Archives for category: Education Reform

 

Jan Resseger writes here about the sordid decision to hire people closely aligned with the interests of the for-profit higher education industry to regulate it. This amounts to hiring the fox to supervise the henhouse. This industry is known for predatory behavior, targeting the most vulnerable students: veterans, their widows, the poor. It is also known for providing subpar education and printing diplomas that are often worthless. Think Trump University.

We are approaching a level of spoils, squalor, and legal corruption that has not been seen since the days of Teapot Dome.

I was contacted last week by a writer for “Inside Philanthropy” to comment on the Gates Foundation’s new program to fight poverty. My response was that I was pleased to see that the foundation was acknowledging the need to combat poverty after wasting billions on the Common Core and teacher evaluation.

I thought it was a good sign. I didn’t realize when I was asked how very little the foundation was committing: $158 Million over four years. Compare that to the foundation’s expenditure on Common Core, probably $2 Billion. And that was a disaster.

Although Bill Gates is often treated as if he were Mother Teresa with megabucks, not everyone is impressed.

Read what Ruth McCambridge, the editor of “Nonprofit Quarterly,” said about the foundation’s “tone deafness.”

https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2018/05/04/not-to-niggle-but/

 

Phyllis Bush, a founding member of the Northeast Indiana Friends of Public Education and a founding board member of the Network for Public Education, warns that the legislature is reconvening on May 14 and will consider a law to facilitate state takeovers and the destruction of local control of public education. Don’t ever believe that Republicans defend local control. When they are in power, they undermine and oppose it.

Bush and her colleagues are especially concerned about a bill called HB 1315.

“HB 1315 focuses on the Muncie and Gary school corporations, which are in fiscal distress. This bill would replace the elected school board of Muncie schools with a board appointed by Ball State University and exempt said board from adhering to a host of laws affecting student learning. By setting a dangerous precedent of state takeover, this bill potentially concerns any public school district that might be in fiscal distress in the future. This bill has the potential of negatively affecting local control, teacher input and protections for students in many communities. This is not just about Muncie and Gary. Your school district could be next.

“Northeast Indiana Friends of Public Education’s concern is that legislators are not listening to the voices of their constituents and are not considering the far-reaching consequences of bringing this bill back in a way that is outside of normal legislative procedures. Add your voice.

“Please encourage legislators to oppose HB 1315 in its present form.

“We NEIFPE members invite people across the state to join us in collective actions to make our voices heard. We will start actions on Monday and continue through May 14. Here are our suggestions:

• Host Postcard Meet-Ups to reach out to our legislators. You can create your own meet-up in coffee shops, homes, libraries or wherever you and your friends are comfortable. NEIFPE will provide postcard templates to help you get started.

• Host a “Tweet-Up.” For those of you who are new to Twitter, we will provide information on how to tweet and on how to schedule tweets at your own convenience. We will also provide sample tweets. All you need is a Twitter account and internet access.

• Send emails and place calls to legislators; these are also effective.

“This is your opportunity to host your own gathering. Let our state legislators know you are paying attention. Show them you care about the issues on which they will be voting. Tell them you a want thorough discussion of the proposals.

“These Meet-Up/Greet Up/Tweet Ups will be statewide actions and will tell our legislators, our friends and neighbors: “We are watching this, and we are proud to advocate for public education.””

 

The Los Angeles school board selected an unqualified person to lead its schools. The decision was made in secret, with no public input.

Carl Petersen points out that state law requires that Superintendents must have experience as teachers and administrators. There is provision for a waiver. Is the superintendent is unqualified, like Austin Beutner, he may be required to take an in-service training program.

35028.
No person shall be eligible to hold a position as city superintendent, district superintendent, deputy superintendent, associate superintendent, or assistant superintendent of schools unless he is the holder of both a valid school administration certificate and a valid teacher’s certificate, but any person employed as a deputy, associate, or assistant superintendent in a purely clerical capacity shall not be required to hold any certificate.
(Enacted by Stats. 1976, Ch. 1010.)

