Archives for the month of: May, 2018

 

The Los Angeles school board selected an unqualified person to lead its schools. The decision was made in secret, with no public input.

Carl Petersen points out that state law requires that Superintendents must have experience as teachers and administrators. There is provision for a waiver. Is the superintendent is unqualified, like Austin Beutner, he may be required to take an in-service training program.

35028.
No person shall be eligible to hold a position as city superintendent, district superintendent, deputy superintendent, associate superintendent, or assistant superintendent of schools unless he is the holder of both a valid school administration certificate and a valid teacher’s certificate, but any person employed as a deputy, associate, or assistant superintendent in a purely clerical capacity shall not be required to hold any certificate.
(Enacted by Stats. 1976, Ch. 1010.)

35029.
A local governing board may waive any credential requirement for the chief administrative officer of the school district under its jurisdiction. Any individual serving as the chief administrative officer of a school district who does not hold a credential may be required by the local governing board to pursue a program of in-service training conducted pursuant to guidelines approved by the commission.
No individual serving as the chief administrative officer of a school district shall be subject to the provisions of the merit system specified in Article 6 (commencing with Section 45240) of Chapter 5 of Part 25 of this division or any other similar merit system.
(Enacted by Stats. 1976, Ch. 1010.)

Will the board require him to learn about school administration or will they just let him bring his experience from the banking world as a source of “new ideas.” (Hint: buy low, sell high). Or from his service on the board of AMI, which owns the notorious National Enquirer (“catch and kill”) or from Jack Welch’s playbook for cut-throat businessmen (“fire the bottom 10% every year”).

Puerto Rico is part of the United States. You would not know that if you paid attention to the neglect of the Island’s needs since Hurricane Maria. Just as the privateers took advantage of Hurricane Katrina to wipe out public schools in New Orleans, they are now moving swiftly to replace public schools in Puerto Rico with charter schools and vouchers. The privatizers are using their familiar tactics of disruption and chaos to shatter communities and displace students and families. The rationale is unexplained.

The austerity measures imposed on the residents have led to violent clashes and tear-gassing of resistors. 

Consider the following information, compiled by the AFT:

Consider the following:

Puerto Rico School Closings: Background

On April 5, Puerto Rico’s Secretary of Education Julia Keleher announced that Puerto Rico would be shuttering 283 schools by September 2018. Those closings would affect nearly 60,000 students and 6,000 teachers and could cause thousands of educators to leave their jobs. This would have a devastating impact on families and communities in Puerto Rico as the island works to recover and grow. Economists have been arguing that the single most important group to keep on the island to stabilize the economic outlook of Puerto Rico are families whose plans for returning or reestablishing normalcy are thrown into chaos.

A small group in the Puerto Rico Education Department proposed the school closing with no input from stakeholders, no visits to schools and using an database that was never shared with the public.

The education secretary for Puerto Rico has admitted that at no time did they do an analysis of any of the school being closed or the impact on students at the closed schools.

The latest round of closings comes less than a year after Puerto Rico closed 167 schools, bringing the total number of schools closed within one year to 450. This represents more than a third of its public schools, though the island’s population has decreased by only 9 percent over the past seven years.

The latest closings also come on the heels of an earlier, smaller round of school closings that occurred due to population loss. Between 2010 and 2015, Puerto Rico closed another 150 public schools in order to deal with population loss.

In addition to the school closings, the U.S. Secretaryof Education Betsy DeVos has been working with Puerto Rico closely to pass legislation to introduce charter schools and vouchers in Puerto Rico. The bill was drafted by a team from Betsy DeVos’s U.S. Education Department, with very little or no input from stakeholders in Puerto Rico.

The closure of schools was built on misleading information.

Initially the Puerto Rican government promised cost savings from closing schools.

o The Government of Puerto Rico has been unable to sell any previously closed schools and is leasing 50 schools out of more than 300 available schools for $1 annually.

o The Governor subsequently acknowledged that there is very little cost savings from closing schools.

o The Governor’s latest statement tracks with studies about school closing in other states that found like one from Pew research that found municipalities get a fraction of the savings they budget for, when they close schools.

o Meanwhile the government just passed voucher and charter school legislation written by DeVos that would cost the Puerto Rico up to $400 million a year.

o As the plan to close schools, the fiscal plan approved by the fiscal oversight board includes more than $7 billion in debt service over five years to vulture funds at the expense of schools and recovery.

