Archives for category: Colorado

A judge in Douglas County, Colorado, ruled that the school board had violated the state fair campaign practices law by hiring two conservative commentators to write papers praising the district’s privatization agenda.

One paper was produced by Frederick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute and the other by conservative activist William Bennett. Hess was paid $30,000 (half from district coffers) and Bennett was paid $50,000 ( by a private foundation).

Although there was no fine, the district plans to appeal.

Today, voters in Douglas County, Colorado, will decide the future of public education for the children of their county. In response to an earlier post about the election battle for control of the schools in Douglas County, where the school board is eager to privatize the schools, this reader made the following comment:

We should be courageous and move in the opposite direction from the so-called corporate reformers, the for-profit charter schoolmasters, and the naysayers of American public education. Administrators, teachers, staff, parents, students and concerned citizens should follow what is happening to American education. It is a violent, destructive force against public education.

The landscape is changing; on the horizon, we do not see public schools or parish schools. We see a disproportionate number of for-profit charter schools and schools serving segregated populations. The closure of neighborhood public and parochial schools widen the gaps, decreasing opportunities to grow and prosper. The demise of neighborhood schools adversely impacts the community life and spirit.

We see the end of public school funding and with that, the end of the significant role public schools play in democratizing our young citizens. In this model, the for-profit schools control the market place and the market values.

Investigative reporter Stephanie Simon of Politico reports on the most bizarre school board race in the nation: Douglas County, Colorado.

There, a powerful coalition of rightwing extremists has gained control of the school board and is determined to turn education into a free market, where competition and choice replace public education. They want vouchers, charter schools, and differentiated pay for teachers.

Simon writes: “The conservatives who control the board have neutered the teachers union, prodded neighborhood elementary schools to compete with one another for market share, directed tax money to pay for religious education and imposed a novel pay scale that values teachers by their subjects, so a young man teaching algebra to eighth graders can make $20,000 a year more than a colleague teaching world history down the hall.”

The future of this free-market policy will determined in the school board election, where powerful rightwing ideologues have funded the pro-market members of the board, and teachers’ unions and parents are funding those opposed to the elimination of public education.

The Koch brothers have contributed $350,000 to the free-market campaigners. They would, if they could, privatize all of what we now know as public education. The current board, fighting to maintain control, hired conservative icon Bill Bennett for $50,000 to be a consultant. It also hired Rick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute to write a paper praising the district’s initiatives, for $35,000.

Among the changes that conservatives admire:

Pushing the free market farther still, the board has urged district elementary schools to compete with one another for enrollment, rather than simply serving all students in the neighborhood. Principals are encouraged to budget creatively so they can develop a marketable niche, a practice that has left some schools without art or music teachers as they build up science programs or bring in foreign-language classes. Then there’s the market-pay system, in which a first grade teacher is valued, and paid, more than a second grade teacher and teaching physics far outweighs teaching art.

Some parents are upset, like one who told Simon that what bothered her most was “the splintering of her community.

“Five years ago, Scott said, all the kids on the block walked together to the local elementary school. Now, each family goes their own way — some to charters, some to private schools and some to public schools across town that have successfully marketed themselves as worth the drive. She has stuck with her neighborhood school, but often thinks of pulling up stakes.

“It’s truly broken up the community,” Scott said, “and it’s sad.” 

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/koch-group-unions-battle-over-colorado-schools-race-99252_Page2.html#ixzz2jWcawZLp

What we have learned after thirty years or more of standardized testing, is that the tests mirror family income education: they measure gaps but do nothing to close them; our kids spend (waste) too much time preparing to take the tests; the test results are massively misused for rewards and punishments instead of for diagnostic purposes; the testing industry is rich and powerful and hires lobbyists to protect its hegemony.

Make 2014 the year we opt out. Do not let your child take the state tests: do not let your child take field tests; do not let your child take practice tests.

Seek out information about your state’s laws by writing Peg Robertson of United Opt Out.