35029.
A local governing board may waive any credential requirement for the chief administrative officer of the school district under its jurisdiction. Any individual serving as the chief administrative officer of a school district who does not hold a credential may be required by the local governing board to pursue a program of in-service training conducted pursuant to guidelines approved by the commission.
No individual serving as the chief administrative officer of a school district shall be subject to the provisions of the merit system specified in Article 6 (commencing with Section 45240) of Chapter 5 of Part 25 of this division or any other similar merit system.
(Enacted by Stats. 1976, Ch. 1010.)

Will the board require him to learn about school administration or will they just let him bring his experience from the banking world as a source of “new ideas.” (Hint: buy low, sell high). Or from his service on the board of AMI, which owns the notorious National Enquirer (“catch and kill”) or from Jack Welch’s playbook for cut-throat businessmen (“fire the bottom 10% every year”).

 

The General Assembly convenes in Raleigh, North Carolina, on May 16.

Stuart Egan writes that teachers will be there to meet them. 

On May 16th, teachers in North Carolina will begin to make a stand for their profession and the state’s public schools.

What these teachers and advocates want Raleigh’s lawmakers to understand is that there is a difference between “rewarding” teachers and respecting the teaching profession and the public schools.

A reward is something that is given in recognition of someone’s service, effort, and/or achievement. One could get a reward for doing well on a project or completing a task. Some could look at a bonus check as a reward for accomplishing a goal.

However, NC’s teachers want more than a reward from the General Assembly. They want respect for all of our public school teachers and the public schools which serve a vast majority of our children.

To have respect is to have a deep feeling of admiration for someone because of his abilities, qualities, and value. It is understanding that someone is important and should be taken seriously.

In this highly contested election year, many will be fooled by lawmakers wanting to “reward” the teaching profession with bills that might offer more pay or actually fund a mandate and mistake that for respect. Respect goes much deeper.

That is why teachers and advocates will march and rally on May 16th when the NCGA reconvenes because it reminds policies makers that there are many stark differences between rewards and respect.

 

Michael Hynes, the superintendent of the Patchogue-Medford School District on Long Island is a visionary educator. He is truly child-centered. When he thinks about the purpose of education, he doesn’t think about test scores. He thinks about the development of healthy, confident, secure children, who are prepared by their schools to live good lives.

In our test-centric world, this district boldly swims against the tide.

The district recently issued a report about its goals. You might enjoy reading it. Ask yourself: is this what I want for my child?

See the report here.

 

Ellen Lubic is a professor of public policy at the University of California.

 

Beutner, his Billionaire Buddies, and LAUSD v. Teachers, Students, Parents, and Taxpayers

That noisy rumbling sound in LA County comes from teachers who are in ‘teacher jail’ rattling their cages at the news this week that the bought and paid for LAUSD Board of Education announced they hired Wall Street billionaire, Austin Beutner, to finally privatize the District. This news delivered while these accused teachers are awaiting their fate to be determined by LAUSD with possible firing without due process, which means losing all their contracted benefits, so as to save the District money.

Finally, another coup by Eli Broad and his band of billionaires including Beutner, Riordan, Milken, Waltons/Jenner, Luskin, the LASR – Mdm.Alter and her Sony president mate, and others. They planned this giant coup for years and their plan emerged with their rapidly arranged development of the 501(c)(3) Great Public Schools Now, and the concurrent hiring of the two deadly efficient pros to run it. The info came to light when Sony’s Prez who is married to Mdm. Alter, had his email hacked and all their correspondence was online for the world to read. Perceptive readers found that there were secret meetings in place at various homes on the West Side to plan the takeover of LAUSD to impose charter schools using taxpayer money to finance these essentially private schools which have no oversight, and which are totally controlled by their own Boards who set standards, curriculum, and payments to the CEO and teachers. Most astounding is that the CEO appoints his/her own Board which can be his/her family members, and they rubber stamp these directives.

