Ron DeSantis signed three bills into law today that tighten his control over higher education and restrict the curriculum to conform to his ideology. If a professor does not agree with DeSantis’ views on race, gender, culture, and history, he or she must change what they teach or find a job in another state.
There are two major contradictions in DeSantis’ approach:
1. He claims that state control over acceptable and intolerable views equates to “freedom.” If you share his views, you are free to teach them. If you don’t, your freedom is extinguished. Freedom for some is not freedom.
2. He claims that Florida intends to focus on “the classical mission of what a university is supposed to be.” But at the same time, he wants the state’s colleges and universities to become “number one for workforce education.” Is that the “classical mission” of universities? Those who know more about higher education than DeSantis would say that “the classical mission” of the university is to teach and deepen students’ knowledge of great literature, history, science, foreign languages, mathematics, philosophy, and the arts. These are not workforce studies; they do not provide “employable” skills. They are probably what DeSantis sneers at as “zombie studies.”
The Miami Herald reports:
Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday signed into law three controversial bills poised to bring major changes to Florida’s college and university systems.
In a ceremony at New College of Florida, he was flanked by a group of supporters including university system Chancellor Ray Rodrigues and Christopher Rufo, an activist known for his opposition to critical race theory and one of six trustees DeSantis appointed to the New College board in January.
DeSantis signed a measure, SB 266, that restricts certain topics from being taught in general education courses, the lower-level classes that all students must take for their degrees. It also expands the hiring and firing powers of university boards and presidents, further limits tenure protections and prohibits spending related to diversity, equity and inclusion programs beyond what is required by accreditors.
Regarding the restricted topics, the measure borrows language from last year’s Individual Freedom Act, also known as the Stop Woke Act. It targets “theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression, and privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States and were created to maintain social, political and economic inequities.”
While those ideas will be kept out of general education courses on Florida campuses, they will be allowed in higher-level or elective courses, subject to review by the Board of Governors, which oversees the university system, or the State Board of Education, which sets policy for state colleges.
DeSantis also signed HB 931, intended to prohibit “woke litmus tests” or required diversity statements, and SB 240, which supports workforce education.
Standing at the New College visitors’ center, behind a lectern with the label “Florida The Education State,” he referred to a group of protesters outside the building who grew louder as he spoke. The governor joked that he was disappointed with the size of the protest and was “hoping for more.”
He spoke of the state’s increased efforts to bring more regulation to higher education.
”It’s our view that, when the taxpayers are funding these institutions, that we as Floridians and we as taxpayers have every right to insist that they are following a mission that is consistent with the best interest of our people in our state,” said the governor, who is said to be preparing a run for president in 2024. “You don’t just get to take taxpayer dollars and do whatever the heck you want to do and think that that’s somehow OK.”
Referring to the Black Lives Matter movement, DeSantis called diversity, equity and inclusion a relatively new concept that took off “Post BLM rioting” in 2020 and “a veneer to impose an ideological agenda.” It’s better described as “discrimination, exclusion and indoctrination,” the governor said to applause.
”We’re going to treat people as individuals and not as groups,” he said.
DeSantis said he hoped the state’s higher education system will move toward more “employable majors” and away from “niche subjects” like critical race theory.
”Florida’s getting out of that game,” he said. “If you want to do things like gender ideology, go to Berkeley,” he said, referring to the University of California, Berkeley. “For us with our tax dollars, we want to be focused on the classical mission of what a university is supposed to be.”
DeSantis said SB 266 will allow presidents to run their universities instead of “a cabal of faculty.” He said he would also allocate $30 million to the Hamilton Center, a civics institute at the University of Florida, where Ben Sasse, the school’s new president, would be able to recruit faculty to join.
The budget also allocates $8 million to the civics center at Florida State University, $5 million to another center at Florida International University and $100 million to recruit and retain faculty across the state system.
HB 931 also establishes an office of public policy events within each state university to organize events on campus representing a range of viewpoints.
”I think some of the universities around the country where orthodoxy has taken hold — a lot of these students can go through for years, get a degree and never have their assumptions challenged,” DeSantis said.
He said SB 240 will support Florida’s goal of becoming No. 1 for workforce education. The bill would expand apprenticeship programs and require districts to offer work-based learning to high school students.
He said he wanted to ensure that not all students feel pressured to go down the university path and end up in debt for a degree in “zombie studies,” a term he has used often.
