The rats begin to leave the sinking ship. Lots of rumors about who will leave the administration and who might be impeached.

Harmeet Dillon announced today that she was stepping down as head of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. Before her appointment, Dillon had established her reputation as a litigator against civil rights. So Trump brought her on to reorient the agency.

Under her leadership, half the agent’s lawyers resigned, being loath to follow her lead.

The Washington Post reported:

During her more than 18 months running the Civil Rights Division, Dhillon oversaw the departure of hundreds of career staffers, more than half the attorneys in the division.

She dramatically reshaped the office to propel President Donald Trump’s social agenda, redirecting attorneys to focus on combating antisemitism, prosecuting noncitizens who voted, expanding gun rights and taking aim at what Trump and his allies have described as anti-Christian bias and Democrats’ “woke ideology.”
To tackle those priorities, the division focused fewer resources addressing its historic mission of fighting discrimination of minority groups and those most vulnerable in society.

She opposed affirmative action and other programs intended to expand opportunities for nonwhites and women.

Dhillon reversed the priorities of the Civil Rights Division. She opposed programs that promoted diversity, equity, and inclusion and treated them as deviant activities. She scorned the traditional and customary values of the Civil Rights Division.

When asked about the mass exit of lawyers from her division, she responded:

“I think that’s fine,” Dhillon said on a podcast about the mass departures in her office. “We don’t want people in the federal government who feel like it’s their pet project to go persecute police departments based on statistical evidence or persecute people praying outside abortion facilities instead of doing violence.”

She added: “The job here is to enforce the federal civil rights laws — not woke ideology.”

In Tennessee’s 9th Congressional District, Brent Taylor (R) ran against Justin Pearson (D). Taylor is white. Pearson is Black. Pearson intended to run in Memphis, which has a large Black vote. But the ultra rightwing legislature gerrymandered Memphis, dividing it in 3 and adding each piece to a largely white rural district. The intent was to remove a seat that would elect a Black. The district was designed by the Legislature to elect a white person.

Republican Brent Taylor won the Tennessee 9th Congressional District race, defeating Democrat Justin Pearson. Brent Taylor (Republican): had 111,968 votes (49.63%) Justin Pearson (Democrat) had approximately 109,500 votes (48.5%)

Taylor’s margin was about 2,500 votes. 

About a week before the election, Taylor was at the center of a scandal. He had allegedly sent “dick pics” to women he didn’t know. For most candidates, a scandal of this magnitude would doom their candidacy (think Anthony Weiner of New York, who did the same thing and lost his political career).

Brent Taylor admitted that he had engaged in this practice as late as 2021. He said it was “youthful indiscretion.” He was 53 in 2021.

The white rural voters who elected Taylor made it clear that they were not bothered by candidates who share “dick pics.”

They elected Brent Taylor.

One other notable fact: Taylor is white. Pearson is Black.

Republican Congressman Thomas Massie proposed impeaching Pete Hegseth on September 15, 2026. The very next day, House Speaker Mike Johnson adjourned the House until after the November election. Massie accused Johnson of adjourning a day early to be sure his resolution of impeachment would be ignored. He said he would bring it up again during the lame-duck session. Massie won’t be a member of Congress in the next term. Trump helped to oust him because Massie demanded the full release of the Epstein files.

If Massie’s proposal fails, the Democratic majority should hold impeachment hearings. Hegseth has been a destructive force as Secretary of Defense, which he insisted be changed to Secretary of War.

Here are Massie’s proposed Articles of Impeachment:

Waging war against Iran without congressional authorization.

Disregarding laws intended to protect civilians in wartime.

Ordering unlawful killings of suspected drug traffickers at sea.

Retaliating against Senator Mark Kelly for constitutionally protected speech.

Participating in the unauthorized capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

Conducting an unlawful bombing campaign in Yemen.

That’s a beginning. Hegseth should also be impeached for firing highly qualified generals and admirals without cause and thus harming the military’s leadership and readiness.

Hegseth should be impeached for denying promotions to well-qualified officers who had been recommended by review panels. A disproportionate number of those denied promotion were women or Blacks. Hegseth seems to assume that only straight white men like himself are fit to lead.

The fact is that Hegseth had no qualifications to lead the Departnent of Defense, which has a bigger budget and more personnel than any other Department. He had no managerial experience. His highest military rank was Major in the U.S. National Guard. He seemed to love humiliating generals and admirals and anyone with higher rank.

