Paul Bowers used to be the education reporter for the Charleston News & Courier. I contacted him when I was trying to understand some issues that he wrote about. Paul left his newspaper job (I think someone in the local power elite complained about his honest reporting on the privatizers). After he left, he started a blog called Brutal South. Now he works as communications director for the South Carolina ACLU. As you can imagine, he’s always busy, always pushing back against book bans, attacks on voting rights, and more.
In this post, he wrestles with his Christian faith. He’s covered so many Christian faith leaders who espouse hateful views that he has had to question his own views. He feels sure that the Jesus he believes in would not agree with them.
I urge you to read the post. I’m quoting just the beginning and the ending.
He writes:
On weekday mornings the coffee shop is clustered with pods of the men. The men are holding forth — loudly — about the virtues of intermittent fasting, the meaning of the Egyptian plagues, and the Bible’s clear teaching on matters of human sexuality.
I used to be part of the pods, but now I sit alone. I eavesdrop. Some days when I listen to them reading from their Bible commentaries I hear an encouraging word, and I miss the feeling of spiritual fellowship. Most days I hear nonsense and remember why I’m in no hurry to return to church.
Last year the great Mississippi songwriter Andrew Bryant released one of my favorite albums, Prodigal, building on the theme that he’s “like the prodigal who never left at all.” He still lives in Mississippi; I still live in South Carolina. When he sings about living on the far side of the creek from the faith community that raised him, I understand him to mean it’s a walkable distance, a permeable barrier. I find myself similarly situated.
I’ve left two churches in my adult life, a theologically conservative one by choice and a theologically progressive one because its leaders left and the congregation ceased meeting. I still see people from both churches often. My family and I never intend to leave our town, so this will likely be the case for the rest of our lives….
I don’t have Christian fellowship anymore, but I do have solidarity. They’re not the same thing.
It would be fair for you to ask if I still believe in God at all. I do, though I would no longer try to convince you one way or the other. I find myself in the position the writer John Jeremiah Sullivan described once: “My problem is not that I dream I’m in hell … It isn’t that I feel psychologically harmed. It isn’t even that I feel like a sucker for having bought it all. It’s that I love Jesus Christ.”
I do love Jesus, and I love the people I know who follow him. Lately I’ve seen Christians with the ash of mortification on their foreheads giving benedictions to the frightened families of trans kids; pledging to fight our Christian governor’s labor union-bashing tactics to the gates of hell; and speaking out against the death penalty — our modern crucifixion — even for people who murdered their family members.
Nietzsche called the way of Jesus “slave morality” and he wasn’t completely wrong, but I think he misread the faith of enslaved people. If the gospel narrative is true then I want to be on the side of Jesus and not the Roman empire, of Moses and not Pharaoh, of Harriet Tubman and not Robert E. Lee. I want to walk justly and love my enemies and fight for liberation always. I’m with the crucified people, as Ignacio Ellacuría put it. There are nonreligious people following this path just as well as the faithful, but for better or worse I will always have a religious impulse in me. A part of me will always seek the Spirit even if it never comes.
This coming Friday I’ll speak at an event hosted by faith leaders in Greenville, focused on how we can carry out the sacred work of hospitality by fighting for housing justice. We pursue this work in the heart of so-called Trump Country, in the shadow of the Moral Majority, amid the ferment of white Christian nationalism and even Christian fascism. We walk as believers, against other believers, ostensibly praying to the same god.

“There are 23,145 verses in the Old Testament and 7,957 verses in the New Testament. This gives a total of 31,102 verses, which is an average of a little more than 26 verses per chapter and 471 verses per book. Psalm 103:1–2 being the 15,551st and 15,552nd verses is in the middle of the 31,102 verses of the Bible.”
It’s easy for someone to become a false prophet and take one verse from the Bible, twisting it out of context to spew hate, when the people filling the pews of their church or chapel never study the entire Bible, never know what it says, never understand it.
To understand the Bible, one must take into account all 31,102 verses while reminding themselves of the 10 Commandments repeatedly as the only laws God wrote Himself, if we believe Moses.
I also suggest reading Exodus first to learn what the Bible says happened on that mountain. Read all of Exodus like I did from the one translation I used. I hope it was a good translation. It was one of the most popular English ones.
That’s another problem. There are many translations of the only text we have of the original Old and New testaments that are mostly if not all in Greek, meaning they were copies of the originals that were written in Biblical Hebrew.