Here is a recent post by education activist Angela Engel of Colorado:

In the sixteen years since I first administered the CSAP test to my fourth grade students at Rock Ridge Elementary School, here’s what we’ve learned:

Wealth and poverty are the greatest indicators of test performance

High-stakes testing correlates to segregation

High-stakes testing increases inequities in opportunities and resources and further harms low-income children and youth

Test scores are not an accurate indicator of a student’s knowledge or potential

Emphasis on standardized testing kills creativity, imagination, and innovation

Commercial tests are more expensive and are far less informative than classroom assessments collected over time and evaluated by professional teachers

High-stakes testing does not improve schools, teachers or students

High-stakes testing has cost billions of dollars with no return on those investments

Standardized tests and the stakes and labels associated with these tests are destructive to children and youth and fail to honor their unique ways of thinking and learning

Over these many years, I have worked to challenge high-stakes standardized testing. I have published a book and articles, written legislation, lobbied on behalf of kids, spoken to audiences, organized and educated. I’ve come to understand that the public’s collective will and their intolerance for injustice is the greatest agent of change. We can still try and change the laws, we can continue to inform the people, and we can also refuse to conform. We can live by a different set of rules; standards that respect our children; choices that are responsible to our spending; and decisions that heal the opportunity divide and lead to cooperation.
The Coalition for Better Education is beginning their annual Colorado campaign to educate parents and students about their rights to refuse the test and OPT OUT. All money goes directly to billboards. In the words of Don Perl, “no amount is too small.”

______
Dear Colleagues:
I have randomly gone through the names of those who have been strong activists in the past for our billboard campaign to inform parents of their rights to exempt their children from the fraud of high stakes standardized testing. As most of you know, we have advertised on Colorado highways since 2005 to raise awareness of the boondoggle of CSAP (now TCAP) and each year more and more parents have opted their children out of the tests.

This is a critical year for voices raised against the corporate takeover. They are more forceful than ever. Consider the latest publications – Diane Ravitch’s Reign of Error, Jim Horn’s The Mismeasure of Education. The Progressive has a new website exposing the corporatization of public education, http://www.publicschoolshakedown.org. The strike of the Chicago Teachers’ Union a year ago had much to do with raising awareness of the privatization of what is a public trust – public education. Our mission has also been included in the wonderful collection of stories in Educational Courage: Resisting the Ambush of Public Education by Professors Nancy Schniedewind and Mara Sapon-Shevin.

I have just signed a contract with Mile High Outdoor Advertising to put two billboards up on the Eastern Slope. We will have these boards from January through March and I am attaching two photos of last year’s boards. Those two boards will cost us $2,200. We have a bank account in the Weld Schools Credit Union which now has about $500 in it. So, we need to raise something like $1,700 to cover the cost of the boards. We have no administrative costs whatsoever. So, however you could spread the word, however you could contribute to this campaign will be very much appreciated. Any contribution at all will help move us toward our goal.

Checks go to:

The Coalition for Better Education, Inc.
2424 22nd Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80631

In appreciation and solidarity,

Don Perl
The Coalition for Better Education, Inc.
http://www.thecbe.org

Please forward this newsletter to your friends and ask them to visit http://www.AngelaEngel.com.

Angela Engel, 8131 S. Marion Ct., Centennial, CO 80122

Hi SOS Supporters,

On October 19th, there are two actions against high stakes testing in Denver. Please join or support them in whatever way you can.  If you enjoy dressing as a Zombie, join the Zombie crawl and protest turning our students into testing zombies.  Visit the tumblr to learn more.

http://testingkillsbrains.tumblr.com/

Also, they are specifically looking for volunteers at the following times. Amber writes,

“I need volunteers for our first action on Sat Oct 19th, to dress as test zombies and pass out flyers at the zombie crawl.  I would love to have a large group of people at the costume contest to chant and get media attention.  Times as follows:

  2:00 pm – Kickoff!

  3:00 pm – Widows Bane

  3:55 pm – Thriller!

  4:00 pm – Zombie Crawl Parade down 16th St.

  5:30 pm – Costume Contests @ Skyline Park

The parade and costume contest is what I feel is most important.

Please send out the word and get as many people as you can to help us.  This is the launch of our group and it promises to be big.  Contact me athypnoamber@netscape.net for more deets.

Amber”

If you don’t want to be a zombie on Saturday, how about joining Students for our Schools to find out how you would score on our students’ tests? On Saturday, the 19th, join adults and community leaders as they take a high stakes tests.

Alex writes,

“Hello Education Activists and Supports,

As you know, the education revolution is a continuous fight, and we could use your help.

On October 19th, we are hosting our Take-The-Test event where adults will be taking a standardized test. We have invited over 100 elected officials, and we need you too!

Below is what we have been sending to the press, but we need your help spreading the word, getting people to sign up and making this event great! If you can spread the word, sign up and get one other person to sign up we can make this event great. Feel free to post this anywhere and everywhere! If you have any questions feel free to send me an email or call.

