Watching the press conference that followed NYC Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s meeting with Trump felt like stepping into an alternate universe.
Before they met, Mamdani called Trump names and promised to “Trumpproof” the city. Trump called Mamdani a “radical lunatic,” “a communist,” and lots of ethnic and religious slurs. He also threatened to cut off federal aid to the city.
But after they met, Mamdani was beaming and Trump was gushing with praise for the vibrant young Mayor-elect. He even gave Mamdani that special smile that he usually reserves for Putin.
As a resident of NYC, I’m very happy with the outcome but puzzled. I haven’t met Mamdani but he clearly has magic powers.
Dean Obeidallah, who is Muslim, explains what happened on his blog:

For those shocked by how smitten Donald Trump was with Zohran Mamdani during their Oval Office meeting on Friday, it’s simply because you don’t know about the special powers, we, Muslims have. One of them is the ability to mesmerize people. Now, we only use this super Muslim power in special moments. We just can’t go around captivating people all day because we would have too many people chasing us around like smitten puppy dogs.
How does this spell get cast? Some online have speculated that Zohran called Trump “Habibi.” I can neither confirm nor deny that the word “Habibi” –or “Habibiti” for a woman—is part of how we do this.
But the trance I saw Trump in means Zohran likely dropped a special potion of Middle Eastern spices into Trump’s Diet Coke or McDonald’s cheeseburger. While I’m sworn to secrecy on the full list of ingredients, it likely involves sumac, cumin, cardamom with a hint of Trump’s favorite Doritos nacho cheese flavor. How powerful is it? Just look at the photo below. We all want someone to look at us with that type of affection!

Now with the kidding aside-or could it there really be a Muslim superpower?! I get why people would be stunned by what transpired. Trump had slammed Zohran days before the meeting as a “communist.” And during the mayoral campaign, Trump had attacked Zohran on everything from his looks —“TERRIBLE”—to his voice—“grating”—and even threatened to look into stripping him of citizenship and arresting him.
And Zohran in return had repeatedly trashed Trump calling him everything from “corrupt” to a “fascist” to a “despot.” He even mocked Trump during his victory speech a few weeks ago taking a shot at him being nearly 80 years old with the comment “I know you’re watching, I have four words for you: Turn the volume up.”
That was all gone yesterday—at least from Trump’s point of view. There was Trump pushing back on reporters that are from pro-Trump media outlets saying at one point, “I’ll stick up for you.” Trump added later he would live in New York under Mayor Mamdani and even said he was “confident that he [Zohran] can do a very good job”.
Now if you watch the clips– such as the one below– as Trump is defending Zohran and looking at him with puppy dog eyes, Zohran is simply being Zohran. He’s professional, poised and like always focused on his message of affordability for New Yorkers.

People can debate why Trump was glowing. I’ve met Zohran and chatted with him here in NYC over the past few years. He’s exceedingly smart—plus he does his homework on issues, etc. That means Zohran knew exactly what to say to Trump to elicit this response—and executed it perfectly.
In addition, Trump is at his lowest point in the polls in the second term. Trump is especially underwater on the economy with a Fox News poll this week finding that 76 percent now rate the U.S. economy negatively under Trump.
Trump needs to be near a winner—and that is what Zohran is. But while this meeting was both entertaining and inspiring, the best part was what happened immediately after it ended. And that was the outrage from the anti-Muslim bigots who to put it bluntly: Lost their sh*t.
For starters, there was GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik who is running for New York governor in 2026. Her campaign has been focused on smearing Zohran and all Muslims. She’s like a female George Wallace but instead of demonizing Blacks–she is hating on Muslims.
Her main line of attack is to call Zohran a “jihadist.” Well in the Oval Office meeting, Trump was asked if he agreed that Zohran was a jihadist? In response Trump said no, adding, “I just met with a man who’s a very rational person.”
In response, Stefanik became hysterical because this undermines her campaign based on hate. She quickly vented her anger online repeating Zohran is a jihadist. Her freak out was a joy to behold.
