Archives for category: Corporate Reformers

Mike Deshotels wrote an amazing post about the shortcomings and failures of charters in Louisiana. I asked him for his permission to repost it in full and he graciously granted it. Mike blogs at http://louisianaeducator.blogspot.com/. Mike, an experienced educator, taught high school science in Louisiana.

NOLA.com, Blackboard Wars Reveal Charter Shortcomings

Recent reports in NOLA.com have described California charter school developer Steve Barr’s problems with expanding his charter concept to New Orleans. Barr has a contract with Oprah’s OWN network to produce a documentary series on his efforts to turnaround John McDonogh high school in New Orleans

Barr’s comments in the NOLA story contradict each other. In one instance he talks about how “beautiful and brilliant” he finds the students of John DcDonogh High School. In another instance he criticizes the New Orleans community and students exclaiming “this is what seven generations of crap looks like!”

The OWN network documentary focuses on some of the new TFA teachers struggling to succeed in their teaching assignments at John McDonogh. Steve Barr is quoted explaining that such teachers are having problems because of inexperience. He points out that it takes at least 4 or 5 years for a teacher to become proficient at his/her craft. If he knew that beforehand, then why did he hire so many minimally trained TFA teachers for his experiment at John McDonogh?

The NOLA article reveals discontent in the parent community and on the charter board and advisory committees. Two of the Board members have threatened to resign because they were not consulted on the approval of the documentary series filming. They also believe that Board members should be able to vote on hiring of staff and teachers. (Note: This is contrary to Jindal’s Act 1 of 2012 which places all hiring totally in the hands of school administrators. This provision of Act 1 has been ruled unconstitutional by a district court, so the charter board at McDonogh may still have some say so in employment matters.)

But the real issue is that charter board members are not elected by the public the way the law provides for traditional Louisiana public school districts. Charter schools are really run by their charter management organizations (In this case Steve Barr who lives in California) and by corporate reform power brokers like John White. There is a related story about Lycee’ Francais, another charter in New Orleans, which is in the process of being reorganized by John White and Charter School Association head, Caroline Roemer Shirley, using ad hoc appointed puppets.

These recent disputes highlight one of the weaknesses of the charter system. Like other recent school reform schemes, the charter concept assumes that schools cannot be run effectively by democratically elected school boards. The corporate reform movement assumes that schools need to be taken over by business oriented managers like Steve Barr or even for-profit organizations like Edison Schools or K12 or Connections Academy. All of these have proven to be failures in Louisiana, yet the Jindal and White power structure wants to give them more and more students to experiment with. They even want out-of-state Course Choice Providers to be able to freely recruit students from Louisiana public schools paid for by our tax dollars with minimal accountability, just because they are privately run.

There is absolutely no research that shows that these schemes educate children better. But there is plenty of evidence that for profit groups like Edison, K12 and Connections squander our tax dollars with minimal service to students. Jindal and White talk about “the urgency of now” as justification for throwing out democratic systems upon which our successful public school system has been built.

The chickens are now coming home to roost. All over the state we are witnessing dramatic charter school failures. Absolutely all the schools taken over and converted into charters in EBR, St Helena, Pointe Coupee and Caddo are failures by the very grading system forced upon our schools by Jindal and White. In recent months we have seen scandals in charter schools from unreported child sexual abuse to embezzlement, to financial collapse with schools not being able to pay utility bills, and to sheer mismanagement by incompetent amateur administrators. Now White and his TFA administrators have announced they will form an “Achievement Zone” in Baton Rouge with the very schools they have so badly mismanaged. Yet the Baton Rouge Advocate reports on the Achievement Zone as though it is an innovative action designed to correct the failures of our local school boards!

The secret weapon of Jindal and White is a strategy of appointing local power brokers such as business leaders, ministers and state legislators to puppet advisory boards for all these hair brained schemes. This assures buy-in from the powers that be. The same strategy has been used in Chicago, Philadelphia and Washington D. C. to implement the corporate reform models while bypassing professional educators. These schemes are all failing to produce academic results and end up in the closing of schools serving at-risk students dislocating thousands of students and ruining the careers of thousands of professional educators.

My questions are: When will our news media start doing their job of exposing the fraud and abuse of charters, vouchers, and reform profiteers? When will our legislature call a halt to this misuse of our tax dollars? When will our District Attorneys start prosecuting the crooks who are using our public school children to raid our school funding?

One way for educators and parents to fight the corporate takeover of our schools is to participate in groups like my Defenders of Public Education. Please consider signing up in the manner described in my previouspost.

Here is the full schedule and details for the organized protest against corporate education reform and high-stakes testing on April 4-7 in Washington, D.C.

I will speak on Thursday afternoon.

There is a stellar lineup of speakers and events.

Please come to Washington if you can.

Marc Epstein is an experienced history teacher in New York City whose school–Jamaica High School–was closed as part of the Bloomberg reform plans. Marc holds a Ph.D. In Japanese history, but he is now part of the Absent Teacher Reserve (ATR) pool, a large number of teachers whoever schools were closed. The teachers now roam the system, assigned for a week at one school, then another, their skills, knowledge, and experience completely discarded.