Remember when he called all the highest-ranking military leaders in the world to a meeting where he lectured them about manliness and told them that he would not tolerate military people who were overweight or had facial hair? How demeaning to his audience! They listened in stony silence.

Hegseth led a crusade against transgender members of the military and pushed them out even if they had exemplary service records and had the approval of their leaders and colleagues. Thousands of service members were expelled or left voluntarily to satisfy his contempt for them.

Hegseth is best at leading culture wars, not actual wars.

He should be impeached and removed.

His successor, of course, would have to be approved by the Democratic-led Senate so Trump would be compelled to find a better candidate.

How can the new Democrat-controlled Congress rein in Trump’s worst appointees? Impeach them. The House should hold impeachment hearings for dangerously unqualified members of Trump’s Cabinet. The obvious ones–the most unqualified–are those who not only lack the qualifications for their position but actually are a clear and present danger to the American people. The two Cabinet members who come to mind are Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense.

This post considers RFK Jr.’s nutty conspiracy theories. It was written by Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases, vaccines, immunology, and virology. He is Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and an attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases.

He is also the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology and a professor of pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

Dr. Offit writes that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s views reflect ignorance of science, as well as his personal paranoia. As the nation’s top public health official, he is in a position to set back medical research and is a danger to the public.

Dr. Offit writes:

RFK Jr., the Secretary of Health and Human Services, has always been an avid conspiracy theorist. He believes the CIA was behind the assassination of his uncle, John F. Kennedy; that SARS-CoV-2 virus was engineered in a Chinese laboratory to kill Whites and Black people but spare Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese; that Bill Gates secretly put microchips in COVID vaccines so the government could monitor who hadn’t received them; that pharmaceutical companies and medical journals conspired to suppress the truth about drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin to treat COVID and that Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates were part of the conspiracy; that malaria and meningitis vaccines in Africa were designed to sterilize women; and that Lyme disease was a military weapon developed at the Plum Island Animal Disease Center.

On September 17, 2026, RFK Jr. gave the keynote address at a Children’s Health Defense conference, an anti-vaccine group he had founded 10 years earlier. RFK Jr. announced that he has called for public comments on the health effects of fifth generation wireless (i.e., 5G) networks, which includes cell towers, smart phones, and laptops. For years, RFK Jr. has believed that electromagnetic radiation from these networks cause cancer. “Generally speaking, electromagnetic radiation is a major health concern… I’m very concerned about it.”

Was RFK Jr. right to be concerned about 5G networks? In truth, only ionizing radiation (e.g., X-rays, gamma rays, and ultraviolet radiation) has been shown to damage DNA and cause cancer. Because electromagnetic radiation from 5G wireless networks is non-ionizing, it doesn’t damage DNA or cause cancer. Major international health and safety organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA), and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation have all reviewed decades of research and concluded that 5G technology poses no known health risks. Ironically, RFK Jr. is a frequent user of tanning beds which, because they emit an intense amount of ionizing ultraviolet radiation, can cause cancer. 

During that September meeting before Children’s Health Defense, RFK Jr. also told the crowd, “We are also looking at chemtrails…emissions from aircraft.” The chemtrail conspiracy, which dates to 1996, holds that white streaks from airplane exhaust at high altitudes is evidence that the government is secretly spraying toxic chemicals and biological agents causing respiratory symptoms, brain fog, autoimmune diseases, and cancer among other problems. Again, RFK Jr.’s claims are nonsensical. At high altitudes, the air is cold. Hot humid air from the engine exhaust mixes with the cold surrounding air causing water vapors to condense into ice crystals that form visible clouds. These are called contrails, not chemtrails. The same condensation caused by contrails, which can be seen on a window after a cold morning, is similarly harmless.

At the Children’s Health Defense conference, RFK Jr. embraced two prominent conspiracy theories. This could easily be dismissed save for one thing—RFK Jr. IS THE NATION’S NUMBER ONE PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIAL. HE IS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING PUBLIC POLICY AND ASSIGNING RESEARCH PRIORITIES. What will it take for Congress to realize the depth of this man’s paranoia? Maybe they’ll act when he requires all members of the Public Health Service to wear tin foil hats to work for protection. Maybe not.

Kennedy deserves to be impeached because his actions imperil the health of the public. Not only is his hostility to proven vaccines dangerous and deadly, but his choices for leadership roles are affected by his ignorance and his hostility towards science.

In addition, Kennedy has gone along with the gutting of research funding and fired outstanding scientists.

