Archives for the year of: 2015

The Chicago Sun-Times reports that federal investigators are probing the finances of politically-connected Gulen schools in Illinois.

“A clout-heavy charter-school firm that operates four taxpayer-funded schools in Chicago is suspected of defrauding the government by funneling more than $5 million in federal grants to insiders and “away from the charter schools,” according to court records obtained by the Chicago Sun-Times.

“No criminal charges have been filed in the ongoing investigation of Des Plaines-based Concept Schools, which has built a network of powerful supporters, including Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago.

“According to the newly obtained court documents filed by law-enforcement authorities, the company, its contractors and “many” of its privately run, taxpayer-financed charter schools across the Midwest “engaged in a scheme to defraud a federal program….

“Concept has 30 schools in Illinois and five other states, including four Chicago Public Schools-funded campuses with a total of about 2,200 students. CPS funds them under school-choice laws that provide for government funding of certain privately operated schools….

“Concept president Sedat Duman signed E-Rate certification forms for schools, court records show. They also show Stephen Draviam, a computer consultant in Ohio, told investigators he was picked to do grant-funded work for Concept’s schools without having to submit written bids.

“Huseyin “Shane” Ulker, as Concept’s chief information officer, “established an invoicing scheme” involving Draviam’s company, passing along E-Rate funds to three businesses found to be “affiliated with” Ulker, according to the court records.

“Ulker deposited money into the account of one of the three companies before “a wire transfer of $20,000 was made to a bank account at the Bank of Asya in Turkey,” wrote Geoffrey Wood, the special agent from the federal Education Department’s inspector general’s office who filed the search-warrant affidavit.

“Founded in 1999 by Turkish immigrants, Concept has ties to the influential Muslim cleric Fethullah Gulen, who now lives in Pennsylvania and is wanted in his native Turkey after falling out with that country’s leader.”

Remind me why it is okay for foreign nationals to operate community public schools.

Anthony Mize was the eighth-grade teacher of Elizabeth Vergara, the lead plaintiff in the case that seeks to eliminate teacher tenure, “Vergara v. California.”

Funded by a Silicon Valley zillionaire named David Welch and a group he created callef Students Matter, Elizabeth Vergara and other students claimed that they were denied equal protection of the law because they were taught by inferior teachers, protected in their job by tenure. However, her teacher Anthony Mize did not have tenure when he taught Elizabeth nor does he have tenure now. He is writing a book about his experience as the teacher who allegedly harmed Elizabeth Vergara. This is an excerpt from his book, which he generously shares here.

 

 

Mize writes:

 

 

Battle Cry

Does a soldier hear the explosion that’s about to change him? What about the ordinary man? Does he hear the bomb go off, knowing it was detonated, yet blind to its totality when it’s already upon him?

 

“It’s your Dad.”

 

She handed the phone to me passing along the heaviness. Merging years of teaching and learning, deliberate footsteps of my life had funneled to this very moment. His voice on the other end was pulling me into The Great Fight.

 

I was not drafted, but chosen.

 

A marked man, dropped onto the front lines of a Battle that will contribute to the War on public education that has been raging for centuries in this country.

 

Embracing reality, the journey ahead, hunkered behind the wall of defiant disbelief that comes with first hearing the news, then the realization of what could become.

 

Picturing the Battle in my mind, what it would look like, feel like, sound like. Wishing to believe it could not kill me, knowing it capable of taming the spirit.

 

Defacing my enthusiasm for life, it would yield a numbed scalpel towards the jagged amputation and dismemberment of my soul. Echoing a muted distance between me, and love. It would attempt to asphyxiate my living breath.

 

On Tuesday June 10, 1692 Bridget Bishop was the first person hung from a tree during the Salem Witch Trials after being found guilty of being a witch. One of those that falsely accused Bishop was a child named Elizabeth.

 

322 years to the day, Tuesday, June 10, 2013 Judge Rolf Treu ruled in favor of the nine student plaintiffs, and their legal team funded by a billionaire businessman, who accused 16 of their former teachers of being grossly ineffective educators, in the case of Vergara vs. The State of California.

 

With a few exceptions, the 16 accused teachers remained anonymous to the public. Known only in official court documents, tagged and labeled in the proceedings by a single letter.

 

I am teacher “D” and Elizabeth Vergara’s eighth grade English teacher, this is my story.

Back to School

 

In this neighborhood sometimes you can sense it coming, feeling it in the temperature of the air, other times it blindsides you.

 

His Mother, an alumni of the school briefly shared her experience as a student there years ago with me, some of her struggles. Knowing the reality of life her son faces as he exits the school and begins the walk home in the surrounding community.

 

He had an Individualized Education Plan (IEP), his biological Father passed away in Mexico during that school year; and he welcomed a new baby sibling into the family, all while making academic gains in my classroom. Amidst all of this, socially he was thriving, his academic gains were a result of increased self-confidence, and new found friend base. Having a voice that was validated in the classroom, and a shift in maturation were evident in his overall growth as a student learner, even during this challenging time.

 

His disability impeded, but did not debilitate, difficulty paying attention was one consistent barrier that teased his academic promise. Moving the discussion towards this topic, I began by praising him on his increase in reading fluency, highlighting specific academic gains of the year, and his strengths in the classroom with his Mother.

 

“Your son has trouble paying attention in cla…”

 

Screeching tires interrupted, a car’s engine gassed faster than the wheels could spin, three bullets cut the evening air. Almost believing the already known, my eyes darted towards the mother negotiating with hers, searching for confirmation.

 

“Yes” They replied.

 

Four to six more shots called out fate’s name, bookended by another set of screeching of tires.

 

Inner workings of my mind exchanged wondering, “Should I duck?” The large caged glass windows that walled the back of my classroom, and row of neighboring classrooms played on the reel in my headspace. Envisioning a stray bullet finding its way through the glass, into the back of my skull, plunging into my brain. Without time to panic, noting the ease in which the Mother was absorbing the moment, seeming tested, like this wasn’t new to her.

 

Unable to see, my back directly turned away from the corner intersection where the drive by shooting was occurring 30-50 yards behind me, and my neighboring colleagues classrooms, as our school’s campus was alive with students, and families back to school that evening.

 

Deciding not to duck, comforted by the actions of my student’s Mother across from me. Reality had shifted across the middle school desk that separated me from this woman I’ve just met, whose child we both knew, both wished the best for. Who was now engaged in prayer, watching as she maneuvered her hand in a cross motion over her chest, silently mouthing a message to above.

 

The shell casings hadn’t fallen, yet I had the strange understanding she was not praying for me, or herself, at least not explicitly, she was praying for someone else.

 

Possibly, her prayers were answered, or it was the shaky trigger finger of a gunman unseasoned to the act of blindly shooting at human targets, not grasping the consequence of their soon to be forever action. There were no physical injuries reported, no immediate loss of life.

