The GOP is always in search of slogans that rile up their angry base and distract them from the fact that the Republicans have no new ideas or policies to improve anyone’s life, other than tax cuts for the 1%.
Thus, the GOP wants to ban “critical race theory” in the schools, even though it is taught as a graduate course in some law schools, not K-12. They want to ban books about race and gender. Their current slogan is “parental rights,” which means that parents must approve what is taught. “Parental rights” is an insanely slippery slope because parents do not agree. Some white parents want to ban Black history, but other parents—Black and white—don’t. Which parents get to control the curriculum?
The Miami Herald editorial board published an editorial criticizing the far-right extremists of “Moms for Liberty,” who have seized on the issue of “parental rights.”
The Miami Herald editorial board says that “parental rights” is not about “true education. It’s another shot fired in Florida’s culture wars.” This effort to replace the professional judgment of teachers with the grievances of rightwing extremists explains why the state of Florida has thousands of vacancies in teaching.
Perhaps there’s no more potent political strategy — and misnomer — than the appropriation by conservatives of the term “parental rights.”
Gov. DeSantis has announced he is targeting more than a dozen school board members in next year’s elections, including Miami-Dade County’s Luisa Santos, who’s considered liberal. The Republican vision for school boards is “pro-parent” and “pro-kids,” in the words of Republican Party of Florida Chair Christian Ziegler, the Herald reported.
Their narrative goes that to be “pro-parent” you must not want your children exposed to topics like “critical race theory,” or you only support a whitewashed version of this country’s history of racism. Being pro-kid means you don’t want them to learn that there are men who date men, women who date women and people who don’t identify with the gender assigned to them at birth. It means you want school libraries sanitized from content that might offend your sensibilities.
It means that there’s one way to look at America and education and anyone with a different opinion be damned, called names like leftist, communist, anti-American.
It’s as if only groups like Moms for Liberty represent what parents want. The group seems more preoccupied with banning books than concerned that too many kids in our schools cannot read at grade level. The leader of its Miami chapter once called the protests after the death of George Floyd at the hands of police “race wars” and repeated QAnon conspiracy theories on Instagram, Politico reported.
To be a parent, under this definition, means to be a conservative in the most extreme sense of the word. So much for the parents who want teachers to speak freely in the classroom. And what about Black parents who want their children’s life experiences to be reflected in school material and who worry their children will suffer from Florida’s attack on how educators can discuss race? They, too, have a right to recourse when their public schools fail to follow a state mandate that Black history be taught. The Herald reported this month that only 11 of Florida’s 67 school districts have developed a plan for teaching African-American studies, and that DeSantis and the Legislature have in the past rejected requests for more resources.
Very little is said about these parents in the so-called parental-rights movement. But, oh, watch out for teachers and librarians indoctrinating our children!
It’s undeniable that there are many parents who agree with DeSantis, who won reelection in November by a margin unheard of in Florida. Without a doubt, the momentum turned in favor of conservatives after parents of all political stripes became frustrated with school closures and mask mandates during the pandemic. If hindsight is 20-20, closing schools did do some damage, as evidenced by declining student achievement across the country. That has turned the assumption that school officials know best how to educate students on its head. Still, closing schools also likely saved many lives, which should count for something.
However, what should have led to a healthy debate on parental participation in education, unfortunately, has been co-opted by culture wars.
Politics 101 says that anger and frustration are the best motivators. People don’t usually organize to keep things as they are. There’s no organized movement to counter or redefine what parental rights mean. Where are the “Moms for the Truth” or “Dads for the Proper Teaching of History?”
The groups that do exist are getting overshadowed by groups like Moms for Liberty, which DeSantis and the media have propped up as the only valid version of parental dissatisfaction with public education.
DeSantis and the Republican Party aren’t hiding their agenda to transform school boards from local nonpartisan bodies into an arm of partisan politics. Opposition has all but been neutered as the Democratic Party has pretty much given up on Florida.
Without a clear opposing point of view on what parental rights means, the loudest voices will dominate. Soon, local control over K-12 will be replaced with a top-to-bottom remake of education that serves only one type of parent and one — blindered — way of thinking.
Reblogged this on dean ramser and commented:
the GOP wants to ban “critical race theory” in the schools, even though it is taught as a graduate course in some law schools, not K-12. They want to ban books about race and gender. Their current slogan is “parental rights,” which means that parents must approve what is taught. “Parental rights” is an insanely slippery slope because parents do not agree. Some white parents want to ban Black history, but other parents—Black and white—don’t. Which parents get to control the curriculum?
From the many posts shared on this blog, It looks like the Miami Herald could teach the New York Times a thing our two.
I was just starting to post the same thing.
