Columnist Thom Hartmann warns of the dangerous overreach by Congressman Jim Jordan, enabled by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. Jordan and other House radicals intend to spend the next two years investigating government employees, in hopes of discrediting the Biden administration and critics of Traitor Trump.
He writes:
This column could get me thrown in jail.
And the fact that I’m even thinking that way is the entire point of Jim Jordan’s new Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, a subcommittee of the Judiciary Committee which Jordan chairs.
This is the same Congressman Jordan who voted to overthrow democracy and make Trump America’s first dictator on January 7th, 2001, who finally admitted he talked with Trump several times during the insurrection, and then defied the January 6th Committee’s request to tell them and America what Trump was doing on that fateful day.
He and his fellow fascist seditionists want Americans to be afraid of them, particularly Americans who may be in a position to identify their crimes and hold them to account.
Frankly, I’d be pretty low on their list. Just like the notorious Republican Senator Joe McCarthy back in the 1950s, Jordan and his buddies appear focused on using their power to intimidate those who have actual legal power. Like the FBI, IRS, regulators, and elected officials.
But it would be foolhardy to think they won’t go after members of the press. Or whatever they’re calling people like me these days: “fake news,” “lamestream media,” or the Lügenpresse in the original German.
The Committee will have the power to pry-bar their way into ongoing investigations, terrorizing agencies and government employees looking into Republican participation in the attempted coup of January 6th and the weeks around it.
They’ve even acquired, in yesterday’s vote, the power to access and use top-secret information normally reserved to the highly-vetted members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
Sources and methods. How the FBI knows which seditionist Members of Congress were involved in giving tours or conspiring with Proud Boys. Secrets Putin or the Saudi’s would pay billions for, as they apparently already have with Jared Kushner and Donald Trump.
As congressman Ruben Gallego said yesterday, it’s “as if we gave the mafia the right to investigate the Southern District of New York attorney’s office.”
Congressman Adam Schiff calls it The Coverup Committee. He’s right, but it’s worse than just that.
They’ve proclaimed their desire to intimidate the FBI, the Capitol Police, America’s spy agencies, and any politician who might show the temerity to suggest traitors should be held accountable for their treason.
We’ve seen this movie before, complete with the bombast, threats, lies, and bullying. And it tells us a lot about what we can expect over the next two years.
On February 9, 1950, an obscure first-term Senator who’d lied about his military service to get elected, Joe McCarthy, gave the first speech of a 5-city tour before a Republican women’s group in Wheeling, West Virginia. Apparently wanting to stir up some buzz, he pulled a random piece of paper from his pocket, waved it theatrically, and claimed it was a list of “205 known communists” who worked at the State Department.
Americans were worried about communists then, with some justification. The “communist miracle” was widely acknowledged under Stalin as just another form of brutal anti-democratic tyranny. Stalin had starved four million Ukrainians to death in what was known as the Holdomor, while he was imprisoning his own citizens in brutal gulags. The Soviet Union had exploded their first nuclear weapon just six months earlier, and that June North Korea, with help from the USSR, would invade South Korea.
By the end of McCarthy’s tour that month, reaching Salt Lake City, he’d reduced his claim to 57 communists in the State Department; in other cities he’d claimed the number was 81. It’s entirely possible he simply couldn’t keep track of his own lies.
In any case, no such list existed. Right up to the day he drank himself to death, May 9, 1957, McCarthy never was able to name a single communist in the State Department. But his demagogic claim got him on the front pages of newspapers across America.
McCarthy and his right-hand man Roy Cohn (later Donald Trump’s mentor) terrorized people working in the US government.
Being dragged before his Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations was a career-ender: over 2000 government employees lost their jobs because of his baseless accusations and innuendo.
In 1950, The Progressive magazine called McCarthy:
“[A]n ambitious faker living by his wits and guts, a ruthless egotist bent on personal power regardless of the consequence to his country, a shrewd and slippery operator with the gambler’s gift for knowing when and how to bluff.”
Even average Americans trembled before McCarthy, who was stepping into the anti-communist game late.
Three years earlier the “Hollywood Ten” (Alvah Bessie, Herbert Biberman, Lester Cole, Edward Dmytryk, Ring Lardner, Jr., John Howard Lawson, Albert Maltz, Samuel Ornitz, Adrian Scott, and Dalton Trumbo)— none of them particularly rich or famous — had all been sent to prison for a year for refusing to acknowledge subpoenas and submit to public interrogation by McCarthy’s peers on the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC).
