Archives for the year of: 2013

Indiana legislators have passed so much anti-public school legislation this year that they are feeling “reform fatigue.”

Of course, they expanded the state voucher program. That way, as many children as possible can escape going to a community school, even if they are in kindergarten. The good news is that 10 Republican senators voted against the bill, maybe they ere public school graduates and didn’t want to see their school destroyed.

By a narrow vote, they dropped the requirement that superintendents need to be an educator or have a master’s degree. This is called lowering standards.

The House and Senate disagree about Common Core. The Chamber of Commerce strongly supports it.

The most useful thing they did was to toss out Jeb Bush’s beloved A-F report cards, because no one understood what the ratings meant.

EduShyster writes a personal letter to Teach for America.

Please, she says, we know you are excellent.

We know you are beyond excellent.

We know that there is no one more excellent than you. Please, we get it. Enough.

But consider what all this self-praise does:

“Every time you toot the horn of triumph, alerting us to the good news that your new teachers are better than our new teachers, even though the evidence is indisputable that all new teachers struggle, or that your handful of alumni teachers are better than our experienced teachers, you hammer the nail in a little deeper. You fan the illusion that temporary teachers who jet in from elsewhere are just as good, are in fact more excellent, than real teachers who are in it for the long haul.”

And one more thing:

“The idea that we could replace our entire teaching force with TFA-style excellence is a fantasy, of course. There are more than 3 million teachers in the country and fewer than 6,000 new TFA corps members each year. And yet the steady drum beat, the constant horn tooting, hat raising and praise singing, creates the illusion that such a thing is not just possible but a worthy goal.

“So please stop, Teach for America. I get it. We get it. The question is do you get it?”

Technical issues plague the tests.

Not ready for prime time.

This is a parody but it is uncomfortably close to reality.

The humorist known as Students Last has compiled a reading list to prepare children for failure on the tests.

Just listen to all the bigwigs warning about high failure rates, ripping off the Band-aid and sink-or-swim in the deep end of the pool. That’s enough to create a sense of dread and high anxiety.

The only thing missing from the reading list is a manual for nervous parents and an advice book on how to organize a mass resistance movement.

An 8th grade student in New York State wrote a brilliant parody of the state ELA exam.

Please read it.

It is very funny.

It does leave you wondering why students are so much wiser than state education officials.

Aaron Pallas, a sociologist at Teachers College, is a sharp observer of educational issues.

In this article, he comments on a joint statement by the leaders of education in New York City and State, hailing the Common Core and the new Common Core tests. Their article appeared in the New York Daily News, where they proclaimed the advent of the new standards and the joy they are bringing back to learning. And now the new Common a core tests will let everyone know whether our none-year-olds are college-and-career-ready.

For most parents of young children, this is doubtless a burning issue, especially since no one can be sure what careers will exist 10 years from now.

What did they forget to say: the introduction of new tests means there is no trend line, no way of basing teacher evaluations on scores. Pallas writes, in part, supplying his own version of the text that wasn’t there:

“Because this year’s assessments are a completely different baseline than previous state assessments, it would be inappropriate to treat the difference between last year’s scores and this year’s scores as evidence of student growth in achievement. Therefore, we are suspending the use of student growth percentiles and value-added models to estimate teachers’ contributions to their students’ learning as a required element of the Annual Professional Performance Review of teachers and principals across New York state for at least one year.”

This article asks the obvious question:

Why does Atlanta’s disgraced superintendent Beverly Hall face serious jail time for the cheating that happened on her watch–which she ignored or encouraged by demanding higher test scores–while Michelle Rhee continues to fly from state to state, urging legislatures to follow the DC model?

The article says that Rhee emerged–so far–unscathed because she has friends in high places.

As for the DC model, let us not forget that John Merrow documented that the DC schools are in worse shape now than they were in 2007:

He wrote to the Education Writers Association, introducing his post about the leaked memo:

“I am also reporting that, after five years of Rhee/Henderson, the DC schools are worse off by almost every conceivable measure: graduation rates, truancy, enrollment, test scores, black-white gap and teacher and principal turnover.”

From the local school boards in Texas to the teachers at Garfield High School in Seattle to the Providence Student Union, the movement against high-stakes testing is growing everyday.

The Washington Post reports here that the public is rising up against the Bush-Obama education agenda.

Across the nation, students, parents, and teachers have had it.

Officials keep pouring millions into testing while cutting the budget for everything else.

Anthony Cody met teacher Michelle Gunderson at Occupy the DOE. When he heard her ideas about testing, he invited her to write a guest blog.

Gunderson explained that she has seen test used to sort children, to punish children, and now–to privatize schools.

She has developed her own credo for the ethical use of tests.

Please read it.

The essence of the pledge is that a student’s test scores should be treated as confidential.

I wholeheartedly agree.

I would go farther.

We don’t expect our doctors to turn over our test results to the state, why should teachers give children’s data to anyone but them and their parent or guardian?

Just unspeakably awful.