 

The shooting had stopped. No bullets had hit our classroom and his Mother was okay, I ran to the window to see if anybody outside was hit. Not seeing anyone down, hurrying to the room of my neighboring teachers, one who was out of the room, and the other teacher was calling the office. A fellow English teacher, and friend whose classroom was closest to the shooting had ducked under his desk for cover. As I entered the room, he was gathering himself, as we all were rattled on some level.

 

Within moments the police were there beginning to secure the scene with yellow caution tape. Another cautionary tale too close to home, too close to school.

 

“Again. Why does your son have trouble paying attention?”

 

Walking out with my Dad on the way out that night, even as Maclay’s Literacy Coach he was always dedicated and in attendance at these school functions. It felt good to be next to him, cognizant of the fragility of existence.

 

At the front gate by the main office we passed Maclay’s Principal Verónica Arreguín.

 

“I’m glad I gave you the highest rankings on the Principal survey we took earlier today. Thanks for running towards the bullets, instead of away from them.” I said.

 

In response to seeing her again, the previous time an hour earlier she was running down the outdoor hall corridor to our back row of classrooms as soon as the shooting started.

 

Walking out my Dad offered to walk me to my car parked in an adjacent lot. Thinking that was sweet, I thanked him and declined. A reminder he will always be My Dad.

 

We all went our ways only to return the next morning.
Lying in bed that night my ears were ringing with the sounds of bullets. Not because of the volume, but because of its sharpness, precise in execution. The reverberations are numbing to the senses, deeply rooted in their cavernous echoes, implanted not only in your eardrums, but into your psyche.

 

My Final Year at Macay

“…I was challenged that year as an educator. Population wise it may have been one of my toughest years; the students had an intensity of needs, out of a school with a population who all have intense needs. It ranked up there with the challenges faced during my first few months taking over mid-year, during my first days of teaching at Maclay.
All of the work was worth it, much was learned, and taught along the way. I had a student who ate glass, and students who didn’t eat. I had homies and the homeless, addicts, cutters, and the forgotten. They were not sprinkled in, but to a student each had one to several major obstacles impeding progress. I looked out for all, and taught with my all. Sometimes they didn’t say goodbye they just disappeared.”

LAUSD Removed as Defendants

 

9.23.2013

 

When the Los Angeles Unified School District is dropped as Defendants in the Vergara Trial, my name was not even associated with the Case yet. Finding out from one of the California Teachers Association union lawyers representing the Defendants that it wasn’t until two months later, before my name was even mentioned. First brought up by Elizabeth Vergara, in a deposition taking place in November of 2013.

 

After all my sacrifice, dedication, debts paid, and burdens carried this is what happens? The Los Angeles Unified School District is dropped as Co-Defendants in the Vergara Case. Walking off unscathed, while I am soon to be named, and included in the Case, set to engage in a battle I wasn’t even aware I was fighting.

 

LAUSD in the matter of a day, one announcement goes from Defendant in the Case, to dropped from the Case. With its highest ranking official poised to testify in support of the Plaintiffs, against the teachers under his watch, and leadership. LAUSD Superintendent Deasy was to take on the battle cry of teacher tenure, and grossly ineffective teachers, precisely what they were calling me.

 

Attorneys working for distinguished law firms, containing the scope of influence and financial backing as the Plaintiffs legal team shouldn’t waffle like this. The Plaintiffs drop LAUSD as co-defendants, with Plaintiffs lawyers stating that as a district the Los Angeles Unified School District, ‘are hindered by rigged and outdated laws that harm students.’

 

Lawyers, masters of nuances and veiled manipulation, intentional in word selection don’t use such concrete words believing in them one day, and disbelieving in them the next. It speaks to a philosophical waffling regarding who is truly responsible for the ailments of education, or is a weak attempt to mask some greater agenda spawned from a muddled political petri dish.

 

Six months after the Vergara Trial´s verdict was announced, Superintendent Deasy would resign from his position in LAUSD, finding employment with Students Matter, led by Silicon Valley billionaire, spearhead of the Vergara Trial, David Welch. Deasy’s replacement would be former LAUSD Superintendent Ramon Cortines.

 

Was LAUSD the innocent bystander in all of this, the damsel in distress? If true, then either way the Plaintiffs are reactionary with whom they are including in this Case, the teachers, or the school districts.

 

These are people’s lives, and livelihood, let’s not throw caution to the wind. If you’re going to pull a trigger marking someone, something, as a target, make sure with absolute certainty that you are firing in the right direction. If you fail at that, you are as reckless as a gang member who commits a drive by, and inadvertently hits an innocent child with a bullet. It doesn’t matter whom you are aiming at, it matters whom you hit.

 

Surely, the Plaintiff’s lawyers check their facts at least on all of the 16 teachers named in the Case. 16 people is a lot, maybe they should enact a cap, or some sort of reduction of accused quasi-Defendants named in lawsuits. Checking up on 16 teachers before you put them in a Case of this stature; this magnitude, is an overwhelming undertaking. The due diligence required is mind-numbing, 16 teachers.

 

I couldn’t imagine the Plaintiffs’ lawyers being required to check up on 35 plus kids, I mean co-quasi defendants, in their classroom, or legal proceedings. What would happen if someone had to go to the bathroom, or three defendants walked in tardy, one had a disability, showed up every three days, doesn’t show up at all, couldn’t even read, or understand the court proceedings, was suicidal, starving, or dying on the inside. How would the lawyers look on them? Like teachers look after students, with the same humanity, love, depth of compassion, levels of patience, ability to teach?

 

Although, yet to be named in the Case, never even hearing of it before, let alone aware of my potential future inclusion, this is a pivotal day in its evolution. The Los Angeles Unified School District is dropped as a Defendant from the Vergara Case after reaching a “settlement”.

 

Yoda You’re My Father

 

Friday 12.13.2013

 

Nick Mize, my Father, coined “Yoda” by some colleagues during his time at Maclay Middle School, for the capacity to know and understand, much like Yoda from Star Wars. By title, and position he was the school’s Literacy Coach. A role in which he served for over six years, prior to that, working as an English teacher at Maclay for the previous three years.

 

As Literacy Coach, he had direct and absolute access to key data pertaining to the analysis and measurement of students and teachers at Maclay. Having firsthand knowledge of all the operating systems, with the capacity to access individual student data on a micro level, to understanding the entire scope of the school, through the lens of data on a wide scale.

 

Specifically, his computer’s hard drive contained information, and data vital to understanding our school, teachers, and individual students, from a variety of statistical and data analysis means. He was the sole gatekeeper, and behind him housed on his computer’s hard drive, a treasure trove of current and archived historical data essential to understanding Maclay’s students and teachers.