Their crime? Most were writers and one, Ring Lardner Jr., had written an op-ed very much like this one in which he noted:
“One of the first acts of the Republicans who took control of Congress in 1946 (for the first time in 20 years) was to convert a temporary committee [HUAC], which had been investigating fascist sympathizers during the war, into a permanent [committee] concentrating on the … left…”
Off he went to prison.
And now, today, Jim Jordan and his colleagues have that same power of subpoena that was so bluntly wielded by McCarthy and his Republican collaborators when I was a kid.
We’ve been hearing about changes that the Republicans are making here and there in Congress since they’ve seized power, but now the full picture is coming into focus. I worried and warned about this two years ago in my book The Hidden History of American Oligarchy.
For example, back in April of 2009 the FBI/DHS issued a report titled: “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.” It had been prepared during the presidency of George W. Bush, but Obama was now president when it was released and the reaction from the right was immediate.
John Boehner said the report was “offensive and unacceptable” and was particularly outraged that it used the word “terrorist” to, in Boehner’s words, “describe American citizens who disagree with the direction Washington Democrats are taking our nation.”
That mild response caused Obama to essentially pull the report.
But imagine if such a report were issued today by the FBI. Jordan’s new committee could call before it — as McCarthy did in the 1950s — the actual government employees who’d done the research and written it.
Their careers would be destroyed, their homes and families under constant death threat, their lives turned upside down.
It would be a long time before any other federal employee would dare expose terrorism on the American right.
This is how fascists behave. It’s how they’ve behaved throughout history. It’s how they get what they want.
Unless you confront them with overwhelming resistance, you can’t negotiate with them; they keep taking more and more right up to the point of using violence.
I hope I’m wrong, but everything I’m seeing tells me this is exactly the direction Republicans in the House are moving.
We’ve entered the new McCarthy era, and Kevin is doing everything he can to empower Jordan as the new Joe.
Only this time the goal isn’t just feeding the ego of an alcoholic narcissist: it’s to end democracy in the United States.
Yes! Here’s a column I wrote on the New McCarthyism (published by Yahoo, The Chillicothe Gazette, etc). “Facing A New McCarthyism
By Jack Burgess
When I was a boy in the late ‘40’s, I saw seemingly endless newspaper headlines about “McCarthyism.” At first I thought the term referred to Charlie McCarthy, the famous comic puppet millions of us listened to on radio—if you can imagine listening to a puppet on radio. But McCarthyism wasn’t funny, as it referred to the political tactic of smearing one’s political opponents with wild, “big lie” tactics in order to derail their programs and further your own. Sen. Joe McCarthy of Wisconsin was its namesake, though he had help from others, including Rep. Richard Nixon, who came to fame serving on the infamous House Un-American Activities Committee.
Basically, Republicans of the ‘40’s had lost power to Franklin Roosevelt and the many benefits of his New Deal of the ‘30’s, and suffered then, as Republican politicians do now, from their unwillingness or inability to put forward any major ideas that would tax or inconvenience their wealthy donors. So they try to win elections by making their opponents out to be bad people—back then it was calling people communists or “fellow travelers.” Sen. Joe McCarthy—called “Jumpin’ Joe” for his tendency to jump to conclusions—hurt a lot of innocent people with his wild allegations, but I don’t think he ever uncovered anyone really threatening our nation. He was so infamous that a comedy record was made about him, called “Point of order!” relating to his habit of interrupting other speakers with that phrase. When he attacked the Army, he was finally asked, “Have you at last no sense of decency?” and censured by the US Senate. He died not long after that, a disgraced man.
The story of Sen. Joe McCarthy—not to be confused with Sen. Eugene McCarthy, a liberal Democrat who ran for President in ’68—has a thread that ties to the story of today’s Republican Speaker, Kevin McCarthy. More than a thread, really, was the role of Sen. Joe McCarthy’s lawyer, Roy Cohn, who later became the lawyer of a New York businessman under investigation for Civil Rights violations—Donald Trump. Former President Trump, of course, was a key backer in Kevin McCarthy’s rise to the House Speakership.
Given Mr. Trump’s ties to the smear-master, Roy Cohn, we shouldn’t have been surprised by Trump’s use of the famed “big lie” tactics in his career, as in his rise to power with lies about Obama’s birthplace and his fearmongering about the mostly peaceful folks seeking refuge at our nation’s borders.