Thank you so much.

Alex”

http://www.students4ourschools.org/takethetest.html

Check out the great press release about this event.

http://www.students4ourschools.org/1/post/2013/10/take-the-test-event-press-release.html

Thank you for all of your help! Together, we can stop this testing madness and let teachers get back to teaching.

-Melody

P.S. Don’t forget to support school board candidates who are committed to fighting the neoliberal or corporate reform movements.  Our teachers and students deserve elected officials who will put students’ interests ahead of political or financial gains. Thank you.

Gary Rubinstein’s analysis of the charter schools founded by Congressman Jared Polis showed that the schools posted low test score growth. Congressman Polis responded in a comment (posted below) that this was understandable because his charter schools enroll very low-performing students, many of whom barely speak or read English, and many of whom are overage for their grade and far behind. It is understandable, he says, that these kids are not posting big score gains. He also notes that the teachers at his schools are not judged by value-added assessment, given the students they serve.

Congressman Polis is making my case for me but he doesn’t realize it. He should read my book.

He would discover that I support charter schools that enroll the kids who didn’t make it in public schools. They should exist to do what the public schools can’t do. They should exist to help kids who were left behind, not to skim the brightest kids from the poorest communities. Schools should not be closed because of their low scores, and their teachers should not be judged by test scores. Charter schools and public schools should collaborate, not compete. Charter schools should fill a need, as Polis’ schools seem to do, not fight public schools for market share.

If Congressman Polis would read my book, he would see that his are the kinds of charters I endorse.

If he would take the time to familiarize himself with the research on test-based accountability, he would join me in opposing it. He would withdraw his support for Colorado’s SB 191, which bases 50% of a teacher’s evaluation on student test scores. This is one of the nation’s worst, most punitive, and most ignorant teacher evaluation law, based on no research or evidence, just the whim of young State Senator Michael Johnston, ex-TFA. There are good ways to evaluate teachers, and test-based accountability is not one of them. That is why Jared Polis’ charter schools don’t do it.

Since we have now found common ground, despite the fact that Polis called me “an evil woman,” and despite the fact that he stubbornly refuses to apologize for his outburst, I invite him to meet with me in Brooklyn to discuss whether he can overcome his irrational contempt for traditional public schools. Even though he is a billionaire, I will pick up the check for breakfast, lunch, or dinner on one condition: read my book. If you don’t like it, Jared, I will give you your money back. Just promise not to throw it at me.

Here is his comment on the blog in response to Gary’s post:

“Thank you for your post defending the efforts of New America School. New America School (NAS) serves almost entirely NEP (non-English-proficient) and LEP (limited English proficiency) students, many of whom are several grade levels behind when they enter NAS. Nearly all of their students are drop-outs or have major gaps in their education.

“Given that the tests are only available in English, the NAS students have a significant disadvantage.

“A primary metric the school uses to demonstrate success is measuring the acquisition of the English language. Many NAS students are 19 or 20 years old, and only have a 6th grade or 8th grade education prior to entering NAS. Sadly in Colorado students “age out” of public education at age 21, and few students can accomplish 4 or 5 years of learning in 1 or 2 years. But even if they don’t earn a diploma, the students gain functional English language literacy.

“This analysis is a good example of why test scores should not be the only criteria used to evaluate schools or teachers. NAS teachers are hard working and dedicated and have literally transformed lives. To be clear, I support transparency on aggregate test scores, and Mr. Rubinstein is welcome to use that information to make whatever charts he wishes to show that a school is good, bad, or otherwise but it is important to educate the reform community about the importance of alternative education and serving all kids.

“Rubinstein mentions that “Colorado is one of the states that has been most aggressive about tying standardized test scores to teacher evaluations and to school rankings. ” but NAS does not use standardized test scores to evaluate teachers, nor has any kind of “ranking” hurt the school’s effort to fulfill its mission “to empower new immigrants, English language learners, and academically under-served students with the educational tools and support they need to maximize their potential, succeed and live the American dream.”

Douglas County, Colorado, has a school board that is enthralled with choice and apparently disdains public education.

Former Secretary of Education Bill Bennett spoke in Douglas County on September 25. According to the local media, he was well compensated. Rick Hess has also been busy consulting and promoting the school board’s plan to bust free of the cage of government schools.

Unless the public selects a new school board, Douglas County might become the first district to privatize public education.

