Well, that was fast!!

At 9 a.m. I posted about a New York Times article published yesterday revealing that Trump wanted a 16-week ban on abortions. Since 93% of abortions are performed by the 13th week of abortion, that would essentially render the Dobbs decision ineffective.

But Trump’s anti-abortion pals got wind of his intention and let it be known that they will play every trick in the book—including reviving an 1873 law—to make abortion illegal everywhere.

The New York Times reports today:

Allies of former President Donald J. Trump and officials who served in his administration are planning ways to restrict abortion rights if he returns to power that would go far beyond proposals for a national ban or the laws enacted in conservative states across the country.

Behind the scenes, specific anti-abortion plans being proposed by Mr. Trump’s allies are sweeping and legally sophisticated. Some of their proposals would rely on enforcing the Comstock Act, a long-dormant law from 1873, to criminalize the shipping of any materials used in an abortion — including abortion pills, which account for the majority of abortions in America.

“We don’t need a federal ban when we have Comstock on the books,” said Jonathan F. Mitchell, the legal force behind a 2021 Texas law that found a way to effectively ban abortion in the state before Roe v. Wade was overturned. “There’s a smorgasbord of options.”

Mr. Mitchell, who represented Mr. Trump in arguments before the Supreme Court over whether the former president could appear on the ballot in Colorado, indicated that anti-abortion strategists had purposefully been quiet about their more advanced plans, given the political liability the issue has become for Republicans.

“I hope he doesn’t know about the existence of Comstock, because I just don’t want him to shoot off his mouth,” Mr. Mitchell said of Mr. Trump. “I think the pro-life groups should keep their mouths shut as much as possible until the election….”

In policy documents, private conversations and interviews, the plans described by former Trump administration officials, allies and supporters propose circumventing Congress and leveraging the regulatory powers of federal institutions, including the Department of Health and Human Services, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Justice and the National Institutes of Health.

The effect would be to create a second Trump administration that would attack abortion rights and abortion access from a variety of angles and could be stopped only by courts that the first Trump administration had already stacked with conservative judges.

“He had the most pro-life administration in history and adopted the most pro-life policies of any administration in history,” said Roger Severino, a leader of anti-abortion efforts in Health and Human Services during the Trump administration. “That track record is the best evidence, I think, you could have of what a second term might look like if Trump wins.”

In what appears to be a transparent effort to protect Confederate monuments, the Florida legislature is considering a bill that would prevent localities from removing monuments that have been in place for at least 25 years.

The Miami Herald reports:

A proposal that would prevent the removal of historic state monuments, like Confederate statues, has been making its way through the Florida House and Senate. 

Senate Bill 1122 would punish local governments that try to take down historic monuments located on public property and would give someone the right to sue if one is removed. A similar bill, House Bill 395, is moving through Tallahassee as well. 

On Tuesday, the Senate Community Affairs Committee voted favorably on SB 1122, but not without contention. 

Many of those who spoke in opposition of the legislation at Tuesday’s meeting viewed the bill as a tactic to prevent the removal of Confederate monuments and also opposed the fact that the bill would take power away from local governments. Those who spoke in favor of the bill said they viewed it as a way to protect history — one commentator specifically said he was in favor of the bill as he saw it as a way to protect “white society.”

Count on the Florida legislature to protect the monuments to white history.

The New York Times reported that Donald Trump has been telling friends privately that he supports a national ban on abortion at 16 weeks, with exceptions for rape, incest or the life of the mother.

A 16-week national ban would eliminate the authority of some 30 states that do not have abortion bans, but it would cancel the highly restrictive laws of states like Florida that have enacted a six-week ban, that is, before women know they are pregnant, and Texas, where abortion has been outlawed.

Very clever! A 16-week ban would restore abortions wherever it has been prohibited.

A 16-week ban would not end many abortions: nearly 94 percent of abortions happen before 13 weeks in pregnancy, according to data collected by the Centers for Disease Control. Nor is such a ban grounded in medical research. Even 15 weeks falls before the point when significant screens take place in a pregnancy to examine the fetus for rare — but potentially fatal — conditions. Instead, it has become a position that some Republicans, based on polling, believe will be the most politically palatable to voters.