The question now is whether Kevin McCarthy and his allies, including Rep. Jim Jordan from St. Paris, Ohio—not Urbana, as folks from there point out—will be as disruptive as Jumpin’ Joe—or worse. News reports say that McCarthy and his allies will try to cut Social Security, Medicare, and other government programs—regardless of the terrible effect on millions of ordinary Americans everywhere. True, the Democrats control the Senate and the Presidency, but they need the House to raise the debt ceiling—an artificial construct no other country is saddled with—and the McCarthy-Republicans seem quite willing to sink our national economy and hurt millions of people just to hang on to power. Constitutional lawyers disagree or what can legally be done to circumvent the debt ceiling law, but the very threat of shutting down our national government or cutting pensions makes me remember the original McCarthyism, and want to ask, “Have you at last no decency?” Or, “Are you just a puppet for Trump?”
And for readers who are not on Social Security, government payrolls at the VA, Post Office, etc., remember that everyone’s spending is interconnected. Without the spending of retiree’s and government workers, many businesses would lose a lot of customers. That’s a recipe for disaster for everyone.
Some in the corporate media and the military-industrial complex are worried about social spending.
So buckle your seatbelt, America. It looks like we’re in for a bumpy ride. Unless Speaker Kevin McCarthy can find his decency before our national plane crashes. Or pilot Biden can work a miracle.
Jack Burgess is a retired history teacher and a former Chief of Arbitration Services for The State of Ohio.
One startling comment I heard a few years back was John Meacham telling Joe Scarborough that we should remember when Joe McCarthy was run out of Washington he still had the support of about 33% of America. Too many in America are willing to run into this MAGA fire. A cautionary tell if there was ever one.
Agreed
Well done, Jack. Thanks for sharing this.
“Or pilot Biden can work a miracle.”
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. . .thanks for the good laugh!
An OVERALL comment…
What a range of posts on here today. From the Abbott Elementary TV series to the parental rights charade in Florida to the New McCarthyism.
What does it take to get a link to this blog added to the Drudge Report?
Diane and the people on this site are hands down more interesting and relevant than many of the bloated, outdated and/or snarky for snark’s sake pundits linked by Drudge right now…
Oh, wait, that describes a good portion of the “right” these days…..
Off topic, but here’s a Twitter thread that Linda will be interested in.
One almost wishes there were a hell so that Leo could rot in it.
The more people know about Leo, the greater the awareness of the most significant threat to the U.S.- the axis of the despot and those who have weaponized religion.
Reports about the e-mails of anti-abortion Rep. Fred Deutsch but, no mention of his religious sect…
Thanks for the link, Flerp.
David Brooks and the Teneo network- no surprise.
So far, the strategy of these MAGA representatives is to yell and bully those being investigated from their perch on Dias. Chris Hayes showed a clip of a labor leader demonstrating how to handle such bloviators: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCJo8MxGGUk
Priceless
The news about the wing of the Republican Party still controlled by Traitor Trump’s MAGA RINOs gets more disturbing by the day. Now it is apparent that they being selected to take over control of the Republican Party in the House (Congress).
And its definitely the tale wagging the Republican dog…
Indeed it does, Lloyd
The OPPOSITE of Thugs like Kevin or Joe McCarthy would be this.
“The Biden-Harris Administration is pushing for bold investments to ensure all students have equitable access to schools that welcome and support them, inspire their love of learning, and prepare them to succeed in whichever career they choose.” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona.
The Biden Budget Education 2024 proposal revives initiatives.
Including tuition-free community college and universal preschool.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/09/biden-budget-proposal-speech-live-updates/
what a difference!
While I applaud free community college and free technical information, I would add that this has been a reality here in Tennessee for several years, a program enacted by Republicans (there seems to be no opposition here in Tennessee). So why would Republicans want free college and at the same time elevate tuition at traditional colleges? This question takes us to the heart of what is dangerous about the policy of free community college.
Most two year programs are forward looking and very beneficial to those who go for the training, which is usually very specific. True, community colleges offer the traditional gen-Ed courses, but they are increasingly focused on tech-Ed things associated with particular industries, often local industries that use these programs to train people directly for jobs in their factory. Nothing wrong with any of this except for one thing: is the industry paying its fair share? My guess is that the answer is no. Seems to me industry has found another way to get someone else to pay for what it needs.