EduShyster provides her typical dazzling overview of the situation. Unfortunately, there is not much humor here. Some of the nation’s wealthiest choice advocates have decided that Douglas County will be a fine Petri dish for a Milton Friedman-style experiment, along the lines already established in Chile and now unwinding there.

After following Jared Polis’s personal attacks on me on Twitter, Jersey Jazzman decided to examine what Polis has done in Congress. He is good on some issues, like gun control and the environment. But when it comes to fiscal issues, he favors tax breaks for corporations and the rich.

He praises Colorado’s SB 191, which bases 50% of teachers’ evaluations on test scores, which most researchers say is wrong. It is one of the most punitive corporate reform bills in the nation. I was in Colorado the day it was passed by the State Senate. The Colorado NEA asked to speak out against it, and I did. But the bill was introduced by young 32years old) State Senator Michael Johnston, ex-TFA, a fervent believer that teachers should be judged by test scores and should be fired or lose tenure if they couldn’t raise them.

Jersey Jazzman concludes thus:

Wealthy “liberals” who do not want to talk about inequality have found a useful issue in education “reform.” They can affect concern for the poor by pointing their fingers at teachers and their unions, deflecting the blame away from themselves. They can pretend that “college and career readiness” will lift the poor out of a system they themselves have benefitted from: a system that requires winners and losers. I don’t think Jared Polis wants to see anyone suffer. I don’t think Jared Polis likes poverty. But I do think Jared Polis would rather not reflect on the possibility that maybe his wealth was acquired at the expense of the working poor and the shrinking middle class, and that maybe we need to reform our government, our economy, and our markets with far more urgency than we need to reform our public school system. If wealthy, “liberal” reformers would finally start acknowledging this state of affairs, maybe we could have a significant, substantive conversation about the future of this country — and that would include education reform. It appears, however, that Jared Polis would rather just call the people who are trying to talk about education at a level beyond platitudes “evil”. –

See more at: http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-continuing-problem-of-wealthy.html#sthash.dXf6rMNo.dpuf

Jonathan Pelto is trying to find out who this Jared Polis is.

He took to Twitter to call me an “evil  woman” and compare me to the Koch brothers as someone doing great harm to public education.

It was puzzling to me.  I have met him twice. The last time I saw him was three years ago.

We know he is a member of Congress from Colorado, we know he sold his family’s greeting card company for $780 million, we know he calls himself a “progressive” and a “new” kind of Democrat.

But what does that mean?

According to Pelto’s research, Jared Polis is anti-union and anti-teacher, even though the Colorado Education Association endorsed him the first time he ran.

Why does he call me “evil”?

I know he founded some charter schools. I think he considers any critic of charters to be “evil.”

Strong words.

That must be it.

A few days ago, Colorado Congressman Jared Polis called me “evil” on Twitter. He said I was doing more harm to American public education than anyone and likened me to the billionaire Koch brothers. I didn’t respond other than to say that in our first meeting, with other Democratic Congressmen, he threw my book across the table in my direction, called it trash, and demanded his money back. I later met him at a gathering at the home of Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (a great friend of education), where he was civil and we had a pleasant chat. (In that same meeting, by the way, California Congressman George Miller went into an angry pout after I said that NCLB was unsuccessful. Miller is a favorite of powerful DFER, the hedge fund managers’ group.)

Who is Jared Polis?

Jersey Jazzman revealed that Polis is one of the wealthiest members of Congress, having sold his family’s electronic greeting card company for $780 million. As the previous link shows, Polis has stepped on many toes.

Jonathan Pelto here explains that Polis is a charter school founder and zealously supports charters and high-stakes testing. Pelto says he is a quintessential corporate reformer who uses his position in Congress to push for more federal money for charters.

Pelto writes:

“As a member of the “New Democratic Coalition,” Polis has consistently pushed an agenda that is as anti-teacher, anti-union and anti-public education as any group of Democrats in the nation.

“This past summer Polis was pushing language to amend the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Authorization Act (ESEA). But rather than correct the worst elements of the bills, Polis was pushing the corporate education reformer’s agenda.

“In one release, Congressman Jared Polis bragged, “We need an entrepreneurial approach to encourage high-quality, proven models of success in education.”

“One of Polis’ proposed amendments would have required local schools “make progress towards the goal of cutting achievement gaps in half in 6 years or towards 100% proficiency, or face interventions including transformation, turnaround, restart and closure.”

To learn more about Jared Polis and his allies, read all of Pelto’s post.