The Puerto Rico Secretary of Education had previously argued that school closing were driven by the fiscal board required it. In a recent interview with Telemundo, Jose Carrion, Chairman of the Fiscal Control Board, said the Fiscal Board did not require the closing of schools.

There’s not a transparent and coherent process for why schools are being closed. Various arguments have been made that are sometimes at odds with each other.

On Friday April 20th, the Department of Education indicated that it had not conducted an updated analysis of which schools were being closed, their impact on the education of kids in the schools or whether receiving schools had the resources to help the incoming kids. The Department also indicated that despite protests from mayors, parents and teachers that the list of 283 would not change under any circumstance.

o On Saturday April 21st, The Department of Education sent out a press release that they would make changes to the number of schools being closed.

o Two days later the education department removed six schools from the list and added three new schools to the list.

The schools on the closure list were not selected using an understandable and transparent process. In fact, a quick review of the latest school performance and demographic data shows a number of troubling facts. It is critical that education officials explain how these schools were selected.

Of the 50 poorest schools (at least 95 percent poverty), 21 are slated to close.

Of the 50 least poor schools (56 percent poverty or less), all are expected to remain open.

Among the 50 schools with the lowest proficiency (9 percent proficient or less), 11 schools are slated for closure.

Among the 50 schools with the highest proficiency (90 percent proficient or better), 22 schools are slated for closure.

58 of the 283 schools scheduled to be closed are rated good or excellent by the Department of education

40 percent of the children in the schools slated to closed are special needs students, including children with autism.

There was no consultation with teachers, parents and community leaders before the school closure list was finalized.

There was no transparency to the school closure process other than what we read in the press.
There is real human and economic impact to the school closures that has not been considered. No one has performed an economic impact on school closure in Puerto Rico.

A department of education offical visited a recently built modern school with air conditioning and computer labs slated for closing and told teachers that the school would be perfect for a charter school operator.

The Secretary of Education went on the record to confirm that she is closing a Montessori school because administrators refused to allow the school to become a charter.

Local mayors find the school closings so disruptive that they’ve petitioned the government to take over operations of the schools.

In Lares a school closing will impact four communities in the surrounding area forcing students to commute for an extra hour to 2 hours a day.

Mercedes is a beloved neighborhood school in San Juan where teachers have invested hundreds of dollars for supplies and the school where they are supposed to go has a lower rating and is located in a violent area.

Manuel Caves is a school slated for closing that had a waiting list last year.

In Arecibo, the only bilingual school is being closed.
A school closing in Barceloneta offers pre-vocational courses, and there is no indication that the new school will continue the program.

A school closing in Bayamon, Papa Juan XXIII High School, specializes in mathematics and science. It has an enrollment of 346, and its honor roll is made up of 320 students. These students receive multiple math, science and English classes during the year. Last year, five students in grade 11 went directly to college.

A school being closed in Humacao, Su Luciano Rios, won a robotics championship in 2017.

A school that specializes in baseball is slated to close in Comerío. Keleher argued that the closing was due to poor conditions, but reporters found the school to be in great physical conditions, with the municipality providing maintenance services for the school.

There are dozens of receiving schools that are too far from the closing school. Teachers feel that some receiving schools are too dangerous for students.
In multiple instances, receiving schools have facility problems that can’t accommodate incoming students, or problems with bathrooms or clean water.

All in all, the department of education under Keleher has made no effort to reach out to and work with teachers and parents about what closing their school would mean for students. There are no indications that any thought has been put into the logistics of disrupting the lives of 60,000 students by talking to the adult guardians or teachers of these kids.

New stories emerge daily about communities and schools impacted because there has been no analysis. The list above is just a sample of problems.

 

The agencies in Texas that finance municipal debt are choosing sides against charter schools. This is good news, but it should not be surprising because charter schools are risky, while traditional schools are not.

”Some Texas public finance firms are choosing sides in the escalating battle between traditional public school districts and charter schools.

“Earlier this year, Hilltop Securities, the state’s perennial leader among municipal advisers, dropped nine charter school clients to demonstrate its support for traditional districts.

”’Initially, we saw assisting charter schools as the firm enhancing our long history of support [for] primary/secondary education,” Hilltop chairman Hill Feinberg wrote in a Jan. 24 letter to Keller Independent School District Chief Financial Officer Mark Youngs. “Hilltop Securities will continue to honor our commitment to those relationships with Texas Independent School Districts by no longer representing charter schools in Texas as advisor, underwriter, placement agent or investment advisor.’”

