Archives for category: Charter Schools

 

Republican Governor Eric Greitens was indicted for invasion of privacy.

“Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens was indicted and taken into custody Thursday for felony invasion of privacy, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner’s office announced Thursday afternoon…

“Gardner’s statement said a grand jury found probable cause to believe Greitens violated a Missouri statute that makes it a felony if a person transmits the image contained in the photograph or film in a manner that allows access to that image via a computer.

“The indictment apparently stems from allegations made in media reports last month that, during the course of an extramarital affair, he took a photograph of his bound and partially nude lover and threatened to publicize it if she exposed the affair.”

Greitens is of interest on this blog because one of his first actions was to pack the State Board of Education and force the firing of the uncontroversial state commissioner of education. Greitens is a huge supporter of privatization and was planning to replace the Commissioner with a charter lover.

But the governor forgot that his appointees were supposed to be approved by the Legislature and they were not. Consequently, none of his appointees serve legally, and there is no quorum on the state board.

What is not clear is why Greiten’s non-legal Board was allowed to fire the state commissioner.

 

 

 

At a town hall meeting in Detroit, students, families, and teachers spoke out against the damage caused to them by the false promise of “school choice.” Allie Gross covered the meeting for the Detroit Free Press.

One parent described the wonderful school attended by his child with cerebral palsy; it was to save money.

“In 2008, Alfred Wright enrolled his son, Timothy, in kindergarten at Oakman Elementary/Orthopedic, a small school on the Detroit’s northwest side that specialized in teaching students with special needs.

“Timothy had recently been diagnosed with cerebral palsy, and the school — which came with spacious hallways, discreet changing rooms, small class sizes, and an on-site nurse — seemed like the perfect match.

“And, according to Wright, it was. For five years, he watched his son thrive in the close-knit and accepting community. Oakman not only was prepared to accommodate Timothy’s needs but it helped Wright, as a parent, better understand his child.

“But then the seemingly unexpected happened. In spring 2013, Roy Roberts, Detroit Public Schools’ second emergency manager, announced that Oakman would be one of six schools to close the following school year. It would add to the list of nearly 100 district schools that had shuttered since 2009, when the state took over DPS due to finance.

LWright and the rest of the parents were given two traditional public school options: one that was 1.2 miles away and the other that was 2.4 miles. Both choices fell within the bottom 5 percent of schools in the state for academic performance. More notably, neither were handicap accessible.

“All of the things we feared happened,” Wright said, explaining how issues at Henderson Academy, where Timothy ultimately ended up, ranged from bullying and isolation to a lack of knowledge and preparedness when it came to educating students with special needs.

”This reality — instability, uncertainty and inefficient resources — is why on Tuesday night, Wright and Timothy made their way to Wayne State University’s Law School to participate in an Education Town Hall hosted by the #WeChoose Campaign. A movement made up of 25 organizations from across that country — including the NAACP, Advancement Project, Dignity in Schools and Journey for Justice Alliance — the group is working to support racial justice and end educational inequality via, among many things, town hall gatherings that bring attention to what the group sees as “the illusion of school choice.”

“Parents, students, and educators do not choose the sabotage of their neighborhood schools, school closings, zero tolerance policies that target black and brown students, punitive standardized testing school deserts,” the group’s mission statement explains. “We choose equity, not the scam called school choice.”

 

 

 

If you saw the film “Waiting for Superman,” you may recall that one of the model charter schools featured in the film was a boarding school in D.C. called SEED. Unmentioned was that the annual tuition was $35,000. The school appeared idyllic, and one of the students was eager to gain admission and realize his dreams.

Now SEED has a problem. A 12-year-old student hung herself, and news reports say she was bullied. 

Terrible things happen at all kinds of schools, as we have seen recently. I am not singling out SEED  because it is a charter, but because it was promoted as a cure-all, a model school.

”Stormiyah’s death prompted backlash from dozens of parents who have come forward to FOX 5, reporting issues of widespread bullying and lack of supervision at SEED. They claim the complaints are not properly being dealt with by school administrators.

“In response, SEED has held multiple parent meetings to address concerns. The latest one held Tuesday was called “SEED Safety and You….”

”The Office of Human Rights is charged with investigating formal complaints made against D.C. schools.

“Why do all these things have to happen for them to have a meeting for safety?” asked Renee Hamilton, the aunt of a SEED student. “That should have been implemented Day 1. And it should have been stayed on top of Day 1.”

“Parents told FOX 5 the school has also promised more supervision. But one parent said she has seen no change since the tragedy.

“Kids running wild, no supervision,” added Tiarra Coleman, the mother of a SEED student. “There should be a parent, a teacher, someone at every door. There is not. Nothing has changed since that tragedy January 23rd.”

“Coleman’s son was asked not to return to school after SEED administrators said he confessed to vandalism. Coleman told FOX 5 her son was coerced to take blame for other students who’ve been bullying and threatening him for months.