Then there were bigots like Laura Loomer—who increasingly looks a cautionary tale for Botox abuse. After Zohran won, she posted a series of anti-Muslim comments such as calling Zohran a “jihadi” and writing “Mamdani will encourage Muslims to commit political assassinations to acquire power and silence critics.”
Yesterday, she was outraged with the Zohran-Trump love fest. She went on a long Twitter rantslamming the meeting and that Republicans need to oppose his agenda or lose. But deep down with Loomer it’s always about anti-Muslim hate.
Others like WABC radio’s Sid Rosenberg—who inadvertently helped Zohran win with his anti-Muslim comments that Andrew Cuomo joined in during the campaign—loves Trump. But he was fully triggered by this meeting. He told the NY Times “to watch them shake hands and smile” made him want to lose his lunch.
Of course there were countless other MAGA loving, Muslim hating scumbags on social media who went ballistic over the meeting. They live to be outraged.
Only time will tell if this meeting helps the people of New York City, Trump’s sagging approval numbers, etc. But one thing we knew it did already was piss off the anti-Muslim haters. If enjoying that is wrong, I don’t want to be right!

Trump knows how to play the media.
That’s what the Mamdani love fest in the oval office was all about. If Trump had been his usual insulting, threatening, hate-filled self, which isn’t doing well for his overall national approval ratings that are headed for rock bottom. Well, not really that low. Trump will always have his loyalist fascist MAGA hate cult and Republican voters who only vote Republican, even if they have to put a gas mask to avoid the stench of corruption when they cast their ballot into that toxic sewage.
What happened in the Oval Office is getting a lot more attention in the media because no one expected that. It was all a lie. Trump hates Mamdani through and through.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Agreed. Trump and Co. are reading the public’s growing discontent and shifting his image to better serve their needs.
I’m a little bit concerned about Mamdani’s “change”. But I guess he’s got to play the game now that he’s gotten on the field. Hopefully Trump didn’t threaten him. Too much. I really don’t trust that man.
LikeLike
The amazing part of that dialogue is that Mamdani did not back away from anything he said on the campaign trail. He didn’t even withdraw his statement that Trump is a fascist.
LikeLike
The other amazing part is that Trump didn’t behave like a complete fool.
LikeLike
lol…no doubt!
That Bruce Fanger analysis that Ed Johnson posted makes some very good points.
LikeLike
That Bruce Fanger analysis is brilliant
LikeLike
I haven’t seen a video of the Trump-Mamdani meeting but I came across this take on it. It destroys any notions of Trump the bully having made a “U-turn” for the better, and rightfully so…
By Bruce Fanger
Thirty Minutes in the Lion’s Den: The Interview Trump Thought He Controlled
White Rose USA — November
There’s a strange thing that happens when you watch the full thirty-minute interview instead of the clipped version the internet tosses around. The edges soften. The masks slip. And you start to see the actual geometry of the interaction — where power sits, where insecurity leaks, where the tone changes, where the truth speaks by accident. The viral clip makes it look like a moment. The full meeting reveals a dynamic.
This wasn’t a showdown. It wasn’t a humiliation. It wasn’t a triumph for either man. It was something far more revealing: a case study in how a bully behaves when he can’t rely on fear, and how a principled politician behaves when he refuses the role of the victim.
The meeting begins as all Trump meetings do — with noise.
The first five minutes are pure Trump: monologues disguised as greetings, numbers inflated beyond physics, scattered recollections of the 1980s like the era froze and preserved him in amber. You can practically hear his brain flipping through its greatest hits, trying to set the tone: This is my room. My chair. My story.
But Mamdani doesn’t react to any of it.
And that is the first hinge of the meeting.
A man like Trump needs emotional feedback to function. Fear works. Flattery works. Even anger works. Mamdani gives him nothing. He sits there with the calm of someone who refuses to let the other person set the emotional tempo. It’s a small thing, but with Trump, it’s enough to break the cycle.