Some bankers are starting their own firms specifically to finance charter schools.

 

The General Assembly convenes in Raleigh, North Carolina, on May 16.

Stuart Egan writes that teachers will be there to meet them. 

On May 16th, teachers in North Carolina will begin to make a stand for their profession and the state’s public schools.

What these teachers and advocates want Raleigh’s lawmakers to understand is that there is a difference between “rewarding” teachers and respecting the teaching profession and the public schools.

A reward is something that is given in recognition of someone’s service, effort, and/or achievement. One could get a reward for doing well on a project or completing a task. Some could look at a bonus check as a reward for accomplishing a goal.

However, NC’s teachers want more than a reward from the General Assembly. They want respect for all of our public school teachers and the public schools which serve a vast majority of our children.

To have respect is to have a deep feeling of admiration for someone because of his abilities, qualities, and value. It is understanding that someone is important and should be taken seriously.

In this highly contested election year, many will be fooled by lawmakers wanting to “reward” the teaching profession with bills that might offer more pay or actually fund a mandate and mistake that for respect. Respect goes much deeper.

That is why teachers and advocates will march and rally on May 16th when the NCGA reconvenes because it reminds policies makers that there are many stark differences between rewards and respect.

 

Michael Hynes, the superintendent of the Patchogue-Medford School District on Long Island is a visionary educator. He is truly child-centered. When he thinks about the purpose of education, he doesn’t think about test scores. He thinks about the development of healthy, confident, secure children, who are prepared by their schools to live good lives.

In our test-centric world, this district boldly swims against the tide.

The district recently issued a report about its goals. You might enjoy reading it. Ask yourself: is this what I want for my child?

See the report here.

The National Education Policy Center released its sixth annual report on “virtual education,” including both online schools and blended learning. The overall funding: neither is as effective as traditional schools with human-to-human interaction.

 

BOULDER, CO (May 1, 2018) – NEPC’s Sixth Annual Report on Virtual Education, Full-Time Virtual and Blended Schools: Enrollment, Student Characteristics, and Performance, provides a detailed overview and inventory of full-time virtual schools and of blended learning schools, including student demographics, state-specific school performance ratings, and—where possible—an analysis of school performance measures.

School performance measures for both virtual and blended schools indicate that they are not as successful as traditional public schools. Nevertheless, enrollment growth has continued.

Full-time virtual schools deliver all curriculum and instruction via the Internet and electronic communication, usually asynchronously with students at home and teachers at a remote location. Blended, or hybrid, schools combine virtual instruction with traditional face-to-face instruction in classrooms.

The report, beyond adding to the overwhelming evidence of poor outcomes for online schools, documents an interesting trend in the sector. Compared to prior years, there has been a shift in the type of schools with the most growth. We are now seeing more school districts opening their own virtual schools. These district-run schools have typically been small, with relatively small levels of enrollment. But the trend is nonetheless evident. While large virtual schools operated by for-profit education management organizations (EMOs) still dominate this sector, they have lost considerable market share. 

Find Full-Time Virtual and Blended Schools: Enrollment, Student Characteristics, and Performance, by Gary Miron, Christopher Shank, and Caryn Davidson, on the web at:

http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2018

 

Ellen Lubic is a professor of public policy at the University of California.

 

Beutner, his Billionaire Buddies, and LAUSD v. Teachers, Students, Parents, and Taxpayers

That noisy rumbling sound in LA County comes from teachers who are in ‘teacher jail’ rattling their cages at the news this week that the bought and paid for LAUSD Board of Education announced they hired Wall Street billionaire, Austin Beutner, to finally privatize the District. This news delivered while these accused teachers are awaiting their fate to be determined by LAUSD with possible firing without due process, which means losing all their contracted benefits, so as to save the District money.

Finally, another coup by Eli Broad and his band of billionaires including Beutner, Riordan, Milken, Waltons/Jenner, Luskin, the LASR – Mdm.Alter and her Sony president mate, and others. They planned this giant coup for years and their plan emerged with their rapidly arranged development of the 501(c)(3) Great Public Schools Now, and the concurrent hiring of the two deadly efficient pros to run it. The info came to light when Sony’s Prez who is married to Mdm. Alter, had his email hacked and all their correspondence was online for the world to read. Perceptive readers found that there were secret meetings in place at various homes on the West Side to plan the takeover of LAUSD to impose charter schools using taxpayer money to finance these essentially private schools which have no oversight, and which are totally controlled by their own Boards who set standards, curriculum, and payments to the CEO and teachers. Most astounding is that the CEO appoints his/her own Board which can be his/her family members, and they rubber stamp these directives.