Trump makes clear that this is a political calculation. It would please many in red states who support abortion rights, and he could still say he was against abortion.

For most of his life, Trump has been pro-abortion but turned against it when he realized he needed the support of Catholics and Evangelicals.

He has boasted to his right flank that he delivered what he promised: a Supreme Court that overturned Roe v. Wade.

But he recognizes that voters are angry about the loss of abortion rights, and Republicans are losing elections because of abortion restrictions.

So now, at his transactional best, he proposes a 16-week ban that enables almost every abortion to proceed at the same rate as before the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe. He would openly revive abortion, bypassing the Supreme Court.

I have this visual image of Trump looking at his anti-abortion followers and cynically smirking, “Fooled you! Hahaha.”

Several readers told me they were unable to access my conversation with Todd Scholl of the South Carolina Center for Educatot Wellness and Learning.

We talked about attacks on public schools, standardized testing, and privatization.

Todd sent these links:

The video can be found on the CEWL website at www.cewl.us. A direct link to the video can be found at https://youtu.be/Zm0Vi3S3RLM.

Thom Hartmann says the Supreme Court is wimping out in the Colorado case. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was written to protect us from fascist thugs. And Florida is passing legislation to teach kindergartners about the dangers of Communism. I’m all in favor of teaching about the dangers of both Communism and fascism (Florida left out that danger). Both Stalin and Hitler were deadly enemies of freedom and democracy. But leave the kindergartners alone. Let them play.

He wrote:

— The Supreme Court has wimped out on Trump. The 14th Amendment was passed to prevent the very scenario we’re now facing: a fascist insurrectionist seeking political office to end American democracy and replace it with a strongman authoritarian like the men who ran the Confederacy. One of the most absurd moments was when Kagan and Roberts both suggested that “one state shouldn’t determine the outcome of a presidential election,” as if they’d never, ever even heard of Bush v Gorewhen Jeb Bush and Kathrine Harris threw out over 30,000 “spoiled” ballots where people in Black communities with defective voting machines both punched the “Al Gore” hole and wrote “Al Gore” on the ballot. Florida, and Florida alone, determined the outcome of the 2000 election. One state. Bottom line: this is now up to us. Nobody is coming to the rescue of American democracy. We must turn out the vote this fall in overwhelming numbers…

— Trump steals classified documents, the ones about US spies in Russia are missing (and our spies are dying), and Biden wrote a letter to Obama when he was VP that he kept, and now the media and this idiot special counsel and lifelong Republican hack Robert Hur are doing their best to conflate the two. That pretty much sums it up. Like the Dean Scream and Comey’s press conference to complain about Hillary’s emails, it looks like our mainstream press and the GOP are working together to get a Republican back into the White House. Again, we have to turn out this fall in overwhelming numbers…

— Pink triangles come to Kansas? Republicans in the Kansas legislature are pushing a new law that would require trans people to be identified as such on their birth certificates. Never forget that the first group Hitler went after — literally weeks after he took power — were trans people. When fascists want a minority group to beat up on for political gain, this is the smallest minority out there, smaller than any racial or religious group, and thus the most defenseless. These Republicans in Kansas are bullies and thugs.

— Smartmatic is suing OAN, and they busted the CEO! Voting machine manufacturer Smartmatic is in the discovery phase of their multiple lawsuits against rightwing hate outlets for defamation, and, boy howdy, they have pulled in a big fish. It appears from press reports that the CEO of One America News, the rightwing TV channel, allegedly obtained hacked passwords to Smartmatic machines and passed them along to pillow guy Mike Lindell and Trump loony lawyer Sidney Powell. Get out the popcorn: this is going to get interesting (and expensive!)…