Then comes the shift — the “gracious Trump” phase.
People mistake this for maturity or diplomacy. It’s not. It’s a reflex Trump only deploys when he can’t dominate the room. The tone goes soft, the eyebrows lift, the compliments come out in forced, syrupy bursts.
“You’re doing great work.”
“New York is lucky to have you.”
“You’re a very smart guy.”
It sounds statesmanlike until you remember the same man called him a communist threat two weeks earlier. What’s happening here isn’t respect — it’s adaptation. A chameleon trying to match the color of the wall.
Trump is gracious when graciousness benefits Trump.
As Mamdani shifts to policy, Trump drifts into autobiography.
This is the most telling stretch — minutes twelve to eighteen. Mamdani tries to talk like a mayor-elect:
transit
housing
Rikers
federal cooperation
immigrant protections
Real issues, real stakes, real governance.
Trump responds by vanishing into his own mythology. Crime statistics from memory that don’t exist. Grievances about prosecutors. Stories from “the old days.” Complaints about how unfairly he’s been treated.
It’s not sabotage — it’s incapacity.
Mamdani is speaking a civic language Trump’s brain can’t decode.
They aren’t having the same conversation.
They aren’t even on the same continent.
Then comes the moment everyone’s dissecting — the “fascistic tendencies” line.
And yes, it happened in the room, not after. Mamdani doesn’t weaponize the word. He doesn’t turn it into a headline. He does something more dangerous: he analytically names the pattern.
Immigrant raids.
Political retribution.
Targeting dissent.
Erosion of checks and balances.
Threats against the judiciary.
He lays out the evidence and names the behavior: fascistic tendencies.
Trump nods and smiles like someone being told he has an excellent golf swing.
It’s not bravado. It’s not denial.
It’s something almost sadder: he doesn’t understand the language of critique unless it’s blunt and emotional. Mamdani moved the discussion into the realm of political analysis, and Trump’s instincts don’t live there. So he simply… accepts it. Not because he agrees, but because he can’t absorb what the words actually mean.
The last ten minutes are the clearest portrait of Trump’s psyche.
Once Mamdani refuses to bend, Trump compensates by overcorrecting into flattery:
“You’re going to surprise people.”
“I feel very comfortable with you.”
“We’re going to get along great.”
It’s dominance disguised as benevolence. When Trump can’t conquer, he tries to adopt. He folds the other person into his narrative: You and I are the same. We’re allies. You approve of me. I approve of you.
It’s a kind of political camouflage — digest the threat by complimenting it.
Mamdani doesn’t take the bait.
He doesn’t fight.
He doesn’t flatter.
He just continues speaking plainly.
Which leaves Trump in the one position he hates most: performing civility for an audience that isn’t fooled.
What the meeting really showed
The full interview isn’t about Mamdani calling Trump a fascist.
It’s not about Trump pretending to be gracious.
It’s not about a progressive mayor meeting an authoritarian president.
What the meeting showed is simpler and more damning: Trump is only powerful when the room fears him.
Take the fear away, and he becomes oddly gentle, strangely polite, and completely unable to dominate the conversation.
People think tyrants rage because they’re strong.
But the truth is they only rage when they know the room will absorb it.
Mamdani didn’t absorb it.
So Trump didn’t rage.
He folded.
Nicely. Neatly.
Like a man who knows the cameras are watching and doesn’t want the world to see what he looks like when the mask cracks.
And if there’s a lesson here for the rest of the country, it’s this: Fear is the oxygen of authoritarianism. Take it away, and even a strongman starts to sound like a man.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Trump is a narcissist and sociopath. Narcissists have 4 recognized modes. They are: 1. Charm 2. Devaluation and blaming the other party 3. Rejection, discarding, public blame and shame. 4. Attempts to re-engage and regain control. Let’s look at some examples. Mike PenceBill Barr Elon MuskSteve BannonRick PerryJohn BoltonGeneral Mark Milley. Shall we go on? Or is the picture clear?So what’s in store for Mamdani?