Eli Broad, who devised this scheme when he started his own non profit in 1999 and then reinforced it over the years, is so hated by so many, it is alleged, that in the past few years the other billionaires finally took charge and used his plan but not his name. He had stated publicly that he wanted to take over another 50 percent of the LAUSD District in addition to the 12% he already has privatized, and eventually privatize it en toto with charter schools, but this was an overreach and even the local media seemed alarmed. So the ‘real in-group’ of greed mongers whose goal is two fold, first, to create workers they will need as cogs in their industries, and second, their drive to bust the unions…all unions…starting with the easiest, teachers unions, so that these new cogs from their charter schools will have no representation when they become workers and will remain low pay and quiet drudges without benefits. Eli and his Silicon Valley buddy billionaire then manufactured a lawsuit filed in Central California, Vergara v. California, and of course including negative aspects of teachers and the teachers union. The first go around found them winning this toxic case adjudicated by a Judge Treu without a jury. Governor Jerry Brown saw through this and he and teachers and the union appealed the decision. The higher Appeals Court agreed that this verdict was not clean and they reversed the Treu decision.

Then Broad hired and assigned his infamous boys who always did his bidding, John Deasy (who had been forced out of LAUSD and was being investigated by the FBI, and Ben Austin, from the failing Parent Revolution group, he who got this flawed law carried by ex legislator Gloria Romero who is still preaching to her choir) as the ostensible ‘street vendors’ to sweep the country with similar law suits. They got LA School Report owned by Mdm. Alter to transfer her self serving online rag to the Right leaning hands of the beauty queen, Campbell Brown, and her nationally known Republican ‘fixer’ husband, Dan Senor, and they put Alter et al in the background, and stepped up the heat for the election of BoE members who followed Eli’s party line to privatize the LA County public schools.

Meanwhile, Anthony Villaraigosa, out going mayor of LA then, Herbalife tout thereafter, and candidate for Governor now, was dancing for Broad, his puppet master, and charterizing schools with Deasy as ‘rapidly’ as they could. The adulterer mayor, (who had cheated on his teacher wife of many years, and who admitted publicly he never would have gotten into UCLA as an undergrad without the benefit of affirmative action, and who failed the Bar Exam so many times he finally gave up) was talking all over the city about his drive to “rapidly” close public schools and turn them into charters. These talks, some even at UCLA in the Luskin School of Public Policy, can be found online.

Some of these emerged charters were/are found in the fanciest part of LA County, such as Woodland Hills and Pacific Palisades. These elitist charter schools still flourish while those in the inner cities were/are run mainly by non educators business folks who could hand pick the students. They did/do not choose students who were/are ‘hard to teach’, or ‘special needs,’ nor English language learners, thereby starving these students real public schools of necessary services. Many of these charters have been shut down for malfeasance perpetrated by their CEOs.

Through all the years this scheme has been building, the BoE long time elected member who is not an educator, Monica Garcia, took all she could get in the way of offers from the billionaires and they all colluded to first get Refugio Rodriguez elected to partner with her in driving the Board toward privatizing, and then in the next election, it was a clean sweep with Melvoin and Gonez who had more Big Donor money, about $14 million, to campaign with than a battalion of teachers could ever earn in a lifetime. It was only a decade before that running for LA BoE cost around $15,000. This is way beyond inflation.

Who can also forget the huge collusion between Garcia, the billionaires, the phony influx of bussed in ‘parents for Deasy’ and the non profit supporters, for the orchestrated street theater on Oct. 29, 2013 estimated by journalists to have cost Eli and his pals about $14,000, when the ignominious BoE voted for a new contract for Deasy, in secret meetings of course, and did not allow any public comment against his second contract even after the IPad scam costing the District a fortune using line item Construction Bond cash. All of this is documented online.

There are so many side issues like rigged accusations leading to ‘teacher jail’ inhabited by a vast army of teachers entering their later years with many who are ‘of color’ and are just about to have their life time benefits, said to be about $60,000 a year, like health care and pensions, vest, all taken away without due process. The Rafe Esquith case reflects more of the worst of LAUSD run by a titular Superintendent, but really run by ‘Broad and Company”… and now by his pal, Austin Beutner.

