Heather Cox Richardson draws together the seams of a story that is unfolding piece by piece. Trump’s popularity is plummeting; he is obsessed with his poll numbers. At the same time, he is assembling military forces to control Democratic-run cities where there are no riots, no disorders that can’t be handled by local police. Does he really believe that the nation’s cities are engulfed by a massive crime wave?
The only terrifying development that she did not include in her summary is Trump’s declaration that he intends to resume nuclear testing, a practice abandoned in 1992.
As I read her piece below, I was reminded that Trump said at a rally, “Vote for me now, and you will never have to vote again.” He often says the quiet part out loud.
House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) continues to try to pin the upcoming catastrophic lapse in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funding on the Democrats. But with the U.S. Department of Agriculture sitting on $6 billion in funds Congress appropriated for just such an event, the Treasury finding $20 billion to prop up Trump ally Javier Milei in Argentina, Johnson refusing to bring the House into regular session to negotiate an end to the government shutdown, and President Donald J. Trump demanding $230 million in damages from the American taxpayer, bulldozing the East Wing of the White House to build a gold-plated ballroom that will dwarf the existing White House, and traveling to Asia, where South Korean leadership courted him by giving him a gold crown and serving him brownies topped with edible gold, blaming any funding shortfall on Democrats is a hard sell.
According to a Washington Post–ABC survey, more Americans blame Trump and congressional Republicans for the shutdown than blame Democrats by a margin of 45 to 33, and Trump’s approval rating continues to move downward, with the presidential approval average reported by Fifty Plus One at 41.3% approval and 55.1% disapproval, a –14 split. G. Elliott Morris of Strength in Numbers noted on October 24 that polls show Americans now trust Democrats more than Republicans to handle the economy well.
Trump ran in 2024 with a promise to bring down inflation, which was then close to the Federal Reserve’s target of 2.0%; now core inflation is at 3%, having gone up every month since April. Halloween candy—on people’s minds today—is at 9.8% inflation and costs 44% more than it did in 2019. Federal Reserve Board chair Jerome Powell sure sounded like he was describing stagflation—a condition when the economy stagnates despite inflation—when he said yesterday: “In the near term, risks to inflation are tilted to the upside, and risks to employment to the downside, a challenging situation.”
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said today that while the stock market has done well this year, a better economy is going to “start flowing through to working Americans next year.”
Meanwhile, on Tuesday, in a rambling and disjointed speech in Japan, Trump told U.S. military personnel that he is federalizing National Guard troops and sending them into Democratic-led cities “because we’re going to have safe cities.” In the same speech, Trump repeatedly attacked former president Joe Biden and insisted yet again that the 2020 presidential election was rigged. (It was not.)
When asked by a reporter later to clarify his remarks, Trump referred back to the Insurrection Act, saying that if he invoked it, “I’d be allowed to do whatever I want. But we haven’t chosen to do that because we’re…doing very well without it. But I’d be allowed to do that, you understand that. And the courts wouldn’t get involved. Nobody would get involved. And I could send the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines. I can send anybody I wanted.”
In fact, a president can invoke the accurately named Insurrection Act only in times of insurrection or rebellion. Neither of those conditions exists.
But the administration is working hard to create the impression that they do. Drew Harwell and Joyce Sohyun Lee of the Washington Post reported yesterday that the videos the Department of Homeland Security has been publishing to demonstrate the administration’s triumph over crime in U.S. cities as its agents work “day and night to arrest, detain and deport vicious criminals” have been doctored. They do not represent current actions, but rather are a hash of video from different states and different times.
When the reporters asked the White House about the misleading footage, spokesperson Abigail Jackson told them that “the Trump administration will continue to highlight the many successes of the president’s agenda through engaging content and banger memes on social media.”
There are signs the administration is not just trying to give the impression that Americans are rioting, but is trying to push them to do so.