It is nice to see that there are still real journalists at the Miami Herald. They QUESTION and CHECK what those in power tell them. At the NYT and other national papers, too many reporters are stenographers of whatever “truth” their favorite (i.e. connected to the very rich and powerful) sources tell them, and they angrily defend their sycophancy by pointing to the disclaimer they bury that says something like “union teachers disagree.”
https://cepr.net/does-being-balanced-at-the-new-york-times-mean-giving-the-right-space-to-lie/?fbclid=IwAR23vi65dPOS6MuulWjgv6dNqzkgI5bliVER8z9-Gich7_i35HKU3HdZCA4
Thanks, Joel. Haven’t seen that blog before and it has some very good stuff.
You have to admit as a more local paper they have a lot more material to work with .
Though as Chris Hayes said the other night;
“the Right sees the NY Times as Liberal, I might disagree. ”
So might I. For a daily dose of Fact Checking WaPo and the NY Times, on economic issues check out Dean Bakers “Beat the Press”
Joel,
Dan Froomkin is a pretty good media critic. Today he linked to an excellent Washington Post story about the parents who don’t agree with the faux parental “rights” movement in Florida.
But….
The article was written by the PARENTING columnist at the Washington Post! Not a political reporter.
When the co-opted and lazy “I’ll phone my powerful source for a quote” political reporters/stenographers at the NYT and Washington Post fail miserably, so glad that there are still some reporters with integrity left.
Yeah, teach em how to call reactionary xtian fundie theocrats/theofascists “conservatives”. Oh, wait the NYT already does that also
THEY ARE NOT CONSERVATIVES!!!
(Yes, I’m screaming that)
Agreed. These are not people who conserve anything except the ability of their donors to be as rapacious as they wish.
The opt-out movement among parents was a real movement started by parents whose kids actually took tests and cared about it. The media barely covered them because they did not have backing that these billionaire-funded shills for right wing censorship have.
Corporate front journalism protects the interests of the wealthy while it turns a blind or critical eye on protests from working folks. That’s not fair or balanced.
DeSantis wants to make school board candidates declare their political affiliation in order to make it easier for him to target them in elections. His goal is to marginalize and vilify liberals and turn school board elections into a partisan circus.
“His goal is to. . . .”
It’s not just his goal. The regressive xtian fundie theocrats have been working towards this point since the 70s. They will blow their wad once again thinking that they can be the masters, especially of baiting the other side into using their disseminating language, but the demographics and time are against their insidious myths.
As I’ve noted previously, the attack on public schools is not some spontaneous “parent rights” outburst. It’s orchestrated. It’s being funded and set into motion, in any number of cases, by right-wing “Christians” at the Council for National Policy, a far-right group that had outsized-influence with the Trump administration.
Richard DeVos, husband of Betsy, has been president of CNP twice. Ed Meese, who helped Reagan cover up the Iran-Contra scandal, has been president of CNP. So has Pat Robertson. And Tim LaHaye.
Current and former CNP members include Cleta Mitchell, the Trump lawyer who was on that call to the Georgia Secretary of State demanding that he find Trump more than 11,780 votes, and Charlie Kirk, head of Turning Point USA who bragged about bussing tens of thousands of people to the January 6th ‘Stop the Steal’ rally and insurrection.
Two of the top people at the Federalist Society, Eugene Meyer and Leonard Leo, are also CNP members. (Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett were high priorities for the Federalist Society and for CNP). Ginni Thomas, the seditionist wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, is a member. So is Stephen Moore, the wacko economist that Trump wanted to appoint to the Federal Reserve but ultimately didn’t because he owed his ex-wife $300,000 in back alimony and child support. Moore was an economic “advisor” to the campaign of current Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin, even though he’s been dead wrong about virtually all of his economic predictions. Moore helped Sam Brownback ruin the economy of Kansas.
The Council for National Policy is interconnected to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the State Policy Network and Tea Party Patriots and a host of other right-wing groups. This is – in fact – the vast “right-wing conspiracy” that Hillary Clinton complained about.
Did this “new” Republican Southern Strategy work? Well, Youngkin won his campaign for governor. Exit polls showed that Youngkin won 62 percent of white voters, and 76 percent of non-college graduate whites. And, Youngkin got way more of the non-college white women votes (75 percent) than his opponent, former Democratic governor Terry McAuliffe.