McCarthyism was evil, but it never threatened the existence of governing itself. I’ve become a big fan of UK talking head James O’Brien, check into his opening bits every now and then. The big kerfuffle over there is a tweet football legend Gary Lineker made comparing government policies with Germany 1933. Predictably, the establishment is going nuts, and since Lineker works for the BBC, his job is in jeopardy. Note how O’Brien deftly handles this and focuses on what matters. The only one comparable today in the US is Medhi Hasan.
Lineker, the most popular football commentator in Britain and legendary player, was fired by BBC today for sending a tweet that compared current British policy on immigration to Nazi policy in 1933. Talk about canceling! Makes the clip above even more on the mark.
He’s really good! Thank you!
All the right wing appointees to the BBC board explains why I have seen so much coverage of US politics there that simply repeats the right wing narratives.
OMG Matt Taibbi!! Anyone who gets their news from Taibbi looks like an embarrassing hypocrite criticizing any other media.
I just heard Taibbi under oath being the most embarrassing weasel of a hired shill for Elon Musk. He isn’t a journalist anymore, if he ever was one. He could not even admit under oath that he started profiting once he become Elon Musk’s recipient of the selectively chosen twitter files that Elon Musk wanted promoted.
Taibbi couldn’t just admit he earned any money. Instead he testified under oath that if you earn a lot of money and spend a lot of money, that “it’s a wash”.
I love that new rule for people who think Matt Taibbi is a trustworthy source. A rich person shouldn’t pay higher taxes because he is earning money AND spending money, so it’s a wash. And remember, rich people can hire lots of people who have to do what he tells them to keep their salary, and that means that the rich person has not really made that money and “it’s a wash”.
Taibbi under oath just repeated the right wing billionaire narrative of rich people being the “job creators” so their vast wealth doesn’t count if they use it to hire people to work for them and do what they want them to do.
There are certainly many EXCELLENT voices on the left who care about truth who should be trusted. But anyone who cites Taibbi as their source should understand why no one else is convinced when they can’t cite anyone except an untrustworthy “job creator”, just like his boss Elon Musk.
Why shouldn’t journalists be paid for their work? You may not like what Matt Taibbi writes, but to deny that he has a decades-long record of journalistic work is silly.
James Eales,
Real journalists who are paid for their work will SAY they are paid for their work! They don’t deny being handsomely paid for their work by citing the right wing billionaires’ favorite defense for paying low taxes – that they used that money to “create jobs”.
Like I say, if you trust a guy who won’t just admit he made a lot money, but instead claims that it is a “wash” because he “SPENT” the money he earned, then that speaks for itself. Lots of right wing billionaires including Taibbi’s pal Elon Musk believe that “job creators” who make a lot of money are special, and so does Taibbi.
I find that argument ridiculous, but if you also believe it is true that making money doesn’t count if you spend it, and making money doesn’t count if you create jobs, then I can see why you would trust like minded people like Taibbi and the right wing Republicans who love him.
And I can understand why you would hate Bernie Sanders now, since Bernie understands that making money is making money, and the far right billionaires and their minions who swear under oath that all the money they earned is “a wash” if they spent it – especially if they spent it hiring people who have to obey them.
Bernie would NEVER lie under oath and claim that the money he earned from a speech is a “wash” because he hired someone to do something he wanted them to do. Because Bernie is honest. He would just say “I got paid”. People like Taibbi lie and mislead because they know they did something wrong.
“You made money. Yes or no?”
Taibbi: “I think it’s probably a wash, honestly.”
“No. You have made money that you did not have before, correct?”
Taibbi:“But I’ve also spent money that I didn’t have before.”
James Eales, if you agree with Taibbi’s right wing billionaire perspective on making money, then own it.
If you believe a whistleblower who risks his job and livelihood is no braver than a guy who gives a hack journalist access to the information his billionaire boss wants to be public, then we have nothing more to discuss. There have been brave people who deserve to be called whistleblowers, and Taibbi insults them all by implying that their motives could be the same as Taibbi’s source – they just wanted to please their very rich boss by telling a journalist what their very rich bosses want the journalist to tell the public. Whistleblowers and PR flacks are the same, says Taibbi. If you agree, own it.
“Why shouldn’t journalists be paid for their work?”
That herring’s so red, I think you may be a Commie!
Not sure I’ve ever seen someone sell their integrity in real time like that before.
The bias in most reporting at the NY Times or WaPo can be be explained sociologically by the desire to be in elite circles and the group think at these papers. . Examples (there probably are better ) : It is far more appealing to wine and dine at Davos with Jeff Bezos and World leaders than it is at the bar in Midtown with Joe Construction Worker. Or Wall Street bankers and Billionaires pushing Charter Schools. Lunch with Bill and Malinda or Joe English teacher from the Bronx who the reporter picks up the lunch tab for. All too often this is reflected in the reporting.