Aaron Glantz of The Guardian reported yesterday that on October 8, Major General Ronald Burkett, who directs the Pentagon’s National Guard bureau, ordered the National Guard in all the states, U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia to form “quick reaction forces” trained in “riot control.” Most states are required to train 500 National Guard personnel, for a total nationwide of 23,500. The forces are supposed to be in place by January 1, 2026.
In his order, Burkett relied on an executive order Trump signed on August 25, calling on the secretary of defense to “immediately begin ensuring that each State’s Army National Guard and Air National Guard are resourced, trained, organized, and available to assist Federal, State, and local law enforcement in quelling civil disturbances and ensuring the public safety and order,” and “ensure the availability of a standing National Guard quick reaction force that shall be resourced, trained, and available for rapid nationwide deployment.”
In August the administration planned for two groups of 300 troops to be stationed in Alabama and Arizona as a “Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force.” Now that number is 23,500, and the troops will be in every state and territory.
The establishment of a domestic quick reaction force to quell civil disturbances at a time when there are no civil disturbances that can’t be handled easily by existing law enforcement suggests the administration is expecting those conditions to change.
That expectation might have something to do with Monday’s story from Anna Giaritelli of the Washington Examiner that the White House is reassigning ICE field officers and replacing them with officers from Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). Greg Wehner and Bill Melugin of Fox News reported that the shift will affect at least eight cities, including Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, Denver, Portland, Philadelphia, El Paso, and New Orleans.
White House officials, presumably led by White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who has said the administration intends to carry out “a minimum” of 3,000 arrests a day, are frustrated by the current pace of about 900 a day. So those officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, special government employee and Noem advisor Corey Lewandowski, and Greg Bovino, a Border Patrol sector chief who has been overseeing the agency’s operations in Los Angeles and Chicago, have decided to ramp up those deportations by replacing ICE officials with far more aggressive CBP leaders.
Tripling arrests will likely bring pushback.
Michael Scherer, Missy Ryan, and Ashley Parker of The Atlantic reported today that political appointees Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have moved onto military bases.
The designs of the anti-immigrant leaders in the administration dovetail with Trump’s political designs. Trump has talked a lot about serving a third term in the presidency, most recently talking about it to reporters on Air Force One earlier this week. The Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution prohibits a third term, but Trump ally Stephen Bannon told The Economist last week that “Trump is going to be president in ‘28 and people just ought to get accommodated with that.” Bannon claimed, “There’s many different alternatives” to get around the Twenty-Second Amendment. Trump keeps “Trump 2028” campaign hats on bookshelves outside the Oval Office.
Janessa Goldbeck, the chief executive officer of the nonprofit Vet Voice Foundation, told Guardian reporter Glantz that Burkett’s recent order shows “an attempt by the president to normalize a national, militarized police force.” Such a force has not just military but also electoral power: it could be used in Democratic-led states to suppress voting. In a worst-case scenario, Goldbeck said, “the president could declare a state of emergency and say that elections are rigged and use allegations of voter fraud to seize the ballots of secure voting centers.”
Today, Buckingham Palace announced that King Charles has “initiated a formal process to remove the style, titles and honours of Prince Andrew” over his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and participation in activities surrounding Epstein. Andrew will be stripped even of his title of “prince” and will be forced to leave the home he has shared for more than 20 years with his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, at Royal Lodge, a 30-room mansion located in Windsor Great Park. The palace said: “These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him.”
Today Jim Acosta reported that survivors of Epstein’s sex trafficking enterprise have written a letter to Speaker Johnson demanding that Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) be sworn into office. Voters elected Grijalva on September 23, but Johnson has steadfastly refused to swear her in. Grijalva has said she will provide the last signature necessary on a discharge petition to force a vote on the public release of the Epstein files, an outcome that threatens to expose how and why Trump was named in those files.
The survivors write that Johnson’s “continued refusal to seat her is an unacceptable breach of democratic norms and a disservice to the American people. Even more concerning to us as survivors, this delay appears to be a deliberate attempt to block her participation in the discharge petition that would force a vote to unseal the Epstein/Maxwell files. The American public has a right to transparency and accountability, and we, as survivors, deserve justice. Any attempt to obstruct a vote on this matter—by manipulating House procedure or denying elected members their seats—is a direct affront to that right and adds insult to our trauma.”