 

On Friday, December 13, 2013, the same day the Vergara Case had its official trial date set, my Dad, Maclay’s Literacy Coach, sitting in his office at Maclay, in front of his LAUSD issued computer, at his desk watching his computer screen said, “It looked like the flesh was falling off the computer.”

 

Files started to disappear, simply vanishing from his desk top. Losing all control of his operating system, he was unable to intervene. His mouse cursor moved, unmanned, across the screen, while helplessly witnessing the removal of data, and the crash of his entire hard drive. Every file, every document, every letter keyed, every mouse click ever stored was now completely gone, ceasing to exist, never again to be retrieved, never again to be viewed.

Over the ten years my Father has worked at Maclay not one day, not one time, did his entire hard drive crash. Out of the years he has been on a computer, whether for personal, professional, or academic use, and the man is at the Doctoral level, not once had his hard drive ever crashed.

Mayor Speak

1.30.2014

 

Day four of the Vergara Trial, holding political traction, with politicians turning up the volume, former Mayor of Los Angeles Antonio Villaraigosa lends his support, joining the students’ cause.

 

“This lawsuit, Vergara v. California, is built on the simple and undeniable premise that every child—regardless of background—deserves a quality education. And that’s why I stand with these brave students who are standing up for what is right and what is just.”

 

As the teacher of the lawsuit’s namesake, I was in this, and chained from afar. Voiceless, as the political bandwagon was being piled on, fueled by a good ol’ boy’s club handshake, and billionaire’s air five, he do, she do, I do, politician see, monkey do, we all scream for ice cream.

The young man photographed on the right of former Mayor Villaraigosa was a classmate of Elizabeth Vergara’s, both of them students in my Period 3/4 English class. The student on the left was also a student of mine in an Intervention and Enrichment class that year. The narratives that follow connect with the young man on the right of the former Mayor.

 

Mayor Villaraigosa stood by him in this photograph, while I stood by him in life. Providing something lasting much longer than a fading image, or brush with celebrity.

 

Where Mayor’s take photo-ops for fame and agenda.

 

Teachers write the agenda on the board and remember.

 

Who’s the fake,

 

and who’s the contender?

 

If this was a team… you should give me an assist.

 

Politicians are shaking hands, and giving babies a kiss.

 

Claim MVP, mount trophies, stuff the ballot to be an All-Star.

 

Remember who’s in the back seat changing diapers, while you’re driving the car.

 

You see:

 

I play for the kid in the back row, who leans his hat back low,

 

And he’s a little agro, and back nearly broke, from the toil, toll, and load.

 

You wouldn’t know, because if that same kid was walking down the street, tug the wallet, grab the car keys, let’s beat feet.

 

I couldn’t express your expression, if you saw them roll up and sit next to you in your seat

 

while front court at a Laker’s game, No photo ops, -not now mijo

 

Back to the cheap seat, Those people we just meet,

 

like a bad memory hit delete, I don’t live what I speak, my speeches are weak

 

the same track, change a few words, and sometimes lanes, mostly just hit repeat.

 

In a town full of ego and stars, fraudulent plastic Botox mirages, even Jack Nicholson knows there is a difference between sitting courtside every Laker game, and actually being on the team.

 

I wonder if student “x” would have been in that photo if it weren’t for the effort, the care, the teaching, the mentoring that he received during the time he was in my classroom?

 

Or would there have been another student “x” in his spot? I say student “x”, because to be in a position as removed from the people, someone so disconnected in an attempt to connect to it all, confined by challenges and time constraints that cripple the position of one in such a responsibility, as Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. One can only operate in a world where they know a student as “x”, and never their name. Student’s stories, and cause, a political tag-line in some greater personal and individual quest.

 

Just like LAUSD Board Member Steve Zimmer can only write an editorial stating, “I know Beatriz Vergara. Not personally. But I know thousands of Beatriz Vergaras. They are my students, my counselees and my neighbors.” He cannot write I know Elizabeth, or Beatriz Vergara, Villaraigosa can only reach as far as his position will allow. He can never know the Vergara’s, only of them.

 

We don’t have time to know any student simply as student “x”. Villaraigosa may have been emotionally invested in the cause of people of a similar identity, circumstance, or lot in life, possibly he even cared about the young men before him in this photo, but he certainly didn’t know them. Standing by them, he was really saying I support my cause, not I support you. Because I know what supporting them was, and is like.

 

He certainly didn’t know that those “brave” children he was standing for, I too have stood for, fought for, sacrificed for.

 

The same young man in the photo taken with Villaraigosa, was the same young man that on his birthday, his Mother emailed me because he was having such success in school that year. Centered on his breakthroughs in writing, increased understanding of academics and self, building a budding confidence, and self-esteem all positive products of his work in my class, specifically the work I did with him. She wanted to reward him, and brought cupcakes in for the class. Cupcakes? This kid was used to violence, and fear, not smiling, and green frosting.

 

When he was awarded, and honored, with other students having his name called out before a Chivas professional soccer game, it was my two daughters, my wife and I who took the hour plus drive each way to support him. His only other support base in attendance was his probation officer, who also cheered for him even though he missed his opportunity to walk the field pregame because he didn’t arrive at the game until after the first period.

 

When his mother emailed again, inquiring about purchasing a yearbook for him, my Wife and I made sure that he had one to commemorate that year, his success. We didn’t have a lot, but more than some.

 

Even though by name, and by job assignment, that year I was a substitute teacher, there is no substitute for that kind of teaching.

 

Seeing him for the last time as a ninth grader visiting Maclay after school let out one day with a football to play catch with me. I have not seen him since.

Knowing him was the first time I was introduced to the F13, Florencia street gang. It was in him, it flowed in his brother, his mostly off again incarcerated Father, who often referred to the boy lovingly as Lil’ Homie, and many of the men who would brand, and exile their footprint on his young life. How do you fight your shadow? You can shadow box, but eventually your shadow will shift, and dance quicker than you, grow bigger than you, enter in, and through you.

 

In the strangest of ways

One of the rich ironies is that If I wasn’t Elizabeth Vergara’s teacher she may never have been in this Trial, nor would I be. As a teacher I am an advocate of the student’s voice, encouraging them to take a stand. Never thinking it was going to be the witness stand, speaking out against me calling me “Grossly Ineffective” as a teacher.

 

A constant proponent of social justice, ally to the community of Pacoima, seeing that it receives its proper and equitable due, highlighting stories of the forgotten, and the unknown. The teaching, the strength, the voice I encouraged in all my students, potentially gave Elizabeth, or aided her in finding herself, allowing for this to occur. Her voice, what she speaks in regard to me is completely inaccurate, declarations of perjury, yet I do applaud the spirit of sticking up for oneself.

