibly, his defense of worker education put him at odds with mainstream unionism. The facts cited below came to my attention due to the above authors description of Dewey as a “fellow traveler'” I am old enough to recall how that term was employed against activists by the likes of Joe Mc Carthy:
January 09, 1929
Labor Politics and Labor Education
BY JOHN DEWEY
‘The recent condemnation of the Brookwood Labor College by the American Federation of Labor brings to the foreground the question of the future of adult education in connection with the labor movement. The issue is rendered especially acute because of the way in which the condemnation was effected; it was a scholastic lynching.”
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/politics/93594/labor-politics-and-labor-education
“freedom of mind, freedom of thought, freedom of inquiry, freedom of discussion, is education, and there is no education, no real education, without these elements of freedom” (Dewey, J. (1929). Freedom in workers’ education. In J. A. Boydston, ed., John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953. Vol. 5: 1929-1930. p332).
On November 24, 1915 at Garden City, Long Island sixty-eight persons established an American Fellowship of Reconciliation. Early Fellowship members included Harry F. Ward, Norman Thomas, Abraham J. Muste, Jane Addams, and Emily Greene Balch. Ward, if he never joined the Communist Party, at least became one of the Party’s most active and influential fellow travelers. Thomas, who became the six-time presidential candidate on the Socialist Party ticket, spent a lifetime collaborating with the Communists. Muste spent more than thirty years supporting Communist fronts and causes and, at one time, he was national chairman of the now-defunct Workers Party, a Communist party.
When the Fellowship was founded in 1915, its initial activity was directed toward opposing the entry of the United States into World War I. Out of the Fellowship’s conscientious objectors program, there developed, in 1916, the National Civil Liberties Bureau which was reorganized in 1920 as the American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU). At one time or another, nearly every leading radical in America was an official of the ACLU including: Harry Ward, Roger Baldwin, Louis Budenz, Eugene V. Debs, Felix Frankfurter, Alexander Meiklejohn, Elmer Davis, Roy Wilkins, Norman Cousins, Freda Kirchway, Archibald MacLeish, Henry S. Commager, Corliss Lamont, Francis Biddle, John Dewey, Max Lerner, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, and William Z. Foster.
In 1918, the Fellowship established its second enterprise: Brookwood Labor College of Katonah, New York. Brookwood was Communistic and was heavily subsidized by the Garland Fund which was a major source for the financing of Communist Party enterprises.
http://www.knology.net/~bilrum/for.htm
In Masters of Deceit (1958), J. Edgar Hoover, longtime director of the FBI, defined a “fellow traveler” as one of five types of dangerous subversives.[7] He believed any of them might promote the goal of a Communist overthrow of the United States government. The five types were:
The card-carrying Communist, one who openly admits membership in the Communist party
The underground Communist, one who hides his Communist party membership
The Communist sympathizer, a potential Communist because of holding Communist views
The fellow traveler, someone not a potential Communist or influential advocate for Communist views but who agrees with some of those views
The dupe, a person who is obviously not a Communist or a potential Communist but whose views serve to enable Communists. Examples are a prominent religious leader calling for pacifism or a prominent jurist opposing red-baiting tactics on civil liberty grounds.
In Safire’s Political Dictionary (1978), William Safire defined “fellow traveler” as “one who accepted most Communist doctrine, but was not a member of the Communist party; in current use, one who agrees with a philosophy or group but does not publicly work for it.”[8]
LikeLike
John Dewey was not a Communist. He was a socialist. He certainly was anti-Stalinist. Years ago, when I worked for a small magazine called The New Leader, I learned about all the factions. J. Edgar Hoover was dumb to think that all of them were Communist. Many were leftwing yet bitterly anti-Communist.
LikeLike
If John Dewey was “not a Communist” was he any one of the other four categories of “dangerous subversives” that Hoover identifies? An underground Communist. A Communist sympathizer? A fellow traveller? A dupe?
