Anthony Mize was the eighth-grade teacher of Elizabeth Vergara, the lead plaintiff in the case that seeks to eliminate teacher tenure, “Vergara v. California.”
Funded by a Silicon Valley zillionaire named David Welch and a group he created callef Students Matter, Elizabeth Vergara and other students claimed that they were denied equal protection of the law because they were taught by inferior teachers, protected in their job by tenure. However, her teacher Anthony Mize did not have tenure when he taught Elizabeth nor does he have tenure now. He is writing a book about his experience as the teacher who allegedly harmed Elizabeth Vergara. This is an excerpt from his book, which he generously shares here.
Mize writes:
Battle Cry
Does a soldier hear the explosion that’s about to change him? What about the ordinary man? Does he hear the bomb go off, knowing it was detonated, yet blind to its totality when it’s already upon him?
“It’s your Dad.”
She handed the phone to me passing along the heaviness. Merging years of teaching and learning, deliberate footsteps of my life had funneled to this very moment. His voice on the other end was pulling me into The Great Fight.
I was not drafted, but chosen.
A marked man, dropped onto the front lines of a Battle that will contribute to the War on public education that has been raging for centuries in this country.
Embracing reality, the journey ahead, hunkered behind the wall of defiant disbelief that comes with first hearing the news, then the realization of what could become.
Picturing the Battle in my mind, what it would look like, feel like, sound like. Wishing to believe it could not kill me, knowing it capable of taming the spirit.
Defacing my enthusiasm for life, it would yield a numbed scalpel towards the jagged amputation and dismemberment of my soul. Echoing a muted distance between me, and love. It would attempt to asphyxiate my living breath.
On Tuesday June 10, 1692 Bridget Bishop was the first person hung from a tree during the Salem Witch Trials after being found guilty of being a witch. One of those that falsely accused Bishop was a child named Elizabeth.
322 years to the day, Tuesday, June 10, 2013 Judge Rolf Treu ruled in favor of the nine student plaintiffs, and their legal team funded by a billionaire businessman, who accused 16 of their former teachers of being grossly ineffective educators, in the case of Vergara vs. The State of California.
With a few exceptions, the 16 accused teachers remained anonymous to the public. Known only in official court documents, tagged and labeled in the proceedings by a single letter.
I am teacher “D” and Elizabeth Vergara’s eighth grade English teacher, this is my story.
Back to School
In this neighborhood sometimes you can sense it coming, feeling it in the temperature of the air, other times it blindsides you.
His Mother, an alumni of the school briefly shared her experience as a student there years ago with me, some of her struggles. Knowing the reality of life her son faces as he exits the school and begins the walk home in the surrounding community.
He had an Individualized Education Plan (IEP), his biological Father passed away in Mexico during that school year; and he welcomed a new baby sibling into the family, all while making academic gains in my classroom. Amidst all of this, socially he was thriving, his academic gains were a result of increased self-confidence, and new found friend base. Having a voice that was validated in the classroom, and a shift in maturation were evident in his overall growth as a student learner, even during this challenging time.
His disability impeded, but did not debilitate, difficulty paying attention was one consistent barrier that teased his academic promise. Moving the discussion towards this topic, I began by praising him on his increase in reading fluency, highlighting specific academic gains of the year, and his strengths in the classroom with his Mother.
“Your son has trouble paying attention in cla…”
Screeching tires interrupted, a car’s engine gassed faster than the wheels could spin, three bullets cut the evening air. Almost believing the already known, my eyes darted towards the mother negotiating with hers, searching for confirmation.
“Yes” They replied.
Four to six more shots called out fate’s name, bookended by another set of screeching of tires.
Inner workings of my mind exchanged wondering, “Should I duck?” The large caged glass windows that walled the back of my classroom, and row of neighboring classrooms played on the reel in my headspace. Envisioning a stray bullet finding its way through the glass, into the back of my skull, plunging into my brain. Without time to panic, noting the ease in which the Mother was absorbing the moment, seeming tested, like this wasn’t new to her.
Unable to see, my back directly turned away from the corner intersection where the drive by shooting was occurring 30-50 yards behind me, and my neighboring colleagues classrooms, as our school’s campus was alive with students, and families back to school that evening.
Deciding not to duck, comforted by the actions of my student’s Mother across from me. Reality had shifted across the middle school desk that separated me from this woman I’ve just met, whose child we both knew, both wished the best for. Who was now engaged in prayer, watching as she maneuvered her hand in a cross motion over her chest, silently mouthing a message to above.
The shell casings hadn’t fallen, yet I had the strange understanding she was not praying for me, or herself, at least not explicitly, she was praying for someone else.
Possibly, her prayers were answered, or it was the shaky trigger finger of a gunman unseasoned to the act of blindly shooting at human targets, not grasping the consequence of their soon to be forever action. There were no physical injuries reported, no immediate loss of life.
The shooting had stopped. No bullets had hit our classroom and his Mother was okay, I ran to the window to see if anybody outside was hit. Not seeing anyone down, hurrying to the room of my neighboring teachers, one who was out of the room, and the other teacher was calling the office. A fellow English teacher, and friend whose classroom was closest to the shooting had ducked under his desk for cover. As I entered the room, he was gathering himself, as we all were rattled on some level.
Within moments the police were there beginning to secure the scene with yellow caution tape. Another cautionary tale too close to home, too close to school.
“Again. Why does your son have trouble paying attention?”
Walking out with my Dad on the way out that night, even as Maclay’s Literacy Coach he was always dedicated and in attendance at these school functions. It felt good to be next to him, cognizant of the fragility of existence.
At the front gate by the main office we passed Maclay’s Principal Verónica Arreguín.
“I’m glad I gave you the highest rankings on the Principal survey we took earlier today. Thanks for running towards the bullets, instead of away from them.” I said.
In response to seeing her again, the previous time an hour earlier she was running down the outdoor hall corridor to our back row of classrooms as soon as the shooting started.
Walking out my Dad offered to walk me to my car parked in an adjacent lot. Thinking that was sweet, I thanked him and declined. A reminder he will always be My Dad.
We all went our ways only to return the next morning.
Lying in bed that night my ears were ringing with the sounds of bullets. Not because of the volume, but because of its sharpness, precise in execution. The reverberations are numbing to the senses, deeply rooted in their cavernous echoes, implanted not only in your eardrums, but into your psyche.
My Final Year at Macay
“…I was challenged that year as an educator. Population wise it may have been one of my toughest years; the students had an intensity of needs, out of a school with a population who all have intense needs. It ranked up there with the challenges faced during my first few months taking over mid-year, during my first days of teaching at Maclay.