Also joining DeSantis was Richard Corcoran, the interim president at New College who formerly served as the governor’s education commissioner. Corcoran spoke of the school’s transformation in the weeks since he arrived, saying he had recruited high quality faculty and planned to enroll a record incoming class this fall.
He called New College “the LeBron James” of higher education.
Divya Kumar covers higher education for the Tampa Bay Times in partnership with Open Campus.
I,as a graduate of the University of Florida with a BAEd, and Florida international University with an EdD, find this fascist governor deplorable. My daughter graduated from New College and won a Fulbright due to the reputations of the faculty and recommendations of the professors. DeSantis will go down in history along with Mussolini, Putin, and other dictators. He is relentless in his drive to extinguish freedom of speech… and spends tax dollars on secret plane trips to stump for his election and SO many more things which do not benefit the people of Florida.
I think he said he was putting aside $30 million for recruiting a faculty. Without tenure, and at the risk of constantly being fired, what professor with any clout is going to want to work in this state? University of Florida is a top public university in the country. I wonder how much longer it will be when DeSantis is done with it.
Catherine, I agree.
“DeSantis will go down in history along with Mussolini, Putin, and other dictators.”
NO!
Don’t give him that much credit or praise. He’s nothing but a small time corrupt Rethuglican politician.
I think that there will be a reshuffling of faculty and administrators. Some will not be very visible: the senior administrator from my institution that was on the market this year refused to apply for any positions in the south. I am sure that is true for many others. Meanwhile my university will be shopping for faculty and students in states like Florida.
Catherine, You forgot Trump and Hitler. DeSantis has probable Hitler’s books many times and is trying to live down to those standards.
DeSantis is a FASCIST! By fiat, everyone that goes along with DeSantis and/or supports him in any way, is also a FASCIST. No matter what they call themselves, the lies they tell, a fascist is always a fascist.
How did fascists keep control?
“The fascist state seeks total control over all major parts of society. Individuals must give up their private needs and rights to serve the needs of the whole society as represented by the state. Rule by a Dictator: A single dictator runs the fascist state and makes all the important decisions.”
— The Constitutional Rights Foundation
https://www.crf-usa.org/bill-of-rights-in-action/bria-25-4-mussolini-and-the-rise-of-fascism.html#:~:text=The%20fascist%20state%20seeks%20total,makes%20all%20the%20important%20decisions.
As a companion piece to Lloyd’s linked article, there is a good article at Politico (5-14-2023), “The Religious Landscape…”
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/05/14/democrats-religion-census-secular-00095858
Thanks, Duane
DeSantis is a depository for far right buzz words including the notion of a “classical education,” aka, white education. I doubt DeSantis knows that a traditional classical education includes a strong foundation in both Latin and Greek, but what he really wants is for colleges to provide free job training for corporations in the state.
I am sure that despite his Yale and Harvard degrees, he never heard of the trivium and the quadrivium. They were the foundations of a classical education. Not job training.
Politico’s new article about “The Religious Landscape…” singles out the voting patterns in Fla. and Texas as contrasted with states where there is good news for Democrats e.g. Wis., Mich., and Penn.
Where religion wanes, the party of humanity, the Democrats, gain. The Trump party gains where religion grows.
Forty-six percent of Biden’s votes came from the non-religious.
The Politico article identifies the role of the Hispanic voters.
Who would have guessed which segment would enable the White patriarchy to govern as fascists? Answer, those who read history from Ireland’s Great Hunger to WWII’s collaborators (and, before).
”I think some of the universities around the country where orthodoxy has taken hold — a lot of these students can go through for years, get a degree and never have their assumptions challenged,” – The hypocrisy is galling. Where is anyone allowed to challenge the assumption under all these new bills he’s passing?
He called New College “the LeBron James” of higher education. – NOT FOR LONG!
ELCALDY, well
Said! No one is allowed to challenge his assumptions.
I think he said he was putting aside $30 million for recruiting a faculty. Without tenure, and at the risk of constantly being fired, what professor with any clout is going to want to work in this state? University of Florida is a top public university in the country. I wonder how much longer it will be when DeSantis is done with it.
There’s a MAJOR contradiction
in DeSantis’ approach…
Learning is NOT limited to
an institution or place or time.
He proves he’s never too old
to learn a new way of being
stupid.
He called New College “the LeBron James” of higher education. – It WAS!
“… a lot of these students can go through for years, get a degree and never have their assumptions challenged,” DeSantis said.
