Archives for the month of: February, 2013

What lessons do we teach young people about government when they see the lies told about their schools and their teachers by public officials? Are we teaching them that elected officials can say anything at all, with no regard for truth or reality?

This is a letter from a high school student in Florida. Please read it. She makes more sense than the deciders in DC and Tallahassee or the pundits.

Esther, don’t give up hope. We need your good sense to turn this nation and your state around.

She writes:

I am a high school student who attends a public school in Seminole County and I applaud you for this blog. This past year especially I have felt as if every other second I’m being force-fed a meaningless statistic about how wonderful the education is in Florida and how we are excelling by leaps and bounds, while I watch teachers and students alike suffer the consequences of these careless political decisions.

Our school’s media center is also a “Hub for Technology” computer lab to be used by teachers for testing, and 124 out of the 180 school days it is being used for just that – PERT, EOC, FCAT, AP, SAT, ACT, semester exams – when are teachers supposed to have the time to teach? We worry about budget cuts (to an already laughable budget), but while faculty and staff are being laid off and programs cut, the money is being handed away to test makers. These tests give us meaningless figures to show everyone we can that we’re “progressing” but personally I believe we are regressing.

And the evaluation systems for both teachers AND students are so ridiculous, it’s as if the public school system is a parody of itself. The pressure a teacher is put under to have all of the correct phrases, learning goals, and “percentile gain” methods on display in their classrooms; I honestly don’t know how they manage to do it. Stopping to have every high school student hold up a hand gesture and gauge their understanding on a lesson every time one is taught, just because these Marzano techniques were highly effective in ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS is, to me, insane.

I don’t even know what to do about any of this either aside from hope that someone with power, someone with common sense, someone with a love of EDUCATION, realizes what is going on and decides to take action. Because seeing my teachers crumpling under stress due to the greed of heartless politicians is something that I can hardly stomach.

The Republican controlled Senate Education Committee voted unanimously to abandon Tony Bennett’s prized A-F grading system for schools.

Researchers have found that such grading systems are unreliable and unfair.

Undoubtedly Republican legislators heard from principals and teachers in their own districts.

Superintendent Glenda Ritz will get a chance to remake the state’s way of evaluating school performance, hopefully with more intelligence and judgment than the Bush-Bennett system.

Three candidates who support Superintendent John Deasy received a gift of $250,000 from M. Rhee today.

This is added to the $1 million supplied by Mayor Bloomberg, and the $1.5 million raised by Eli Broad and his friends (including Joel Klein).

Clearly there is an all-out effort to make sure that corporate reform policies favored by the Gates Foundation win the day.

DFER called on its friends across the nation to send money to Board President Monica Garcia, the billionaires’ favorite.

Garcia is the choice of Bloomberg, Broad, and DFER.

Question to be answered by the voters of Los Angeles: Is the school board for sale to the highest bidder?

A few days ago, my six-year-old grandson, who attends first grade in a public school in New York City, called to ask a question.

He said, “Ama, I am doing a data analysis. I need to ask you a question.”

I said, “You are doing a WHAT?” He repeated, “I am doing a data analysis.”

Then he asked whether I would rather be a porcupine or a hedgehog.

I thought a minute and said I would rather be a hedgehog.

He was very surprised. I knew he was doing something related to the Common Core, but I still thought he was a little young to get my mini-lecture about Isaiah Berlin’s famous essay about War and Peace.

He asked why I wanted to be a hedgehog, and I said that the hedgehog knows one big thing.

He asked me what the big thing was that I knew.

And I said that you should not be afraid to speak up when you were outnumbered.

It turns out that he was making a bar graph, plotting the number of people who preferred to be either a porcupine or a hedgehog.

I was not sure why he was learning this in first grade.

More on this from the following exchange.

Recently, Edward Miller and Nancy Carlsson-Paige wrote a critique of the K-3 sequence in the Common Core standards, saying they were completely inappropriate for these ages.

Then E.D. Hirsch Jr. responded to them.

Now Miller and Carlsson-Paige respond to Hirsch.

Read the three pieces here.

Would you rather be a porcupine or a hedgehog?

Steve Strieker is a teacher in Janesville, Wisconsin, who knows how important data are.

So he developed a survey metric that accurately and succinctly records the amount of love his family members have for one another.

Some showed improvement.

Others didn’t.

We can learn from his important research.

Surely there must be a foundation that will give him a few million to extend his studies of socio-emotional attachments and metric calibrations.