 

Even agreeing with her cause, I disagree with the way she went about it. The way her team went about it. Adults using children as collateral, like parents in a nasty divorce. We all know those hurt the parents, but more importantly, and adversely it always damages the children deeply.

 

As plaintiffs in this case, children and parents are both strung along by the powerfully persuasive because they come equipped with sellable back stories, and are willing to contort to fit the required role. Showpieces for lawyers, and faces for agendas, the flashy escorts to judicial and legislative after parties of educational reformation, a self-promotion of those who have too much power.

 

This experience at times has been draining, exhausting in its consumption of my time, overwhelming in what it has drawn out, and put in. Yet, it has allowed me to experience life in new ways, understanding that which I could not have had, or known without these experiences. In a sense, and in many ways Elizabeth Vergara is my teacher, so too is Judge Rolf Treu, attorney Marcellus McRae, even billionaire spearhead of the Case David Welch. As is my mentor Verónica Arreguín, so too is Nick Mize, and “student x”, as are my own daughters my teachers. For this, and them, I do it all.

 

With that same respect, the young man that walked into the city of Pacoima, onto the campus of Charles Maclay Middle School, was a young man of much different experience and understanding. The man that exited, or checked out, but never fully left, was a young man with a much fuller comprehension of life in all facets. The learning that occurred within me is almost unfathomable in its infancy, essentially unmeasurable, because it continues to flourish daily, and sprout anew from seeds started and cultivated there.

 

I found my own voice in the community of Pacoima. A voice that was found there, but is carried everywhere. It has an edge, born from adversity, and circumstance, creating an ability to stick up for that in which you believe in. Pacoima by virtue of its beauty and brutality provided me a voice to speak, to stand up for myself with, to tell this portion of this story.

 

In the oddest and strangest of ways this is all intertwined and directly linked. Without my ability to provide Elizabeth with a voice in a sense, even though it did come out deeply misguided when referencing me, the edge that Pacoima provided me, allowed for both of us to speak out, and speak up.

 

My hope for Elizabeth Vergara is to know that she is not a grossly ineffective student, that at times our biggest weakness can be our greatest asset. That life forgives, that education does ignite, and allow one to overcome. But education does not only exist in a classroom, sometimes it’s a courtroom, sometimes it’s our own reflection. I thank her for the lessons she has shared with me, and wish her many successes.

The Every Student Succeeds Act shifts much–though not all–of the responsibity for testing and accountability to the states. States have more flexibility, if they choose to exercise it. Many states, lacking imagination or thoughtfulness, will continue to do what the Department of Education and NCLB forced them to do.

 

NY Chalkbeat here explains how ESSA will affect education in New York. You can translate this to your own state. The state can no longer say “the Feds made me do it.”

Just in:

 

 

Working Families Party national director Dan Cantor lauded growing momentum for Senator Bernie Sanders’ campaign for President today, as the Communications Workers of America union and progressive group Democracy for America both announced endorsements for Senator Sanders today.

 

“The political revolution Bernie Sanders has called for is already starting to take shape. Young people and grassroots activists are volunteering in droves for Senator Sanders. Now, important progressive groups are adding their voices. Combined, those are the ingredients of a winning campaign. This is a big moment for anyone who wants to see a government that truly serves all of us, and not just the wealthy and well-connected.”

 

The Working Families Party announced its endorsement for Bernie Sanders last week. It was the progressive party’s first national endorsement, and came following a membership vote in which 87% of WFP members voted to support Bernie Sanders.

Michael Elliott is a gifted videographer who has made videos for parents who protest testing. He knows the issues: his own children are in public school in Brooklyn.

 

In this post, he explains why opt out numbers were very low in New York City, while parents in the rest of the state were refusing to let their children take the state tests. Statewide, more than 220,000 students did not take the state tests in 2015, about 20% of students statewide. In New York City, the opt outs were only 1.4%.

 

Elliott explains the difference. Students in low-performing schools have the possibility of school closure hanging over their heads. If they opt out, their school might close.

 

Students in other schools need test scores to be admitted to a junior high school or high school of their choice (and they might not get their choice anyway, since the city has a convoluted system based on admissions to medical schools).

 

Fear suppressed the New York City opt outs.

 

Interesting that when you think about the number of opt outs in the rest of the state–excluding NYC–the proportion rises dramatically. Maybe 30% or more of the kids outside NYC opted out. No wonder the politicians in Albany are running scared and trying to allay the concerns of the angry parents on Long Island, upstate, and in the Hudson Valley.

As the world turns, the reform leaders come and go, like swallows or salmon or starlings.

 

Either Michelle Rhee or Wendy Kopp founded the New Teacher Project, now known simply as TNTP. Then Kopp stepped down, then Rhee stepped down, then Rhee’s replacement stepped down, and the new leader of TNTP is Karolyn Belcher.

 

TNTP is here to supply new teachers for urban districts, well prepared and ready for reformer success.

 

Belcher is a product of Teach for America; she taught for two years in New Orleans.

 

As Mercedes Schneider explains, Belcher opened a charter school in New York City. It was one of the first charter schools in New York Cityto be closed for poor performance.

 

She then took a high-level position with TNTP, rose rapidly through the ranks, and  is now president, with an annual salary north of $250,000 (which she received when she was only a VP).

 

Having led a failed charter school, she is well prepared to direct TNTP and produce recruits who are ready for success.

John Thompson, historian and teacher, takes a closer look at the New Mexuco court decision that imposed a preliminary injunction on the use of value-added measurement to evaluate teachers and to punish or reward them. In his judgment, VAM is on the way out.

 
New Mexico District Judge David K. Thomson granted a preliminary injunction preventing consequences from being attached to the state’s teacher evaluation data. As Audrey Amrein-Beardsley explains, “can proceed with ‘developing’ and ‘improving’ its teacher evaluation system, but the state is not to make any consequential decisions about New Mexico’s teachers using the data the state collects until the state (and/or others external to the state) can evidence to the court during another trial (set for now, for April) that the system is reliable, valid, fair, uniform, and the like.”

 

This is wonderful news. As the American Federation of Teachers observes, “Superintendents, principals, parents, students and the teachers have spoken out against a system that is so rife with errors that in some districts as many as 60 percent of evaluations were incorrect. It is telling that the judge characterizes New Mexico’s system as a ‘policy experiment’ and says that it seems to be a ‘Beta test where teachers bear the burden for its uneven and inconsistent application.’”

 
A close reading of the ruling makes it clear that this case is an even greater victory over the misuse of test-driven accountability than even the jubilant headlines suggest. It shows that Judge Thompson made the right ruling on the key issues for the right reasons, and he seems to be predicting that other judges will be following his legal logic. Litigation over value-added teacher evaluations is being conducted in 14 states, and the legal battleground is shifting to the place where corporate reformers are weakest. No longer are teachers being forced to prove that there is no rational basis for defending the constitutionality of value-added evaluations. Now, the battleground is shifting to the actual implementation of those evaluations and how they violate state laws.