– isn’t that what he’s trying to do? He’s such a hypocrite.
That reference had nothing to do with education and everything to do with bigotry.
DeFascist strikes again. Himmler in thigh-highs must subvert any challenging cultural authority – medical, scientific, economic or in this case academic – lest he present anything but the god-like image of the right-wing “woke” disrupter. It says a lot that a sexually abusive prevaricating Russian asset still savages him in RepubliQan polls.
I await the first ever posting by this blog’s host and the first ever reader comments that condemn the political litmus tests at many colleges to support extreme DEI agendas. This includes lowering standards for admission, hiring faculty on the basis of immutable characteristics rather than accomplishments, shouting down non left-wing speakers, and creating classroom environments where moderate and conservative students self-censor rather than face peer and faculty repercussions for expressing opinions not in conformity with the prevailing orthodoxies. I personally know several liberal professors at various institutions who admit that academic freedom is far more limited than it used to be because of far Left control of the administrations and of the younger faculty. Many reader comments in the NY Times from professors have also lamented the current state of academia.
This condemnation will not come because Diane Ravitch and 95+% of her readers aren’t in the least bothered by left-wing censorship and pressures to conform to the preferred narratives. Principled liberals are a noble but nearly extinct species.
Erica,
You are obnoxious and insulting.
I oppose censorship whether it comes from the left or the right.
I have been consistently opposed to censorship, book banning, shouting down speakers. Read my book “The Language Police.”
I was ousted by Teachers College, Columbia University, in 1994 because I had served in the Bush administration.
I was fired in 2012 by Grover Whitehurst from an unpaid position at the Brookings Institution because I did not share his conservative views.
Of course both gave different reasons.
I have been purged by both sides.
I despise and condemn censorship. I believe in free speech.
I also condemn you, Erica Adams, for your despicable comment. Inform yourself before you open your mouth.
Diane Ravitch
I’ve read 100+ of your original postings over the last year concerning right-wing censorship. Conspicuous by its absence has been any condemnation in your original postings of left-wing censorship or the extremes of DEI on college campuses. Only in responses to other commenters do you ever claim to oppose censorship from all points on the political spectrum.
I believe that you are sincerely anti-censorship. But your extreme partisanship results in you overlooking, and not condemning in your original posts, censorship and other illiberal acts from people on your side of the political spectrum. I look forward to seeing an original post from you with a headline something like this: “Left-wing Censorship Is Also Wrong”, followed by paragraphs describing what happened to merit your condemnation.
Erica, I write what I choose. I don’t answer to you. Keep reading.
And I reiterate: your comment was obnoxious and insulting.
You effectively admit that you won’t call out your own side. You don’t want to be cancelled, and you want your new tribe to approve of you. That’s been obvious for a long time.
Erica,
Rule #1 of this blog is “never insult your host.” You have now insulted me three times. That’s enough.
“The Koch brothers have established “centers” on 300+ campuses to sell their libertarian views and support likeminded faculty.”
Yet the Right always brings up Soros. 🤔
Bringing up Soros is an anti-Semitic dog whistle. What has Soros done wrong other than support democratic causes? I admire him.
Erica could review the right wing/libertarian funding of faculty and colleges e.g. Harvard’s Graduate School of Education. She could read at the site of UnKochMyCampus.org about George Mason University.
I’ve never known a professor writing for the left who has been referred to an an intellectual prostitute.
When a faculty member writes a factual paper about the socio-economic condition of the 90%, instead of a support piece for the richest 0.1%, it reflects a professional commitment to the truth.
Erica believes propaganda. Dishonest right wingers use women like her. They convince her and other dupes that the issue is social liberalism not, the economic conservatism that guarantees the rich, get richer.
Unfortunately, people like Erica are easily riled up and distracted. They are a dream come true for Charles Koch’s network.
Most of the people at this blog believe in representative democracy. The fake “grassroots” networks of libertarians suck Erica and those like her into plutocracy.
Because Erica wants to give up her rights to collectively bargain, to fair voting, to civil rights -protected employment, etc. doesn’t mean the majority in the nation (who are better informed) want to go down the rabbit hole with her.
The Koch brothers have established “centers” on 300+ campuses to sell their libertarian views and support likeminded faculty.
Not to diminish the destructive role of the Kochs. Is this something new?
Ludwig von Mises never received a salary from NYU where he was a visiting professor in the 1940s his salary was paid by Right wing oligarchs and foundations.