LikeLike
Dewey’s defense of the Brookwood Labor college against the AFofL makes fascinating reading and calls to mind today’s schism between the Karen Lewis’s and the Randi Weingarten’s of the world:
Conservative Labor Leaders Clean House: The Case of Brookwood Labor College – Grabiner – 2007 – Educational Theory – Wiley Online Library
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1979.tb00853.x/abstract
LikeLike
Brookwood’s primary offense had not been that it espoused radical or even Communist doctrines nor that its faculty belonged to subversive groups. Rather, Brookwood’s militant teachings were providing support to a growing nucleus of activists within the AFL who opposed the labor federation’s increasingly conservative tendencies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookwood_Labor_College
LikeLike
“Conventional education which trains children to docility and obedience, to the careful performance of imposed tasks, regardless of where they lead, is suited to an autocratic society.” Dewey
NCLB is a generation of passive, poorly informed, and incurious students woefully unprepared to assume their rightful roles as active, contributing citizens in a democratic society. Alan W. Garrett
REVISITING DEWEY, Stuckart and Glanz
Thank you Paul Horton!
LikeLike
… Now is the time to preserve the legacy of John Dewey and teach the rest of the country about Democracy in Education …
Private schools are certainly free to pursue that course.
School funding litigation in many states makes clear that constitutional common schools are the legacy of Horace Mann. If public school employees are unwilling to preserve Mann’s legacy, than privatization might be the best use of public education resources.
Do teacher preparation programs educate their students to know the difference between the Mann and Dewey legacies?
LikeLike
!#!#!!!
… then …
LikeLike
Horace Mann died in 1859. He was a progressive liberal, who had the endorsement of the Whig party. He advocated a secular, non- religious education open to all. When he was alive the Prussian system (which in German was called the “new humanism”) was the most advanced in the world because it was open to talent and sought to enlarge the culture and outlook of the students by engaging them with serious learning. Matthew Arnold and Dr. Arnold (of Rugby) both learned from it.
In the mid-nineteenth century, reforms pioneered in Prussia were also adopted by universities such as Johns Hopkins and Harvard (one of these was the class lecture — rather than going around the room translating passages, as had hitherto been the rule). During the later part of the nineteenth century Prussia (Germany), which up until 1848 had been relatively liberal, became more and more identified with a harsh and reactionary militarism. It is absurd at this point to suggest that our schools should go back to the Prussian system.
The above is a gross simplification, but parenthetically, the Prussian system was not about the education of the very youngest children, which was what Dewey was concerned with.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on kevin and Jeminah and commented:
Which, again, raises the question about the purpose of Education, for whom?
LikeLike
Which, again, raises the question about the purpose of Education. For whom?
LikeLike
The Chicago schools cost the same as what is spent/student in D.C. What is happening in D.C. when they have $29,145/student and $16,145/student in the charter schools which are 40% of the 52,000 students in D.C. Schools. That means $284,000,000 goes into some rathole for whatever. This Chicago School of Finance is a direct copy of the Austrian School of Finance which since 1919 is Fascist. Wonder why we have this problem. In fact, read “Hapsburgs to Hitler” by Gulick published in 1948 by the Berkeley and Oxford Presses and then you will totally understand what is going on. If you really want to know the rest of the story read “Crossing the Rubicon” to learn what you do not know and is fully documented about our involvement in 9-11 to allow and make this to happen. They are not that slick it is just that not many know history anymore. Not an accident. Thank Reagan and Bennett in about 1985 for that one. This is a war and do not misunderstand it.
George Orwell had it down.
LikeLike
Rather than merely referring us to books, I had rather you say explicitly what you think is going on. That makes it more personal. I’ve heard the speculation that the US government was involved in the perpetration of 9-11, but that seems so utterly unlikely to me, that I am looking for you to step out front and say it. Would it be something like this: “George Bush ordered 9-11.” Is it possible you really think that George?
LikeLike
This would be a good time to read (or reread) Dewey’s Democracy and Education. Project Gutenberg link here:http://www.gutenberg.org/files/852/852-h/852-h.htm Whenever I get overwhelmed with the onslaught of reform rhetoric and want to crawl in a hole, I take my iPad with me and read Dewey again. I can crawl out of my hole ready for another fight.
LikeLike
“What all friends of public teachers and public Education need to understand is that Mr. Duncan and the Obama administration listen to no one on this issue. What Republicans and Tea Party activists need to understand is that this is not about Government corruption, it is about the fact that when it comes to Education issues, we do not have a government.” For me this is the money quote.
LikeLike
Paul Horton: thanks for keeping it real.
Not Rheeal.
Are you and other critics of the education establishment and their antiquated notions (like their adoration of failed merit pay schemes that go back to the nineteenth-century) having an effect?