All of the work was worth it, much was learned, and taught along the way. I had a student who ate glass, and students who didn’t eat. I had homies and the homeless, addicts, cutters, and the forgotten. They were not sprinkled in, but to a student each had one to several major obstacles impeding progress. I looked out for all, and taught with my all. Sometimes they didn’t say goodbye they just disappeared.”
LAUSD Removed as Defendants
9.23.2013
When the Los Angeles Unified School District is dropped as Defendants in the Vergara Trial, my name was not even associated with the Case yet. Finding out from one of the California Teachers Association union lawyers representing the Defendants that it wasn’t until two months later, before my name was even mentioned. First brought up by Elizabeth Vergara, in a deposition taking place in November of 2013.
After all my sacrifice, dedication, debts paid, and burdens carried this is what happens? The Los Angeles Unified School District is dropped as Co-Defendants in the Vergara Case. Walking off unscathed, while I am soon to be named, and included in the Case, set to engage in a battle I wasn’t even aware I was fighting.
LAUSD in the matter of a day, one announcement goes from Defendant in the Case, to dropped from the Case. With its highest ranking official poised to testify in support of the Plaintiffs, against the teachers under his watch, and leadership. LAUSD Superintendent Deasy was to take on the battle cry of teacher tenure, and grossly ineffective teachers, precisely what they were calling me.
Attorneys working for distinguished law firms, containing the scope of influence and financial backing as the Plaintiffs legal team shouldn’t waffle like this. The Plaintiffs drop LAUSD as co-defendants, with Plaintiffs lawyers stating that as a district the Los Angeles Unified School District, ‘are hindered by rigged and outdated laws that harm students.’
Lawyers, masters of nuances and veiled manipulation, intentional in word selection don’t use such concrete words believing in them one day, and disbelieving in them the next. It speaks to a philosophical waffling regarding who is truly responsible for the ailments of education, or is a weak attempt to mask some greater agenda spawned from a muddled political petri dish.
Six months after the Vergara Trial´s verdict was announced, Superintendent Deasy would resign from his position in LAUSD, finding employment with Students Matter, led by Silicon Valley billionaire, spearhead of the Vergara Trial, David Welch. Deasy’s replacement would be former LAUSD Superintendent Ramon Cortines.
Was LAUSD the innocent bystander in all of this, the damsel in distress? If true, then either way the Plaintiffs are reactionary with whom they are including in this Case, the teachers, or the school districts.
These are people’s lives, and livelihood, let’s not throw caution to the wind. If you’re going to pull a trigger marking someone, something, as a target, make sure with absolute certainty that you are firing in the right direction. If you fail at that, you are as reckless as a gang member who commits a drive by, and inadvertently hits an innocent child with a bullet. It doesn’t matter whom you are aiming at, it matters whom you hit.
Surely, the Plaintiff’s lawyers check their facts at least on all of the 16 teachers named in the Case. 16 people is a lot, maybe they should enact a cap, or some sort of reduction of accused quasi-Defendants named in lawsuits. Checking up on 16 teachers before you put them in a Case of this stature; this magnitude, is an overwhelming undertaking. The due diligence required is mind-numbing, 16 teachers.
I couldn’t imagine the Plaintiffs’ lawyers being required to check up on 35 plus kids, I mean co-quasi defendants, in their classroom, or legal proceedings. What would happen if someone had to go to the bathroom, or three defendants walked in tardy, one had a disability, showed up every three days, doesn’t show up at all, couldn’t even read, or understand the court proceedings, was suicidal, starving, or dying on the inside. How would the lawyers look on them? Like teachers look after students, with the same humanity, love, depth of compassion, levels of patience, ability to teach?
Although, yet to be named in the Case, never even hearing of it before, let alone aware of my potential future inclusion, this is a pivotal day in its evolution. The Los Angeles Unified School District is dropped as a Defendant from the Vergara Case after reaching a “settlement”.
Yoda You’re My Father
Friday 12.13.2013
Nick Mize, my Father, coined “Yoda” by some colleagues during his time at Maclay Middle School, for the capacity to know and understand, much like Yoda from Star Wars. By title, and position he was the school’s Literacy Coach. A role in which he served for over six years, prior to that, working as an English teacher at Maclay for the previous three years.
As Literacy Coach, he had direct and absolute access to key data pertaining to the analysis and measurement of students and teachers at Maclay. Having firsthand knowledge of all the operating systems, with the capacity to access individual student data on a micro level, to understanding the entire scope of the school, through the lens of data on a wide scale.
Specifically, his computer’s hard drive contained information, and data vital to understanding our school, teachers, and individual students, from a variety of statistical and data analysis means. He was the sole gatekeeper, and behind him housed on his computer’s hard drive, a treasure trove of current and archived historical data essential to understanding Maclay’s students and teachers.
On Friday, December 13, 2013, the same day the Vergara Case had its official trial date set, my Dad, Maclay’s Literacy Coach, sitting in his office at Maclay, in front of his LAUSD issued computer, at his desk watching his computer screen said, “It looked like the flesh was falling off the computer.”
Files started to disappear, simply vanishing from his desk top. Losing all control of his operating system, he was unable to intervene. His mouse cursor moved, unmanned, across the screen, while helplessly witnessing the removal of data, and the crash of his entire hard drive. Every file, every document, every letter keyed, every mouse click ever stored was now completely gone, ceasing to exist, never again to be retrieved, never again to be viewed.
Over the ten years my Father has worked at Maclay not one day, not one time, did his entire hard drive crash. Out of the years he has been on a computer, whether for personal, professional, or academic use, and the man is at the Doctoral level, not once had his hard drive ever crashed.
Mayor Speak
1.30.2014
Day four of the Vergara Trial, holding political traction, with politicians turning up the volume, former Mayor of Los Angeles Antonio Villaraigosa lends his support, joining the students’ cause.
“This lawsuit, Vergara v. California, is built on the simple and undeniable premise that every child—regardless of background—deserves a quality education. And that’s why I stand with these brave students who are standing up for what is right and what is just.”
As the teacher of the lawsuit’s namesake, I was in this, and chained from afar. Voiceless, as the political bandwagon was being piled on, fueled by a good ol’ boy’s club handshake, and billionaire’s air five, he do, she do, I do, politician see, monkey do, we all scream for ice cream.
The young man photographed on the right of former Mayor Villaraigosa was a classmate of Elizabeth Vergara’s, both of them students in my Period 3/4 English class. The student on the left was also a student of mine in an Intervention and Enrichment class that year. The narratives that follow connect with the young man on the right of the former Mayor.
Mayor Villaraigosa stood by him in this photograph, while I stood by him in life. Providing something lasting much longer than a fading image, or brush with celebrity.
Where Mayor’s take photo-ops for fame and agenda.
Teachers write the agenda on the board and remember.
Who’s the fake,
and who’s the contender?
