Archives for category: Charter Schools

 

Tom Ultican, who recently retired as a high school teacher of advanced math and physics in California, has been studying the tentacles of the privatization movement.

His latest expose reveals the nefarious, insidious organization benignly called “Education Cities.” It is a spin-off of The equally insidious organization called The. I don’t Trust, which has hidden behind a facade of faux progressivism. The Mind Trust goal is the complete privatization of the public schools of Indianapolis.

Dont be fooled! Like The Mind Trust, Educatuon Cities is a central part of a long-range plan to destroy public education. It is now operating in 25 Cities. Like other privatization groups, it begins by telling you how terrible your public schools are. It warns that there are achievement gaps in your schools, based on race and income. It claims that it will lure schools to your city that are so great that every student will have high scores. It’s propaganda, like all propaganda, is shot through with lies, exaggerations, hyperbole, and false promises.

Is your city one of their targets? Read Tom’s article and find out.

These are the hollow men. They come to steal your public schools and give them to entrepreneurs.

 

 

There is a renewed effort to impose privately managed charters in Nevada, without a referendum or any indication of public demand. This is ironic because Nebraska has a long tradition of good public schools that are the anchors of their communities. We know the playbook. A rightwing Republican will Press for charters for those poor black children in Omaha, for whom he has never shown any previous concern. He knows this is the nose under the camel’s tent, the wedge he can use to please his allies in ALEC, who want to privatize everything.

I visited Omaha in 2016 and learned about Nebraska before I went.

This is what I learned: Nebraskans love their public schools.

I gave a see h to civic and education leaders, and this is what I said:

“You are too independent, too smart, too stubborn to follow everyone else over the edge of a cliff. You have saved tens of millions (maybe hundreds of millions) of dollars by losing Race to the Top. You are a model for the nation. And without having adopted any of the so-called “reforms,” Nebraska is one of the highest-performing states in the nation on NAEP. In fact, Nebraska outperformed every state that won RTTT except Massachusetts.

“Nebraska dragged its feet implementing NCLB. It put in a proposal for Race to the Top, but fortunately lost. It has no charter schools, no Common Core. It didn’t get a waiver because the state doesn’t want to evaluate teachers by test scores. The state commissioner decided not to ask anymore but to wait and see if NCLB is overhauled.

“The state is mainly rural so there is not much enthusiasm for charters except in Omaha, where there is a poor black community. Some black leaders think that charter schools will be a panacea. Some white legislators agree. But so far no action on that front.

“Despite the fact that Nebraska avoided almost every part of the reform menu, its students did very well on the 2015 NAEP. The state was in the top tier, ranked 9th or 11th in the nation. It outperformed every Race to the Top winner except Massachusetts, which has been number 1 for years.

“Nebraska is a conservative state, in the best sense of the word. It doesn’t believe in following the crowd. It doesn’t want to blow up its public schools and hope for the best. It wisely decided to wait and see. No creative disruption. No experiments on children. Just common sense.

“Also, being a state where people know one another in small cities, towns, and rural communities, Nebraska loves its public schools. Even Warren Buffett, one of the richest men in the world, sent his own children to Omaha public schools.

“But there is a new governor, and he is convinced that Nebraska needs charters, vouchers, virtual schools, the whole bag of privatization schemes.

“Hopefully the good citizens of Nebraska will persuade him that conservatives don’t destroy; conservatives conserve. Hopefully, they will inform the governor that Nebraska’s public schools are among the best in the nation.”

If it ain’t broke, don’t break it.

 

The Michigan House passed a bill to let the charter sector—including for-profit charters and cyber charters—share in millage revenues. Voters no doubt think they are underwriting their local community public schools, but they will be paying for the privately managed charters if the State Senate agrees.

https://www.freep.com/story/news/education/2018/01/18/michigan-legislation-millage-charter-schools/1045504001/

Michigan charters are unusual in that they operate with little accountability. Some 80% of the state’s charters operate for profit.

In recent years, with the spread of charters, Michigan’s ranking on NAEP has fallen from the middle of the national rankings to near the bottom.

Michigan believes in investing in failure. Results don’t matter.

 

 

Readers of this blog are familiar with the story of ECOT, the mammoth virtual charter school in Ohio. It made over $1 Billion for the entrepreneur who founded it. But it seems to be slipping rapidly down the drain hole.

Mother Jones tells the story here in graphic detail. 

“Now, with ECOT imploding, some state politicians have floated the idea that Lager, who has made millions in profits off the school and come a long way from the Waffle House, should be personally held responsible for paying back some of the $80 million owed to the state. But while the coming days will reveal if the political will or mechanisms exist to make this happen, it’s unclear how he might ever be held accountable—because the real scandal is that ECOT grew up legally, with the support of state politicians and national GOP power brokers, and that in many ways it has served as a model for schools like it across the country. Now, the same districts ECOT pulled its funds from are scrambling to find a way to take in its former students, and Ohio is facing a reckoning, after nearly two decades when the state became one of the country’s freest laboratories for pro-charter policies. “Why did it take a generation and a half of kids to go through this crappy system for us to do something about it,” Stephen Dyer, a former Ohio state representative asked me in exasperation in December. “The reason is because a lot of money came in.”