In this article, Marc asks the unavoidable question, what happens when the reformers have won? What changes after they have abolished unions, tenure, and the public control of public education? There are many ways to write this scenario. This is Marc’s.

Krazy TA asks a relevant question: Do reformers put their own children in no-excuses schools?

He writes:

The charterites/privatizers have toned it down a bit, but remember the electrifying mantra “we want to give poor kids the same education that rich kids get”? [chant in alternating patterns with “poverty is not destiny.”]

All right then. Go to the websites of the Waldorf School of the Peninsula, Cranbrook, Harpeth Hall, Chicago Lab Schools, Sidwell Friends. If you don’t like my choices pick similar ones that suit your individual tastes. Read what they offer—I am not speaking rhetorically; I really mean go through all their offerings.

Yes, [sigh] these schools do serve some students whose SES status is not Rocketing out of the Earth’s atmosphere. But these are the kinds of schools that the children of the wealthy, well-connected, well-educated and powerful attend. These sorts of schools don’t just exist in someone’s online piece about what he would do if he were Secretary of Education.

No need for the rheephormy crowd to “make it up as they go along” like Rocketshipsters claim is necessary. They’ve got highly successful proven models right in front of them.

Charterites/privatizers: actions speak louder than words. I invoke what seems to be your highest moral imperative: put your money where your mouth is.

Oh, and I almost forgot: put your own children in your charters, not in the Waldorfs or the Cranbrooks or any of the rest. If it’s good enough for the children of others it’s good enough for yours.

Not too much to ask, is it?

A teacher in Douglas County, Colorado, reports that the school board and superintendent are determined to wreck the public school system for which they are responsible.

The teacher writes:

I can’t begin to tell you how your sharing the information about the LA school district victory for kids is boosting the morale of fighters for public education in Douglas County, Colorado. We’re in a fight for our public school life here too. The school board elections in November will determine the future of our public schools.

The school board was elected, partly in 2009 and partly in 2011, by money from sources outside of the district and heavily connected with the GOP and ties to ALEC. The purpose seems to be to conduct a corporate experiment to on an affluent, not broken, school district south of Denver.

The school board in turn has proudly broken all ties with the union. While the union still exists there is no collaborative, working relationship, or no collective bargaining agreement between the district and the union. And it seems that every time someone disagrees with them, these opponents are called “union thugs.” If this weren’t so serious, their tactics would look downright silly. At the last board meeting, the BOE supporters dressed up as Grinches in their interpretation of the union, and passed out inaccurate pamphlets about the union.

The school board hired a corporate reform superintendent in 2010. Some of her first contacts with the community involved traveling to community public schools to praise the charter school movement and the important of choice. If you want to listen to her speak, contact the Milton Friedman Foundation. http://www.edchoice.org/Foundation-Services/Speakers/Elizabeth-Celania-Fagen.aspx

The school board has also forced a voucher program currently tied up in litigation thanks to the group, Taxpayers for Public Education- http://www.facebook.com/pages/Taxpayers-for-Public-Education/165645363470905?fref=ts. The lawsuit is on its way to the Colorado Supreme Court. The community voted down funding for merit pay, but they have still spent the money from elsewhere to implement a merit pay program that is basically behavior modification for teachers. And they are extremely proud of the fact that they have reduced the teachers’ salary in this district. Polls show teacher morale at an all time low.

More about the voucher program. The right wing of our Republican party is now going after the head of our public libraries for his participation in supporting the lawsuit. http://www.ourcoloradonews.com/castlerock/news/douglas-county-commissioners-push-for-library-changes/article_11d11136-850d-11e2-9323-001a4bcf887a.html

And now they are moving on with a new era in charter school relations. http://www.9news.com/news/article/321642/222/Douglas-County-Schools-signs-unique-charter-school-deal?fb_action_ids=10200721010176750&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_ref=artsharetop&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%5B499626156739696%5D&action_type_map=%5B%22og.recommends%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%22artsharetop%22%5D

They have an $83 million reserve while students sit in unheated classrooms; parents have to pay for student busing, among other things a free public education is supposed to provide. http://strongschoolscoalition.org/dougco-finances-crystal-ball/

And just like the LA elections, the corporate reformers are continuing to spend money on commercials, and the Republic party headquarters here has no qualms about spending over $1 million on November’s elections. The air here is thick with propaganda.

But just like LA, and so many other areas in this country, we have a brilliant and dedicated community that wants its public schools back. Here are just a few of the very information blogs and organizations created by our communities. http://douglascountyparent.com/ and http://strongschoolscoalition.org/ While we don’t have their money, we can only hope that the truth will also prevail here in Douglas County.

A reader in Boise sends the following comment about the trial of Khan Academy videos, funded by the Albertson Foundation:

From the article linked in Diane’s post:

“The statewide pilot received $1.5 million for training, technology, technical assistance and assessment from the J.A. and Kathryn Albertson Foundation.”