“Friedrich von Hayek was conferred professorship by the University of Chicago, where he became a professor in the Committee on Social Thought Hayek’s salary was funded not by the university, but by an outside foundation, the William Volker Fund.” Who also contributed to von Mises salary.
The Chicago School of Economics was the “Committee on Social Thought ” as a part of the University of Chicago Law School. Why ? The economics department wanted nothing to do with a bunch of flakes. The University position provided an air of respectability as these same Foundations, Corporations and Business Organizations from NAM to the National Chamber spread the message equating capitalism with freedom. And Government operating for the Public good as serfdom.
IMHO. Louis Powell’s 1971 complaint about the American University can be summed up as ; not what they were teaching, but rather that they were not teaching what good money had paid for.
“The campuses from which much of the criticism emanates are supported by tax funds generated largely from American business, and contributions from capital funds controlled or generated by American business. The boards of trustees of our universities overwhelmingly are composed of men and women who are leaders in the system.
Most of the media, including the national TV systems, are owned and theoretically controlled by corporations which depend upon profits, and the enterprise system to survive.”
In spite of the Powell’s complaint American Universities and the media for have mostly served their masters well. For most of the 20th century the College educated vote leaned Republican in 2000 by 11 points. Was Al Gore a radical? Our Universities hardly producing hordes of raving socialists.
Joel, how did the Ivy League affect the views of Trump, Cruz, Hawley, DeSantis?
It seems as the the University systems have moved away from the subversive liberal arts and humanities, moving toward becoming glorified trade schools “to train students for careers “. The the fewer college graduates identify as Republicans. DeSatanist might want to reconsider.
Obviously the Ivy League churns out a fair share of right wing self serving………….
Joel-
One thing that is new, the Chicago Cubs co-owner, GOP Sen. J. Peter Ricketts, promotes the Lumen Christi Catholic Institute on the campus of the University of Chicago. He’s on the board of the Institute.
In the United Catholic/Christian States of America, forget about the need to learn Spanish and instead, learn right wing religion’s favorite language, Latin, and learn more about Catholic Vote, EPPC (and Opus Dei) to understand your governance in states and in D.C.
transitioning the discussion from “producing socialists” –
Statistics show fewer than 1/2 of college grads (46%) say religion is very important in their lives. Nearly 6 in 10 (58%) of those with no more than a high school education say the same.
46% of Biden’s votes were from the non-religious.
Erica, then why are you here? She dresses big issues. The major censorship is going through legislation right now and it’s the bigger issue from the right. You’re creating a false equivalency. The censorship on the left, while present, is not on the scale of what we’re seeing now going through state legislatures. Plus, there are enough people on that side via the Koch money train, and ALEC, that there needs to be some pushback from the left..
More Sameness, Inequity, and Exclusion (SIE)! Something to strive for!
Erica,
Perhaps you missed my post here: https://dianeravitch.net/2023/02/28/florida-the-purge-at-new-college-begins-with-elimination-of-diversity-office/#comment-3454828
Not really a condemnation, but our host and at least one frequent contributor did learn about DEI statements in hiring. You might note that an earlier post in that thread did condemn the practice.
I personally am a liberal professor who has taught at several institutions for over three decades. My observation is that the casual racism and sexism of my youth is less tolerated both on campus and in society than in the past and that in recent years some speakers have been invited to campus simply to cause a confrontation, not because they had anything interesting to say. I applaud the former, condemn the latter, but agree with the administration that any speaker invited to the university in a way that conforms to the rules must be allowed to speak.
Finally pressures to conform have always existed in every institution in society. What is, I think interesting and laudable about the current situation is that the pressure is against requiring conformity. That, I think, is a true liberal value.
Te
It’s reasonable, under the heading, free speech, to expect no blowback when a speaker is invited to a PUBLIC university, a platform paid for by the diverse taxpayers of the state, under the following conditions- (1) the speaker is known to attempt to persuade the community that people who are Black should be forced to leave the US, where they are citizens, and to go to Africa (2) he/she advocates for a return to a time when homosexuality resulted in imprisonment or castration (3) he /she provides PR for a candidate who praises Hitler’s solution (4) he/she steers students to voter mobilization efforts backing legislation that gives preference to Catholics in immigration (5) he/she describes grabbing pussy as a legal right for stars, etc.