Eli Broad, who devised this scheme when he started his own non profit in 1999 and then reinforced it over the years, is so hated by so many, it is alleged, that in the past few years the other billionaires finally took charge and used his plan but not his name. He had stated publicly that he wanted to take over another 50 percent of the LAUSD District in addition to the 12% he already has privatized, and eventually privatize it en toto with charter schools, but this was an overreach and even the local media seemed alarmed. So the ‘real in-group’ of greed mongers whose goal is two fold, first, to create workers they will need as cogs in their industries, and second, their drive to bust the unions…all unions…starting with the easiest, teachers unions, so that these new cogs from their charter schools will have no representation when they become workers and will remain low pay and quiet drudges without benefits. Eli and his Silicon Valley buddy billionaire then manufactured a lawsuit filed in Central California, Vergara v. California, and of course including negative aspects of teachers and the teachers union. The first go around found them winning this toxic case adjudicated by a Judge Treu without a jury. Governor Jerry Brown saw through this and he and teachers and the union appealed the decision. The higher Appeals Court agreed that this verdict was not clean and they reversed the Treu decision.

Then Broad hired and assigned his infamous boys who always did his bidding, John Deasy (who had been forced out of LAUSD and was being investigated by the FBI, and Ben Austin, from the failing Parent Revolution group, he who got this flawed law carried by ex legislator Gloria Romero who is still preaching to her choir) as the ostensible ‘street vendors’ to sweep the country with similar law suits. They got LA School Report owned by Mdm. Alter to transfer her self serving online rag to the Right leaning hands of the beauty queen, Campbell Brown, and her nationally known Republican ‘fixer’ husband, Dan Senor, and they put Alter et al in the background, and stepped up the heat for the election of BoE members who followed Eli’s party line to privatize the LA County public schools.

Meanwhile, Anthony Villaraigosa, out going mayor of LA then, Herbalife tout thereafter, and candidate for Governor now, was dancing for Broad, his puppet master, and charterizing schools with Deasy as ‘rapidly’ as they could. The adulterer mayor, (who had cheated on his teacher wife of many years, and who admitted publicly he never would have gotten into UCLA as an undergrad without the benefit of affirmative action, and who failed the Bar Exam so many times he finally gave up) was talking all over the city about his drive to “rapidly” close public schools and turn them into charters. These talks, some even at UCLA in the Luskin School of Public Policy, can be found online.

Some of these emerged charters were/are found in the fanciest part of LA County, such as Woodland Hills and Pacific Palisades. These elitist charter schools still flourish while those in the inner cities were/are run mainly by non educators business folks who could hand pick the students. They did/do not choose students who were/are ‘hard to teach’, or ‘special needs,’ nor English language learners, thereby starving these students real public schools of necessary services. Many of these charters have been shut down for malfeasance perpetrated by their CEOs.

Through all the years this scheme has been building, the BoE long time elected member who is not an educator, Monica Garcia, took all she could get in the way of offers from the billionaires and they all colluded to first get Refugio Rodriguez elected to partner with her in driving the Board toward privatizing, and then in the next election, it was a clean sweep with Melvoin and Gonez who had more Big Donor money, about $14 million, to campaign with than a battalion of teachers could ever earn in a lifetime. It was only a decade before that running for LA BoE cost around $15,000. This is way beyond inflation.

Who can also forget the huge collusion between Garcia, the billionaires, the phony influx of bussed in ‘parents for Deasy’ and the non profit supporters, for the orchestrated street theater on Oct. 29, 2013 estimated by journalists to have cost Eli and his pals about $14,000, when the ignominious BoE voted for a new contract for Deasy, in secret meetings of course, and did not allow any public comment against his second contract even after the IPad scam costing the District a fortune using line item Construction Bond cash. All of this is documented online.

There are so many side issues like rigged accusations leading to ‘teacher jail’ inhabited by a vast army of teachers entering their later years with many who are ‘of color’ and are just about to have their life time benefits, said to be about $60,000 a year, like health care and pensions, vest, all taken away without due process. The Rafe Esquith case reflects more of the worst of LAUSD run by a titular Superintendent, but really run by ‘Broad and Company”… and now by his pal, Austin Beutner.

Take into account the push Broad and Riordan made to buy the LA Times and their op-ed article about what selfless philanthropists they are, and shortly after, their close friend and Wall Street colleague Austin Beutner was named publisher of our local paper. All this information is online, about the real owners of our public schools, the giants of industry, the Bonfire of the Vanities guys and gals, with their names on endless buildings, who now have clawed to control the New Normal of private, unsupervised education. paid for by the taxpayers who have no input. What other industry can earn major monetary returns to ‘free market’ investors yet have no investment by the Founders, and be only paid for by public taxpayers?