After the Toxic T in the White House and his Nazi fascist klepto-kakistocracy regime starts a nuclear World War III, after the first strike is over, there won’t be many people left to vote.
A few years later, even billionaires living in underground bunkers in New Zealand will eventually run out of food or die from lack of healthcare. I don’t think any of them will build, support, and staff an underground hospital next to their bunker.
There also may not be anyone left to write the history that shows who was responsible for ending our species.
The Earth doesn’t care. Ten to thirty thousand years later, the planet’s environment will have started to recover, and some other life forms will take the place of those that vanished along with our species.
The Chicxulub asteroid impact 66 million years ago caused more damage than a nuclear war would, resulting in an extinction event that wiped out 75% of life on Earth. The impact was immensely powerful, unleashing an energy equivalent to 10 billion World War II-era atomic bombs and triggering global catastrophes like wildfires, tsunamis, and a “nuclear winter”-like cooling effect that blocked the sun. In contrast, a nuclear war would not eliminate all life on Earth, though it would cause devastating, widespread destruction.
Earth’s recovery from the Chicxulub asteroid varied, with initial rapid recovery of ecosystems in the impact crater beginning in just a few years, leading to a thriving ecosystem within 30,000 years. However, the overall global recovery of biomass and diversity took much longer, estimated to be from hundreds of thousands to several million years. Some areas, like parts of the North Atlantic, took up to 300,000 years to recover.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Once again Diane Ravitch laughably cites former historian Heather Cox Richardson as a credible source. HCR is a 100% partisan on her blog; she discards all pretense of scholarly analysis in pushing agendas. Here is what a very anti-Trump writer says about HCR:
But I don’t share your admiring view of Richardson. She’s a tireless propagandist who regularly says things I consider dishonest and deceptive. She’s constructing an ongoing narrative of “resistance” that often distorts the truth to give her side leverage. In other words, exactly what I said our own side shouldn’t do. Calling that an expectation of perfection is to assume she’s making mistakes when I think she’s actually bending the truth deliberately, or else so in the tank for her own side that she continually succumbs to motivated reasoning and doesn’t recognize them AS mistakes. That she and JVL sounded more nuanced on a Substack Live is great — but her newsletter has 2.7 million subscribers. She needs to correct the record if she got something wrong. That’s the standard. It’s not perfection. It’s professionalism and devotion to the truth, norms that govern journalism and scholarship, whatever it is. That’s one big reason why we’re better than propagandists on the right willing to say anything to win.
LikeLike
Ignore, folks, it’s just another MAGAt troll who, unlike Richardson, did not cite any sources, such as for the claim someone made that 100% of her blog is partisan (and presumably untrue.)
Funny these trolls don’t realize that BECAUSE she cites her sources, we can easily find out what’s up all by ourselves.
LikeLike
Richardson even provides direct links to her sources at the very end, as can be found here: https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/october-30-2025?r=rls8&triedRedirect=true
LikeLike
The writer who wrote that criticism of HCR is Damon Linker. He is a former conservative, now a moderate liberal who is very critical of Trump. HCR has still not retracted her untrue claim that a far Right person killed Charlie Kirk. She – like Diane Ravitch now – is a 100% partisan, in no way a serious historian.
LikeLike
Serious historians can be partisan, in either direction. Heather Cox Richardson is a serious historian; she won a major award from the American Historical Association for her contributions to enlightening the public about history. Timothy Snyder is a serious historian who recognizes the danger that Trump poses to our society.
There may be serious historians who endorse Trump’s authoritarianism, but I can’t think of any.
Any historian who prizes the Constitution and the rule of law is appalled by Trump’s actions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Heather Cox Richardson cites her sources at the end of every post.
When I repost her work (with her permission), I don’t include the sources.
In the future, I will.