Take into account the push Broad and Riordan made to buy the LA Times and their op-ed article about what selfless philanthropists they are, and shortly after, their close friend and Wall Street colleague Austin Beutner was named publisher of our local paper. All this information is online, about the real owners of our public schools, the giants of industry, the Bonfire of the Vanities guys and gals, with their names on endless buildings, who now have clawed to control the New Normal of private, unsupervised education. paid for by the taxpayers who have no input. What other industry can earn major monetary returns to ‘free market’ investors yet have no investment by the Founders, and be only paid for by public taxpayers?

Austin Beutner, who it is said acquired his wealth on Wall Street as a hedge fund manager, along with other DFER billionaires like Whitney Tilson, learned from Rupert Murdoch how vast a wealth accumulator public schooling is in America. Murdoch wrote about it being the best private, free market, investment opportunity, and Tilson and his pals started teaching their hedge fund investors how to glean fortunes from investing in ‘public’ charter schools.

In California, the CCSA, California Charter School Association, built a sound base (partially financed also by Fetullah Gulen, the Turkish imam who has made billions with his over 150 charter schools in the United States, and with his Los Angeles schools run by Mdm. Caprice Young whom he groomed). The CCSA became the biggest lobbying bully in Sacramento, and they got/get what ever they wanted/want, including buying the now indicted Refugio Rodriguez a seat on the LAUSD BoE, and he was mentored by Monica Garcia and helped by the Latino ‘Voteria’ scam.

As with the current BoE, the influx of mind boggling cash from these same billionaires plus Bloomberg, Petersen, and other out of state ‘vulture’ philanthropists, bought more seats in the recent elections. They spent $14 – 17 million on the last election for Medvoin and Gonez to win, and rapidly the con artist Monica Garcia was appointed President of the Board when Rodriguez was finally indicted on charges involving election tampering/fraud, and he also is being investigated for financial mismanagement of the 16 Charters he founded. Medvoin was supported in the grandest style by the West Side wealthy, and he, a young man who spent a year failing at teaching, became their current mouthpiece.

What a setup!

Now their ‘bought’ BoE members, Garcia, Rodriguez, Gonez, Melvoin, hired Wall Streeter, Beutner, with the help of the waffler old time Board member, Vladovic. Only the two former teacher/administrators Scott Schemerelson and George McKenna, had the cojones, intelligence, and ethical value system to vote against him. The flakes and phonies who are motivated by dollar signs are now firmly in charge at Beudry.

This week the LA Times indicates that Beutner said “real estate owned by the District should be a money maker”. It sure has been in the past when Eli sold the BoE and the District the Beudry Street location at a huge profit.

So much is kept so hidden from the public (We, the Taxpayers, who foot all the bills for the charter schools) regarding the blatant theft within, plus the costly mistakes made by top administrators like Deasy, Eli’s favorite puppet, when he used taxpayer money to buy $1 billion dollars of obsolete computers from Apple and then gave Pearson an open ended contract for curriculum development, and when he imposed MiSiS which failed and damaged students who lost their classes needed for graduation. Fortunately Cortines cut off the Deasy contracts and recouped a bit of taxpayer money, but it all left the District on the verge of bankruptcy, which, if implemented, could motivate these same insider billionaires to snap up the huge real estate holdings for pennies on the dollar.

So, I wonder if a Wall Street tycoon is a more reliable Superintendent of LA Schools than a proven educator? Every educator I know thinks not.

I have been writing about LAUSD for some years, yet things have gone from bad to dreadful. Every decision is made behind tightly shut doors. A few years ago, at the end of the infamous Deasy tenure, many teachers, administrators, residents, and parents who represent ‘the public’ demanded a voice in revising this disgusting ‘pay for play’ system. They demanded no more Blue Ribbon panels to make the rules of how LAUSD should be run. But what they got was the Bluest Ribbon panel of oligarchs led by Austin Beutner, who carries the flag for his fellow greed mongers and who now has the ultimate authority to run LAUSD into the ground. The are probably drooling at Spago’s at the prospect.

It all hangs together…just follow the money.

Submitted by :

Ellen Lubic
Public Policy Educator, Political Writer, Director of Joining Forces for Education

 

 

After years of denying that the Koch Foundation exercised control of hiring and firing professors by giving millions of dollars, George Mason University was compelled by the release of documents to admit that it was true. 

