Jennifer Rubin explains why she gave up her column at The Washington Post, previously one of the most prestigious positions in American journalism. Billionaire Jeff Bezos, one of the richest men in the world, with assets exceeding $200 billion, has bent his knee to kiss the ring of Trump. To stay in Trump’s good graces, he has censored the editorial board, even an editorial cartoonist. The Post is hemorrhaging great journalists. Bezos bought one of the nation’s greatest newspapers and is destroying it.
Corporate and billionaire owners of major media outlets have betrayed their audiences’ loyalty and sabotaged journalism’s sacred mission — defending, protecting and advancing democracy.
The Washington Post’s billionaire owner and enlisted management are among the offenders. They have undercut the values central to The Post’s mission and that of all journalism: integrity, courage, and independence. I cannot justify remaining at The Post. Jeff Bezos and his fellow billionaires accommodate and enable the most acute threat to American democracy—Donald Trump—at a time when a vibrant free press is more essential than ever to our democracy’s survival and capacity to thrive.
I therefore have resigned from The Post, effective today. In doing so, I join a throng of veteran journalists so distressed over The Post’s management they felt compelled to resign.
The decay and compromised principles of corporate and billionaire-owned media underscore the urgent need for alternatives. Americans are eager for innovative and independent journalism that offers lively, unflinching coverage free from cant, conflicts of interest and moral equivocation.
Which is why I am so thrilled to simultaneously announce this new outlet, The Contrarian: Not Owned by Anybody. The Contrarian will offer daily columns, weekly features, podcasts and social media from me and fellow pro-democracy contrarians, many of whom have decamped from corporate media, others who were never a part of it. I am launching this endeavor with my cofounder, Norm Eisen. Founding contributors will include Joyce Vance, Andy Borowitz, Laurence Tribe, Katie Phang, George Conway, Olivia Julianna, Harry Litman (who recently resigned from the LA Times for reasons similar to mine for leaving the Post), and Asha Rangappa, among many other brilliant voices. We will provide fearless and distinctive reported opinion and cultural commentary without phony balance, euphemisms or gamified political punditry.
The need for upstart outlets has never been more acute. The contradiction between, on the one hand, the journalistic obligation to hold the powerful accountable and, on the other, the financial interests of billionaire moguls and corporate conglomerates could not be starker.
The Post’s own headline last month warned: “Trump signals plans to use all levers of power against the media; Press freedom advocates say they fear that the second Trump administration will ramp up pressure on journalists, in keeping with the president-elect’s combative rhetoric.” And yet The Post’s owner quashed a presidential endorsement for Trump’s opponent, forked over $1M for Trump’s inauguration through Amazon, and publicly lauded Trump’s agenda.
None of us could imagine Katharine Graham sending LBJ or Nixon a $1M check. It would have been, as it is now, a fundamental betrayal of a great American newspaper. Defense of the First Amendment is incompatible with funding or cheerleading for the very person who seeks to “drastically undermine the institutions tasked with reporting on his coming administration.”
The Post’s downfall is hardly unique. ABC, Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta and corporate-owned cable TV networks (which have scrambled to enlist Trump-friendly voices) are catering to powerful interests, and have profound corporate conflicts. Instead of guarding their independence, they join financial leaders, politicians and other public figures currying favor with Trump and his orbit.
Through classic anticipatory obedience—a dangerous but all too familiar pattern—they normalize the authoritarian menace. If Trump has taken “attacks on the press to an entirely new level, softening the ground for an erosion of robust press freedom,” as The Post reported, it is because he finds insufficient resistance. Instead, owners whose outlets he targets quite literally rewarded him.
In closing, I want to reiterate that I have been honored to work for over fourteen years alongside the finest writers and editors in journalism. Above all, I was blessed to work for The Post under the Graham Family ownership and Fred Hiatt’s leadership of the editorial section. My admiration for their collective integrity, dedication to craft, courage, patriotism, and decency is boundless. But when new leaders sully the reputation of institutions entrusted to them and the fate of democracy is in the balance, we all must reevaluate our careers and our obligations to the world’s most essential nation.
History calls us all.
I treasure the readers who have stuck with me over the years. I invite them and all those interested in defeating authoritarianism as well as writers and content creators to join this exciting new venture in defense of democracy. Forward!

Just signed up!
LikeLike
It has been reported that Bezos also budgeted $40 million for Amazon Prime to produce Melania Trump’s story (documentary) with her as the executive producer.
Amazon Will Pay $40 Million to License New Melania Trump Documentary – Business Insider
That reminds me of Red Azalea, abut Mao’s wife. Before Mao died, China’s film industry was in production for a film about his wife’s life who was slated to become the next leader of China when Mao died.
Does this mean when FELON47 dies, Melania will take over as dictator of MAGA Land?
What happened to Mao’s wife after he died?
There was a coup led by Deng Xiaoping with support from the PLA [the military]. Mao’s wife was arrested along with three others, called the gang of four. She hung herself in her cell after she was found guilty of being Mao’s dog. She said on the stand, “When Mao told me to bite, I bit.” Something like that.
Will the same fate happen to Melania after FELON47 is gone?
LikeLike
What a prospect!
LikeLike
Hello Diane: I had two posts here that disappeared–did I say something unsuitable? I have (messily) posted them again below. Thanks, CBKTo:You
Mon 1/13/2025 9:13 AM
Jordan Wickes January 13, 2025 at 12:06 pm Jennifer Rubin and Diane Ravitch are identical twins, ideologically speaking. They were both moderate conservatives for many years until life events turned them into crazed, 100% left-wing partisans. They renounced everything they used to believe in order to conform to their new far Left tribe. Neither one will now say anything that dissents from current left-wing orthodoxy.
LikeLike
I was waiting for you to quit. I have cancelled my Washington Post subscription.
LikeLike
Was working today and saw this news item on the fly….
And, here it is on your blog.
Touche.
As Rubin noted, “History calls us all.“
Indeed!
LikeLike
I will be joining you. You are a brilliant, brave women, who is willing to move at a time when many many strong people are (hopefully temporarily) lost in the fog. And you have a wonderful partner. We need more people like the two of you. Kudos!!!
LikeLike
Jennifer, you have been my favorite Post columnist for years. I will miss you dearly. I will follow you in your new endeavor.
LikeLike
We have lost the ability to have civil discourse. Trump converses only with name calling, like a bully in the playground….
LikeLike
Trump doesn’t know what civil discourse is. His mode of communication is bullying, boasting, and insulting.
LikeLike
ready to subscribe! I had cancelled the post and didn’t know that JR had resigned. Good for her and us!
LikeLike