Here’s how the NY Times explained it:
“Republicans have moved to galvanize crucial groups of voters around what the party calls ‘parental rights’ issues in public schools, a hodgepodge of conservative causes ranging from eradicating mask mandates to demanding changes to the way children are taught about racism…Glenn Youngkin, the Republican candidate in Virginia, stoked the resentment and fear of white voters, alarmed by efforts to teach a more critical history of racism in America…he released an ad that was a throwback to the days of banning books, highlighting objections by a white mother and her high-school-age son to ‘Beloved,’ the canonical novel about slavery by the Black Nobel laureate Toni Morrison…the conservative news media and Republican candidates stirred the stew of anxieties and racial resentments that animate the party’s base — thundering about equity initiatives, books with sexual content and transgender students on sports teams.”
UVA political analyst Larry Sabato described the Youngkin Critical Race Theory strategy this way:
“The operative word is not critical.And it’s not theory. It’s race. What a shock, huh? Race. That is what matters. And that’s why it’s sticks. There’s a lot of, we can call it white backlash, white resistance, whatever you want to call it. It has to do with race. And so we live in a post-factual era … It doesn’t matter that [CRT] isn’t taught in Virginia schools. It’s this generalized attitude that whites are being put upon and we’ve got to do something about it. We being white voters.”
Check the exit polls:
WHITE WOMEN COLLEGE GRADS
VA 2020: 58% Biden, 41% Trump
VA 2021: 62% McAuliffe, 38% Youngkin
WHITE WOMEN NON-COLLEGE
VA 2020: 56% Trump, 44% Biden
VA 2021: 75% Youngkin, 25% McAuliffe
This is who Glenn Youngkin is, and it’s who Virginia and national Republicans are. They hate public schools, and they mask their racism with phony “Christianity” and “parents rights.”
But they are not fooling most people.
“than the appropriation by conservatives of the term “parental rights.””
GDit. They aren’t conservatives. They are reactionary xtian fundie theocrats who seek to take this country back to an imaginary time that never was and never will be. . . unless they kill all the heretics. Theofascist is what they are.
Parental rights as defined by the MAGA morons is insane and disturbing.
“Parental Extremists” is a valid descriptor but, that shouldn’t distract from understanding who their establishment supporters are. The extremists gain ground because of the work of legislators like GOP Rep. Fred Deutsch of South Dakota. He’s establishment and he’s one of the lawmakers who is most prominent nationally in the campaign opposing trans rights. Deutsche’s e-mails recently came to light via Mother Jones (“Inside the Secret Working Group that Helped Push Anti-Trans Laws Across the Country.”) Deutsch is quoted as saying, “The longer we can fly under the radar the better.” His plan succeeds because many in media omit identification of the religious sect that is the most politically powerful for the right wing and that has the most wins.
Authoritarian religion that engages in politics thrives on secrecy. Father Alberto Cutie wrote in Huffpo about the American Catholic Church, “Most of the people sitting in the pews have little knowledge of just how much remains hidden.” He offers as example the backstory of a priest (appeared on Hannity) who served for 10 years as president of one of the largest pro-life organizations in the world. The Church covered up his secret.
One of Rep. Deutsch’s right wing agenda bills (2021) got testimony in support from two groups, the South Dakota Catholic Conference and the Family Heritage Alliance.
Archbishop Chaput when he spoke to ADF in 2019, called ADF’s opposition, an, “ugly brand of extremism.” The wealthy conservative Catholic couple, who wrote in a WaPo oped that they supported Koch’s network as their commitment to the Pope’s call to serve the poor, are, reportedly, financial supporters of Archbishop Chaput and the Susan B Anthony List (which works to elect Republicans).
Read at the Scielo site, “The new official contents of sex education in Mexico: laicism in the crosshairs.”
a superb read, that
Click to access 2007-2171-dsetaie-11-21-00019-en.pdf
It’s Diane”s blog. If she wanted to post the article from the Scielo site about, “laicism in the crosshairs,” she would.
Bob, I appreciate your attempts to get the info out there.
Slightly off topic, I offer my apologies. I was pleased to read the following op-ed in the usually anti-equality L.A. Times. (See the last few paragraphs.) https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-03-06/education-gavin-newsom-sat-ged-uc-ivy-league-meritocracy The racist policy of standardized testing that fosters the growth of segregation academies must be reconsidered, er, re-imagined.
Again, although in the UK, this is a brilliant way to respond to these folks and the cult on any issue. We even have some of these “reasonable” people here! You’ll like this, NYCPSP.
This is good. But I still think Jon Stewart is better. This is subtle and I like both the clips you posted where he makes callers spewing talking points actually define what they mean. (Of course they can’t, because it is nonsense.) If he was a NYT journalist he would have simply let the callers spew their nonsense and at the end replied “some people with liberal biases disagree”. But he isn’t, so he asked callers to define the terms they used instead of responding by presenting them as coming from such a highly admirable and universally respected source like William Barr, so only a rabid partisan would disagree.
Loved seeing Stewart take down that pro-gun anti-trans right wing Republican.