But cases like Taibbi or Greenwald seem to be rooted in their psychological need to be relevant . Their egos getting in the way of their reporting.
“It is far more appealing to wine and dine at Davos with Jeff Bezos and World leaders than it is at the bar in Midtown with Joe Construction Worker.”
No, it’s not!
Greenwald appeared several times on Tucker Carlson show. Sad.
Can we also talk about how Taibbi INTENTIONALLY made a mockery of whistleblowers?
When a journalist is given access to information controlled by a rich and powerful man who wants his narrative amplified, that information wasn’t provided by a “whistleblower”. A whistleblower gives reporters information at risk of their job. A whistleblower is not a rich and powerful man who controls the company and want some shill to publicize a narrative for him that uses the information he owns. Nor is a whistleblower someone who gets the media to write the story the rich and powerful man wants using the information the rich and powerful man controls.
That’s called a PUBLIC RELATIONS person. Not a “whistleblower”. There aren’t journalistic ethics to protect PR hacks.
Brave people speak out when they see wrong, at the risk of their jobs. They don’t give information to co-opted reporters that their rich and powerful boss who owns that information wants out there.
And protecting a rich and powerful source – or someone who is doing his bidding – from criticism because you wrote a story he wanted is not protecting a “whistleblower”.
NYCSP,
Thanks for clarification.
Elon Musk is no whistleblower.
Diane,
If you don’t already know about him, the wonderful actor Pedro Pascal has come out as a huge friend of the LGBTQ community (he has a trans sister). The HBO show “The Last of Us”, which stars him and the non-binary young actor Bella Ramsey who co-stars with him in it, is brilliant.
And to top it off, the show runner of “The Last of Us” is Ted Cruz’ former freshman year roommate at Princeton and was the guy who tweeted a few years ago about how much he despised Cruz. (He’s been off twitter, but was very outspoken and hilarious).
Thanks for the recommendation.
We have been watching “Will Trent, “ good crime show.
I started the Will Trent series because over the last 10 or 12 years, I’ve read every single Karin Slaughter book, including her Grant County and Will Trent series (which eventually combine as the characters from each series meet one another). Plus all her stand alone novels. The first episode was good, so I will probably get back to it even though I already know the ending! Slaughter’s later books are more interesting than her early books (which had too many serial killers), and a few later books have flashbacks from decades ago about the difficulties of being a female police officer in Atlanta in the early days when they were rare. Thanks for reminding me to continue the series!
Ladies and gentlemen, Speaker of the House, United States Representative Kevin NeoMcCarthy.
Authoritarianism-
From the site of the Ivy League Christian Union- “Weeding Out Divisive People” – the statement begins with a quote from Titus 3:10-11, warn him twice then have nothing more to do with him, knowing that he’s warped and sinful.
The Christian group’s post, “Understanding and Responding to the Transgender Movement,” is the work of Ryan T. Anderson.
Evan Baehr is identified in the new Pro Publica report about Leonard Leo. Baehr’s bio at The Federalist site lists the Ivy league Christian Union.
America is an ever-increasing theocracy.
Ryan T Anderson is president of the D.C.-located EPPC.
The Ivy League Christian Union – seven board members, all men. They “network leaders,” “working to develop Christian leaders,” “transform the culture of these campuses spiritually, intellectually and socially.”
Evan Baehr’s bio also lists the New Canaan organization which has grown nationally to 60 chapters and internationally has 3 chapters. It is about “living in pursuit of Jesus.” The Baehr bio also lists the Beckett Fund, a legal firm for conservative religious cases and, the Lily Foundation. Lilly’s grants, identified by religious sect, are listed on line.
Evan Baehr’s startup, Outbox (reportedly, Baehr has ties to Peter Thiel), “aimed to takeover the US Postal Service.” Louis DeJoy, Trump’s pick to head the US Postal Service, whose plans came under fire by Democrats, is conservative
religious.
Recent Al Franken podcast with Sheldon Whitehouse restates what you’ve been teaching us:
https://alfranken.com/listen/senator-sheldon-whitehouse-on-the-rights-50-year-scheme-to-capture-scotus
Senator Whitehouse has brilliantly exposed the role of Dark Money. But since so many of his colleagues are implicated.