If this was a team… you should give me an assist.
Politicians are shaking hands, and giving babies a kiss.
Claim MVP, mount trophies, stuff the ballot to be an All-Star.
Remember who’s in the back seat changing diapers, while you’re driving the car.
You see:
I play for the kid in the back row, who leans his hat back low,
And he’s a little agro, and back nearly broke, from the toil, toll, and load.
You wouldn’t know, because if that same kid was walking down the street, tug the wallet, grab the car keys, let’s beat feet.
I couldn’t express your expression, if you saw them roll up and sit next to you in your seat
while front court at a Laker’s game, No photo ops, -not now mijo
Back to the cheap seat, Those people we just meet,
like a bad memory hit delete, I don’t live what I speak, my speeches are weak
the same track, change a few words, and sometimes lanes, mostly just hit repeat.
In a town full of ego and stars, fraudulent plastic Botox mirages, even Jack Nicholson knows there is a difference between sitting courtside every Laker game, and actually being on the team.
I wonder if student “x” would have been in that photo if it weren’t for the effort, the care, the teaching, the mentoring that he received during the time he was in my classroom?
Or would there have been another student “x” in his spot? I say student “x”, because to be in a position as removed from the people, someone so disconnected in an attempt to connect to it all, confined by challenges and time constraints that cripple the position of one in such a responsibility, as Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. One can only operate in a world where they know a student as “x”, and never their name. Student’s stories, and cause, a political tag-line in some greater personal and individual quest.
Just like LAUSD Board Member Steve Zimmer can only write an editorial stating, “I know Beatriz Vergara. Not personally. But I know thousands of Beatriz Vergaras. They are my students, my counselees and my neighbors.” He cannot write I know Elizabeth, or Beatriz Vergara, Villaraigosa can only reach as far as his position will allow. He can never know the Vergara’s, only of them.
We don’t have time to know any student simply as student “x”. Villaraigosa may have been emotionally invested in the cause of people of a similar identity, circumstance, or lot in life, possibly he even cared about the young men before him in this photo, but he certainly didn’t know them. Standing by them, he was really saying I support my cause, not I support you. Because I know what supporting them was, and is like.
He certainly didn’t know that those “brave” children he was standing for, I too have stood for, fought for, sacrificed for.
The same young man in the photo taken with Villaraigosa, was the same young man that on his birthday, his Mother emailed me because he was having such success in school that year. Centered on his breakthroughs in writing, increased understanding of academics and self, building a budding confidence, and self-esteem all positive products of his work in my class, specifically the work I did with him. She wanted to reward him, and brought cupcakes in for the class. Cupcakes? This kid was used to violence, and fear, not smiling, and green frosting.
When he was awarded, and honored, with other students having his name called out before a Chivas professional soccer game, it was my two daughters, my wife and I who took the hour plus drive each way to support him. His only other support base in attendance was his probation officer, who also cheered for him even though he missed his opportunity to walk the field pregame because he didn’t arrive at the game until after the first period.
When his mother emailed again, inquiring about purchasing a yearbook for him, my Wife and I made sure that he had one to commemorate that year, his success. We didn’t have a lot, but more than some.
Even though by name, and by job assignment, that year I was a substitute teacher, there is no substitute for that kind of teaching.
Seeing him for the last time as a ninth grader visiting Maclay after school let out one day with a football to play catch with me. I have not seen him since.
Knowing him was the first time I was introduced to the F13, Florencia street gang. It was in him, it flowed in his brother, his mostly off again incarcerated Father, who often referred to the boy lovingly as Lil’ Homie, and many of the men who would brand, and exile their footprint on his young life. How do you fight your shadow? You can shadow box, but eventually your shadow will shift, and dance quicker than you, grow bigger than you, enter in, and through you.
In the strangest of ways
One of the rich ironies is that If I wasn’t Elizabeth Vergara’s teacher she may never have been in this Trial, nor would I be. As a teacher I am an advocate of the student’s voice, encouraging them to take a stand. Never thinking it was going to be the witness stand, speaking out against me calling me “Grossly Ineffective” as a teacher.
A constant proponent of social justice, ally to the community of Pacoima, seeing that it receives its proper and equitable due, highlighting stories of the forgotten, and the unknown. The teaching, the strength, the voice I encouraged in all my students, potentially gave Elizabeth, or aided her in finding herself, allowing for this to occur. Her voice, what she speaks in regard to me is completely inaccurate, declarations of perjury, yet I do applaud the spirit of sticking up for oneself.
Even agreeing with her cause, I disagree with the way she went about it. The way her team went about it. Adults using children as collateral, like parents in a nasty divorce. We all know those hurt the parents, but more importantly, and adversely it always damages the children deeply.
As plaintiffs in this case, children and parents are both strung along by the powerfully persuasive because they come equipped with sellable back stories, and are willing to contort to fit the required role. Showpieces for lawyers, and faces for agendas, the flashy escorts to judicial and legislative after parties of educational reformation, a self-promotion of those who have too much power.
This experience at times has been draining, exhausting in its consumption of my time, overwhelming in what it has drawn out, and put in. Yet, it has allowed me to experience life in new ways, understanding that which I could not have had, or known without these experiences. In a sense, and in many ways Elizabeth Vergara is my teacher, so too is Judge Rolf Treu, attorney Marcellus McRae, even billionaire spearhead of the Case David Welch. As is my mentor Verónica Arreguín, so too is Nick Mize, and “student x”, as are my own daughters my teachers. For this, and them, I do it all.
With that same respect, the young man that walked into the city of Pacoima, onto the campus of Charles Maclay Middle School, was a young man of much different experience and understanding. The man that exited, or checked out, but never fully left, was a young man with a much fuller comprehension of life in all facets. The learning that occurred within me is almost unfathomable in its infancy, essentially unmeasurable, because it continues to flourish daily, and sprout anew from seeds started and cultivated there.
I found my own voice in the community of Pacoima. A voice that was found there, but is carried everywhere. It has an edge, born from adversity, and circumstance, creating an ability to stick up for that in which you believe in. Pacoima by virtue of its beauty and brutality provided me a voice to speak, to stand up for myself with, to tell this portion of this story.
In the oddest and strangest of ways this is all intertwined and directly linked. Without my ability to provide Elizabeth with a voice in a sense, even though it did come out deeply misguided when referencing me, the edge that Pacoima provided me, allowed for both of us to speak out, and speak up.
My hope for Elizabeth Vergara is to know that she is not a grossly ineffective student, that at times our biggest weakness can be our greatest asset. That life forgives, that education does ignite, and allow one to overcome. But education does not only exist in a classroom, sometimes it’s a courtroom, sometimes it’s our own reflection. I thank her for the lessons she has shared with me, and wish her many successes.
