The cruelest of Trump’s policies is his determination to deport millions of immigrants. Stephen Miller, the man without a heart, wants to deport one million immigrants every year. The new head of the Department of Himrland Security, Markwayne Mullen, wants to meet that goal. So now the numbers of people detained has risen sharply, but most of them have never committed a violent crime.
Remember when Trump said he would deport “the worst of the worst”? Remember when he said he would expel the rapists and murderers?
I remember. You probably remember too.
Some are married to American citizens. Some are waiting for their green card to arrive.
That’s who he is deporting. Most of those detained have never committed a violent crime. Most are hardworking people who are contributing to society. Most are running small businesses or working on farms or in construction or landscaping. They need to get their papers, and they want them, but there is no path to legal citizenship.
Some of the deportees have lived here for twenty years or more.
No matter. The door to American citizenship is closed, except for white South Africans. For those whose skin is not white, go away.
Albert Sun and Alison McCann of The New York Times reported:
A surge in immigration arrests this summer has swept up thousands of people who had not previously been the focus of President Trump’s mass deportation campaign. They included people married to U.S. citizens, people who had entered legally and were pursuing an asylum claim, and others with a temporary legal status that the administration pushed to revoke.

A majority of the immigrants arrested in July were people who were accused of violating civil immigration laws but who had not been charged with or convicted of a crime, an analysis of newly released federal data shows. The share with a past violent criminal conviction fell to less than 4 percent.
Overall, immigration arrests rose to record highs with 43,000 ICE arrests in June and 49,000 in July. Two fatal shootings involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, in Texas and Maine, drew outrage but did not meaningfully slow the pace of arrests.
A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security said that the administration was keeping its promises to arrest and deport criminals and that anyone in the country illegally was a target for enforcement.
The new data contains details on every ICE arrest through Aug. 5 and offers the fullest picture yet of how the agency’s activities have shifted since public backlash forced a retreat from the aggressive tactics seen in Minneapolis early this year. It was obtained by the Deportation Data Project, an academic group, through a public records lawsuit and analyzed by The New York Times.
After his confirmation this spring, the secretary of homeland security, Markwayne Mullin, promised quieter but more effective enforcement. ICE now appears closer than ever to meeting a recent goal of 2,000 daily arrests.
“They have more officers, more money, more detention space, more local partners and better systems,” said Claire Trickler-McNulty, a former senior ICE official. “And they’re finally putting all the pieces together to build out this deportation machine.”
A wider focus
Immigration arrests are near all-time highs in almost every state. Even sparsely populated Montana and Vermont saw spikes, with arrest rates more than doubling.
But the surge was strongest in Florida and Texas, two states with large unauthorized immigrant populations and leaders friendly to the Trump administration’s crackdown.
The golden door is closed.

ICE has set a target of 3,000 arrests per week. They are not only aiming for the worst of the worst. They are looking to round up as many Black or Brown people as they can without too much regard for their immigration status. Citizens sometimes are ensnared, and it can take more than a week for them to be released.
LikeLiked by 1 person
cx: According to AI they are aiming for 3,000 daily arrests. Either way, they are not very discriminating about who goes into detention. They are more interested in meeting their quota.
LikeLike
Stephen Miller wants 1 million expulsions every year.
LikeLike
Our adopted daughter, born in Guatemala & a US citizen since the age of 18 months, was raised in a highly diverse environment & never experienced overt racism in her life, until now. She says she’s looking over her shoulder as she goes to work at a NYC public school. This is not the world she was raised to live in.
We recently returned from a cross-country trip to visit family, & agreed to meet my sister, who lives in Minneapolis, in Chicago because our daughter is afraid to set foot in Minneapolis. We wanted to tell her, “Don’t worry, it’ll be OK,” but honestly, we just couldn’t. We’re not about to risk her life on “It’ll probably be fine.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
…& the lamp is extinguished.
For 35-40 years, US immigration laws have been enforced ineffectively, through multiple administrations of both parties. The last time these laws were updated was 1990, reflecting circumstances substantially different from recent years. Either everyone responsible since then has been incompetent, or perhaps conditions made the laws unenforceable (or both). Either way, we the American people, through our elected officials, are responsible for the current undocumented immigrant situation, & it’s on us to set it straight in the least disruptive way possible.
For 40+ years we — all of us — have accepted their presence in our communities, their labor, their military service, their taxes. We’ve allowed them to establish lives, families, businesses, communities. Others followed when they saw it was effectively permitted. After allowing this to continue for an extended time, it’s not moral to decide that now, suddenly we’re going to enforce these outdated laws & reverse 40 years of neglect in a year or 2 with a show of force to “protect our borders.” A practical solution would also take years. If the current program achieved its stated goals next week (it won’t), it would leave us with a massive labor shortage, which we’d then have to just start addressing.
