Archives for category: Tennessee

A reader posted this comment:

 

I am a teacher in TN. I have 6 years of experience and a masters degree, and I don’t make even 40k a year. Our district already has a performance incentive program – the top level of merit pay, which I did earn last year, was $2,000 – about $1600 after taxes. Insulting. In fact, many teachers earned it. So what are they doing for this year? Raising the qualifications to make it harder for teachers to earn it because they didn’t want to give out so much $$.

Yesterday I received an email from Huffman – I think it was sent to all educators in TN through a listserve. I was so, very, very very very very tempted to reply to it and say just what someone said above – “Dear Mr. Huffman, I think it’s only fair that you too tie your salary to a measurement of our evaluation of your performance in office, and not receive any further raises unless warranted.”
But I didn’t, because I value my job. Unlike him.

When Kevin Huffman was sworn in as state commissioner in Tennessee, he was offered a salary of $200,000 a year, 11% more than his predecessor.

Granted that he believes experience and degrees are worthless, wouldn’t an elemental sense of fairness compel him to cut his own salary, having cut salaries of teachers across the state? After all, a teacher with a masters and a doctorate and 20 years experience will make less than $60,000.

Who provides greater value?

A teacher in Tennessee reacts to the state board’s decision to reduce her future pay for investing in an advanced degree:

After teaching in East TN for 20 years as a special educator, I decided to get my Ph.D. because I wanted to learn more about teaching reading. I am in the final stages of my dissertation and am sick at the thought that I will not be able to pay off my student loan of $15,000. (I worked full-time and paid for the rest of it by teaching art classes, selling stained glass and working extra jobs during the summer and on nights I didn’t go to classes. I am 60 and guess I will be working until I drop dead at this rate.

State Commissioner Kevin Huffman persuaded the Tennessee State board of Education that teachers should not be paid more for advanced degrees.

The state board agreed that less education is better than more. Tennessee doesn’t want teachers to be too educated. They might ask too many questions.

Dumb is good in Tennessee.

In his relentless effort to raise teacher quality in Tennessee, Kevin Huffman will cut the salaries of most new teachers.

The ax will fall most heavily on teachers who get an advanced degree.

You see, the way to improve teacher quality is to remove any incentive for additional education. If it can’t raise test scores, why bother?

Huffman got a law degree, but maybe that doesn’t count. He worked for Teach for America and was its communications director before becoming Commissioner in Tennessee. Maybe that’s what really counts.

A teacher in Cheatham County, Tennessee, sent me this article about the unusual exodus of teachers from the county’s schools. Twenty-five percent of the staff have resigned in the past year, including the football coach and the basketball coach (whose teams had good seasons).

There is a local school board meeting tonight to hear all sides. Parents and citizens should show up and get involved. Learn what is happening in your local schools.

A reader shared the following story about a student in Tennessee, where StudentsFirst named an outspoken anti-gay legislator as its “Reformer of the Year.”

“11-year old takes on Michelle Rhee and Students First over endorsing “Don’t Say Gay” lawmaker endorsement. ”

“I am Marcel Neergaard, and I am 11 years old. This year I was homeschooled for sixth grade because of severe bullying. If I had gone back to public school, there is a great possibility that I would have taken my own life. That possibility would have grown if a certain bill introduced in my home state of Tennessee had passed into law. This bill was known as the “don’t say gay” bill. Though that bill never became a law, Oak Ridge’s own representative, John Ragan, introduced a new version of the Classroom Protection Act. It is the “don’t say gay” bill, just more homophobic. While he crafted this horrifying bill, he received an award. I wrote a petition to take a stand against this.”

Gary Rubinstein came across an article in which Tennessee State Commissioner Kevin Huffman boasted about the merit pay scheme he was proposing and derided the leader of the Memphis teachers’ union for expressing caution about the program. Gary decided to take a closer look at the merit pay program and concluded that the union leader’s concern was well placed. Teachers would receive $2,000 to sign up and would receive another $5,000 only if they got the required gains.

I am constantly amazed that policymakers pay no attention at all to the evidence on merit pay. It has failed again and again. The most spectacular failure was in Nashville, where teachers were offered a bonus of $15,000 to produce higher test scores. There was a control group and an experimental group. After three years, there was no significant difference in the test scores of the two groups. Merit pay also failed in New York City and in Chicago.

Merit pay is faith-based policy.

 

Policymakers and the media in Tennessee thought that charters would outperform public schools. They would “save minority kids from failing public schools.” Unfortunately, the charter schools are manufacturing “success” by pushing out low-performing children right before testing time.

True believers refuse to accept the plain facts but it is hard to hide the disappearing students.

But the media is catching on.

A reader helpfully forwarded the transcript:

“NASHVILLE, TN (WSMV) –

Leaders with Metro Nashville Public Schools have serious concerns about what is happening at some of the city’s most popular charter schools.

Students are leaving in large numbers at a particularly important time of the school year, and the consequences may have an impact on test scores.

Charter schools are literally built on the idea that they will outperform public, zoned schools. They are popular because they promise and deliver results, but some new numbers are raising big questions about charter schools.

One of the first things a visitor sees when stepping into Kipp Academy is a graph that shows how Kipp is outperforming Metro schools in every subject.

However, Kipp Academy is also one of the leaders in another stat that is not something to crow about.

When it comes to the net loss of students this year, charter schools are the top eight losers of students.

In fact, the only schools that have net losses of 10 to 33 percent are charter schools.

“We look at that attrition. We keep an eye on it, and we actually think about how we can bring that back in line with where we’ve been historically,” said Kipp Principal Randy Dowell.

Dowell said Kipp’s 18 percent attrition is unacceptable.

MNPS feels it’s unacceptable as well, because not only are they getting kids from charter schools, but they are also getting troubled kids and then getting them right before testing time.

“That’s also a frustration for the zoned-school principals. They are getting clearly challenging kids back in their schools just prior to accountability testing,” said MNPS Chief Operating Officer Fred Carr.

Nineteen of the last 20 children to leave Kipp Academy had multiple out-of-school suspensions. Eleven of the 19 are classified as special needs, and all of them took their TCAPs at Metro zoned schools, so their scores won’t count against Kipp.

“We won’t know how they perform until we receive results and we see. We would be happy to take their results, frankly. The goal is getting kids ready for college. The goal is not having shiny results for me or for anyone on the team,” Dowell said.

Kipp Academy has started new counseling groups to try to retain children. MNPS said it constantly sees charters being held up as the model, but feels these numbers prove the two different types of schools play by different rules.”

Copyright 2013 WSMV (Meredith Corporation). All rights reserved.

Tennessee charters have learned the secret to high test scores: push out low-performing students right before testing time.

That way, the charter keeps the money, and the public school gets the low score.

This is not a closely guarded secret, but it usually fools the media and the politicians.

Here is one journalist–Dennis Ferrier at WSMV–who was not fooled:

“When it comes to the net loss of students this year, charter schools are the top eight losers of students.

“In fact, the only schools that have net losses of 10 to 33 percent are charter schools.”

The KIPP school in Nashville has an attrition rate of 18%.