In your world, the nation’s democracy is not fragile and not threatened by theocrats, racists, sexists, plutocrats and fascists?
Rhetorically, do you disagree with the psychologists’ opinion that behavior follows attitude?
I attempted to think of a category you would be in, one where your demographic had been oppressed and without rights. I couldn’t think of one. That might explain your largesse of attitude about speakers. When you don’t fall into a demographic that would feel legitimate threat, it’s easy to flip those who do off with, “if you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.”
Skin in the game-
I think White, heterosexual men who are not Jewish should sit this discussion out. I think men should sit out the legislative discussions about abortion. I think heterosexuals should sit out legislative discussions about homosexuality.
Thanks for the link, TE. I hadn’t gone back to look at the responses to my comment in that thread. Not at all surprised to see the usual suspects, who never met a chance to self-flagellate they didn’t like, chiming in to say they thought diversity statements are a good thing.
The University of Wisconsin last week announced that it will no longer use diversity statements. That’s fantastic news and hopefully it’s a side that the tide is turning on this Orwellian practice.
Lol, one of the usual suspects in that thread wrote that “diversity statements aren’t a solution,” but they’re a good “first step.” In other words, not only is the political litmus test a good thing, but it’s just a tiny part of the litmus test that we really need. Off the rocker.
I have no idea who you are referring to, but my own opinion that diversity statements are a good thjing comes from a relative who is a science PhD and knows about them first hand. It is not a problem except for the same cranky types of people who didn’t like it when women asked them to start using Ms instead of Miss. We get it. The old way worked for them so they want it to continue.
To reasonable scientists, there is nothing as foolish as non-scientists who believe that there was a time in the ideal past that “merit” was scientifically determined. It is the OPPOSITE of science to claim that scientists have always had a scientific measure for “merit”. It’s like saying scientists can measure “beauty”.
“Merit” is in the eye of the beholder, and the far right has politicized the word. Thus a rich white sort of okay student like Jared Kushner just has to be “qualified” to get a job or be admitted, but a Black student must “be superior to every other applicant who is not given the seat or job.”
“Merit” has never been a term. “Good enough with connections” gets privileged white applicants a special boost.
And many of the “good enough with connections” white job seekers who have always gotten jobs over applicants with more so-called merit actually shine despite their so-called “scientifically proven inferiority.” It is implicitly racist that this accepted and beloved practice to give white candidates with inferior merit the benefit of the doubt, but insist that other candidates must be scientifically proven to be superior to all others to get hired.
If for the last 20 years you haven’t been handwringing about how standards are being lowered so that inferior rich white and connected people can benefit, it just sounds racist to object only when candidates who aren’t white get that same benefit.
But LOL at anyone who says scientists agree that “merit” can be scientifically determined. Any scientist who claims that needs to be fired.
NYC
For jobs in the public sector, preference should be given to grads of public universities. Public universities are not legacy admission. The prevention of the formation of a group within government of political conspirators attached to schools like Liberty University, Georgetown and Hillsdale has great advantage.
Oh my god not the “that’s what they used to say about Ms.” again. 😂
Linda,
Public universities are not immune to admission scandals. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Illinois_clout_scandal
FLERP!,
I refer you to the brilliant Bob Shepherd’s comment:
“I’m still stuck on why anyone would want sameness, inequity, and exclusion.”
flerp!, you acknowledged being too young to recall the over the top outrage from certain folks resistant to making changes in how they refer to women. But while people took them very, very seriously at the time, nowadays they just seem foolish with their exaggerated claims that using Ms was unleashing a dangerous and destructive force on America. But back then they got a lot of positive reinforcement insulting those who were fighting for Ms to be used.
As I pointed out, “merit” can’t be scientifically determined. It depends on what society values. There was a time when society valued sameness and comfortableness. Men weren’t comfortable with women colleagues, so they found “merit” in things that would justify them hiring people they did feel comfortable with.
Now we value diversity, equity and inclusion. It’s ironic that privileged white parents will donate millions so their kid can attend a university that values diversity, equity and inclusion, when they could choose one that doesn’t. They want their kids to attend universities that value diverse student bodies whose professors often value diversity.
Maybe in the future they will donate millions so University of Austin will accept their kid,and they can brag about how “merit” was the only criteria.
I don’t understand for the life of me why anyone would object to a democratic people’s republic in North Korea. What’s wrong with democracy, or a republic of the people? I’ll just never understand it.