What was lost in translation or should I say “translations”?
“As of September 2023 all of the Bible has been translated into 736 languages, the New Testament has been translated into an additional 1,658 languages, and smaller portions of the Bible have been translated into 1,264 other languages according to Wycliffe Global Alliance.”
The Greeks invented the comma in the 3rd century. When commas were added to the original Biblical Hebrew during that first translation into Greek, how did those commas change the original context?
A former friend of mine who I think is a Christian Nationalist and evangelical fundamentalist, who votes for Trump in 2016) defended the translation and false prophet he follows by claiming God guided the hands of the translators for the English version he reads.
But the context of all those translations do not end up with the same interpretations. Which one would God recommend? I’d have to hear that from Him, not a mortal human claiming to talk for God.
And literally translating a text translated hundreds of times from the original that was written by a culture of metaphorical thinkers adds more layers of confusion.
LikeLike
Bob calls it “the Goatherders Guide to the Galaxy.”
LikeLike
Having studied the Bible in lots of translations and exegeses all my life (literally since I was a little boy), I do NOT think that the Hebrews were metaphorical thinkers. IN GENERAL, almost no one was during the times when the OT was written. It’s quite concrete. If the Bible says that the sky is a firmament, that is quite literally what was believed by the Hebrews of the time. The same belief was shared by cultures throughout the Middle East–by Sumerians and Babylonians and Hittites and Canaanites, etc.–that the sky was a DOME over the earth, supported by mountain pillars at the ends of the Earth. And into this dome, the little stars were stuck like raisins in a pudding.
LikeLike
Also, the Bible is not a book. It is a library of books, written at different times from about 1,400 BCE to 90 CE. In other words, over a period of about 1,500 years. And many of these books are later retellings of material drawn from previously existing books that were combined by ancient Hebrews working at different times.
Some are as separated in time as, say, the Odyssey and Catcher in the Rye.
LikeLike
Some of the Biblical stories are stitched together from several sources and contain contradictory tales. Some contain more than one telling of the same story, again with significant contradictions. (Google contradictions in the two creation stories, in the two stories of the Ten Commandments, in the four canonical gospels, and so on. In the early years of the past millennium, Church fathers gradually came up with a list of accepted, canonical books. However, these are but a small fraction of the religious writings of the Hebrews (and of the Christian Greeks of the New Testament).
The Ethiopian Bible, also known as the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church Canon, is a collection of religious texts unique to the Ethiopian Orthodox Church. It contains several books that are not found in the Western canon of the Bible:
–The Book of Enoch: Attributed to the biblical figure Enoch, this book contains apocalyptic visions and teachings about the end times. THIS ONE IS A MUST READ!!!
–The Book of Jubilees: Also known as the “Little Genesis,” it retells stories from the book of Genesis and adds additional details and traditions.
–The Book of Jasher: Mentioned in the Bible in the book of Joshua and 2 Samuel, it contains stories and legends from the time of the patriarchs.
–The Book of Wisdom of Solomon: Attributed to King Solomon, it contains teachings on wisdom and righteousness.
–The Book of Sirach (or “Wisdom of Sirach” or “Ecclesiasticus”): A collection of wise sayings and teachings on morality.
–The Book of Tobit: Tells the story of Tobit, a righteous man helped by the angel Raphael.
–The Book of Judith: Narrates the courageous actions of Judith, who saves her people from the Assyrians.
–The Book of Baruch: Attributed to Baruch, the scribe of the prophet Jeremiah, it contains prayers and teachings on repentance and faith.
–The Letter of Jeremiah: A letter written by Jeremiah to the exiled Jews in Babylon, warning them against idolatry.
–The Book of 1 Enoch: Contains more apocalyptic visions and teachings attributed to Enoch.
–The Book of 2 Enoch (also known as the “Slavonic Enoch”): Includes additional visions and teachings attributed to Enoch.
–The Book of 3 Enoch (also known as the “Hebrew Enoch”): Contains mystical teachings about the angel Metatron.
Interesting Facts:
The Ethiopian Bible comprises 81 books, compared to the 66 books in the Protestant Bible and the 73 books in the Catholic Bible, making it one of the most extensive canons in any Christian tradition.
The Ethiopian Orthodox Church considers the Book of Enoch to be inspired scripture, while it is considered apocryphal by most other Christian traditions, highlighting the unique theological perspective of the Ethiopian Church.