A reader sent the following information about the planned destruction of public education in Indianapolis:

Unfortunately the Neighborhoods of Educational Opportunity/Indianapolis Mayor’s Office plan (NEO) presentation which has been made public is just the tip of the iceberg. There is a well documented, more detailed plan that select groups (The Mind Trust, Stand for Children, Teach for America, The New Teacher Project) are meeting about in private and making plans while they await the possible receipt of a Bloomberg grant of $5 mil to get this plan off the ground in Indianapolis.
This plan will not be publicly unveiled in Indianapolis until it is a done deal.

Certain members of the Indianapolis Board of School Commissioners were strategically placed there by the powers that be to weaken Indianapolis Public Schools and prime it for takeover.
Also, watch legislation in Indiana. The Mayor’s office is slowly taking powers away from other branches of government. For example, they now have oversight of four former IPS schools taken over under Tony Bennett’s watch.

There is legislation pending that would allow those schools to become “independent” schools at the end of the takeover period.

We now have a parent trigger law.

There is also legislation which would remove the involvement/oversight of the city county council in approving new Charter schools.

Another bill takes a funding source from public schools (proceeds from auctioned properties due to non-payment of taxes) and gives it to Mayor-sponsored charter schools.

Other legislation forces the sale or lease of closed public schools to Charter schools and other private entities.

All of this collusion is no accident. If you happen to believe it is a bunch of coincidental things, non-related, happening all at the same time, then I feel sorry for you.

When I was in Austin last September to speak to the Texas Association of School Administrators and the Texas School Boards Association, I scheduled a visit to Eastside Memorial High School.

There I spoke to a rally of hundreds of parents, students, and teachers who were determined to save their school, which had recently been handed over to a charter chain.

After I left, there was an election, and the new school board decided to sever the connection with IDEA.

Now state and local officials are deciding what to do with Eastside.

District officials say they may close the school if they can’t find another charter to run it.

This is unbelievable.

The district doesn’t know how to run its own schools? How about some accountability at the top?

I saw a school with dedicated parents, students, teachers, and community members, eager to work together for their community public high school.

Why doesn’t AISD take responsibility for this school which is filled with so much promise and goodwill?

Why do they need to find a charter operator?

By the way, on the federal NAEP tests, Austin is one of the highest scoring urban districts in the nation.

I revealed the title of my new book yesterday and said the subtitle was a secret.

Then a reader commented that he found the book on a website, so my secret is out.

The full title of the book is

Reign of Error:
The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger for America’s Public Schools

I bet you are not surprised.

The bios now on various websites are dated and contain some errors. Several say I am affiliated with the Brookings Institution but I was kicked out last year after a 19-year association because of my alleged “inactivity.”

The book is being edited now, the jacket is not yet designed, it’s very early.

I believe it will have a big impact on the education debate because it documents the failure of corporate reform and offers a dozen research-based chapters on what we need to do to improve our schools and our society.

Innovation Ohio is a nonpartisan think tank that studies public policy in the state. Its reports are carefully researched and documented.

Its latest study finds that charter schools, a favorite “reform” of Governor John Kasich and the Republican-dominated legislature, cost taxpayers twice as much as public schools and hurt the public schools that enroll the other 90% of the children in the state.

I read on Twitter just now that I compared “school choice” to a Nazi invasion.

 

Excellence in Ed ‏@ExcelinEd

@DianeRavitch likens school choice to Nazi invasion. Yes. You read that correctly. http://bit.ly/Y7svLC

 

To say the least, I was taken aback because I had never written or implied any such thing.

But consider the source.

It comes from Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education (“excellence” in this case meaning the promotion of vouchers, charters, and advancing the interest of for-profit entrepreneurs in the public sector).

The post in question was https://dianeravitch.net/2013/02/19/what-about-the-good-charters/.

Jeb Bush–or whoever writes his foundation’s tweets–deliberately misconstrued the post, as well as its authorship.

It was not written by me.

It was written as a comment by a reader on the blog.

I post many readers’ comments, for the sake of discussion, not because I endorse them.

The comment was in response to an earlier post by Mark Naison and Bruce Bernstein: https://dianeravitch.net/2013/02/16/how-to-tell-if-your-local-charter-school-is-avaricious

I am delighted to learn that Jeb Bush and his staff are reading this blog closely.

Maybe they will learn something new.

Maybe they will hear the voices of parents, teachers, students, school board members, and others who are not invited to their corporate conferences.

I hope they spend some time working to improve their ability to comprehend what they read.

Decoding will get you just so far, and no farther.