You know, I went into this piece expecting to sympathize with the teacher, but now I’m wondering if Elizabeth Vergara might have a point. I’m a teacher and an active union member, but I wouldn’t want someone with no apparent clue about the basic rules of punctuation and capitalization teaching my kid English. If he were a math teacher I could probably get over it, but this man claims to be an English teacher and is going around capitalizing random nouns and writing sentences like, “LAUSD in the matter of a day, one announcement goes from Defendant in the Case, to dropped from the Case.” What does that even mean? Is there a predicate hiding somewhere in there?
I wouldn’t normally tear apart someone’s grammar like this, but since we’re taking about an English teacher who’s been accused of incompetence it does seem relevant.
Tinala,
The case was about tenure. The plaintiffs claimed that he was bad and was not removed because he was tenured. He did not have tenure and does not now. He is engaged here in stylistic wordplay. Did EE cummings use proper sentences? Excuse him for trying to express his sense of shell shock.
His part in this case is very strange. The case is about tenure and yet he does not have tenure, he is a long term substitute.
LAUSD has a bigger problem; finding full time teachers. But wait if they do that then they will have to pay them a decent salary with benefits.
Yes, he was a long term sub
Curious to name a sub in a case against tenure
Yes. If a teacher cannot write like Shakespeare, all those useless, lazy teachers ahold be punished and fired. Geesh.
I was a long term sub at one point and I would not wish that job on even my worst enemy. You have all of the responsibilities of the regular teacher but get almost none of the support and respect. Students still consider you “just a sub” with all of the negative connotations.
I can’t say for sure, but it is at least possible that some of my students would have jumped at the chance to testify against me since I actually demanded that they work in class (and at home!) and I had a low tolerance for messing around.
I know for a fact that some of them disliked me. One of them actually drew a picture of me with a swastika on it (which the VP completely ignored when I showed it to him. How’s that for support!)
It strikes me that the one who was actually incompetent in this case is the judge — for allowing this case to go forward.
The very idea that a junior high student is qualified to adjudge their teacher “grossly ineffective” is just absurd on its face.
I mean, what kind of nitwit would buy that argument anyway?
OK, let me clarify my previous comment: I don’t think Mize should be teaching anyone English. This doesn’t read like stylistic wordplay; it reads like someone who doesn’t know how to write but fancies himself a brilliant writer.
However, that absolutely 100% does not mean that tenure should be abolished. It means that relevant administrators should have done their jobs and noticed that their English teacher can’t operate a comma.
My initial impression was similar to tinalamanna’s, though I really did want to see, & hopefully be able to support, the teacher’s point of view in this. After reading a few paragraphs I came to Diane’s view that this was a stylistic choice. However, I do have to question the motivation for such a choice. As a reader who wanted to feel justified in supporting this teacher, I was hoping for a clear, expository description of the events & issues involved. That approach would not preclude the inclusion of passages in a more poetic style to describe his feelings about the events. As a result of the use of that style throughout the piece, I had to work harder to understand the events & timeline than I would have had a more straightforward approach been used to convey that information; & not all readers would be approaching this in as sympathetic a frame of mind as those who follow this blog. Assuming his purpose was to convey understanding of the events & gain public support for his position, I question Mr. Mize’s style choice. Maybe that assumption is wrong, & he wanted to convey his feelings about the process & illustrate its affect on him. I also understand that the posting here is an excerpt of a larger work; maybe that’s why the issue of his being included in the case, despite not even having tenure, was mentioned but not addressed. Therefore, I can’t pronounce him a “bad teacher” based on this. He clearly cares very deeply about his profession & the kids he works with, & I wish him the best in moving forward from this horrific experience.
“If a teacher cannot write like Shakespeare, all those useless, lazy teachers ahold be punished and fired.”
It’s a tough crowd here on Diane’s blog.
That’s why I usually restrict my comments to short poems. If someone criticizes my grammar and or punctuation (or, god forbid, rhyming), I can just whip out my poetic license (issued by the State of Delusion and de-notorized by e e cummings)
“High Standards”
If Shakespeare is the standard
Then all the rest are bad
Lord Tennyson is spam word
And Robert Frost just sad
Here’s to grammar
“davey and arne and shelly and raj” (with apologies to e e cummings)
davey and arne and chelly and raj
went down to the white-house (to hodge a podge)
and arne discovered a race to the top
so helpful he couldn’t remember his troubles
and davey befriended a billionaire
whose dollars a billion fingers were;
and chelly was chased by a horrible thing*
which blogged snideways while bursting bubbles
and raj came home with an unsound study
As touted can be but as clear as the Muddy
For whatever we lose (like a test of a tool)
It’s always a dollar we find in the school
(*initials D.R.)
I was a substitute for the first two years after I earned my teaching credential. I signed up to sub in six school districts and the calls came before 6 AM in the morning. I never knew what subject or grade I’d teach from day to day. I worked every day for two full school years as a sub. Imagine expecting a substitute to be an expert in every subject and punishing them when they weren’t.
During the first year, I ended up as a long-term sub in a fifth grade class for the second semester. 19 of the boys were hyperactive and had ADD. I was the 13th sub in 13 days. The rest of the subs refused to come back. I didn’t know this when I started workign there.
After two weeks, the principal offered me the long term position and I stayed for the rest of that year. That grade school was in an area so dangerous that there was concertina wire strung across the roofs to keep the gangs from chopping their way through the roof at night to loot the school.
I arrived at school one day when we couldn’t park in the teacher parking lot because the gangs had shot out all the lights that illuminated that parking lot at night and the lot was littered with shards of broken glass.
On another day, I arrived to discover the custodians busy filling bullet holes in all the classroom doorways and repainting them before the children arrived.
On another day, a Monday, I arrived along with the other teachers to find out that every doorknob in the school had been smashed off and locksmith trucks were parked everywhere as every locksmith from miles around worked frantically to get us into our classrooms and repair the damage.
During my second year as a sub, I was offered another long term sub positioning at a middle school in a district where I had never subbed before. I got that job because the principal had called one of the schools where I subbed regulatory–an intermediate school known as the toughest most dangerous school in the San Gabriel Valley. At the time, that school was so dangerous, that the teachers worked in teams before school started to frisk their students. One teacher frisked while another carried a bucket to collect the razor blades, knives and shards of broken glass the kids carried as defensive or offensive weapons.
I was recommended.
I ended up in an art class for that long term sub job.
The regular art teacher had a nervous crackdown and was in the hospital. My first visit to the school was after hours and the principal walked me to my new classroom.
He unlocked the door and let me enter first. I flipped on the lights and froze. Playboy centerfolds hung from the ceiling where the students had hung them. The art supplies had been tossed against the walls and carpet. All of the art supplies had been spilled, trashed, broken. Home made darts with sharp points hung from the acoustic tiles.