These additional texts provide valuable insights into the religious beliefs and practices of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church.
That’s just the books considered canonical (accepted/revealed) by ONE nonwestern Christian church!!!! Before Constantine had his vision (there are two historical versions of that, both different) and made Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire (and so the religion of Europe down to the present day), there were literally HUNDREDS of different Christian sects, with very different beliefs, including lots and lots of Gnostic ones, each with their own scriptures. In addition, there were a couple hundred gospels, acts, epistles, books of songs, wisdom books, and so on produced by early non-Gnostic Christians (within the first couple centuries after Christ) that were NOT included in the official Catholic and Protestant Bibles, including gems like The Gospel of Thomas and The Infancy Gospel of Jesus. At least a couple hundred THAT HAVE SURVIVED. And the Catholic and Protestant churches as we know them would be VASTLY different if some of these texts had been accepted by the early “Fathers.”
And then there are all the translation issues. To Europe the Bible was mostly, throughout Western History, known from the Septuagint (a Greek translation) and the Vulgate (a Latin translation of the Septuagint). Then, with the emergency of Protestantism came lots and lots and lots of translations into many languages. And then there are the additional bibles created by various persons over the years–Joseph Smith’s Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants, the Thomas Jefferson [secular)] Bible, and the weird free-love, vegetarian hippie Bibles called The Essene Gospels of Peace, written by a cult leader from Hungary with a commune in Baja, California and passed off as “translations” of ancient texts that somehow, miraculously disappeared after he translated them.
LikeLike
Love your post, Lloyd!
One addition: Exodus is, indeed, an exciting book.
Here’s an oddity about it: THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE STORY THAT IT TELLS OCCURRED.
The ancient Egyptians kept records of EVERYTHING. There is no extant record in Egyptian or other sources, except for the Hebrew one, of a general captivity in Egypt or of an exodus of the Hebrews from Egypt. And there is no archaeological evidence of this either. There is evidence of some Hebrew slaves in Egypt, but that’s it.
LikeLike
Right wing Christians tend to promote the precepts of The Old Testament and The Ten Commandments, which are essentially a code of conduct and a prohibition list. Jesus, on the other hand was a liberal, perhaps even a ‘hippie.’ Christian Nationalists echo the sentiments of the song “Onward Christian Soldiers.” when they should be trying to spread Jesus’ message in The Beatitudes, which is mostly about love, care and peace.
The Eight Beatitudes
01. Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
The first beatitude teaches us to be the last of all, the servant of all, to be humble, to do not judge others and to share all.
Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.
The second beatitude teaches is to consider well the people we and others have lost, the things we have not done well, and the things we long for. We should know that we are never alone.
Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.
The third beatitude teaches us to be slow to anger, to be quick with patience and drop our ego.
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be filled.
The fourth beatitude teaches us to help others to take the right path, to trust everyone though they may let you down.
Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.
The fifth beatitude teaches is to strive to do the right thing, to forgive others first, then ourselves. Our heavenly Father will forgive you our transgressions, if we forgive our fellow men theirs. (See also the Corporal and Spiritual works of Mercy linked below).
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.
The six beatitude teaches us to build your castle with goodwill and with solid, blameless, foundations.
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God.
The seventh beatitude teaches us to love peace and to be involved in actively helping others to make peace.
Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
The eighth beatitude teaches us not to stop doing the right thing because of others.
If Christians truly embraced the teaching of Jesus, they would be far more empathetic, humble, honest and less preoccupied with acquiring more wealth.
LikeLike
RE,
Consider that you are making it more complex than it is. And, that focusing on what the Bible says, is a distraction.
The dioceses’ leaders in Ohio who spent almost $1,000,000 to destroy democracy in Aug., are simultaneously citing cost cutting as reason to close parishes. The right wing church leaders want political power, money from the government and, to keep women in 2nd place. It’s not about the content of the Bible, IMO.
LikeLike
Christian Nationalism is the result of politicizing religion and ignoring most the Biblical passages about forgiveness, charity and tolerance in ‘The New Testament.’
LikeLike
Most of the Gnostic sects, of which there were many, thought that the God of the OT and that of the NT were so vastly different that they were two separate beings. The former they called the Rex Mundi, or lord of the sinful, fallen world.
LikeLike
Is the following a winning argument for Democrats trying to persuade voters?