“Those boys are still at the school to this day,” she said.

“Coleman has since been trying to pull her son out of SEED, but said she can’t get the school to release his records so she can move him.”

No School is perfect. Humility is best.

 

 

This is what you must read to understand how the richest and most powerful charter advocacy group imploded. It pretended to be the voice of powerless black and Hispanic families. It was the Waltons, the Broads, and assorted financiers. The ostensible cause for its demise was the licentious behavior of its founder and CEO, who apparently had multiple hookups with staff members and then made lewd comments to a non-staff member at the education reform Philos meeting. That was the end for him, and the organization collapsed too.

  1. Chalkbeat reports. Key in this account is that other charter leaders were disgusted by Eva’s hardball tactics. It worked for her but embarrassed the others. What the Chalkbeat story leaves out is the importance of the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars that the financiers were giving to Cuomo’s re-election campaign. So, organizing the kids, their parents and teachers by the thousands, hiring buses, staging a march, and waging a political campaign using the children as props was a speciality of FES. No real public school could do that; it would be illegal. But the money to Cuomo was even more persuasive in building the appearance of a “movement.”
  2. Mercedes Schneider reports, A deep dive into data. Her specialty.

 

Economist Eric Hanushek of Hoover at Stanford frequently testifies that how money is spent matters far more than how much is spent. Actually both matter. In Ohio, for example, the $2 Billion spent on low-performing online virtual charter school ECOT was a waste of money. California and Florida and other states have wasted billions on low performing charter schools and charters that close in mid-year.

Bill Phillis, former deputy Commissioner of Education in Ohio responds here:

“Eric Hanushek, Stanford University Economist: “How money is spent is more important than how much is spent.”

“Dr. Hanushek was at the Statehouse January 31 participating with a group of experts assembled to discuss how to improve Ohio’s education system. The participants agreed that Ohio’s prosperity is tied to education attainment.

“Most states that have had to defend a constitutional challenge to the school funding system have involved Eric Hanushek one way or another. Dr. Hanushek can be counted on to support inadequate, inequitable school funding systems. His deal-how money is spent is important-is a no brainer. Of course, how money is spent is consequential. (The Ohio charter industry with its poster child ECOT has demonstrated the importance of how money is spent.) But the total amount of funds available is extremely significant.

“Unfortunately, many boards of education, particularly in low wealth districts, have the task of determining which valuable programs and services to put on the chopping block.

“Dr. Hanushek can and does produce data sets that show an increase in funding may not produce a commensurate increase in student achievement. But test scores are not the only measure of the benefits students accrue from the public common school.

“One sure way to diminish education attainment is to adopt Dr. Hanshek’s philosophy that higher levels of funding are not consequential. Ohio continues to operate an inadequate, inequitable, unconstitutional system.”

William L. Phillis | Ohio Coalition for Equity & Adequacy of School Funding | 614.228.6540 | ohioeanda@sbcglobal.net| http://www.ohiocoalition.org

 

Community activist Tamar Manessah wrote an eloquent plea in the New York Times to save public schools in Chicago—from Rahm Emanuel and the charter industry. 

She writes:

”On Feb. 28, the Chicago Board of Education is expected to vote on a disastrous proposal to close four public high schools with declining enrollment around the Englewood neighborhood of southwest Chicago. The affected children, who are overwhelmingly black and poor, would go to public schools out of the neighborhood or be encouraged to attend one of the charter schools being pushed by business and religious interests.

“The schools would close over three years, and in their place, the city plans to build an $85 million high school in Englewood. But the school won’t be up and running until September 2019 at the earliest — more than a full school year from now.

“Dwindling enrollment is a reality at these schools, but that’s partly because the city has not invested nearly enough in them. At the same time, Chicago has opened dozens of new schools, mostly charters, which draw students away from traditional public schools.

“Englewood, one of the poorest areas in the city, is plagued by high unemployment and gang activity. It’s where my organization, Mothers Against Senseless Killings, does its work. Our volunteers take care of the local kids during the summer, feeding them hamburgers for lunch and encouraging them to stay in school. And the neighborhood has made great strides — last year there was a significant drop in homicides and shooting.

“My greatest fear is that we will backslide. How we will be able to sustain these gains without a strong public school presence?“

 

 

Two charter schools in Boston voted to join the Boston Teachers Union.  

It seems the teachers want some rights, some voice, and equitable pay.

This story will not make the Walton Family Foundation happy. It is spending $200 million a year to open new charters in hopes of eliminating trachers’ Unions. More than 90% of charters are non-union. That’s why Betsy DeVos adds another $263 Million each year. The faster charters can replace public schools, the sooner the teachers’ unions will disappear.

Unlike public schools, charters open and close like day lilies. So Walton and DeVos and taxpayers must keep spending to open more charters.

 

Theresa Peña served as president of the Denver school board when reform began more than a decade ago.