Yes. Just read some of the comments on this blog. Read the postings on this blog concerning Hannah Nguyen. Note the pathetic kerfuffles concerning the owner of this website. Note the ‘town hall meetings’ that are tightly controlled eduproduct launches and brand defenses.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” [Mahatma Gandhi]
Krazy props.
🙂
LikeLike
Teresa Wiley,
Thanks for the link. Dewey’s Democracy and Education was required reading in high school social studies class at my daughter’s Waldorf high school. It was through her enthusiam that I first heard of Dewey as an educational theorist.
LikeLike
It’s needs to be stated in regards to the above post about education and democracy is that we do not live in a democracy here in the U.S. We live in a republic. The difference between the two forms of government is that a democracy is by a majority rule and a republic is rule of law. Think about the pledge to our U.S. flag: I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands… Let’s be wise and accurate with the use of our words when describing things.
Thanks!
LikeLike
“A republic is by rule of law”
With all due respect, I believe that to be a cherished illusion. You might have a look at the definition for kleptocracy : narco-kleptocracy in particular. If you doubt it, reflect on the history of robber barons and anti-monopolist legislation in an era of ‘free trade’ and globalism in what might be called ‘bipartisan tyranny’ and oligarchy. Certainly the writings about the ‘banksters’ in general and The Fed in particular would lead one to belief in economic servitude. This is a time when the differential between rich and poor exceeds anything in the past century. Robert Reich on Facebook is instructive.
Back to the topic in hand. I think it should be clear by now that misunderstood and unseen influences pervert the system away from its Mission Statement into terra incognita.
First, the background. For those aware of George Orwell’s ‘1984’ there is a rich online harvest of writings and information cached under his name. I would, however, first refer to his ‘Homage to Catalonia’ – a biographical work – for the basics of his experiences…which were followed by broadcasting as a hate radio announcer for the BBC in wartime. Today propaganda has a more modern and expanded euphemism : Mind control.
Another noted piece of historical ‘speculative fiction’ ( ahem … choke ) is Brave New World by Dr. Aldous Huxley. It plows a subtly different field.
But Julian Huxley, founder of UNESCO, is where I tend to think the nexus of our difficulties originates.
With that background, the YouTube videos of Charlotte Iserbyt around her book “The Dumbing Down of America” come to the fore. She tells of Skinnerean psychology using the human analogue of Pavlovian Response being used to frustrate learning by disabling natural paths to learning reading and to study : in fact by using futile tests to head off innate student curiosity to explore and to make a kludge of their learning/reading skills.
I’m sure if you go through this, the culture shock will equal anything you might have found if you experienced “The Matrix” first hand…red pill and all.
LikeLike
BINGO!
Aldous Huxley-Brave New World 1932
“Within the next generation, the rulers will discover that infant
(K-12?) conditioning and narco-hypnosis (meds) are more
efficient, as instruments of Government (mandated public “Ed”)
than clubs and prisons, and the lust for power can be satisfied by
suggesting people into loving their servitude.”
Albert Camus
“What better way to enslave a man than to give him a vote
and tell him he is free” …
LikeLike
Are we really saying that the Democrats under Obama and Duncan have for whatever purposes the destruction of the public school systems and are walking in step with the Republicans and conservatives who want to privatize all public education to remove their children from indoctrination by socialist ideas?
Can that really be the case, that the practical aims of both Liberals and Conservatives for public education are identical, though for different reasons? That is, the complete conversion of government run schools to privately run schools funded by tax dollars?
LikeLike
Public “Education” is an instrument of Government, mandated by
Government, and controlled by Government.
The Government will still “Run” Public “Education” through
“Private” hands, with NO intent of changing the indoctrination, that
has served Capital .
While the L/R Paradigm triggers ideological thinking,
INCOME DISTRIBUTION continues upward, at historic levels.
LikeLike
Yes, of course. I was referring to socialist indoctrination. I am much in favor of capitalist indoctrination. Socialism stagnates, capitalism works. The problem of inequitable income distribution arises from government interference with the economy. Don’t you remember “A rising tide lifts all boats”? Reagan to the rescue.
LikeLike
Amazing!
Socialist indoctrination is behind the concentration of wealth/capital of today.
Wall Street suffers from the stagnation of Socialism.
Government interference with the “spontaneous order” of the “Free Market”,
has impacted the “The Virtue of Production”.
Concentrated Capital will resist a change in Socialist indoctrination just as
Government Employees resist “Less” Government through Privatization.
LikeLike