He may be the least qualified of Trump’s Cabinet due to his hardened ideology and his disregard of science.

Nancy Lacore served in the Navy and earned the rank of Vice-Admiral. She was chief of the Naval Reserve when Hegseth purged a bunch of highly experienced admirals and generals.

Lacore moved to South Carolina and decided to run for Congress. She ran in a reliable red district, the First Congressional District, which had been held by Nancy Mace, who gave up her seat for an unsuccessful run for Governor.

Lacore’s Republican opponent was Jenny Costa Honeycutt.

The results were close; after votes were counted, Lacore led by 1 point and claimed victory. The district had been gerrymandered in 2020 to make it a safe Republican seat.

As she campaigned, Lacore focused her remarks on Hegseth’s incompetence and his role in getting us into the Iran war.

As a member of Congress, she will have the opportunity to grill Hegseth and possibly to vote for his impeachment if the majority takes that route.

Revenge is sweet.

Last night was a big night, a great night for public schools, writes Carol Burris, executive director of the Network for Public Education. Carol was a teacher of Spanish for many years, then a high school principal on Long Island in New York. She was selected as New York State Principal of the Year by her statewide colleagues. As executive director of NPE, she excels as an organizer, a researcher, a writer, and an analyst of statistical data. We are so fortunate to have her leadership in the battle to preserve public schools against privatization and corporate interests. And, at the same time, to advocate for ways to improve our public schools.

She writes:

Last night was an extraordinary night for those who love public education.

For me, the highlight was Gina Hinojosa’s election as governor of Texas. Gina came into politics as a mom. She ran for the Austin school board to keep her son’s school, and other neighborhood schools, from closing. In the Texas House, no one has defended public schools more fiercely, fought vouchers harder, or been more skeptical of charter schools. She has promised to fire Education Commissioner Mike Morath on day one and end state takeovers of school districts, including takeovers like Houston’s, where the failure of a single school was used to seize an entire district. You can hear Gina’s address at the 2025 Network for Public Education Conference here.

James Talarico’s Senate victory drew more of the headlines, but Gina’s win should not be overlooked. She beat a three-term incumbent who had never lost a general election and who outspent her by tens of millions of dollars. Talarico’s opponent was Ken Paxton, a scandal-plagued attorney general. I suspect Gina helped bring Latino voters to Talarico as much as he helped bring a broader electorate to her.

Talarico’s win is also good news for public schools. He is soft on charters, but he is a fierce opponent of vouchers and has publicly opposed the federal tax-credit voucher. His arrival should add momentum to Senator Mark Kelly’s Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act, which would repeal it.

He will be joined by other strong allies of public education: Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan, Roy Cooper of North Carolina, and Sherrod Brown, who returns to the Senate from Ohio and has always stood with public schools. This matters. Corporate Democrats such as Cory Booker and Michael Bennet have too often sided with Republicans on school choice. The new Senate Democrats can help move good bills forward and block further expansion of the federal Charter Schools Program.

Ohio delivered another big win: Governor-elect Amy Acton, a strong supporter of public schools who earned the endorsement of the Ohio Education Association.

In the House, I don’t yet know where many of the newly elected members stand. But a larger Democratic majority should help us build support for reining in the federal Charter Schools Program and outvote the minority of pro-charter Democrats.

A pro-public education agenda for the new Congress

  1. Repeal the federal tax-credit voucher.
  2. Pass the CHARTER Act to end federal funding for charter schools run by for-profit operators.
  3. Hold the Department of Education accountable:
    • Release the program funds it has frozen.
    • Cut the federal Charter Schools Program.
    • Rescind its anti-DEI policies.

As more results come in, I hope more pro-public education state legislatures will emerge as well.

~Carol Burris

Gina Hinojosa, Diane, and Carol Burris at the Conference of the Network for Public Education in Columbus, Ohio, in 2025

Gina Hinojosa beat Governor Greg Abbott, defying most of the polls. She was outspent at least 10-1. Elon Musk poured millions into Abbott’s campaign. She won by 7 points.

Her number one issue was supporting public schools and opposing privatization of public money. She opposes vouchers. She opposes the state takeover of public school districts. She served on the Austin school board. She got into politics because her own child’s school was threatened with closure.

Gina said at her victory party last night:

I am grateful and in awe of the incredible grace and power of God and of Texas.

Texas, I am humbled to be your next Governor.