That was a Friday afternoon. I returned over the weekend and cleaned up the room. The principal bought new art supplies. Before my first day of teaching ended, my new students had nicknamed me the Sergeant because I imposed Marine Corps discipline on my students but without the insults and profanity often heard at MCRD.
The kids complained to their parents how mean I was not to give them the freedom the previous art teacher allowed, who didn’t really allow the bad behavior. After more than thirty years of teaching, she had a nervous breakdown, she burned out as many teachers do from the pressure they work under in this country, and couldn’t control them anymore.
The next year, I was hired full time under contract in that other intermediate school with the worst reputation in the San Gabriel Valley. The principal liked how I did my job and that’s why he had recommended me for that art class position.
Perhaps I have a beam in my eye and fail to see the obvious, but the author has a consistent & consciously chosen style that does not meet with the approval of some commenters.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. So is efficacy…
If I were to have a chance a talk with him, I would humbly suggest that given the audience[s] I am guessing he might want to reach, he should read John Owens’ CONFESSION OF A BAD TEACHER: THE SHOCKING TRUTH FROM THE FRONT LINES OF AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION (2013) and Laurel M. Sturt’s DAVONTE’S INFERNO: TEN YEARS IN THE NEW YORK PUBLIC SCHOOL GULAG (2013). *I recommend both to the viewers of this blog.*
Not because I think his stylistic choices are wrong—they underscore his passion—but because in a sense he is making his case to people who know nothing about him and the context in which he taught. I would recommend to him that, IMHO, more of an expository style [with plenty of personal details to be sure] could make it more accessible and convincing to others.
That said, his life, his book, his choices.
That’s the way I see it…
😎
“’LAUSD in the matter of a day, one announcement goes from Defendant in the Case, to dropped from the Case.’ … Is there a predicate hiding somewhere in there?”
Since you ask: “LAUSD … *goes*…” [emphasis added]
“It means that relevant administrators should have done their jobs and noticed that their English teacher can’t operate a comma.”
How the hell does one “operate a comma”??
Me thinks you you have met the Kettle, ms Pott!!
“Incommapetence”
To operate a comma
One needs a Commaploma
Awarded by Obama
From U of Alabama
In some of my classes, I would have felt great if I could have taught comma placement. Mainly, I had to decipher the words on the students’ papers and show them how to write the words they had intended.
My goodness, people! I am agog at the relevance of your discussion of grammar and mechanics of the piece. This person bared his soul over time in a stream of consciousness during an unfathomable period of his life. I empathized at the beginning, as there is a modern witch hunt in the works. I sympathized with the description of the Mother, the thought, the observation of the drive by. How it was clear Mother was no stranger to such terrifying events posing harm to her beloved child at any point in the realty of his environment. I somehow experienced the confusion and desperate struggle this teacher must have contended with. Why? How? Who? Why? In a foggy, spiraling, jagged, enraging, immobilizing ride. Mention of his Father served 2 purposes : This expresses a feeling of psychological assault that rendered this teacher ability to function as an autonomous adult. He needed his Daddy. Can we not understand the power in this message? The other purpose for Father is to expose dirty deeds of a corrupt LAUSD. And, I teared at this teacher’s grace in seeing student X as the puppet she was, and his best wishes for her future. I know I would never have grown to compassion. SO now that I have just critiqued this man’s work which I ironically admonished some of you for doing I say, YOU MISSED THE POINT. I think your response was mean. This poor guy is living a Hel^&$ish experience that anyone of us could face at the snap of an elite finger. This colleague needs support, not snark. Thank you teacher “D” for sharing your story and my thoughts will be with you.
In case there was misunderstanding
My snark was directed at Miss Grammar.
I find it ludicrous that someone would actually see fit to analyze whether he correctly “operated” his commas (whatever that means)
LAUSD’S TREACHEROUS ROAD FROM REED TO VERGARA- IT’S NEVER BEEN ABOUT STUDENTS, JUST MONEY –
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/06/lausds-treacherous-road-from-reed-to-vergara–its-never-been-about-students-just-money.html
and while you are reading about the corrupt practices at LAUSD, do read this
City watch piece…THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH ABOUT THE PROCESS THAT TAKES OUT TEACHERS ACROSS THE NATION.
http://citywatchla.com/8box-left/6666-lausd-and-utla-complicity-kills-collective-bargaining-and-civil-rights-for-la-s-teachers
Good calls Susie Lee…although Lenny sounds a bit like Donald Trump in addressing “social promotion” and “schools only baby sitting these inner city kids.
I would hope all readers would review the Skelly hearings and their process and outcomes mentioned in your second link. This also relates to the Rafe Esquith case and why his attorney would not let him testify at a hearing by this kangaroo court.
I bet that if you sicced a team of private investigators — oh heck, just one private investigator — you might find that the families of Vergara and the other plaintiffs are living lives that are strangely more affluent than they were prior to their lives as plaintiffs … nicer house, nicer neighborhood, nicer car, owning when they were previously renting, etc. … and that the source of that newfound affluence is the multi-billion-dollar corporate reform movement
Just a guess. I’m open to being proven wrong on this.
Agree with your assessment, Jack. Broad/Welch/Wasserman foundations were generous to these plaintiffs to keep them actively involved in the process over a period of about three years, before the case could be filed.
This was hard to follow. This teacher needs to tighten up his writing and have someone coach him on what is relevant and not to include.
The point is Vergara herself was used to launch an attack on teachers that was part Salem Witch Trial and part Cultural Revolution. This was about embarrassing good teachers- one was a Teacher of the Year, and undercutting our profession. She was used by entities that want to privatize education and attack teachers. Each of these teachers should file a defamation lawsuit.
“Six months after the Vergara Trial´s verdict was announced, Superintendent Deasy would resign from his position in LAUSD, finding employment with Students Matter, led by Silicon Valley billionaire, spearhead of the Vergara Trial, David Welch.”
The extreme coziness of the ed reform “movement” should alarm anyone. I’m sick of it. I’m sick of paying public employees to run public schools when they go in and out of the revolving door of this “movement” which seems to revolve around attacking labor unions and privatizing public schools. I get that they’re allowed to go work for whomever they want when they play this game of musical chairs, but I can’t help but notice they all go to the same orgs. Public education shouldn’t be run by 150 well-connected people who march lock-step in this “movement”. This circle is WAY too small.
Can someone give me an example of a high level ed reformer who went somewhere OTHER than one of these orgs or lobbying groups after they left government?
C, We’re still waiting to learn where Cami Anderson works next. She had ~$120K severance from Newark, NJ.