And what’s wrong with No Child Left Behind? Why would anyone want to leave a child behind?! It’s beyond me.
But then again that’s EXACTLY what people used to say about “Ms.”!
Words can be used to disguise, distort or confuse.
Correct. We should not take names, brands, or slogans at face value.
Right. Democrats for Education Reform = Hedge Fund Managers for Charter Schools
Again to your point about not trusting names and brands: Stand for Children switched from defending children to shilling for the foundations giving it millions
Ministry of Peace.
I’m with Flerp on this one. The idea of a pledge of loyalty to any stance (let alone examples of how you implement that stance in your teaching) makes my gorge rise.
It strikes me as some kind of lazy admin/ legal/ sop-to-donors CYA. Let them assess candidates for prowess in their fields. Let them publish their U’s mission and goals, and advise applicants for hire or tenure their adherence to those tenets will be considered in decisions for retention and advancement.
Why? Because such pledges— just like DeStalinist’s laws cited in Diane’s post— are vague, and easily manipulated as excuses for unjust firing.
IMHO, requiring DEI pledges/ statements are not baby but rather large steps— in the wrong direction.
“Principled liberals are a noble but nearly extinct species.”
That is such a nice thing to write! Noble! Just exactly what, in your opinion is noble? And what is it about that “noble-ness” that makes it “nearly extinct”?
I’m still stuck on why anyone would want sameness, inequity, and exclusion.
Your nearest gated community will have many ready answers. Or my and likely your neighborhood would do as well.
I have avoided those, Greg.
The Indifferent | John Donne
I can love both fair and brown,
Her whom abundance melts, and her whom want betrays,
Her who loves loneness best, and her who masks and plays,
Her whom the country formed, and whom the town,
Her who believes, and her who tries,
Her who still weeps with spongy eyes,
And her who is dry cork, and never cries;
I can love her, and her, and you, and you,
I can love any, so she be not true.
Will no other vice content you?
Will it not serve your turn to do as did your mothers?
Or have you all old vices spent, and now would find out others?
Or doth a fear that men are true torment you?
O we are not, be not you so;
Let me, and do you, twenty know.
Rob me, but bind me not, and let me go.
Must I, who came to travail thorough you,
Grow your fixed subject, because you are true?
Venus heard me sigh this song,
And by love’s sweetest part, variety, she swore,
She heard not this till now; and that it should be so no more.
She went, examined, and returned ere long,
And said, Alas! some two or three
Poor heretics in love there be,
Which think to ’stablish dangerous constancy.
But I have told them, Since you will be true,
You shall be true to them who are false to you.
Now, don’t any of you nasty liberals go making fun of Josh Hawley’s Manhood.
Anyone writing a book about “manhood” must be insecure about his own.
Can’t make jokes ’bout somethin’ that don’t exist. Now that I think about it, I guess you can. Kind of like the Idiot’s decency. The jokes just write themselves.
Insert reviews of Josh Hawleys manhood here:
Think of The Villages and other planned communities.
OK. The John Donne was a joke. But my previous point was not. We’ve come to a sad pass when there are people today who think that diversity is a terrible thing, that equity is a terrible thing, that inclusion is a terrible thing. WTF says, “I really wish everything were a lot more inequitable”?
Erica— I too disapprove of DEI “litmus tests” (further comment below). Whether that includes lowering stds for admission is arguable, as is the suggestion that hiring staff based on “immutable characteristics rather than accomplishment.” There are many ways to measure accomplishment. I have no issue with a state or private college adjusting their student body or staff to reflect a rough equivalent to the SES/ racial,”/ cultural makeup of region or nation.
As for “shouting down non-left speakers” on campus, remember you are responding to an article on FL laws enacted to micromanage campus doings— not how individual U’s handle controversial speakers of any stripe. Personally I could care less how partisan pundits are treated, but I agree serious academics of any persuasion should be shown courtesy—e.g., protestors restricted to outside the forum. But if we are going to zero in on the recent display at Stanford Law School, let’s keep in mind the context [how ridely and dismissively the judge responded to student questions].
I need to add that I subscribe to the NYT, and read nearly everything they publish related to education. While I read frequent complaints by profs on the academic quality of incoming freshmen in general, I have read very little that connects this to “DEI” admissions.
Is teaching about the Holocaust (oppression of groups of people) on DeSantis’ restrictive list ?