Austin Beutner, who it is said acquired his wealth on Wall Street as a hedge fund manager, along with other DFER billionaires like Whitney Tilson, learned from Rupert Murdoch how vast a wealth accumulator public schooling is in America. Murdoch wrote about it being the best private, free market, investment opportunity, and Tilson and his pals started teaching their hedge fund investors how to glean fortunes from investing in ‘public’ charter schools.

In California, the CCSA, California Charter School Association, built a sound base (partially financed also by Fetullah Gulen, the Turkish imam who has made billions with his over 150 charter schools in the United States, and with his Los Angeles schools run by Mdm. Caprice Young whom he groomed). The CCSA became the biggest lobbying bully in Sacramento, and they got/get what ever they wanted/want, including buying the now indicted Refugio Rodriguez a seat on the LAUSD BoE, and he was mentored by Monica Garcia and helped by the Latino ‘Voteria’ scam.

As with the current BoE, the influx of mind boggling cash from these same billionaires plus Bloomberg, Petersen, and other out of state ‘vulture’ philanthropists, bought more seats in the recent elections. They spent $14 – 17 million on the last election for Medvoin and Gonez to win, and rapidly the con artist Monica Garcia was appointed President of the Board when Rodriguez was finally indicted on charges involving election tampering/fraud, and he also is being investigated for financial mismanagement of the 16 Charters he founded. Medvoin was supported in the grandest style by the West Side wealthy, and he, a young man who spent a year failing at teaching, became their current mouthpiece.

What a setup!

Now their ‘bought’ BoE members, Garcia, Rodriguez, Gonez, Melvoin, hired Wall Streeter, Beutner, with the help of the waffler old time Board member, Vladovic. Only the two former teacher/administrators Scott Schemerelson and George McKenna, had the cojones, intelligence, and ethical value system to vote against him. The flakes and phonies who are motivated by dollar signs are now firmly in charge at Beudry.

This week the LA Times indicates that Beutner said “real estate owned by the District should be a money maker”. It sure has been in the past when Eli sold the BoE and the District the Beudry Street location at a huge profit.

So much is kept so hidden from the public (We, the Taxpayers, who foot all the bills for the charter schools) regarding the blatant theft within, plus the costly mistakes made by top administrators like Deasy, Eli’s favorite puppet, when he used taxpayer money to buy $1 billion dollars of obsolete computers from Apple and then gave Pearson an open ended contract for curriculum development, and when he imposed MiSiS which failed and damaged students who lost their classes needed for graduation. Fortunately Cortines cut off the Deasy contracts and recouped a bit of taxpayer money, but it all left the District on the verge of bankruptcy, which, if implemented, could motivate these same insider billionaires to snap up the huge real estate holdings for pennies on the dollar.

So, I wonder if a Wall Street tycoon is a more reliable Superintendent of LA Schools than a proven educator? Every educator I know thinks not.

I have been writing about LAUSD for some years, yet things have gone from bad to dreadful. Every decision is made behind tightly shut doors. A few years ago, at the end of the infamous Deasy tenure, many teachers, administrators, residents, and parents who represent ‘the public’ demanded a voice in revising this disgusting ‘pay for play’ system. They demanded no more Blue Ribbon panels to make the rules of how LAUSD should be run. But what they got was the Bluest Ribbon panel of oligarchs led by Austin Beutner, who carries the flag for his fellow greed mongers and who now has the ultimate authority to run LAUSD into the ground. The are probably drooling at Spago’s at the prospect.

It all hangs together…just follow the money.

Submitted by :

Ellen Lubic
Public Policy Educator, Political Writer, Director of Joining Forces for Education

 

 

After years of denying that the Koch Foundation exercised control of hiring and firing professors by giving millions of dollars, George Mason University was compelled by the release of documents to admit that it was true. 

“Virginia’s largest public university granted the conservative Charles Koch Foundation a say in the hiring and firing of professors in exchange for millions of dollars in donations, according to newly released documents.