Throughout history there have been scapegoats, often blindsided civil servants, and kangaroo courts that serve at the will of the powerful to suit a preconceived agenda. That this sad story is a contemporary one is disturbing. The oligarchs are a Machiavellian lot, and the Mize family members are one of many victims that got in the way of privatization. They won’t be the first or last teachers that found themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Is there a point at which we should expect to hear anything from Jerry Brown? He has been good on many things……..and Obama and Hillary do not have impressive records on education. Is he simply above it all?
In June 2014 after a two-month trial, Judge Rolf M. Treu of the California Superior Court issued a preliminary ruling finding that all of the statutes challenged by the plaintiff students were unconstitutional.In August 2014 this ruling was finalized.The decision was subsequently appealed by Governor Jerry Brown.
Wikipedia–always stylistic in its own way…. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vergara_v._California
It’s unfortunate the teachers were unable to hire a forensic cyber investigator to find out why files “evaporated.”
retired teacher, I was wondering exactly the same thing! I wondered if there was going to be a connection in the story between the computer file deletions with the Vergara case.
Bilge water, I had the impression that there was a connection between the deleted hard drive and the case, but it was left hanging on purpose because Mize doesn’t know.
Your commenters who have been criticizing Mr Mize’s use of English clearly never reached the end, and so missed the main point of the story.
I did reach the end of the story and found it somewhat bizarre. He needed to make his point more clearly and more quickly.
Barbara,
Well raised in twitter/facebook/instagram English are thee, eh!?!
As one whose English teachers almost always pointed out my run-on sentences, and as one who has read a lot of Spanish literature, I found the writing to be excellent. Those who are criticizing need to break out of their self-imposed sense of what can/may be considered good writing.
Well spoken/written Anthony!
Señor Swacker: next thing you know you’ll praise such train wrecks in Spanish as EL QUIXOTE (Cervantes) and CIEN AÑOS DE SOLEDAD (García Márquez) and claim that Cantinflas was a verbal virtuoso in Spanish and…
Well, let me tell you one thing, or rather, I’ll let the tv character El Chavo del Ocho [created by the late Roberto Gómez Bolaños aka Chesperito, “little Shakespeare”]: “Tómalo por el lado amable” [take it in a nice way].
I think you’re on to something…
😎
Ah so…Duane and Krazy…I am SO in agreement with you. No one has pointed out that Eli Broad is partnered with David Welch in the Vergara case, and Eli’s henchmen, Broad and Austin, are focused on spreading this same kind of case statewide and nationwide. New filings have already popped up from California to NY…I read that there are now 11 active filings in Ca. And Eli is of great help to the NY instigators of court action killing due process for teachers and also the unions.
The object is only tangentially to be the issue of tenure. The true element is to break the back of the teachers unions. And the choice of suing Ca. and CTA is that their’s are the deepest pockets. Jerry Brown saw through this trumped up case and he was the prime person to be congratulated for getting it to the Appeals Court.
The nine plaintiffs were nurtured for years, encouraged, maybe paid, by the billionaires, before they could get this to court. And Deasy, a fink and mouthpiece for Broad, testified against his teachers, but for his master. When this Central Ca. judge made such a divisive ruling based on the false testimony of two experts who reneged on their testimony, saying it was based on manufactured, not real, data, the judge still used it as the basis of ruling for the plaintiffs.
What a set up….
And Deasy gleefully proclaimed that “now I can go back to LAUSD and fire teachers rapidly”…and he did. He went from about 250 firings, to approximately 450, last year…without due process. You can find the details of all this in the Ravitch archives.
As to the writer of this personal expose, he uses his own language to make his points. I found it engrossing and congratulate him for telling his story…one which I have heard for decades from teachers in inner city schools. Thanks Diane for posting this one.
And if LAUSD can scrub the data from a person’s computer (“the flesh was falling off the computer”) as he describes, why is not feasible they can manufacture emails and add them to a district computer as in the case of Rafe Esquith?
It would be fitting if the missing files could be traced back to someone that works for Broad.
Dear retired teacher…a large number of those working at LAUSD are in fact, working for Broad. Many are Broad Academy grads…and others are still getting parts of their salaries paid by Broad.
And the attitude is “I’m paying the money, I get to say whats going to happen!”
“Elizabeth Vergara and other students claimed that they were denied equal protection of the law because they were taught by inferior teachers” And in this example, a new teacher.
So from a logic standpoint, for the state of California to provide equal protection, they need to vet new hires, and provide enough pay to bring in a qualified pool of applicants.
Nothing five to ten billion dollars of funding won’t solve. Thank you Vergara for making the case to lien the state budget.
Anyone who has ever been around junior high students long enough to hear them talk about their teachers knows that to them, pretty much everyone is an inferior teacher.
And, of course, they would know because they know everything at that age.
That anyone would take their complaints about “grossly ineffective” teachers seriously is just absurd.
Virginia…suggest you do some homework before jumping and jumping to conclusions based on ……what?
Read the transcripts and read the many news sources.
I can see that Mr. Mize attempts to gain sympathy by describing the poor conditions of the school neighborhood. It’s not easy to teach in that environment. But the one thing that Mr. Mize didn’t explain, or rather can’t explain, is why he received a much lower score than the other teachers in that school. You see, they all had similar students and similar conditions. VAMs don’t rate teachers against others who have only affluent students. They rate teachers’ performance against other teachers with similar students. Mr. Mize can’t explain that. He doesn’t even try. To even attempt to do so would show that how hollow his argument really is.
Virginia, Mize did not have a VAM score. His name was used to eliminate tenure but he didn’t have tenure. The case was not about VAM. It was about tenure.
How did they determine he was grossly ineffective? I thought the case was about not requiring LIFO (last in, first out). The plaintiffs were arguing that ineffective teachers should not be given tenure so quickly. How did the plaintiffs determine which Ts were ineffective without VAMs?
No one determined that Anthony Mize was grossly ineffective. The charge was made without any backup. The teacher of the year at a school in Pasadena was also called grossly ineffective in the same lawsuit.
I could call you “grossly ineffective” but that doesn’t make it so. Or do you think that calling someone a name means that it must be true?
Diane/Ellen, I admit I haven’t read the transcripts in the Vergara case. I knew it was about tenure and that Chetty testified. I saw some video of the Plaintiff’s closing online. I assumed that they used objective data to show that 1) there were many ineffective teachers with tenure, 2) VAM data could begin to identify ineffective teachers within 2-3 years but that 3) one simply cannot determine which teachers are effective before tenure is granted (within about 3 years). Thus, granting tenure before a teacher is verified effective leads to ineffective teachers being entrenched.
Am I confused? What was the basis of claiming Mr. Mize was grossly ineffective? Is it really just the students’ allegations?