— Crazy Alert! Republicans want Florida schools to teach kindergartners all about the “threat of communism.” Soon, five year olds in Florida may be watching newsreels of mass murders in Stalinist Russia and learning how Social Security and Medicare are “socialism.” These are the same idiots who keep railing against “liberal elites indoctrinating our kids.” Right…

The Houston Chronicle reported yesterday that Republicans who voted to oppose Governor Greg Abbott’s voucher program are being bombarded with fake ads, distorting their support for their local public schools. Governor Abbott received a gift of $6 million from Pennsylvania billionaire Jeff Yass to advance vouchers, as well as more from billionaire oil tycoons Wilks, Dunn, and Farris. Clearly he’s putting this bonanza into a campaign of lies. Abbott says that polls show that Texans want vouchers. If that were true (it’s not), Abbott should run honest ads saying, “Don’t vote for this guy because he opposes vouchers.”

During the regular session and four special sessions, Abbott held public school funding and teacher pay hostage. He said he would not give a penny to public schools or their teachers unless he got vouchers. Twenty-one Republicans opposed vouchers, so now Abbott accuses them of sabotaging the funding of public schools and teacher pay.

Abbott won’t run honest ads because he knows that Texans don’t want to spend their taxes to pay for religious schools and to subsidize the tuition of rich kids in private schools. His ads lie because the Governor knows vouchers are unpopular. They have been voted down in every state that has put them on the ballot.

Reporter Jason Scherer writes:

The ad opens with a dramatic message: “Steve Allison failed our teachers and kids.”

It says the San Antonio Republican stopped a bill in the Texas House last year that would have raised teacher pay, ended STAAR testing and poured more than $200 million into public schools in his district. “You deserve better,” the narrator concludes.

RELATED: Who’s behind the campaign mailers flooding GOP districts? Most lead back to megadonor oil tycoons

What the ad, from the Family Empowerment Coalition PAC, fails to mention is that Allison supported all of those measures. Gov. Greg Abbott refused to sign a package that included them into law unless it included private school vouchers, which Allison opposed.

The PAC is using similarly misleading online ads to target at least a dozen Republican state House members who voted to strip the voucher proposalfrom a $7 billion education funding bill in November. The PAC is one of several groups that have worked in conjunction with Abbott ahead of the March primaries to unseat GOP lawmakers who rejected the governor’s push last year to give parents taxpayer dollars to send their kids to private schools.

Twenty-one House Republicans joined with every Democrat in the chamber to strike vouchers from the bill. The GOP author then withdrew the entire package, citing Abbott’s threat to veto any education funding that did not come with vouchers.

Allison, a former Alamo Heights ISD board president who has long pushed for Texas to bolster school funding, said the ad’s claims are a “flat-out falsehood.”

BACKGROUND: Texas House rejects school voucher proposal, dealing blow to Abbott, private school advocates

“There was absolutely no reason in the world why the rest of that bill couldn’t have gone forward — and I think we would have passed it,” Allison said, adding that he supported the rest of the $7 billion measure. If anything, he argued, it did not go far enough to boost education funding.

Leo Linbeck, a leader and co-founder of the Family Empowerment Coalition PAC, has contended that “anti-voucher extremists” were responsible for the bill’s demise, arguing that they received major concessions and were only asked to approve a limited voucher program “that would have served 1% of kids, all poor.”

“(W)hen you strip out a major part of a compromise bill, it dies,” Linbeck wrote on X last month.

Linbeck did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

The ads are just one example of how Abbott and the cadre of pro-voucher political groups have made only sparing reference to vouchers, instead focusing on teacher pay raises, border security and abortion in their political ads.

The Family Empowerment Coalition has been among the most active players in the state House primaries, spending some $762,000 through late January to attack anti-voucher Republicans and support their primary challengers. Other founding members include Doug Deason, a prominent Dallas GOP donor, and former state Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr., a Democrat who supported vouchers in the Legislature.

Beyond attacks on school funding, they have also accused GOP members of being “weak on the border” and promoted their challengers as stronger advocates for border security — a topic that carries far more weight among GOP primary voters than vouchers, according to a recent statewide poll.