I wait for the Trump trolls to name any serious historian who admires Trump’s violations of the Constitution and his disregard for the rule of law.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Diane, I don’t know any either.
Although not a historian per se, the closest thing I’ve seen to that these days is David Brooks, from the Brooks and Capehart show on PBS. But even his ostensibly middle ground has swung left for quite awhile now, so the two often come off as being on the same side –but not always. Even though they’re not at odds all the time, they do provide insights on both sides, so I often feel somewhat surprised and enlightened –and I happen to like the show that way.
LikeLike
At the beginning of the podcast below by Richardson regarding the killer of Charlie Kirk, following the arrest of Tyler Robinson, you can hear exactly what she said about him. She verbally provided the sources of her information there as well.
I did not hear anything that sounded deceptive or untruthful, so I don’t know why there’s so much hubbub about it. I suspect all the outrage by MAGAts is just more spin so they can blame Democrats.
Others can judge for themselves by listening here: https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/september-12-2025-4f6
LikeLike
You can also see how information unfolded following the death of Charlie Kirk at Wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Charlie_Kirk#Accused
(In the early days of Wikipedia, I did not see a lot of value to it or allow my college students to cite that as a source, because virtually anyone could write there and the quality varied. But it has improved considerably because they closely monitor articles and red flag them if they are missing citations for sources –so now it’s much more credible.)
LikeLike
MAGA bot.
LikeLike
Please name a “serious historian” who admires Trump and his evisceration of the Constitution and the takeover of Congress’s powers. Name one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This Nell Mathews is a MAGA troll. It doesn’t matter what names they use, real or sock puppet, we can always tell they are MAGA hate cult Trolls.
Do not feed Mell Mathews, the MAGA hate cult troll.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just like in computer programming which can be made into something political or biased, AI can be set to reflect a right wing perspective. Two of the apps are Grok and GIPPR.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some future serious historian will also tell us that when ICE shock troop tear gassing tyranny arrived in Chicago’s Lakeview community, they picked the wrong “hood.”
Chicago’s Lakeview neighborhood is considered an affluent and sought-after area with a high number of wealthy residents and expensive homes. Its median household income is significantly higher than the average for Chicago and the state of Illinois.
Those 🏠 homeowners VOTE. They have political influence and they use it regularly. Many of us are watching who exactly is being radicalized by these invasions. Radical means these citizens are being sent directly back to the healthy root of DEMOCRACY which they will nurture and expand.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It sounds uncalled for, but ICE may have been looking for foreign born gardeners and housekeepers who the wealthy often hire –as the convicted felon knows only too well from own his personal/professional experiences of hiring (and exploiting) undocumented Hispanic (and Polish) workers…
LikeLike
cx: s/b his own, not own his
LikeLike
I read that the Polish construction workers he hired to build Trump Tower in Manhattan (and then refused to pay) were undocumented.
LikeLike
I read that Trump Tower was built by undocumented Polish workers. He bored them because they were nonunion and cost less. But I don’t recall the source.
LikeLike
Diane, Time magazine has an in depth piece on that (rather complicated) matter here: https://time.com/4465744/donald-trump-undocumented-workers/
LikeLike
Excellent article! Supplants my flawed memory.
Trump saved money by not installing fire detectors.
One of his tenants died a couple of years ago when a fire broke out in his apartment in Trump Tower. No fire detector.
LikeLike
That’s so sad about the man who died in the fire. I’m guessing that, just like the Time article which said, “most of the Polish workers lacked safety equipment like hard hats,” yet Trump was depicted there wearing a hard hat on the Bonwit’s demolition site, it would probably be a safe bet that HE has smoke detectors in his own place at Trump Tower, since everything he does is so consistently all about him and ONLY HIMSELF.
LikeLike
Thanks, Nancy, for giving me information from sources I don’t usually see. But today’s offer of one was quite as much as I can handle. More than one a day is too unsettling to my nervous system. Got a cute video from Kara of Seraphina walking. Is the Harman birthday party for Annwn this weekend, or next? Much love with blessings XO
LikeLike