Robert Hubbell summarizes Trump’s goals, as he explained them to TIME magazine in an interview. They sound remarkably fascistic. All power to the imperial President. No checks or balances. Remember and ask yourself: is this the country we want to live in? I suppose we should be glad that Trump is turning 80 this year. With any luck, he won’t have time to abolish the Constitution and make himself President-for-life.
Hubbell writes:
On a day of many important stories, the most important news came from Donald Trump’s interview with Time Magazine. See Donald Trump on What His Second Term Would Look Like | TIME. In the interview, Trump confirmed that he will attempt to exercise dictatorial powers in a second term.
We have been warned.
We ignore Trump’s threats at our peril and the peril of our democracy.
In describing his fever dream of autocratic powers, Trump said he would take (or allow) the following actions:
- Allow states to monitor the pregnancies of women to ensure they comply with abortion bans (a grotesque violation of liberty, privacy, and dignity).
- Fire US attorneys who refuse to prosecute defendants targeted by Trump (a violation of US norms dating to the creation of the Department of Justice).
- Initiate mass deportations of alleged illegal immigrants using the US military and local law enforcement (neither of which are authorized to enforce US immigration law).
- Pardon insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol on January 6.
- Prosecute President Biden (for unspecified and non-existent crimes).
- Deploy the National Guard to cities and states across America—likely those with predominately Democratic populations (presumably under the Insurrection Act, a deployment would violate the terms of the Act and implementing regulations).
- Withhold funds from states in the exercise of his personal discretion (a violation of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974).
- Abandon NATO and South Asian allies if he feels the countries are not paying enough for their own defense.
- Shutter the White House pandemic-preparedness office.
- Fire tens (hundreds?) of thousands of civil servants and replace them with Trump acolytes with dubious qualifications (other than loyalty to Trump).
Most readers of this newsletter understand the seriousness of Trump’s threats and are working tirelessly to prevent a second Trump term. But tens of millions of Americans seem oblivious or apathetic in the face of an imminent and dire threat.
If elected, will Trump succeed in achieving any of his stated goals? No—not if Democrats continue their resistance in the courts, in Congress, in state legislatures, and in the hearts and minds of most Americans.
However, whether Trump succeeds in achieving his stated objectives is beside the point. He will attempt to do so—and his attempts will tear at the fabric of democracy and destroy legal norms that have served as the bedrock of our republic since its founding.
To be clear, I am not attempting to frighten readers of this newsletter. To the contrary, I believe that we can and will defeat Trump—or outlast him, whatever it takes. But the interview confirms that we are not frantic alarmists exaggerating the threat posed by Trump.
No, far from it.
When we challenge the milquetoast, both-siderism reporting of the media or the normalization of Trump by spineless politicians, we are not overreacting. We are sounding the alarm in a responsible, necessary way. For reasons that defy comprehension, our warnings have been unheeded—often dismissed, minimized, or patronized.
We must redouble our efforts. Commit the above list to memory. Copy the URL so you can forward this newsletter or the Time Magazine article to friends, colleagues, and complete strangers who doubt that Trump is a danger to democracy. Pick two or three issues and be prepared to discuss them when the moment arises. We have been warned—and we must act accordingly.

Hi Diane–First paragraph–isn’t Trump turning 80 this year?
LikeLike
Mark, my typo!
LikeLike
Of course, Diane. I’ve read your books, so I am aware of your gifts as a stylist.
When one of these editorial comments goes into moderation (I’m doing this from a work computer, so most of my comments do now), feel free to delete it. I am, honestly, extremely self-conscious about editing your prose.
Best,
Mark
LikeLike
Don’t be hesitant, Mark. I write all my posts on my cell phone and I make mistakes. I am grateful when readers point out an error that I can easily fix.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even a braindead buffoon like Trump can learn from experience. This time around, he plans to employ his slimy, idiot sons to vet anyone who appoints to office to ensure that he or she is a goose-stepping bootlicker who will carry out orders from the boss of bosses.
LikeLike
Watch The Godfather to understand Trump
LikeLike
Exactly. He is all about kissing the . . . I started to say ring.
LikeLike
turning 70? He is 77. And I am about to turn 73 and have more than 20 years left. So we have to count on our efforts and his bad health habits
LikeLike
Sorry, he will turn 80, not 70.
My typo!!
LikeLike
Trump is a terrorist to the highest order. Plan and simple. Trump may not shoot bullets, use bombs, burn down buildings but he is still a terrorist who would use his position, if elected, to destroy democracy and the way of life in the United States and negatively affected the lives people around the world. Trump is totally an evil person.
LikeLike
While I agree that Trump is a threat, I cannot help but agree with Thom Hartman that the difference between Post-Reagan Republicans and Trump is not as great as most people think. We are deep into a hard march to the right politically that is way bigger than trump. If he does not get elected in 2024, another more rational-sounding person will appear. Already Abbott and DeSantis have put in their bids for the top guy in charge of the rightward movement. We have come to a spot where republicans are acting friendly toward Russia. We have come to a place where republicans think it is ok to commit genocide if the people are detestable enough. We have come to a place where it is ok if a woman is subservient to whatever she carries in her womb. Perhaps trump gave them some of that, but the group that elected him will transition quickly to another when he is gone.
LikeLike
Roy,
It’s worse than that. Trump has also degraded public life. He does and says things that in an earlier time would have disqualified him from running. Think John Edwards. Or Gary Hart. In the past, the public expected dignified behavior and language from
Presidential candidates. Aside from the right wing policies, he is a vile human being with no ethics or character
LikeLike
Exactly. He is the lowest of the low. An utter scumbag. Given my choice, I would not, will not have any dealings with anyone so demented or predatory or stupid as to support this man’s (I use the term loosely) candidacy. When I learn this about a person, that’s it. End of interaction.
Support for the Common [sic] Core [sic] is a litmus test for whether a person knows enough to be allowed anywhere near a school or an education policy desk. If he or she supports these puerile pseudostandards, he or she is too ignorant to be doing such a job.
If a person supports Trump, he or she is too insane, predatory, or stupid for me to want to have any truck with him or her. What kind of person supports a beast like him? A sick or opportunist or profoundly ignorant person.
LikeLike
While I agree that trump has degraded public life in the sense that certain behavior no longer destroys political figures, I am reminded that Nixon’s incursion into Cambodia, Reagan’s deal with Iran that let him circumvent legal channels of diplomacy, and Bush’s deception that led us into an ill-advised law in Iraq were also assaults on democracy, perhaps more erosion of norms than Trump has done. I am also disturbed by Obama era incursions into other nations to war on terrorism and the implications of that action.
By contrast, trump and McConnell have degraded many domestic policy norms, and has been supported by a Supreme Court that is now perceived as more corrupt and more partisan.
LikeLike
Correction. ”and has been supported by a Supreme Court that is now (xxxxxxxxx xx) more corrupt and more partisan.”
LikeLike
I mean what you know
LikeLiked by 1 person
ROFL, Roy. I hadn’t heard that phrase before. It’s awesome.
LikeLike
” . . . and complete strangers who doubt that Trump is a danger to democracy.”
It’s worse than that insofar as apparently many on the right would like nothing better than to see democracy end.
But people keep saying things like, “Don’t they realize that ‘our democracy’ is at stake?” Or, “what can we say that will get them to realize . . . . ?”
They realize it, and they want it. It was the same with the “Oh no! but the government will shut down!!”
Exactly. CBK
LikeLike