Virginia,
The basis for the allegations is that David Berliner, testifying for the defendants, said he “guessed” that 1-2% of teachers might be ineffective. The judge then extrapolated and said that those ineffective teachers had to go, and their tenure had to go. Mize didn’t have tenure. There was no showing whatever that any of the specific teachers–like Mize– in the case were ineffective, other than the claims of the students.
I did not know that. One cannot possibly discern a teacher is ineffective by asking a couple of students. I (or anyone) might like to think they can make such judgments, but that’s what the history of subjective evaluations show. And especially so for a small sample of students in a single teacher’s class. Even with VAMs, having a low score for just a few kids does not result in an overall ineffective rating.
That said, one can use data to demonstrate some percentage of teachers are ineffective and that it crosses tenure lines. My understanding is that the verdict did not rely on any individual teacher being ruled ineffective but that the plaintiffs needed a person “injured” by the tenure law to gain standing. While it seems unfair to declare these teachers ineffective without any hard data, I don’t think that substantially changes the outcome of the case.
I am surprised they alleged teachers were ineffective without real data though. It is unnecessary.
Thanks Diane for your explanations to Virginia…and also it is common practice to place the most ‘difficult to teach’ in one classroom, and too often this class is assigned to subs (also TFA kids)…who generally flee from exhaustion and fear for their lives. This is no exaggeration.
Packed classrooms with 50 teens like these, hormones raging, and neither fear of, nor respect for teachers, and Lloyd’s picture of his experiences are the norm. Anyone who criticizes a teacher or a sub under these circumstances, does not have a clue, and their comments are based on merely their own fantasy. Unfortunately the subs list is not filled with former Marines who are young and determined and fearless as Lloyd was when he first taught in San Gabriel.
Ellen Lubic: oh sure, that old absurd and meaningless assertion that students aren’t randomly assigned to classrooms, e.g., that vengeful admins might load up the [documented] most difficult-to-teach students in classrooms taught by the teachers they hold unjustified grudges against whilst their BFFs on the teaching staff are given every break possible.
Your assumption seems to be that admins aren’t automatically demigods with hearts of gold—when we all know that just about anybody in command positions must be right and don’t make bad decisions, say, to a 98% “satisfactory” [thank you, Bill Gates!] chance of certainty.
You realize, I hope, that your stubborn refusal to accept rheeality over reality might undermine such brilliant management schemes as “kiss up—kick down” and “stack ranking for thy and thine but not me and mine”?
Kevin Huffman is “platform-agnostic”—at least in words. Can’t you be “reality-agnostic” in return and meet Peter Cunningham halfway at conducting a rheeally “civil conversation”?
I fear this thread may be headed down the road to a “better education for all.”
And we all know where that leads….
Lakeside School. Sidwell Friends. U of Chicago Lab Schools. Delbarton School. Harpeth Hall. Madeira. Spence Academy.
For all. No excuses. Whatever it takes.
😎
Krazy…a big MUAH.
Isn’t there a difference between fact and a theory? Seems like more of a theory that weakening tenure produces higher quality teachers in a system. So no, not proven by any means.
If tenure is the mechanism that the court recognizes for vetting teachers, then the court would have to ensure that equal protection was granted, by requiring that all students and schools got an equal percentage of tenured teachers.
I seem to recall “VirginiaGSP” as being totally convinced that Value-Added Measurements never lie and that teachers are never truthful. In this case, it doesn’t matter that the teacher in question is a sub. Or any other of the facts.
Virginia doesn’t know how to play nice; only how to bloviate. It never listens to anyone else’s point of view, or facts for that matter.
ECONOMAD has made another error in assumptions.
What a shocker.
Mr. Moron Virginiagsp claims that it is not appropriate to rate teachers without hard data, and in the same literal breath, he claims that this should not have made a difference in the outcome for the teacher in question.
Which is it, Virginia? Does one need data, or can one dispense with it?
Gee, Virginia. It must be fun to contradict yourself and sound like a pure idiot to the rest of morally and cognitively unimpaired world.
BTW, Virginia, you are grossly ineffective.
Or ineffective.
Or just plain gross.
But, what the hell? Why bother with data when you can just throw labels at someone?
At the request of City Watch Today, i wrote this article over a year ago…..
Archive-Hidden
Vergara Decision: Key to Destroying Teachers Unions and In Time All Unions
Print Email
13 Jun 2014
Written by Ellen Lubic
EDUCATION-On Tuesday, Judge Rolf Treu, the sole person to decide the fate of LAUSD teachers, and by extension, teachers throughout California and possibly the nation, proffered his opinion in favor of the plaintiffs in this ostensible “civil rights” case brought by 9 plaintiffs, LA school children, who claim that their inner city teachers were ineffectual at teaching, which deprived them of an equal education to more affluent areas.
With this contrived and illogical decision by Treu which eliminates the current tenure practice and ends seniority protection in firing (giving Supt. Deasy free reign to fire older teachers to cut his budget costs), litigation is sure to proliferate across the country as the profiteering billionaires like Eli Broad have now found the key to destroying teachers’ unions … and in time, all unions. This is their real goal.
The litany of the Broad Academy (which has now trained thousands of Superintendents and administrators who are running districts all over the US) is to close schools “rapidly” and replace them with charters, even those run by foreign political agitators like the Gulen Movement which is run by the Turkish Imam who uses American taxpayer money gleaned from his student tuition’s at this 143 American schools, to promote Sharia law and foment Turkish revolution.
The Silicon Valley tech giant, David Welch, in league with other billionaire charter school owners who view public and universal free education as potential vast business for the free market, rounded up the plaintiffs to file the Vergara lawsuit.
Eli Broad’s mandated job choice who was trained at the Broad Academy in 1996 to be an education CEO and was hired without any other search, LAUSD Superintendent Deasy, who also worked for Gates, was a prime advisor to the legal team and he was a witness for the plaintiffs against his own district.
Other plaintiff witnesses included Raj Chetty from Harvard, a known supporter of charter schools, who continued the litany of painting teachers, generically, as being ineffective and he manufactured statistics to support his theory of time and income loss to students who have “bad” teachers. The judge relied mainly on the testimony of these men in asserting his decision.
The well respected leader of the Chicago Teacher’s Union, Karen Lewis, stated that tenure equals due process, and that no teacher should or could be fired without a fair hearing. She sees the “propaganda machine” to kill tenure as the stepping stone to killing off teachers’ unions through professional marketing tricks. She adds that tenure is vital to fight discrimination, particularly of teachers of color.
It is apparent that the charter school push has created so much re-segregation of students in ways that led to the 1954 ruling of Brown vs. Board of Education, a conglomerate of 5 cases leading to true civil rights for children of color. Lewis states that teachers are the primary advocates for children and should be treated with respect.