State Rep. Ernest Bailes, a Shepherd Republican who opposes school vouchers, is another of the group’s targets. His main rival is Janis Holt, a school board trustee and owner of an air purification company who also challenged Bailes in 2022.

More than three-quarters of Holt’s campaign funding has come from the Family Empowerment Coalition PAC and Abbott, who endorsed her in January.

“Governor Abbott needs an ally to fight with him for a secure border,” one of the Family Empowerment Coalition PAC’s ads reads. “That’s why he has endorsed Janis Holt for HD 18.”

The PAC ran another ad accusing Allison of bragging “that he helped close the border, even though he didn’t. That’s why Gov. Abbott didn’t endorse him.”

But the ad leaves out that every Republican in the Texas House, including Allison and Bailes, supported a far-reaching new law that empowers state officials to essentially deport people who are suspected of crossing the border illegally. They also backed a contentious bill that establishes stiffer penalties for human smuggling and approved more than $6.5 billion for border security over the next two years, including $1.5 billion to continue building a wall along Texas’ southern border.

Allison called the border-focused ads “outrageous,” pointing to his votes for the slate of GOP immigration bills.

“I’d like to see them point to one border bill that I didn’t vote for, or show anything that I’ve ever done except being 100% behind border security,” Allison said. “I’ve been down there three times. I have voted for every appropriation — I was on (the House) Appropriations (Committee) — and voted for every request the governor has made.”

Abbott is running a digital ad promoting Allison’s main challenger, attorney and former Bexar County district attorney GOP nominee Marc LaHood, as an ally in his fight to “stop the flow of illegal immigrants, crime and drugs into Texas.” The governor has run the same version of the ad for several other candidates running to unseat anti-voucher Republicans.

The governor also invited 20 Republican House members to the border last week for a press conference where he touted their bona fides on border legislation. Abbott did not invite any voucher opponents to the press conference.

Putin has finally gotten rid of his chief opponent, Alexei Navalny. Officials announced that he died after taking a “walk” in the remote prison where he was confined.

Navalny was a strapping handsome man of 47 who bravely stood up to Putin. He previously survived an attempt to poison him, a near-death experience. Navalny recovered in a German hospital.

He could have stayed in the West and remained a free man, risking the possibility that Putin’s agents would kill him.

Instead, after his recovery, he returned to Moscow to lead the struggle against Putin. He was arrested the instant he stepped off the plane.

Navalny was repeatedly moved into solitary confinement and suffered harsh conditions. While imprisoned, his jail term was increased again and again.

From today’s New York Times:

Mr. Navalny was given a three-and-a-half-year prison sentence in February 2021 after returning to Russia from Germany, where he had been recovering from being poisoned with a nerve agent the previous August. In March 2022, he received a nine-year sentence for embezzlement and fraud in a trial that international observers denounced as “politically motivated” and a “sham.” And in August 2023, he was sentenced to 19 years in prison for “extremism.” 

Mr. Navalny had effectively returned from the dead after his 2020 poisoning and had conducted multiple hunger strikes to improve his treatment, with many of his supporters believing him to be all but invincible. 

During his detention, Mr. Navalny was repeatedly placed in solitary confinement, and complained about severe illnesses. In December, he disappeared for three weeks during his transfer to a penal colony 40 miles north of the Arctic Circle.

Navalny was interviewed by the New York Times in 2021.

An excerpt:

What is the likelihood you will be killed in prison?

In interviews, at points like this, there’s usually a remark in parentheses (laughter). You cannot see me right now, but I assure you, I’m laughing.

For many years, I was forced to make excuses in response to questions like: “Why haven’t you been killed yet?” and “Why haven’t you been jailed?” Now that I have both these boxes checked (the one about murder with a side note: “Well, almost”), I’m asked to gauge the probability of my own death while in prison.

Well, the answer, obviously, can be taken from a joke: 50 percent. I’ll either be killed or not be killed.

Let’s not forget that we clearly have to deal with a person who has lost his mind, Putin. A pathological liar with megalomania and persecutory delusion. Twenty-two years in power would do that to anyone, and what we’re witnessing is a classic situation of a half-mad czar.