 
Judge Thomson concludes that the state’s evaluation systems don’t “resemble at all the theory” they were based on. He agreed with the district superintendent who compared it to the Wizard of Oz, where “the guy is behind the curtain and pulling levers and it is loud.” Some may say that the Wizard’s behavior is “understandable,” but that is not the judge’s concern. The Court must determine whether the consequences are assessed by a system that is “objective and uniform.” Clearly, it has been impossible in New Mexico and elsewhere for reformers to meet the requirements they mandated, and that is the legal terrain where VAM proponents must now fight.

 
The judge thus concludes, “New Mexico’s evaluation system is less like a [sound] model than a cafeteria-style evaluation system where the combination of factors, data, and elements are not easily determined and the variance from school district to school district creates conflicts with the [state] statutory mandate.”

 
The state of New Mexico counters by citing cases in Florida and Tennessee as precedents. But, Judge Thomson writes that those cases ruled against early challenges based on equal protection or constitutional issues, as they have also cited practical concerns in implementation. He writes of the Florida (Cook) case, “The language in the Cook case could be lifted from the Court findings in this case.” That state’s judge decided “‘The unfairness of this system is not lost on this Court.’” Judge Thomson also argues, “The (Florida) Court in fact seemed to predict the type of legal challenge that could result …‘The individual plaintiffs have a separate remedy to challenge an evaluation on procedural due process grounds if an evaluation is actually used to deprive the teacher of an evaluation right.’”

 
The question in Florida and Tennessee had been whether there was “a conceivable rational basis” for proceeding with the teacher evaluation policy experiment. Below are some of the more irrational results of those evaluations. The facts in the New Mexico case may be somewhat more absurd than those in other places that have implemented VAMs but, given the inherent flaws in those evaluations, I doubt they are qualitatively worse. In fact, Audrey Amrein-Beardsley testified about a similar outcome in Houston which was as awful as the New Mexico travesties and led to about 1/4th of their teachers subject to those evaluations being subject to “growth plans.”

 
As has become common across the nation, New Mexico teachers have been evaluated on students who aren’t in the teachers’ classrooms. They have been held accountable for test results from subjects that the teacher didn’t teach. Science teachers might be evaluated on a student taught in 2011, based on how that student scored in 2013.

 
The judge cited testimony regarding a case where 50% of the teachers rated Minimally Effective had missing data due to reassignment to a wrong group. One year, a district questioned the state’s data, and immediately it saw an unexplained 11% increase in effective teachers. The next year, also without explanation, the state’s original numbers on effectiveness were reduced by 6%.

 
One teacher taught 160 students but was evaluated on scores of 73 of them and was then placed on a plan for improvement. Because of the need to quantify the effectiveness of teachers in Group B and Group C, who aren’t subject to state End of Instruction tests, there are 63 different tests being used in one district to generate high-stakes data. And, when changing tests to the Common Core PARCC test, the state has to violate scientific protocol, and mix and match test score results in an indefensible manner. Perhaps just as bad, in 2014-15, 76% of teachers were still being evaluated on less than three years of data.

 

 

The Albuquerque situation seems exceptionally important because it serves 25% of the state’s students, and it is the type of high-poverty system where value-added evaluations are likely to be most unreliable and invalid. It had 1728 queries about data and 28% of its teachers ranked below the Effective level. The judge noted that if you teach a core subject, you are twice as likely as a French teacher to be judged Ineffective. But, that was not the most shocking statistic. In Albuquerque, Group A elementary teachers (where VAMs play a larger role) are five times more likely to be rated below Effective than their colleagues in Group B. In Roswell, Group B teachers are three times more likely to be rated below Effective than Group C teachers.
Curiously, VAM advocate Tom Kane testified, but he did so in a way the made it unclear whether he saw himself as a witness for the defense or the plaintiffs. When asked about Amrein-Beardsley’s criticism of using tests that weren’t designed for evaluating teachers, Kane countered that the Gates Foundation MET study used random samples and concluded that differing tests could be used in a way that was “useful in evaluating teachers” and valid predictors of student achievement. Kane also replied that he could estimate the state’s error rate “on average,” but he couldn’t estimate error rates for individual teachers. He did not address the judge’s real concern about whether New Mexico’s use of VAMs was uniform and objective.

 
I am not a lawyer but I have years of experience as a legal historian. Although I have long been disappointed that the legal profession did not condemn value-added evaluations as a violation of our democracy’s fundamental principles, I also knew that the first wave of lawsuits challenging VAMs would face an uphill battle. Using teachers as guinea pigs in a risky experiment, where non-educators imposed their untested opinions on public schools, was always bad policy. Along with their other sins, value-added evaluations would mean collective punishment of some teachers merely for teaching in schools and classes where it is harder to meet dubious test score growth targets. But, many officers of the court might decide that they did not have the grounds to overrule new teacher evaluation laws. They might have to hold their noses while ruling in favor of laws that make a mockery of our tenets of fairness in a constitutional democracy.

 
During the last few years, rather than force those who would destroy the hard-earned legal rights of teachers to meet the legal standard of “strict scrutiny,” those who would fire teachers without proving that their data was reliable and valid have mostly had to show that their policies were not irrational. Now that their policies are being implemented, reformers must defend the ways that their VAMs are actually being used. Corporate reformers and the Duncan administration were able to coerce almost all of the states into writing laws requiring quantitative components in teacher evaluations. Not surprisingly, it has often proven impossible to implement their schemes in a rational manner.

 
In theory, corporate reformers could have won if they required the high-stakes use of flawed metrics while maintaining the message discipline that they are famous for. School administrators could have been trained to say that they were merely enforcing the law when they assessed consequences based on metrics. Their job would have been to recite the standard soundbite when firing teachers – saying that their metrics may or may not reflect the actual performance of the teacher in question – but the law required that practice. Life’s not fair, they could have said, and whether or not the individual teacher was being unfairly sacrificed, the administrators who enforced the law were just following orders. It was the will of the lawmakers that the firing of the teachers with the lowest VAMS – regardless of whether the metric reflected actually effectiveness – would make schools more like corporations, so practitioners would have to accept it. But, this is one more case where reformers ignored the real world, did not play out the education policy and legal chess game, and anticipate that rulings such as Judge Thomson’s would soon be coming.

