Archives for category: For-Profit

Readers may recall that outgoing Indiana State Superintendent Tony Bennett left behind a videoconferencing system that cost $1.7 million and was utterly useless because it was incompatible with the department’s existing technology. The expensive technology was purchased from Cisco Systems, which by happy coincidence employs Bennett’s former chief of staff Todd Huston.

Karen Francisco of the Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette notes that the useless videoconferencing system is symptomatic of Bennett’s most important legacy: a full-bore assault on Indiana’s public school system.

She asks:

“Is the spin that is used to justify the questionable $1.7 million deal any different from the claims he used to expand charter schools, to shift tax dollars to private schools through voucher payments, to strip collective bargaining rights for teachers or require third-graders to pass a standardized reading test before moving on to fourth grade?

“Aside from his former chief of staff’s job with Cisco, Bennett’s ties to corporate interests have become increasingly clear. A nonprofit group in January released thousands of emails revealing the Foundation for Excellence in Education’s efforts in working with state officials, including Bennett, in writing education laws to benefit the foundation’s corporate supporters. The foundation, started by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, has received financial support from for-profit companies like McGraw Hill, Pearson and K12 and the nonprofit College Board, Huston’s current employer.

“The complex web of ties between corporate influences, Bennett’s administration and the raft of legislation should give lawmakers every reason to halt the continuing tide of education bills, including several sponsored by Huston. Demanding research-based evidence of the effectiveness of laws already passed and simply giving schools time to implement and evaluate them could save legislators some embarrassment later.”

Mercedes Schneider checks out the linkages between ALEC and Cato, the think tanks that are doing their best to advance freedom from government, I.e. deregulation and privatization of everything in the public sector.

One common link: the billionaire Koch brothers.

A reliable source in Tennessee sent this news to me.

Angry Moms of Tennessee scored a big victory!

Here is the report:

“No state charter authorizer. No vouchers. No charter trigger law expansion. No for-profit charter schools.

“BAM!

“Cost to StudentsFirst, etc. this election cycle- $2M. Cost of Angry Mamas- nothing. 🙂

“Wanted to make sure you knew. Huge Victory! Big celebrating down here!

“The end of session yesterday was nuts. The Lt. Gov. decided to hold the authorizer bill hostage to force the House to pass his unrelated judicial redistricting bill. The House refused, and amazingly- at the 11th hour- the authorizer was suddenly dead! No one could have predicted that one.

“Now to start educating and talking about all this so that it’s not so appealing when session starts again in January. “

A secret group commissioned by reactionary elements in Michigan crafted a plan to voucherize education funding. The plan will be submitted to Governor Snyder. Note that the purpose of the plan is not to provide better education, but to cut costs.

The article describes the plan as “reform,” but as usual, the real intent of this treat eggy is to abandon public education. When the privatizers say “the money should follow the child,” what tpthey mean is that the funding should go anywhere: to religious schools, private schools, cyber schools, for-profit vendors. That way, they drain essential funding from public schools, which will lose programs and staff, this facilitating the growth of the private sector.

This November, the Denver school board will be up for grabs.

As you will see in this article, the privatization movement has decided to make a play to take control of the board. You know what they want.

If the Denver race plays out like the one in Los Angeles, billionaires and Wall Street hedge fund managers, along with Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst, will pour millions into the race. Expect big gifts from Rupert Murdoch and Philip Anschutz, maybe the Koch brothers. They will turn the schools and the children over to the free market.

If you care about public education, now is the time to stop the corporate takeover.

This article asks the obvious question:

Why does Atlanta’s disgraced superintendent Beverly Hall face serious jail time for the cheating that happened on her watch–which she ignored or encouraged by demanding higher test scores–while Michelle Rhee continues to fly from state to state, urging legislatures to follow the DC model?

The article says that Rhee emerged–so far–unscathed because she has friends in high places.

As for the DC model, let us not forget that John Merrow documented that the DC schools are in worse shape now than they were in 2007:

He wrote to the Education Writers Association, introducing his post about the leaked memo:

“I am also reporting that, after five years of Rhee/Henderson, the DC schools are worse off by almost every conceivable measure: graduation rates, truancy, enrollment, test scores, black-white gap and teacher and principal turnover.”

Maureen Reedy, a veteran teacher and a teacher of the year in Ohio, has been fighting valiantly against the privatization movement in Ohio.

In this article that she wrote in the Columbus Despatch, she demonstrates how charters of low quality have diverted billions of dollars from the state’s public schools.

Consider:

“While 77 percent of Ohio’s public schools were successful last year (rated Excellent with Distinction, Achieving or Effective), only 23 percent of Ohio’s charters were successful (rated Effective or Achieving). So 77 percent of Ohio’s public schools are receiving A’s, B’s and C’s while 77 percent of Ohio’s charter schools are receiving D’s and F’s. And the bottom 111 performing schools last year? All were charter schools.”

And consider this:

““Following the money” also leads us to family-run charter-school operations with hefty salaries and few education credentials, including multimillion-dollar salaries for the CEOs of Ohio’s two largest charter-school chains, David Brennan of White Hat Management Co. and William Lager of Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow. Our tax dollars also are going to pay for advertising campaigns to recruit students to attend their underperforming charter schools.”

And here is a fact that is very odd: When public money goes to charters in Ohio, there is no transparency or accountability. It mysteriously transformed into private money belonging to the charter operator.

The Thomas B. Fordham Institute, which sponsors charters in Ohio, disagrees with Reedy. It says that most charter schools are not for-profit (although the two that Reedy mentions are reaping huge profits), and that the number of failing charter schools and failing district schools are about the same.

The Chalkface blog says that we have had a steady diet of “miracles” for at least the past dozen years, starting with the “Texas miracle.”

He calls this Voodoo Education Reform.

I tend to see the ideas of the past dozen years as Zombie Education Reform.

I use the term to refer to policies that have no evidence to support them, that fail and fail again and again, but that are imposed repeatedly by powerful people, despite their failure.

Merit pay is a Zombie Reform.

Evaluating teachers by student test scores is a Zombie Reform.

Privatizing public education for fun and profit is a Zombie Reform.

Hiring inexperienced and uncertified teachers for the children with the greatest needs is a Zombie Reform.

Closing public schools and calling it “reform” is a Zombie Reform.

Putting a single letter grade on a complex institution like a school is a Zombie Reform.

Giving academic tests to pre-school children is a Zombie Reform.

We live in an age where zombies run our nation’s education policy.

It won’t surprise you to know hat here is a lot of money behind the conservative agenda in Texas. But you might be interested to see the connections between the privatization advocates in Texas and national organizations like ALEC.

Julian Heilig Vasquez traces the connections in his series on the Teat, in which he reflects on what is known as neoliberalism.

Bill Sublette is a former Florida state representative who is now chairman of the Orange County school board. He is a Republican.

In this excellent article, he explains how the parent trigger bill, which just passed in the Florida House, will allow charter corporations to grab neighborhood schools, public property paid for by local citizens. And once the corporation takes control, neighborhood children will have to enter a lottery to attend what was once their neighborhood school.

He asks the reader:

“Imagine you live in a neighborhood with a school your community has called its own for years. A school you and your neighbors take great pride in and in which you’ve invested substantial time and effort. A school you sent your own children to, and one which you hope your children will choose to send their children to.”

But then the political consultants arrive to collect signatures and sell your neighbors a bill of goods. Before you know it, the school is owned by a corporation, and you as a parent have no rights at ll.

Here is a true conservative, a man who loves his community and its history. He is standing up against the those in his party who flak for corporate interests.