Holocaust education is mandated in the state of Florida and DeSantis is committed to continuing that (can’t alienate Jewish voters 😉). However, he’s DeSanitizing it, as well.
https://www.jta.org/2023/05/11/united-states/florida-rejects-holocaust-education-textbooks-in-clampdown-on-woke-instruction
Interesting that state has found “critical race theory” as basis to reject new takes on Jewish-American history. I wonder if they are dinging facts as recent as 1940’s (& before), when there were strict quotas on how many Jews were allowed into med studies et al professions?
As long as it is the Netanyahu-approved “6 million Jews only” narrative, it’s in there.
I’m not familiar with this narrative. What is it?
1) DeSantis is quickly turning Florida universities into glorified vocational schools. No need to bother with those pesky humanities courses that might expose students to different points of view. Just get that business or tech degree and get slotted into finance or tech.
2) We now know what institute Ben Sasse slithered off to.
Semi-related, sort of—not about this DeSantis stuff, but about workplace DEI.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/she-offered-lgbtq-themed-book-211106682.html
Well, I was wrong. A year ago, I thought that our having a President Ron DeSantis in 2024 was pretty much inevitable. But then DeSantis chose the path of political self-destruction. Here’s the thing: People elect others whom they LIKE. They elected Shrub–little Bush–because they felt, however much the Texas Christian good ole boy thing was an act, that they could “sit down and have a beer with him.” They elected in Reagan the amiable, joking Granda next door. And about 40 percent of Americans LIKE Donald Trump, despite the fact that, as one humorist put it, “even his faults have faults.”
But no one likes a Scold, a Nanny, a Browbeater, a Bully.
And petulance, peevishness, standing on stages and doing a credible imitation of a furious toddler–sputtering, gesticulating, stamping one’s foot, making fists, and turning red in the face–do not strike people as STATESMANLIKE.
What a surprise.
And then there is the provincial backwardness. In a time when almost everyone, and especially almost every young person, has embraced our LBGTQ+ brothers/sisters/others, when doing so has become one of the two or three most common themes of pop culture arts (music, film, television, video, games), he has chosen to go after drag queens. Who except Christian fundamentalist nutcases has anything against drag queens, for crying out loud. In a state where people go to get away from it all and let their hair down, where a lot of people get pregnant who don’t want to be, he has chosen to go after abortion. Oh, and guess what? Half of the people of Florida are women–what a surprise!–who are now being told that they can’t make their own decisions about their own bodies. In a state with an enormous agricultural sector that employs a lot of migrant workers, he has chosen to go after migrants. And he is at war with one of his largest employers–with a company that is almost universally beloved. So, now he is ___ing off and freaking out big industry in his state and elsewhere.
It was his to lose. Has he? Unless he changes course soon, he has. It’s over.
Hmmm. How do I make myself popular with a majority of the electorate? I KNOW. I’LL GO TO WAR WITH AN EXTRAORDINARILY POPULAR MAKER OF MOVIES FOR KIDS AND THEIR PARENTS.
Yeah, that should work really well.
I read a comment by a Republican legislator in Florida who thinks DeS is being silly fighting Disney. He says the issues will be in litigation for the next few years. A new governor will be elected who says, let’s move on.
Yes.
Abortion may actually hurt DeSantis in the primaries. Trump is rhetorically carving out the “moderate” position on that issue, painting DeSantis as too extreme.
Florida is one of many Southern states where people are against divorce and abortion and have lots and lots of divorces and abortions. LOL. Yeah, this will hurt him, as will his refusal to take a firm stance in favor of Ukraine.
Yeah, but yet they still voted for him a second time. He squeaked by the first time but won by double digits the second, after people already had a taste of him.
It’s funny, I grew up in South Florida and never felt like I lived in the South. My family came down during the great migration from the north east in the 70s everyone I knew was pretty much from up north, but now the deep south is infiltrating this area.
But this was before he went gangbusters with the culture wars and BEFORE he signed the six-week abortion ban.
Yes, but he was already an a-hole, doing things like yelling at kids in masks.
Those in Florida and the other 49 states who don’t know they are living in the United Catholic/Christian States of America, are ill-informed.
A panel of 3 judges (in Louisiana, the state in the South unique for its high percentage of Catholics) will hear the scheduled federal abortion pill appeal. Each judge has a history of chipping away at abortion rights. One of the three recused herself from a bankruptcy hearing involving the Catholic Church after the AP reported that she had contributed tens of thousands of dollars to an archdiocese.