Yes, it’s the law. It’s already clear those laws don’t work; why compound the error? What if instead of the show of force, we created a citizenship path for those who’ve shown themselves to be productive community members? No, it’s not fair to all those who followed the rules. Maybe they could receive tax breaks in compensation; it would be offset by the increased revenue. That would simultaneously address the labor issue. Not as dramatic as the show of force, but far less disruptive — unless, of course, the show of force is the true goal, & protecting our borders is just an excuse.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lenny,
I think cruelty is the point of our current deportation policy, which involves brutality, force, and tearing families apart. Immigrants married to American citizens are not exempt from deportation. Some are deported to countries they have never visited, where they have no family.
That is what Stephen Miller wants. His goal is restoration of a white America.
Ronald Reagan signed an amnesty for 2.7 million immigrants.
AI answered my question about Reagan:
About 2.7 million undocumented immigrants received legal permanent residence under the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986, which President Ronald Reagan signed.
A few important details:
One interesting point: Reagan himself explicitly used the word “amnesty” when discussing legalization during his presidency, although the statute itself called it legalization.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I believe the deportations are supported by those who would bring harm to us deliberately. Consider this fight:
https://www.osvnews.com/florida-ags-threat-to-catholic-schools-clear-violation-of-the-first-amendment-law-scholar-says/
In this fight, the State of Florida is trying to strong arm the Catholic Church into accepting unvaccinated children because they receive voucher money. The church should have known better. They should have known that tying church to state is devastating for both.
Will conservatives wake up and quit supporting a gargantuan federal government where power is located in a despicable executive? Probably not. Think Franco.
Haitians are generally pretty tuned in to religion. As a group, they are the most gracious recent migrants to our shores. The Republican governor of Ohio is pushing back against the wholesale deportation of Haitians from his state. Their crime rate is a fraction of other subgroups in the country.
So why would Trump and Miller want to deport everyone in that group? Some call it racial prejudice. What if they just want to use the prevalent racial prejudice in America against the country to destroy it? What if you conjured up a plot for a novel in which some entity conspires to ruin a country by exploiting its sins?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Roy is making a point that’s been very much on my mind lately:
What if they are deliberately trying to undermine our country?
I don’t remember who it was, but I do remember during a past administration, a high ranking figure in the cabinet said that an occasional Depression can actually be a good thing for the country.
These guys are multi-national billionaires. They are not going to be jumping out of windows if the s#*t hits the fan. And I question just how much national ferver really exists in their minds.
LikeLike
Gitapik,
How else to explain Trump’s friendship with our adversaries (Russia and North Korea), and his contempt for our allies, esp Europe and Canada?
He doesn’t care about our national welfare. The DOGE cuts systematically damaged every agency.
LikeLike
When the detentions and deportations started, the data showed that the Biden administration had better numbers in the area of deportations.
Miller/Trump couldn’t have that. Lower the bar in terms of who they can take into custody and, like magic, the numbers increase!
While I think that fear and intimidation (both in this and all other areas of Trump’s governance) are unmistakably at play here, I think there’s an element of competition, as well.
They are spoiled children and bullies who’ve been left unchecked. And they’re also like the angry kids I used to teach in Special Ed. Destruction is an easy avenue to take when you’re looking to feel powerful and influential. Creation and building towards positive outcomes requires much more effort and planning.
.
LikeLike
Diane – yes, it’s clear cruelty is the point. Border protection is just a convenient excuse. The goal is to normalize this sort of government action so it can continue, with enactment of increasingly oppressive laws.
LikeLike
Do the Democrats have a coherent plan for how they’re going to fix this if/when they take the majority and/or regain the presidency? Abolition? After all, we did just fine without ICE for the first 227 years of our existence as a country. Barring that, what sort of reform measures do they think will meaningfully change anything? Should agents be arrested, prosecuted and incarcerated for breaking the law in the course of duty? Who’s going to do that arresting, prosecuting and incarcerating? The regular police who have their own history of unchecked brutality and lawlessness? Or maybe some amount of redirection of funds toward things like education, healthcare, jobs, etc. that actually help people (i.e., “defunding”)? What about codifying procedures for entry, asylum and pathway to citizenship? Any specifics there, or just slogans? Or, best yet, what about a plan to stop creating immigrants in the first place by not invading, bombing, sanctioning and otherwise destabilizing other countries? If anyone can direct me toward a coherent Democratic platform on any of those issues, I’d appreciate it.
LikeLike
If Democrats win control of one or both houses, they can cut the budget but they can’t legislate anything. If they pass a law abolishing ICE, Trump will veto. I doubt they will votes to override any veto by Trump.
If they regain the presidency and control of Congress, they will have the power to make major changes.
LikeLike