“Virginia’s largest public university granted the conservative Charles Koch Foundation a say in the hiring and firing of professors in exchange for millions of dollars in donations, according to newly released documents.

“The release of donor agreements between George Mason University and the foundation follows years of denials by university administrators that Koch foundation donations inhibit academic freedom.

“University President Angel Cabrera wrote a note to faculty Friday night saying the agreements “fall short of the standards of academic independence I expect any gift to meet.” The admission came three days after a judge scrutinized the university’s earlier refusal to release any documents.

”The newly released agreements spell out million-dollar deals in which the Koch Foundation endows a fund to pay the salary of one or more professors at the university’s Mercatus Center, a free-market think tank. The agreements require creation of five-member selection committees to choose the professors and grant the donors the right to name two of the committee members.

“The Koch Foundation enjoyed similar appointment rights to advisory boards that had the right under the agreements to recommend firing a professor who failed to live up to standards.

“Cabrera emphasized in his note to faculty that the “agreements did not give donors control over academic decisions” — an apparent reference to the fact that the Koch Foundation did not control a majority of seats on the selection committees.

“A university spokesman said Cabrera was unavailable for an interview. On Monday night, Cabrera issued a statement saying he is ordering a review of all the university’s donor agreements that support faculty positions to “ensure that they do not grant donors undue influence in academic matters.”

“Cabrera’s admission that the agreements fall short of standards for academic independence is a stark departure from his earlier statements on the issue. In a 2014 blog post on the issue, he wrote that donors don’t get to decide who is hired and that “these rules are an essential part of our academic integrity. If these rules are not acceptable, we simply don’t accept the gift. Academic freedom is never for sale. Period.”

“In 2016, in an interview with The Associated Press, he denied that the Koch donations restricted academic independence and said Koch’s status as a lightning rod for his support of Republican candidates is the only reason people question the donations.

 “The documents were released to a former student, Samantha Parsons, under a Freedom of Information Act request she filed earlier this year after years of having similar requests rejected.“Parsons, who now works for the activist group UnKoch My Campus, said the documents are strikingly similar to agreements the Koch Foundation made with Florida State University that caused a similar uproar.

“She said provisions giving the foundation a say in which professors are chosen are especially alarming.

“The faculty is supposed to have the independence to choose the best-qualified candidate,” she said.”

The University recently renamed its law school for the late conservative Supreme Justice Antonin Scalia. This occurred following a Koch gift of $10 Million, plus $20 Million from an anonymous donor.

Some 300 colleges have accepted Koch funding.

When Duke historian Nancy MacLean wrote “Democracy in Chains,” criticizing the Koch-funded economist James Buchanan, she was viciously attacked by libertarians for her portrayal of Buchanan as anti-democratic and unduly influenced by Koch libertarianism. She must be smiling as the mask of impartial scholarship is stripped away by student activists.

Big Money Rules

 

 

Mercedes Schneider takes apart Bill Gates and his monumental hypocrisy and arrogance. 

She documents his predilection for experimenting on other people’s  children, as he did with the Commin Core, and his penchant for carelessly destroying other people’s  lives, as he did with the ineffective teacher evaluations.

She notes that he recently announced an initiative to fix poverty, but is not investing much money, as compared to the billions he wasted on education forays.

Bill Gates has funded studies to belittle class size reduction, though in his own schooling and in that of his children, small classes were crucial.

He has given advice lately, sharing advice about how to raise children. He says you should love them unconditionally and pay no mind to their grades or test scores. Nice for his children, whose elite schools would never follow Gates’ education ideas. But what about the teachers who got fired because their students didn’t try or their parents didn’t care?

And last, to really see how out of touch he is, read about the “modest” bequests he plans to leave them.

 

 

The Koch Brothers have bankrolled an effort to derail a referendum on voucher expansion this November. It lost in the courts, and their next ploy was to have the legislature repeal the law that was under challenge, then re-enact it under a new name, wearing down the opposition.

But last night, the Arizona legislature failed to get the votes necessary to repeal the voucher expansion law and force opponents to start over. 

This is a huge victory for the #RedForEd Movement. Now the voters get to decide whether to continue the Koch brothers’ Plan to privatize public education.

Congratulations to SOS Arizona and the 50,000 teachers who showed up in red T-shirts to speak up for their students, their profession, and public education.

Democracy wins!