Putin is at last free of the one man who led a movement to oust him.

Please Google and watch the documentary “Navalny.” The world has lost a man of courage and principle.

Putin killed Navalny, but he never broke his spirit.

I will be in conversation with Todd Scholl of the Center for Educator Wellness & Learning in South Carolina tonight February 15 at 7 pm EST.

We will talk about privatization of public schools and the attacks on public schools.

The conversation will be livestreamed on Facebook.

Tonight February 15 at 7 pm.

Colorado has been the site of some high-profile mass murders. One thinks of the massacre at Columbine High School in 1999, which involved 15 deaths plus the two shooters. The massacre at a movie theatre in 2012 in Aurora, which involved 12 deaths. The massacre at a supermarket in Boulder, where 10 people died. Five people died at a gay nightclub in Colorado Springs in 2023. Curtailing access to guns may be one way to limit future killers.

The Denver Post reports:

Colorado would ban the sale, transfer and importation of so-called assault weaponsunder a bill introduced Tuesday in the state House.

The measure, HB24-1292, is similar to legislation that a House committee killed last spring in its first hearing, but this year’s version may have better chances. The new bill would define assault weapons as including semi-automatic rifles and pistols with fixed large-capacity magazines or the ability to accept detachable magazines, along with several other types of high-powered firearms.

It would not ban the possession of the weapons but would prohibit the “manufacturing, importing, purchasing, selling, offering to sell or transferring” of them, with exemptions for police and the military. It also would prohibit the possession of rapid-fire trigger activators, Seth Klamann reports.

At a campaign rally in Conway, South Carolina, Donald Trump said that he met with “the president of a big country,” who asked him, “Well sir, if we don’t pay, and we’re attacked by Russia – will you protect us?”

Trump said he responded:.

“I said: ‘You didn’t pay? You’re delinquent?’ He said: ‘Yes, let’s say that happened.’ No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them (Russia) to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay.”

European leaders were shocked by Trump’s casual dismissal of Article 5 of NATO, which binds every member nation to defend any other nation that is attacked. Since NATO was created in 1949, in response to the Soviet threat, Article 5 has been invoked only once, in aid of the United States on September 11, 2001. NATO has kept the peace, as it was meant to do. The USSR has never invaded a NATO nation, which may explain why so many former Soviet satellites weee eager to join NATO.

Thirty-one nations now belong to NATO.

Trump doesn’t understand how it works, so The Washington Post tried to explain it, in hopes that he reads it.

NATO member nations all make payments to cover the operating expenses of the organization, which was founded in the aftermath of World War II to help Western Europe counter the Soviet Union with help from Canada and the United States. But they don’t pay membership fees to remain in the alliance, so there’s no delinquency to speak of.

Countries do, however, commit to spending at least 2 percent of their gross domestic product (GDP) on defense each year, with the goal of ensuring the alliance’s military readiness and deterring any potential attacks. The commitment is a guideline, not a requirement, that has been in place for nearly two decades.

Last year, 11 countries met or exceeded that target, according to NATO statistics. The rest spent smaller portions of their GDP on defense. (Iceland, the only member state with no armed forces, is omitted from the data set.)

The nation that spent the most on military readiness was Poland, perhaps because of the years it was subjugated by the USSR.

Second was the United States.

The other nine that met the goal of at least 2% were: Greece, Estonia, Lithuania, Finland, Romania, Latvia, Hungary, the United Kingdom, Slovakia.

The nations that Trump is offering up to Putin as targets for invasion are: France, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Albania, Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Germany, Czech Republic, Portugal, Italy, Canada, Slovenia, Turkey, Spain, Belgium and Luxembourg. None of these countries met their 2% of GDP goal for military spending.

If you have been thinking of vacationing in any of the unprotected nations, like France, Germany, or Spain, it would be best to plan your trip in 2024. Should Trump be elected, those nations might be battlefields or Russian satellites.