This article was written in 2015 but it is as timely today as it was then. Maybe more timely, because in 2015, who would have dreamed that Betsy DeVos would soon be U.S. Secretary of Education?

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is a bill mill founded in 1973 and funded by the Koch Brothers, the DeVos family, and major corporations. It operates secretively. It does not issue press releases. It churns out model laws that state legislators introduce into their own states to deregulate business and privatize the public sector for profit. It is a stealth political campaign to privatize everything for profit while classified by the IRS as a charity. Its members include one of every four state legislators in the nation. It’s corporate members include some of the nation’s pre-eminent businesses.

One of the major targets of ALEC is public education, because it is public. ALEC has model legislation for charter schools, vouchers, and cybercharters. It has Model legislation to eliminate collective bargaining and unions. It has Model legislation to lower standards for teachers and deregulate entry into teaching.

To learn more about ALEC, watch DeVos and read the website ALEC Exposed.

Alecexposed.com

Circulate this post and the links to everyone you know.

The Waltons are a singular American family. Not exactly like you or me, to be sure. They are, according to Forbes, the richest family in America, with a net worth of $140 billion or more.

They were recently praised by Trump for raising the minimum wage for their 1 million workers to $11 an hour. On the same day, however, they closed down 63 Sam’s Club warehouse stores, putting more than 11,000 people out of work without notice.

I wish any member of the Walton family would try to live for a month on only $11 an hour wages. However, since they are all heirs to their great fortune, it’s likely that none ever held a paying job where they had to show up every day.

Here is an article about them that appeared on the Walton Foundation blog.

While other billionaires have pledged to give away most of their money to charity, the Waltons decline to join them. They know money is power. Also, it means you never have to go to work.

Their primary takeover target is education.

“The largest chunk of the foundation’s retooled and accelerated giving plan — $1 billion over the next five years — will go to education. While family members still evangelize about the benefits of “school choice” for struggling families, they’ve fought enough battles over the past two decades to determine that simply providing parents a slate of options among traditional public schools, charter schools, and private institutions isn’t enough to improve student achievement.

“For school choice to succeed, the Waltons concluded, the foundation has to move beyond making start-up grants for charters and focus more on building a constituency of supporters in local school districts.”

Typically, that means they have to actually buy elections, although the article doesn’t put it quire like that.

Their passion is charter schools. This is a handy way to bust unions and advance the privatization of public education. The Waltons claim to have started one of every charter schools in the U.S.

“Some critics have complained that the Waltons have donated a relatively small percentage of their enormous wealth to charity. Still, their giving is so substantial in terms of raw dollars that other critics contend it gives them too much influence over public policy. In response, the family has sought safe havens: school districts where there are plenty of skilled teachers and administrators excited about new educational models. In those places, the foundation has courted local officials open to charter schools operating alongside traditional neighborhood schools.

“The new approach means the foundation will exit cities where charters have been a tough sell, including Phoenix, Chicago, and Albany, N.Y. Its roster of 13 target areas now includes New Orleans, Oakland, and San Antonio, where charters are seen as ripe for success.”

See, they just sit around and decide how to privatize the public schools in your community. Arkansas is one of the poorest states in the nation. Couldn’t they just concentrate on raising up the families in their own backyard?

 

Roxana Marachi writes about two proposals before the California State Board of Education today. Maybe the decision has already been made.

Question: Is it true that “anyone can open a charter school in California?”

Does it matter if the proposal comes from an organization that has previously failed?

Does it matter that no one knows who will actually run the school?

Do California taxpayers care how their money is spent?

Does the State Board of Educatuon have any quality standards?

Can convicted felons open charters?

Can maniacal parents home school their children and chain them to their beds?

Does California have any standards?

Or is it Betsy DeVos’ Dream State?

 

 

 

 

 

This article summarizes a year-long investigation Of Michigan charter schools by the Detroit Free Press.

Eighty percent operate for profit.

No accountability.

This is Betsy DeVos’s handiwork.

Michigan scores on NAEP plummeted since adoption of the DeVos plan of choice with no accountability.

 

Alan Singer reviews the New York Times list of failed corporate reformers to replace Carmen Farina.

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2018/1/18/1733788/-Times-Endorses-Anti-Fari-a-Candidates-for-NYC-School-Chancellor-Alan-Singer-on-the-Daily-Kos

John King? Chased out of New York State.

Jaime Aquino? In charge of the iPad disaster in Los Angeles.

John White? Tool of rightwing former Governor Bobby Jindal.

Has beens.

Hey, Bill, find someone who believes in public schools.

 

 

Thomas Ultican has put his research skills to work while reviewing the depredations of the corporate reform organization’s intent on destroying public education.

In this post, he analyzes the origins of TNTP, The New Teacher Project, a spin-off of Teach for America led initially by Michelle Rhee.

TNTP is a cash cow for ambitious reformers. It advances its self-interest by attacking experienced teachers.

TNPT is an integral part of the privatization movement. It ignores genuine scholarship and undermines teacher professionalism.

“TNTP is important for the DPE movement. It produces papers that undermine teacher professionalism and it works to circumvent proven teacher training led by universities. It also works to gain control of pedagogy in a way that narrows curriculum. Why? It is all about cutting costs and business transactions. It does not improve the quality of education in America; it harms it.”