Martha Ture Mt. Tamalpais Photographyhttps://mttamalpaisphotos.com The greatest joy in the world is in restoring the earth.
LikeLike
I’m really disappointed that 86 Democrats voted yes on the resolution “Denouncing the Horrors of Socialism,” especially right before Mamdani’s meeting with Trump. At a time when people are struggling, we need more social-democratic policies — not less.
Who doesn’t love Medicare and Social Security? They’re proof that government can actually improve people’s lives. Yet we keep allowing “socialism” to be treated like a dirty word, even though the happiest countries in the world credit their social welfare states.
I understand that some Democrats worry about swing districts, but is reinforcing the GOP’s false narrative really an effective strategy for winning? Or does it just make it harder to defend the very programs Americans rely on?
LikeLiked by 1 person
David P.,
I’m shocked too about the number of Dems who voted to denounce the “horrors of socialism.” Are they so stupid that they don’t know the difference between socialism and Communism? Do they oppose Medicare for All? Do they denounce the great social services of the Scandinavian nations?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I just looked up Jeffries’ position on Medicare for All.
“In 2019, Hakeem Jeffries signed on as a co-sponsor of Rep. Pramila Jayapal’s Medicare for All Act of 2019 (H.R. 1384). At the time, he was one of the highest-ranking Democrats in the House to back the bill, and his support was celebrated by DSA organizers who had been pressuring him.”
His official health-care page today talks about strengthening and expanding the ACA and lowering drug costs, but does not foreground Medicare for All.”
I guess he must be getting pressure from the corporate wing of the party to not look too progressive? Or Dems are trying to play nice with Republicans so they can continue the ACA subsidies?
“Some Democrats are reportedly open to compromise on subsidy rules (e.g., income caps) in order to enable bipartisan agreement.”
I sent him Jeffries an email expressing my concerns for supporting the bill.
LikeLike
The difference between socialism and communism is that socialism is just a transitional stage until the state fades away into irrelevancy because the workers will democratically control society (true participatory democracy, not just show up and vote twice a year “democracy”).
LikeLike
Democrats need to do a better job of explaining the difference between socialism, where the government owns the means of production, and Democratic socialism, where certain goods or services are socialized because it is more efficient and less expensive to do. We already have many examples of Democratic socialism in the US. We pool funds for the military, fire/police departments and education. Our many subsidies to certain industries as well as bridges, dams, and roads are examples.
Sad to see Hakeem Jeffries on this list. He should know better.https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-of-democrats-voting-to-condemn-socialism-as-mamdani-comes-to-town-11088383
LikeLiked by 1 person
According to that Newsweek article the DSA website says-
“Democratic socialists believe that capitalism is a “system designed by the owning class to exploit the rest of us for their own profit” and must be replaced by democratic socialism, according to the organization’s website.”
I didn’t find that statement on the DSA website. I don’t know where it came from. This is what I found.
Who we are
The Democratic Socialists of America is the largest socialist organization in the United States, with over 80,000 members and chapters in all 50 states. We believe that working people should run both the economy and society democratically to meet human needs, not to make profits for a few.
Much less scary than the first statement and probably one that many people on both sides of isle would agree with.
LikeLike
Maybe pundits are reading too much into the Mamdani Trump face-off. Maybe the meeting was more about two New Yorkers finding common ground to best serve the city that helped raise them both. Perhaps both of them are expedient politicians that decided to find common ground rather giving the press “a real housewives” moment. Perhaps Wall St. and New York billionaires got to both of them and told them not to turn New York City into the next Chicago, which would hurt Wall St.’s bottom line as well as both men that have a vested interest in keeping New York one of the greatest cities in the world.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes. This and the fact that he and his team are reading the right wing’s growing distrust and dislike of Trump’s “style” and trying to “play nice”, now.
LikeLike
In a week or two Trump will be back to trashing Mamdani.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a safe bet!
LikeLiked by 1 person