When we started this campaign a little over a year ago, I asked a simple question:

Does Texas belong to the people of Texas: who live here, who work here, who raise their families here? Or is this the billionaires’ world and the rest of us just live here?

Does Texas belong to parents and their children, or the billionaires trying to dismantle our schools?

Does Texas belong to the farmers and ranchers who have worked this land for generations, or the corporations buying it up?

Does Texas belong to the working families who pay their taxes, and do everything right, or the wealthy and well-connected who play by different rules?

Does Texas belong to the people who rise before the sun, who work two jobs, and who put everything they have into small businesses and big dreams? Or does it belong to the people who write the biggest checks to politicians?

Tonight, Texas answered. And we didn’t whisper. We answered loud enough for every billionaire, every lobbyist, and every corrupt politician in Austin to hear.

Texas belongs to us.

We answered in McAllen and Corpus Christi. Dallas and in Temple. In San Antonio and Lubbock. From the neighborhoods of Austin to the wide-open skies of West Texas, all the way out to Big Bend.

We answered in our big cities, where they tried to silence your voice with gerrymandered maps and closed polling sites only to see turnout like never before, and you answered in small towns, where people had been told their vote was already spoken for.

We answered in communities that politicians visit every four years to ask for your vote, only to forget about you the minute they get to Austin.

We answered in places that have been overlooked, underestimated, and left behind for far too long. And we answered across party lines.

Because this campaign was always about whether the people of Texas ought to have a government that belongs to them. Not the highest bidder. Not the biggest donor. Not the most powerful lobbyist. You.

In January, I will take the oath of office ready to lead a government by the people, and for the people again.

Not for the people who donated the most. Not for the people who know the right people, but for every single Texan.

Because the governor’s office does not belong to me. It doesn’t belong to my party. It belongs to you.

This is our Texas. This is our government. And this is our one fight.

And tonight, we won.

Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for being a part of this campaign. This victory is because of you.

– Gina

As a native Texan, I am beyond thrilled by the election results. It was a night for the history books. All the statewide offices were won by Democrats–Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Comptroller, and “Railroad Commissioner” (who regulates the powerful oil and gas industry).

No Democrat had been elected to the U.S. Senate since 1988. No Democrat had won a statewide office since 1994. The gerrymander that Trump asked for and got was washed away in a tide of blue. Four of the five gerrymandered Congressional districts–designed to be safe Republican seats–were captured by Democrats. The races that were supposed to be close–for US Senate and for Governor–were total blowouts. The only unknown is whether one or both houses of the legislature remain in Republican hands.

Forrest Wilder of Texas Monthly has the story:

I’ve covered every election in Texas since 2006. Tuesday night’s results are, by far, the most shocking I’ve ever seen. For my whole adult life, the script has been more or less the same for Texas elections: Republicans win, Democrats lose. In recent years, the story has been about the GOP civil war: the far right winning and the Republican establishment retreating in defeat. The governance story was also predictable: Those in power did what they wanted and everyone else suffered what they must. That timeworn script was ripped up in just a few hours. 

A good night for Democrats was certainly indicated by the usual metrics—polling, prediction markets, reporting, and vibes. I thought Talarico would win by a few percentage points. But I’m not sure anyone was prepared for the alternative universe we’ve just entered. Texas went to bed as a red state—the red state. Wednesday morning, it will wake up as something very, very different. 

Republicans are on track to lose every statewide race. Governor Greg Abbott, a fundraising juggernaut who was on the verge of becoming the longest-serving governor? Trounced by state representative Gina Hinojosa. Ken Paxton, who seemed to possess some kind of superpower? Devastated by James Talarico, now an instant superstar and presidential contender. Mayes Middleton, who insisted on calling himself “MAGA” Mayes? Whupped by Dallas state senator Nathan Johnson, a virtual unknown. Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, one of the most adept politicians in modern Texas history? Humiliated by Austin-based state representative Vikki Goodwin, who barely had a profile in her hometown. Openly racist edgelord Bo French? Beaten by Jon Rosenthal. Democrats seem to be on track to flip all four of the Texas Supreme Court seats up for grabs, dramatically changing the balance of power on Texas’s highest civil court. As of right now, it looks like Democrats may have a majority in the Texas House for the first time since 2002. In short, they won everywhere.  