She describes the promises and high hopes.

Now she admits that reform failed. 

The kids who lost were the poor black and Hispanic students, she says.

She writes:

Almost 11 years ago, when I served on the Denver Board of Education, the board and then-Superintendent Michael Bennet published a lengthy manifesto detailing how we planned to transform and radically improve public education in Denver.

They published their manifesto. They said:

“Ten years from now, let them say that Denver was the vanguard for reform in public education. Let them say, 10 years from now, that in Denver we saw what others could not, and laid down our adult burdens to lift up our children. Let them say that a spark flew in Denver that ignited a generation of educators, children, parents, and communities, and gave them courage to abandon the status quo for a shimmering future. We can do this in Denver; it is simply a matter of imagination and will.”

In 2007 our board believed we were starting a revolution. We were going to dramatically change outcomes for Denver students. We were going to construct a new educational system that served students first.

We believed that the goals in our strategic plan, known as the Denver Plan, would close the achievement gap and set a new path forward for all graduates of Denver Public Schools.

I am writing today to tell you that we failed. And, as a city and a school district we are still collectively failing our neediest students.

The Denver public school system is now a darling of the rightwing.

Last year, Betsy DeVos visited Denver twice; she praised the city for its charter efforts, but declared that it needed vouchers as well.

The Brookings Institution released its “Education Choice and Competition Index,” which ranked Denver first in the nation. The Index was created by Grover Whitehurst, who was George W. Bush’s choice to lead the Department of Education’s research division.

Charter champion David Osborne showered praise on Denver’s “portfolio” strategy in the rightwing journal Education Next.

Kevin Hesla of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools raved about Denver’s commitment to the privatization agenda, again in the rightwing Education Next.

Denver is where Democrats gave up the fight for public education and invited the fox of privatization into the henhouse. The conservative media and think tanks love Denver.

Peña dissents. She writes:

My conclusion calls into question the conventional wisdom about Denver Public Schools. Over the past decade, under the leadership of Bennet and his successor, Tom Boasberg, DPS has gained a national reputation as a forward-thinking, even visionary school district, which welcomes high-quality charter schools and grants the most deserving of its own schools unprecedented degrees of autonomy from the district bureaucracy. Enrollment has grown and student achievement has improved.

While elements of that sterling national reputation are deserved, and some real gains have occurred, they have been far too slow and inequitable. On perhaps the most critical measure of success, literacy in early elementary schools, low-income and minority students have improved at a much slower rate than their Anglo and higher-income peers. This has caused Denver’s abysmal achievement gaps to grow even wider.

In 2017 64 percent of students who did not qualify for free or reduced lunch were reading and writing at grade level compared to 26 percent of students who qualified for free and reduced lunch, a 38 percent gap. And only one of three low-income third-graders read and write at grade level.

Our aspirations of a decade ago have not been realized. Until and unless Boasberg and the Board of Education take concrete steps to fundamentally change the district to serve its students and schools, real progress will remain elusive. Over time, I have come to doubt whether this is even possible.

The new reform board promised innovation, school autonomy, transparency, accountability, closer monitoring of results, and higher expectations.

She concludes:

We failed on all counts.

Teacher turnover and principal turnover remain large. Achievement gaps are as large as ever, possibly larger.

Denver, the shining model of reform by charters and test-based accountability, is no model at all.

So says one of the reform leaders who was there at the beginning.

Jeannie Kaplan was a school board member also during those heady years. She quickly became disillusioned with the disruptive tactics. She is not sure whether Theresa Peña means what she says or has something else in mind. But she has long believed that the “reforms” failed the neediest kids.

What say you, Senator Michael Bennett? What say you, Superintendent Tom Boasberg?

Why not focus on what works? Reduced class sizes; support and retention of teachers and principals; collaboration; school nurses and clinics. Talk about root causes of low academic performance and focus on changes that address the root causes.

 

 

Iowa has one of the best school systems in the nation, but legislators are working to pass a voucher program.

They very likely belong to ALEC, where they got their marching orders to destroy public education.

The bill advanced on a party line vote, with Democrats opposed. Every student who gets a voucher will take $5,000 away from the state’s public school. That amount will not be enough for a high quality private school.

In recent studies, done by scholars of different views, vouchers depress student achievement. Do Iowa legislators know that? Do they care?

The sponsor admitted that his plan would reduce funding for public schools:

“Yeah, it’s going to take a student away and that funding will go away (for public schools),” he said. “But that’s no different than a student leaving for any other reason. So schools have to deal with that all the time – declining enrollment or enrollment changing.”

Citizens of Iowa must rise up and say no. No to vouchers! No to additional “flexibility” to charter schools! No to budget cuts for public schools.

One day it was open. The next day it closed. Gone.

That’s a charter school for you!

http://www.kcra.com/article/sacramento-charter-school-shuts-down-without-warning/16754549