This show of force at the big win for the 1/2 of 1% but not for children, including Eli Broad, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch, the Waltons, Anschutz, Kochs, Bloomberg, and their cohorts, is meant to rub the noses of teachers and public schools in their particular brand of defecation.
These are the people who have worked assiduously over the past decade to frame all teachers as inept and lazy, and have painted a picture in the minds of Americans that ‘teachers are villains’ who are destroying students and the country.
Their long range plan of destroying public schools is now obvious to many who are following the money. It all leads back to the insiders of this Wall Street brigade, the billionaires and hedge fund managers who wield so much power in government and who now blatantly say public education is the next great investment opportunity.
Rupert Murdoch published this opinion in the NY Times as an op-ed, and Broad with his sidekick Richard Riordan, have access to the LA Times to promote themselves as the greatest of philanthropists while also promoting their charter schools as an op-ed. It is big business.
Hedge fund plutocrat Tilson, and others, are teaching classes for their clients on how to invest in public education, and all promote the untested Common Core paid for mainly by Gates and with open ended contracts to the British firm Pearson, as the only valid teaching method in our new education world.
President Obama and his education henchman Arne Duncan imposed this system with no longitudinal testing, as the new law of the land. Watch the money as it flows into the pockets of these new age robber barons.
They are doing this brain washing by financing slanted message movies such as Waiting for Superman, and by promoting non-professionally trained ‘educators’ such as Broad’s protege (who has become a millionaire as leader of Students First) Michelle Rhee as the “voice of education” (and her husband plans to be Governor of California), and Wendy Kopp’s 5 week wonders from Teach for America as the leading voices of education.
Concurrently, they revile the insights of legitimate and lifetime honored educators with bone fides from the best university education departments such as Diane Ravitch who trained at Columbia and is a professor at NYU, and Linda Darling-Hammond of Stanford.
Now there is another huge, teacher-bashing, ad in USA Today paid for by the shady PR man, Rick Berman, who touts for some of the same billionaires who promoted and paid the bill for the most powerful legal representation in the nation, with Ted Olson as the lead attorney in this Vergara case.
Berman fronts for Center for Union Facts, one of many groups he organized, to destroy the union movement in America. This is the same infamous man who lobbied against the Americans With Disabilities Act, and who earns his millions by shilling for the power brokers, billionaires, and corporations. His 60 Minutes interview was eye opening.
The Vergara case is related to so much more than just a few claims of ineffective teachers in inner cities, and many public policy analysts feel that it is part of the ALEC agenda to privatize all education and to finally and forever get rid of unions.
It is a major case that will probably travel up the court system to be decided by the Supreme Court, and could be a forerunner of the death of free universal American public schools, and the union movement, which many see as the two wedded systems that built a strong American Middle Class.
(Ellen Lubic is Director of Joining Forces for Education. She is an educator and a policy maker and can be reached at: joiningforces4ed@aol.com)
That bit about the files disappearing sounds like someone at Beaudry hijacked his district computer. LAUSD IT can literally take over a networked computer, usually to solve some problem from their offices, so they don’t have to send out a technician. In this case, it seems they did it to prevent use of the data by any defense team. It’s a truly evil empire, and Deasy was its Vader.
Agree…and it is built into the corporate culture.
Makes me wonder what they did to Rafe Esquith.
EnBCee, I was wondering the same thing (as was “retired teacher” above). I was hoping Mr. Mize would bring this up later in the story, but this was a loose end left dangling.
Wow. Powerful. Don’t you wonder what has become of Elizabeth, the other “plaintiffs” and their families? Were they promised some small riches to participate? Have the students gone on to a better education, there, or elsewhere? What has become of them, after they were discarded by the monied privatizing reform interests? We know where pig Deasy landed. Where have these plaintiffs landed? What has become of the teachers they slandered and defamed? The reformers cut a wide swath of injustice, then move along to the next lynching as if there was nothing here to see folks, move along.
Campbell Brown and Michele Rhee are off somewhere, giggling with glee.
I keep my data in a separate notebook as well. Computers can and do crash. I have colleagues who use an outside hard drive. If data is important it needs to be backed up.
Interesting to hear the story from gut level. Kafaesque, especially the bit about watching all the data melt off the hard drive.
I think that the author would have benefited from a little knowledge of the legal system and how civil litigation works before trying to imply that a hard-drive crash on the scheduled trial date somehow prohibited the defense from making use of data contained on that hard drive.
So here is a little Litigation 101. For starters, at the outset of litigation, all parties are required to preserve documents that are relevant or potentially relevant to the litigation. Presumably, data documenting the academic progress of the plaintiffs in the Vergara suit would have been required to have been preserved. Failure to preserve documents, be they in digital or paper format, is potential spoliation, and there are serious legal consequences for spoliation, especially for intentional spoliation.
Then, during the discovery period, which is often quite lengthy (generally at least 6 months at an absolute minimum), all parties are afforded the opportunity to request production of documents relevant to the claims and defenses in the litigation. If the documents on that hard drive were relevant to the defense, defense counsel should have requested those documents, and those documents should have been produced to defense counsel, in usable electronic format, long before the trial began. Even if the documents belong to a third party, they can still be requested and obtained pursuant to a subpoena.
Because taking discovery (i.e., serving document requests, subpoenas, etc.) is Litigation 101, the author’s allegations about documents “melting” off the hard drive on the day the trial was scheduled to begin are, quite frankly, silly. More to the point, these implied allegations undermine the author’s credibility, and make readers like me more skeptical of the remainder of what’s contained in the piece, to the extent that we can decipher it. In real life, unlike in the movies, defense counsel quite rightly would have been prohibited from attempting to sandbag plaintiffs’ counsel with the use of such data if the data had not been produced to plaintiffs’ counsel in advance. This is part of that often misunderstood legal and Constitutional doctrine we lawyers call procedural due process.
The Vergara judge’s opinion was both terribly reasoned and poorly written, and I believe that the case was wrongly decided. Hopefully the record and arguments provided to the appellate courts will provide the appellate courts with sufficient basis to reverse the decision. But please note that if the sort of spoliation the author of this piece implies happened actually happened, any lawyer worth his or her salt would have made sure that this was a major issue in the litigation itself. Although it’s been awhile since I reviewed the pleadings and documents made available to the public, I recall seeing no evidence whatsoever that spoliation was an issue in the Vergara litigation.
Reblogged this on anthonymize.net and commented:
It wasn’t a joke. It was my heart on paper. Exactly two years to the day since first hearing the news this written narrative was complete. Puddle Deep, my story as a teacher wrongfully named by my former student included in the case Vergara vs. The State of California. I shared excerpts of Puddle Deep with Dr. Ravitch a vocal supporter who has written about the case in her widely read blog.