Democrats ran up the score in the big urban counties. They flipped longtime red suburban counties, including Denton and Collin (Paxton’s home county) and Brazoria. They ran riot through heavily Hispanic areas that Trump had flipped in 2024. Just as one example, Starr County—96 percent Hispanic—went from voting for a Republican for the first time since 1892, when they gave Trump 57 percent of the vote, to giving Talarico more than 75 percent of the vote. Paxton and Abbott and the other statewide candidates begged for rural Texas to turn out. But even in rural counties, Democrats did better than they normally do. The red wall was breached quite handily. Shit, they even won Brazos County in the heart of Aggieland.

Trump ordered up an aggressive gerrymander, to try to give the GOP five more winnable seats. But the dummymander seems to have gone bust. They tried to stimulate the lizard brains of voters, fearmongering about Muslims. But that tack fell flat. The richest man in the world, Elon Musk, wasted an ocean of cash—at least $212 million—trying to salvage Paxton. Now, he’s talking about taking his data centers to space.

It seems like Texans went into the voting booth with a vengeance, voting against anyone with an R next to their names. Let’s not take anything away from the winners. Talarico was a very strong candidate—charismatic, disciplined, an excellent fundraiser who had few, if any, major errors. Hinojosa, too, surprised a lot of observers with her creative attacks on Abbott. She was vastly outspent, but managed to land blows on Abbott over data centers, private school vouchers, and the cloud of corruption that seems to be parked over the Governor’s Mansion. But it’s also probably the case that just about any Democrat would’ve won in this environment. Trump was deeply unpopular in Texas—his approval rating was underwater by about twenty percentage points. There was a blue tsunami that swept over much of the nation, and Texas was part of it.

And yet, there likely were Texas-specific factors, too. Paxton and Hinojosa ran on an anti-corruption platform. They told a story about Texas: that the ruling political class had sold the state out to billionaires. Facts were not hard to marshal to drive the message home. Abbott’s signature policy during his twelve years as governor was private-school vouchers, which seemed to have little popular support but was a pet project of various billionaires, including Pennsylvania’s Jeff Yass, who gave Abbott at least $12 million. And just in the closing days of his campaign, Texas Monthly reported that Abbott’s Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission had discussed selling Boca Chica State Park to Musk. There were the data centers that Abbott welcomed with open arms, and the 765-kV transmission lines. And what more can be said about Ken Paxton? Corrupt, unethical, swagless. In retrospect, the question is, how did this man stay in power for so long? 

It will take some time to adjust to the new reality. The basic set of assumptions that have been operative in Texas for decades are now called into question. One is tempted to say one-party rule is over. Yet, somehow we’ve entered a new era of one-party rule. Regardless of your political persuasion, did you ever expect to see Democrats winning races in Texas from top to bottom in 2026? The parlor question—”when will Texas turn blue?”—had long ago become a cliche, a sick joke. And yet here we are. 

Yes! Voters listened to Trump, who told them to pretend he was on the ballot. And they voted accordingly. Voters elected enough Democrats to hand control of the Senate and the House of Representatives to Democrats.

Voters voted against high prices on consumer goods like groceries and gasoline, against the brutality of ICE, against Trump’s vicious deportation of law-abiding immigrants, against corruption.

Exciting news:

Georgia elected Keisha Lance Bottoms, the first Black Governor of Georgia. And the first woman.

Dr. Annie Andrews won Lindsey Graham’s Senate seat in South Carolina, beating his sister, who was selected by Trump. Think of it: South Carolina elected a Democratic Senator!

Dr. Amy Acton defeated Vivek Ramaswamy for Governor of Ohio.

Susan Collins lost her Senate seat in Maine to Democrat Troy Jackson.

Iowa and Kansas elected Democratic senators. Kansas has not elected a Democratic Senator since 1932!

As I went to sleep at 3 a.m. this morning, the Mississippi Senate race was tied. With 97% of the vote counted, Democrat Scott Colom was leading the incumbent Cindy Hyde-Smith by 28 votes. Colom is Black; Hyde-Smith is a Confederate. Mississippi!

The voters imagined that Trump and his idiotic, malicious administration were on the ballot, and they responded by giving Democrats control of Congress.

For me, the biggest news of the night was the election in Texas. Democrats won the the two big prizes: James Talarico crushed Ken Paxton to win the Senate seat. Gina Hinojosa won a decisive victory over Greg Abbott for Governor. I am hoarse from cheering and screaming.