 
Real world, VAM advocates had to claim that its results represented the actual effectiveness of teachers and that, somehow, their scheme would someday improve schools. This liberated teachers and administrators to fight back in the courts. Moreover, top-down reformers set out to impose the same basic system on every teacher, in every type of class and school, in our diverse nation. When this top-down micromanaging met reality, proponents of test-driven evaluations had to play so many statistical games, create so many made-up metrics, and improvise in so many bizarre ways, that the resulting mess would be legally indefensible.

 
And, that is why the cases in Florida and Tennessee might soon be seen as the end of the beginning of the nation’s repudiation of value-added evaluations. The New Mexico case, along with the renewal of the federal ESEA and the departure of Arne Duncan, is clearly the beginning of the end. Had VAM proponents objectively briefed attorneys on the strengths and weaknesses of their theories, they could have thought through the inevitable legal process. On the other hand, I doubt that Kane and his fellow economists knew enough about education to be able to anticipate the inevitable, unintended results of their theories on schools. In numerous conversations with VAM true believers, rarely have I met one who seemed to know enough about the nuts and bolts about schools to be able to brief legal advisors, much less anticipate the inevitable results that would eventually have to be defended in court.

Horace Meister (a pseudonym) worked as a data analyst for many years in the New York City  Department of Education. He is currently conducting research at a major university. In this post, he addresses some of the common misperceptions about charter schools. I cannot explain why everyone who writes about SA feels the need to be anonymous.

 

 

 

 

The Charter School Myth

 

 

Hilary Clinton recently remarked “there are good charter schools and there are bad charter schools…most charter schools, I don’t want to say every one, but most charter schools, they don’t take the hardest to teach kids, or if they do they don’t keep them.” This upended a comfortable consensus that had emerged in the past decade. Politicians, both Democrat and Republican, blindly support charter schools. Facts are ignored or denied.

 

Simultaneously, a number of unflattering stories came out in the press about the Success Academy charter chain in New York City. It turns out that the charter chain suspends large numbers of kindergarten and first grade students.[i] It also turns out that the charter chain tries to force out challenging students.[ii]

 

Success Academy should serve as a lesson, debunking the mythologizing of charter schools that has become so widespread in education reform and political circles. But before examining the myth of Success we must address a deliberate obfuscation often introduced into such analyses by some defenders of charter schools.

 

We assume that the purpose of charter schools is to educate the same students as the public school system. In other words a successful charter school should have great outcomes with students living and growing up in challenging circumstances and environments. A charter school that creams students, that selectively gets rid of large numbers of challenging students, or that otherwise manipulates its outcomes is not fulfilling the purpose of charter schools. Talk of magnet public schools or the all too many zoned public schools that, due to the unfortunate segregation in American neighborhoods and communities, are not diverse, is irrelevant to the policy issue under discussion. The bottom line is that thousands of public schools and tens of thousands of teachers are dedicated to students that American society has put at significant disadvantage. The relevant policy question is—do charter schools show up the public schools doing this critical work?

 

So, what do we know about Success Academy?[iii]

 

Success Academy schools have a student body very different than public schools. The New York City Department of Education’s (NYCDOE) School Quality Report data show that. Success Academy has a very different student population than the NYC public school system.[iv] On average, a Success Academy school has sixty six percent fewer English Language Learners (4.7% vs 13.8%), forty three percent fewer special education students (12.3% vs 21.4%), eighty six percent fewer of the highest need special education students (.9% vs 6.5%), and forty percent fewer students living in temporary housing (8.1% vs. 13.4%) than a public school. These disparities will only grow as Success Academy’s push into gentrifying and middle class neighborhoods continues.[v]

 

 

 

Success Academy has very high and selective attrition rates. SA has high attrition rates particularly among special education students and English Language Learners.[vi] The attrition rate increases as students advance to the grades when they will be taking the state tests.[vii] “This pattern repeats cohort after cohort with growth in early grades, followed by sharp winnowing accumulating over time.”[viii] The selective nature of the attrition is crucial, since that is the distinguishing characteristic between attrition at Success Academy and that at public schools. Such selective attrition is characteristic of the charter sector.[ix]

 

Success Academy suspends students at extremely high rates as a deliberate strategy to get challenging students to leave. “The charter school network suspended its students at more than double the rate of the New York City public schools, eleven percent to five percent” with a much less challenging student population.[x] “In its first two years, Success Academy 1 suspended 8% and 2% of its students respectively. Over the next five years, however, those numbers jumped to 12%, 15%, 22%, 27%, and 23%…By the way, the out of school suspension rate for 2011-2012 at Upper West Success, a school where 29% of students qualify for free lunch and 10% for reduced price lunch? 5%. Apparently suspension rates in the high 20s are a necessity for schools where 78% of the students are in or near poverty.”[xi] Insiders report that “school leaders and network staff members explicitly talked about suspending students or calling parents into frequent meetings as ways to force parents to fall in line or prompt them to withdraw their children.”[xii]

 

Success Academy forces high need special education students to leave. “But The News found a disturbing number of suspension cases where the network’s administrators removed special-education pupils from normal classrooms for weeks and even months, while at the same time pressuring their parents to transfer them to regular public schools.”[xiii]

 

Success Academy employs additional strategies to winnow out challenging students. For example, they mail the annual reenrollment forms to only preferred families.[xiv] By the way, public schools as a general rule don’t even have reenrollment forms. A student on the roster of a public school remains on the roster.

 

Teaching at Success Academy is focused on test prep and practice. It appears that teachers are mandated to focus overwhelmingly on test prep.[xv] To such an extent that students wet their pants out of the induced anxiety.[xvi] This leads to high teacher attrition rates, with over 30% of teachers annually leaving the charter chain entirely.[xvii] Often because the teachers could not abide by the way SA wanted them to treat students.[xviii]

 

Despite these shenanigans the academic outcomes of Success Academy schools are questionable.

 

A Success Academy education does not seem to prepare students for success in high school. Only 21% of SA middle school graduates passed their classes and earned at least 10 credits (44 credits are required to graduate high school in NYC) in their 9th grade courses. Note that since SA is a relatively new charter chain these data only exist for their first school, Harlem Success Academy 1.[xix] And not a single SA student scored well on the Specialized High School Admissions Test (SHSAT).[xx]

 

Success Academy seems to do a mediocre job of growing their students academically. For the sake of argument we will use test scores on the New York State exams as a measure of success, since Success Academy likes to boast about those scores. The NYCDOE calculates growth targets for every school.[xxi] On the English exams three Success Academy schools exceeded, two schools met, one school approached and one school did not meet expected growth targets.[xxii] On the Math exams only two schools exceeded, four met, and one approached the expected growth targets.

 

Success Academy seems to do a very poor job with their high need students. The data provide a measure for how students in each school’s bottom third do. Only two Success Academy schools exceeded and two schools met English growth targets for these students, while two approached and one did not meet the target. In Math, four schools did not meet the expected growth target while two exceeded and one met the targets.