The Albertson Foundation has given over $500 million to Idaho schools over the years, but for the past few years its efforts have been devoted to promoting some of the worst initiatives and legislation ever to don the mantle of “education reform,” most notably in the run-up to the November 2012 elections. Throughout 2012 the Foundation published monthly full-color, multipage supplements in all the major print media in Idaho, touting the benefits of reform efforts, documenting the so-called “failure” of Idaho schools, and casting a suspicious eye upon the teachers union, the Idaho Education Association. (Idaho is a right-to-work state.) Joe Scott, an early investor in K12, Inc., heir to the Albertson fortune, and the current chair of the Foundation’s board of directors donated $200,000 to Idaho Voters for Education in an attempt to save the Luna Laws from repeal. Idaho Voters for Education presented itself as the “voice of Idaho parents,” but after a lawsuit filed by the Idaho Secretary of State forced it to reveal its donors, turned out to be a group of fewer than two dozen hedge-fund manager, venture capitalists, and billionaire social engineers, including NYC Mayor Bloomberg, who donated $250,000.

They threw their money away; the Luna Laws were repealed by large margins at the polls. Diane has written about them here before:

“The Luna Laws imposed a mandate for online courses for high school graduates (a favorite of candidates funded by technology companies), made test scores the measure of teacher quality, provided bonuses for teachers whose students got higher scores, removed all teacher rights, eliminated anything resembling tenure or seniority, turned teachers into at-will employees, and squashed the teachers’ unions.”

To get out the reformers’ message, the Albertson Foundation created the ED SESSIONS, monthly talks by “national thought leaders on education reform,” now in its second year. The Foundation isn’t particularly interested in thought leader opposed to market-driven, for-profit education reform; past speakers include Salman Khan, Sir Ken Robinson, Marguerite Roza, Joe Williams of Democrats for Education Reform, and Andy Smarick of Bellwether Education Partners. Coming up, Kristoffer Haines, VP at Rocketship Education and Rick Ogston, founder of Arizona charter school Carpe Diem, to talk about “no-excuse schools.” In addition, the foundation recently launched a web site and radio/tv ads to promote its initiative “Don’t Fail Idaho,” the latest of the Foundation’s many efforts to dominate the conversation about school reform under the guise of fostering and promoting discussion. In short, the Albertson Foundation is anti-union, pro-charter, and apparently determined to spend a metric boatload of money to get its way.

In this perceptive essay, California teacher David B. Cohen has some interesting observations about Mayor Villaraigosa and Superintendent John Deasey.

The mayor has no regrets about asking billionaires Michael Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch to pour vast sums of money into the school board race. He says that “we” (himself and the billionaires) have to stop letting them (the people who teach in the public schools of Los Angeles) from having so much influence.

“We”–meaning the mayor and a handful of super-rich people who poured $4-5 million into a local school board race. “We” –meaning people who do not live in Los Angeles. “We”–meaning people who do not have children in the public schools of Los Angeles. “We”–meaning corporate elites that control vast amounts of wealth and know nothing about educating anyone else’s children.

“They”–meaning the people who work in the system, teach the children, dry their tears, teach them to tie their shoelaces, see them every single day.

And John Deasey says he is delighted that people like Bloomberg, Murdoch, and Klein are prepared to “invest” in the public schools of Los Angeles. Maybe I am dense, but I have trouble seeing a political contribution to three candidates in a school board race as an “investment” in the schools. If they really want to “invest” in the schools, why doesn’t Dr. Deasey invite them to buy school supplies, build health clinics, reduce class sizes, or do something that benefits children, real students?

In school, when we study history and civics, we learn about the principles of democracy. We learn about government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” We learn about how important it is for citizens to be informed and to participate in decision-making because the government is their servant, not their master, and we choose our leaders to represent us, not to rule us.

Except for school reform. Now the fashion is to say that the needs are so urgent, that we can’t wait for discussion and debate. Decisions must be made now, without consultation, and they must be imposed without delay, without evidence.

David Sirota of Denver asks why the school reform movement has decided its answers are beyond question. Are we teaching kids to disdain democracy? Are the reformers so wise that we must do as they say at once, without stopping to think about it? Why is the anti-democratic impulse so deeply embedded in the reform movement? Why do they never acknowledge error? What will be left of public education when they are done with their passion for privatization and move on to the next big thing?

Now here is an interesting debate topic: Who really controls the Florida legislature?

Jeb Bush or ALEC?

Or are they the same people with different organizational ties?

Read here to learn about ALEC’s role in Florida.

Recently, ALEC was about to pass a resolution condemning the Common Core standards, but Jeb intervened to stop it. He probably reminded them of the profits that corporations will make as the test scores plummet across the land in response to “tougher,” more “rigorous” standards.

In his inimitable style, combining wit and solid analysis, Bruce Baker dissects the latest “data-free drivel” from ConnCAN.

Baker responds to a report claiming that the state was helping low-performing, high-needs districts. Not true, says Baker.

And he has the evidence to back up his response.

The question: Why do the news media report “studies” by advocacy groups with an agenda without recognizing that they are not disinterested research? They are kind of like the research and studies on nicotine and smoking by tobacco companies.

Caveat emptor.