The three biggest losers were:

  1. Trump: he asked voters to make this election a referendum on him. They did. He lost.
  2. Elon Musk: Musk moved his SpaceX business to Texas because of Greg Abbbott’s low-tax, business-friendly policies. He escaped California’s high taxes and the possibility of a billionaire’s tax. he put almost $500 million into Republican PACs. The candidates who benefited most from his money were Ken Paxton, Greg Abbott, and Vivek Ramaswamy. All of them lost. Elon Musk wasted almost $500 million in his campaign gifts.
  3. The pollsters: They were right in predicting a blue wave. I followed only one state closely, and that was Texas. The pollsters consistently underrated both Talarico and Hinojosa. Not by a little but by a lot. In the polls, Talarico usually had a lead of 2-3 points, and some pollsters showed him losing to Paxton. Gina Hinojosa occasionally led Abbott by 2 points in the polls, but most polls showed her losing to Abbott. How wrong could they be? Talarico and Hinojosa won by huge margins–not 1 or 2%, but decisive margins.Not a single pollster predicted a complete blowout in Texas.

Last night was a seismic shift in American politics. Trump’s power crumbled. Democrats can investigate the crimes and corruption of the Trump administration. Trump can’t get another Supreme Court nominee through the Senate, unless he tries to shove one through before January 1.

It’s a new day.

Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor, says that the central issue in the midterm elections is whether to continue the enrichment of the richest or to bolster the well-being of the rest of the citizenry.,

He writes:

Friends,

America makes its choice November 3.

It’s not really a choice between two parties. After all, a record 45 percent of American voters now call themselves “independent” and don’t align with either party. And most of us who still describe ourselves as Republicans or Democrats don’t have much love for whichever party we’re registered with. 

Nor will it be a choice between the “left” and the “right,” as those terms have been used for the last half-century — representing preferences by the left for more and bigger social safety nets and by the right for lower taxes. These days, big business wants more government in the form of subsidies, bailouts, no-bid government contracts, and a giant military-technology state. 

The real choice is between ever more concentrated wealth and power at the top — in the billionaire class, tech bros, Wall Street, and the C-suites of giant corporations — versus more wealth and power in what used to be the American working middle class. 

That’s what the “affordability crisis” is all about. It also underlies America’s growing concern about corruption. 

For the last few weeks it’s looked as if America was about to choose the second path, for The People and against Big Money. 

But Big Money is now striking back. Elon Musk is pouring hundreds of millions into supporting Republican candidates, as are Big Crypto, AIPAC, AI, and Trump’s MAGA Inc. (and its related super PACs). 

“Dark money” — anonymous campaign donations flowing through so-called “nonprofits,” mostly from wealthy individuals and CEOs — is also dropping into the system. 

Democratic candidates are being outspent 2-to-1 by super PACs and megadonors. More than in any midterm since the Supreme Court’s shameful Citizens United decision, Big Money is going almost exclusively to the GOP. The Supreme Court has given Republicans an additional spending advantage by allowing super PACs to work in close cooperation with candidates.

Texas’s James Talarico hasn’t taken any corporate PAC money, for example, and has an army of volunteers going door to door for him and has accumulated one of the largest small-donor war chests of any candidate in this election cycle. But his opponent, Ken Paxton, is relying almost entirely on $158 million he’s got from Musk via a Republican super PAC.

This enormous gusher of Big Money for Republicans has no regulatory oversight because the Federal Election Commission has no quorum and therefore can’t function. 

At the state level, Big Money is attacking ballot measures to increase taxes on the super-rich — such as California’s Proposition 40, a one-time 5 percent tax on billionaires. Google multibillionaire Sergey Brin is sinking hundreds of millions into defeating it. Gavin Newsom also opposes it. But another California presidential hopeful, Ro Khanna, is pushing for it, to his great credit. (Note to California voters: Vote YES on 40 and NO on the poison pills, Props 41 and 42.)

This election is the clearest contest yet between Big Money and The People. Spending by super PACs and other megadonors in the current midterms is over 50 percent higher than in the 2022 midterms, in inflation-adjusted dollars. 

I wish I were more confident that The People will prevail. Democrats are doing well in the polls, but polling is flawed when it comes to the influence of Big Money. Many so-called “low-information” voters are more likely to be swayed by media advertising and less likely to respond to polls or tell pollsters truthfully how they intend to vote. 

When this is over, if the Democrats take back the House and at least come close to retaking control of the Senate, high on their agenda must be seeking to get Big Money out of our politics — via constitutional amendment or public financing of elections (matching small-dollar donations). And also going after the source of much of the Big Money by enacting a national wealth tax. 

In the meantime: stay calm, support good candidates, do whatever you can to get out the vote, and vote as soon as you can.