 

Other analyses have found similarly poor outcomes from Success. An examination of 2012 and 2013 fourth grade scores found that “Success schools dropped by about 40 points while other schools that had such high 2012 scores dropped by about 20 points. But in math, two of the four Success schools had a smaller drop than the other schools and the other two Success schools had about the same drop.”[xxiii] A different analysis of the 2013 data found that “Success Academy scored in the 39th percentile on English exam growth for their overall student population and in the 21st percentile on English exam growth for the students who began with scores in the lowest 1/3 of students.”[xxiv]

 

Overall these are rather sorry outcomes that nonetheless overestimate Success Academy’s performance since even growth measures don’t account for selective attrition and other SA tactics. Still the growth metrics do a better job than pure performance metrics in measuring the true contribution of a school to student learning.

 

What can be learned from Success Academy? There are of course positive take-aways from Success. Additional learning time, such as that mandated by SA, is likely a positive intervention strategy for some students requiring additional academic support. SA offers the equivalent of about fifty additional schools days, thanks to their extended school day.[xxv] That is of course expensive and we know that SA spends thousands of dollars more per student than public schools with similar populations.[xxvi] There is no question that additional funding for schools helps improve outcomes for students growing up in poverty.[xxvii] New York City is now directing additional funds, along with other initiatives such as extended learning time, to their Renewal schools, schools that serve a disproportionately disadvantaged student body. Providing schools with such supports can benefit students at both charter and public schools.

 

Teachers must be given the time and support to grow into the tremendous responsibility that every educator has for student success. As Success Academy first year teachers are assistants in the classroom ideally working with and learning from excellent and experienced teachers. Such an initiative, at a national scale supported by local districts and the federal government in collaboration with schools of education, is definitely worth a look.

 

 

 

[i]http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/kindergarten-young-suspend-student/

 

[ii] http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/30/nyregion/at-a-success-academy-charter-school-singling-out-pupils-who-have-got-to-go.html

 

[iii] An earlier review of claims made by and about Success Academy can be found here https://dianeravitch.net/2014/09/12/researcher-charter-chain-built-on-hyperbole/.

 

[iv] The data can be found in the file here http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/06F7DE89-AA46-4509-9A0C-600038728D14/0/2014_2015_EMS_SQR_Results_2015_12_09.xlsx. For explanation of the various metrics see http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5347DA79-B985-4CBF-B56E-B05C8380C53B/0/201415EducatorGuideEMS11122015.pdf. The Success Academy schools with data include five schools in Harlem, two in the Bronx. Two schools, one in Bedford Stuyvesant and one on the Upper West Side have demographic but no academic performance data as they are too new. All the other twenty three SA schools are so new that they have no Quality Report data at all.

[vi] http://commonal.tumblr.com/post/58209601458/harlem-success-academy-charter-and-attrition

 

[vii] http://insideschools.org/blog/item/1000359-vanishing-students-at-harlem-success#

 

[viii] See the data here http://danielskatz.net/2015/11/25/eva-moskowitz-cannot-help-herself/.

 

[ix] See https://dianeravitch.net/2015/02/09/the-unholy-alliance-charters-the-media-and-research/.

 

[x] http://www.shankerinstitute.org/blog/student-discipline-race-and-eva-moskowitz%E2%80%99s-success-academy-charter-schools

 

[xi] http://danielskatz.net/2015/11/25/eva-moskowitz-cannot-help-herself/

 

[xii] http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/30/nyregion/at-a-success-academy-charter-school-singling-out-pupils-who-have-got-to-go.html?_r=0

 

[xiii] http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/success-academy-fire-parents-fight-disciplinary-policy-article-1.1438753

 

[xiv] http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/30/nyregion/at-a-success-academy-charter-school-singling-out-pupils-who-have-got-to-go.html?_r=0

 

[xv] https://dianeravitch.net/2013/10/04/mole-in-success-academy-speaks/ and https://dianeravitch.net/2015/04/07/my-conversation-with-a-success-academy-charter-teacher/ and http://nymag.com/news/features/65614/index3.html. Interestingly enough there has been a recent attempt by some apologists to claim that Success Academy is a progressive pedagogy paradise. First-hand reports by teachers (i.e. those not describing carefully arranged guided and pre-scheduled tours) provide an overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

 

[xvi] http://www.businessinsider.com/students-wetting-pants-success-academy-charter-schools-2015-4

 

[xvii] http://www.shankerinstitute.org/blog/teacher-turnover-success-academy-charter-schools with data suggesting even higher attrition rates found here http://citylimits.org/2014/08/20/why-charter-schools-have-high-teacher-turnover/.

 

[xviii] http://www.wnyc.org/story/302768-high-teacher-turnover-at-a-success-network-school/. It has been suggested that “The pedagogy in the Success Academy schools is rote, highly disciplined and punishment, suspensions, are commonplace, perhaps the pedagogical/discipline practices chase away teachers of color.” https://mets2006.wordpress.com/2015/10/20/success-academy-charter-school-staff-diversity-why-is-the-staff-overwhelming-white-tone-deaf-by-choice-a-diverse-workforce-is-essential-in-the-21st-century/. Some telling reviews of Success Academy’s culture can be read on Indeed.com http://www.indeed.com/cmp/Success-Academy-Charter-Schools/reviews and on glassdoor.com https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Success-Academy-Charter-Schools-Reviews-E381408.htm. Other first-hand accounts can be read here https://dianeravitch.net/2015/04/27/a-former-success-academy-teacher-steps-forward-to-tell-her-story/ and here https://dianeravitch.net/2015/12/01/former-success-academy-teacher-why-i-resigned/.

 

[xix] See column CW on the following file http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/06F7DE89-AA46-4509-9A0C-600038728D14/0/2014_2015_EMS_SQR_Results_2015_12_09.xlsx under the “student achievement” tab.

 

[xx] http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/gonzalez-success-charter-students-fail-top-city-schools-article-1.1833960. It would not be surprising if SA has already begun intense SHSAT prep for this exam for their students in response to this, now widespread, statistic. While unfortunate that tests are driving so much of what happens in schools that may be the best way to open high school opportunities for their students.

 

[xxi]The data can be found in the following file http://www.shankerinstitute.org/blog/estimated-versus-actual-days-learning-charter-school-studies. See columns P, V, AT, and AZ under the “student achievement” tab. Broadly speaking one third of all schools each exceed, meet or approached their growth targets. The remaining ten percent of schools did not meet their target. See pages 24-25 in the document here for an explanation of these growth targets http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5347DA79-B985-4CBF-B56E-B05C8380C53B/0/201415EducatorGuideEMS11122015.pdf.