“The release of donor agreements between George Mason University and the foundation follows years of denials by university administrators that Koch foundation donations inhibit academic freedom.

“University President Angel Cabrera wrote a note to faculty Friday night saying the agreements “fall short of the standards of academic independence I expect any gift to meet.” The admission came three days after a judge scrutinized the university’s earlier refusal to release any documents.

”The newly released agreements spell out million-dollar deals in which the Koch Foundation endows a fund to pay the salary of one or more professors at the university’s Mercatus Center, a free-market think tank. The agreements require creation of five-member selection committees to choose the professors and grant the donors the right to name two of the committee members.

“The Koch Foundation enjoyed similar appointment rights to advisory boards that had the right under the agreements to recommend firing a professor who failed to live up to standards.

“Cabrera emphasized in his note to faculty that the “agreements did not give donors control over academic decisions” — an apparent reference to the fact that the Koch Foundation did not control a majority of seats on the selection committees.

“A university spokesman said Cabrera was unavailable for an interview. On Monday night, Cabrera issued a statement saying he is ordering a review of all the university’s donor agreements that support faculty positions to “ensure that they do not grant donors undue influence in academic matters.”

“Cabrera’s admission that the agreements fall short of standards for academic independence is a stark departure from his earlier statements on the issue. In a 2014 blog post on the issue, he wrote that donors don’t get to decide who is hired and that “these rules are an essential part of our academic integrity. If these rules are not acceptable, we simply don’t accept the gift. Academic freedom is never for sale. Period.”

“In 2016, in an interview with The Associated Press, he denied that the Koch donations restricted academic independence and said Koch’s status as a lightning rod for his support of Republican candidates is the only reason people question the donations.

 “The documents were released to a former student, Samantha Parsons, under a Freedom of Information Act request she filed earlier this year after years of having similar requests rejected.“Parsons, who now works for the activist group UnKoch My Campus, said the documents are strikingly similar to agreements the Koch Foundation made with Florida State University that caused a similar uproar.

“She said provisions giving the foundation a say in which professors are chosen are especially alarming.

“The faculty is supposed to have the independence to choose the best-qualified candidate,” she said.”

The University recently renamed its law school for the late conservative Supreme Justice Antonin Scalia. This occurred following a Koch gift of $10 Million, plus $20 Million from an anonymous donor.

Some 300 colleges have accepted Koch funding.

When Duke historian Nancy MacLean wrote “Democracy in Chains,” criticizing the Koch-funded economist James Buchanan, she was viciously attacked by libertarians for her portrayal of Buchanan as anti-democratic and unduly influenced by Koch libertarianism. She must be smiling as the mask of impartial scholarship is stripped away by student activists.

Big Money Rules

 

 

The Koch Brothers have bankrolled an effort to derail a referendum on voucher expansion this November. It lost in the courts, and their next ploy was to have the legislature repeal the law that was under challenge, then re-enact it under a new name, wearing down the opposition.

But last night, the Arizona legislature failed to get the votes necessary to repeal the voucher expansion law and force opponents to start over. 

This is a huge victory for the #RedForEd Movement. Now the voters get to decide whether to continue the Koch brothers’ Plan to privatize public education.

Congratulations to SOS Arizona and the 50,000 teachers who showed up in red T-shirts to speak up for their students, their profession, and public education.

Democracy wins!

 

NPR Illinois has been covering the harsh disciplinary policies at the high-scoring Noble Network of charter schools.

After publishing one piece about “dehumanizing” discipline, NPR learned about another issue. Girls who are bleeding because of their menstrual period and need to go to the bathroom at once must wait for an “escort,” if the incident happens during class. If the escort is late, the girl bleeds on herself. Sometimes they are allowed to tie a sweater around their waist to hide the blood on their trousers, and they won’t get a demerit.

Two teachers persuaded the administration to let girls wear black trousers instead of khaki, to hide the bloodstains.

Would any public school do this to students? Is this inhumane discipline resreserved for low-income students of color in “no-excuses” charter schools?

Be sure to read the comments. Many were posted by people who say they are current or former teachers at the Noble Network.