 

[xxiii] http://garyrubinstein.teachforus.org/2013/08/13/how-to-define-success/

 

[xxiv] https://dianeravitch.net/2014/09/12/researcher-charter-chain-built-on-hyperbole/

 

[xxv] Somewhat disappointingly it appears that the better test results claimed by many charter schools often reported as an “estimated days of learning” metric are less than the actual extra days of learning at those charter schools. See http://www.shankerinstitute.org/blog/estimated-versus-actual-days-learning-charter-school-studies.

 

[xxvi] See Table 2 here http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/ttr-charter-rent_0.pdf

 

[xxvii] See http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~ruckerj/Jackson_Johnson_Persico_SFR_LRImpacts.pdf. Of course the additional funds must be spent sensibly.

 

Steven Singer is a teacher in Pennsylvania. This is a moving post, and he gave me permission to post it in full. It has many links. If you want to read them, open the article.

 

 

Pennsylvania lawmakers are ready to help all students across the Commonwealth – if only they can abuse, mistreat and trample some of them.

 

Which ones? The poor black and brown kids. Of course!

 

That seems to be the lesson of a school code bill passed with bipartisan support by the state Senate Thursday.

 

The legislation would require the Commonwealth to pick as many as 5 “underperforming” Philadelphia schools a year to close, charterize or just fire the principal and half the staff. It would also allow non-medically trained personnel to take an on-line course before working in the district to treat diabetic school children. And it would – of course – open the floodgates to more charter schools!

 

It’s a dumb provision, full of unsubstantiated facts, faulty logic and corporate education reform kickbacks. But that’s only the half of it!

 

The bill is part of a budget framework agreed to by Governor Tom Wolf and the Republican-controlled legislature necessary to finally pass a state-wide spending plan. The financial proposal has been held hostage for almost half a year!

 

The major sticking point has been school funding. Democrats like Wolf demand an increase. Republicans refuse. And the worst part is that the increase would only begin to heal the cuts the GOP made over the last four years.

 

Republicans just won’t clean up their own mess.

 

They slashed public school budgets by almost $1 billion per year for the last four years with disastrous consequences. Voters who could make little headway against a GOP legislature entrenched in office through gerrymandering rebelled by kicking the Republican Governor out of Harrisburg and voting in Wolf, a new chief executive who promised to support school children.

 

But for the last 5 months, the Republican-controlled legislature simply refused to spend money on – yuck – school children! Especially poor brown and black kids who rely more on state funding! Barf!

 

Finally a bargain was struck to put the money back, but only if it screws over more poor black and brown kids.

 

As usual, Philadelphia Schools are the state’s whipping boy.

 

For decades saddled with a host of social ills yet starved of resources, Philadelphia Schools simply couldn’t function on funding from an impoverished local tax base. The 8th largest school district in the country needed a financial investment from the state to make up the difference. However, in 2001 the Commonwealth decided it would only do this if it could assume control with a mostly unelected School Recovery Commission (SRC). Now after 14 years of failure, the state has decided annually to take a quintet of Philly schools away from the state and give them to – THE STATE! The State Department of Education, that is, which will have to enact one of the above terrible reforms to turn the schools around.

 

Yet each of these reforms is a bunch of baloney!

 

Hiring non-medical personnel with on-line training to treat diabetic kids!? Yes, two children died in Philly schools recently because budget cuts took away full-time school nurses. But this solution is an outrage! Try proposing it at a school for middle class or rich kids! Try proposing it for a school serving a mostly white population!

 

More charter schools!? Most new charter companies aren’t even interested in taking over Philly learning institutions. There’s no money in it! The carcass has been picked clean!

 

Privatizing public schools has never increased academic outcomes. Charter schools – at best – do no better than traditional public schools and – most often – do much worse.

 

Closing schools is a ridiculous idea, too. No school has ever been improved by being shut down. Students uprooted from their communities rarely see academic gains.

 

And firing staff because the legislature won’t provide resources is like kicking your car because you forgot to buy gas. You can’t get blood from a stone.

 

But this is what Republicans are demanding. And most of the Democrats are giving in. Every state Senator from Philadelphia voted for this plan – though reluctantly.

 

Is this really the only way to reach some kind of normalcy for the rest of the state? Do we really need to bleed Philadelphia some more before we can heal the self-inflicted wounds caused by our conservative legislators?

 

The bill includes a $100 million increase for Philadelphia Schools. But this is just healing budget cuts made to the district four years ago. Until Republicans took over the legislature, Philadelphia received this same sum from the state to help offset the vampire bite of charter schools on their shrinking budgets. Now – like all impoverished Pennsylvania schools – that charter school reimbursement is only a memory.

 

So this money only puts Philly back to where it was financially a handful of years ago when it was still struggling.

 

It’s a bad bargain for these students. Though some might argue it’s all we’ve got.

 

A sane government would increase funding to meet the needs of the students AND return the district to local control.

 

Republicans demand accountability for any increase in funding but how does this new bill do that exactly? Charter schools are not accountable to anyone but their shareholders. The School Recovery Commission has been failing for over a decade. Since most are political appointees, who are they accountable to really?

 

A duly elected school board would be accountable to residents. If voters didn’t like how they were leading the district, they could vote them out. THAT would be accountability. Not this sham blood sacrifice.

 

The state House is set to vote on this bill soon and will probably pass it, too. Maybe that’s just as well. Maybe there really is no other choice in the twisted halls of Pennsylvania politics.

 

However, let’s be honest about it. This is some classist, racist bullshit.

This is a paradox. New federal data show that the four-year high school graduation rate is up to 82%. But at the same time, college-going rates are down.

The high school graduation rate is at a historic high. The state with the highest graduation rate is Iowa, at 91%. The jurisdiction with the lowest graduation rate is the District of Columbia, at 61%.

The 82% rate understates the proportion of students who receive a high school diploma. Reformers decided a few years ago to pay attention only to the four-year rate, without exception. This, students who graduate in August instead of May or June are not counted. Students who took five or even six years to get their degree are not counted. When the U.S. Census Bureau counts the percentage of high school graduates in the age range of 18-24, the numbers are much higher for every group because the U.S. Department of Education’s methodology excludes anyone who required more than four years to graduate.

Jon Marcus writes in “The Hechinger Report” about the decline in college-going rates, especially in community colleges and for-profit “universities.”

He writes:

“Enrollments at colleges and universities dropped for the eighth semester in a row this fall, down nearly 2 percent below what they were last fall, new figures show.

“The number of students over 24 continued to decline sharply—more than 4 percent—according to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, which tracks this. Enrollment at four-year for-profit institutions plunged by nearly 14 percent.

“U.S. university and college enrollment has fallen 6 percent in the last four years….

“In all, U.S. university and college enrollment has fallen 6 percent in the last four years, even as policymakers push to increase the proportion of the population with degrees.”