” GOP churches are selectively ignoring passages of the Bible.”
It may provoke discussion in polite company. Does it link to the required impetus that drives voters toward change?
LikeLike
Just to clarify, when Linda says that the GOP or Catholic Church spent x “to destroy democracy in Ohio,” what she is talking about, hyperbolically, is support for an anti-referendum law. And yes, that law would have been a bad thing.
LikeLike
When talking to Evangelicals, focusing on what the Bible says is NOT a distraction. They are literalists. So, pointing out that something in the Bible contradicts their beliefs is extremely important. This is the stuff on which new Evangelical sects are born, and there are a bunch of these now–progressive Evangelical sects that choose the nicer parts of the Goat Herder’s Guide to the Universe, or Bible, (Love thy neighbor) and ignore the not-so-nice parts (thou shalt not suffer a witch to live).
LikeLike
When I say that Evangelicals are literalists, I am saying that MOST OF THEM are also Fundamentalists, who believe that everything in the Bible is LITERALLY true–for example, that Joshua told the sun to stop in the sky, and it did. There are some problems with that. ROFL. BTW, the problem is not that the story is metaphorical or symbolic. The people who cooked it up literally believed that the sun was a little fiery ball that traveled across the sky each day.
LikeLike
In response to Bob and his minimalist description of a “bad thing,” in Ohio, if the the church had won, it would have prohibited collective bargaining for public employees, for example teachers. Senate Bill 5 referendum in Ohio was a costly and hard fought battle by Democrats and others in a red state. Much was sacrificed to win which is evidently never on Bob’s radar.
For those who believe in abortion rights, that “bad thing” would have prevented citizens from having a voice against the anti-women, religionist lawmakers.
Without the viability of referendums, there would be no way to thwart any noxious law enacted e.g. ones against LGBTQ and Jews. I could go on with specific, real world examples but, Bob, with his blog backing, is anointed, the be all, end all authority on all subjects.
Btw- when crafting the message to GOP churches about their selective interpretations of the Bible, write one for the billionaires and inform them, they are out to make a profit for themselves with privatization.
LikeLike
I agree that restricting voting access and restricting the use of referendums are both horrific things that the Republican Party is trying to do nationwide. They have to because their numbers are dropping rapidly as young people come online as voters and as POC populations increase.
LikeLike
I would argue that the way to respond to right-wing elements within Catholicism would be to identify them as NOT REPRESENTING THE IDEALS AND VALUES OF THE CHURCH.
LikeLike
As being bad Catholics
Certainly, Pope Francis does not want to restrict voting rights and democratic voices; he seeks to expand them!
LikeLike
Effective opposition to right wing churches in the central states is going to have to speed up. If not, the mentality of MAGA/religious right will steam ahead with its policy, legal and judicial wins, not limited to the states but nationally.
GOP aid, for example, the almost $1,000,000 spent by dioceses in Ohio to destroy the gerrymandered state’s only chance for democracy, has got to end. Citing cost cutting reasons, the Ohio city dioceses are simultaneously closing “beloved” parishes.
(The religious right in the south seems intractable which is why my comments focus on central states.)
The following profiles of 3 educated women (and, the voting of their husbands) may have significance if they are indicative of a bigger voting block. One profile is of a woman, a baby boomer, who was raised Catholic in Ohio, changed to evangelical and has “loved” her Church for 25 years. A young pastor, independent Baptist, was selected by members to lead her church which is American Baptist. The pastor lied about his credentials and attempted to move the church to the Southern Baptist organization, largely with appeal to anti-gay and anti-abortion sentiments. (A journalist should look into the source of funds used to build the new churches like his.) The church is now split with the young pastor taking half the church members with him. (Surprisingly, it’s the older congregants who are not as conservative.) The woman voted for Trump in 2016 to secure a conservative SCOTUS. In 2024, she will, likely, resist the party of Church friends and not vote for Trump. Her husband, a racist, who doesn’t attend church will continue to vote Republican. The second profile is of a woman, baby boomer, raised Catholic who remains in the Church but, who has resisted her friends and family by voting Democratic for more than a decade. Up until and, including the tenure of George W Bush, she was a GOP voter. Her husband attends church and will always vote Republican.
His vote is to preserve traditional power structures. The third woman was raised Catholic, changed to Unitarian, votes Democratic, her daughter is gay. Her husband who does not attend church is a fan of Nikki Haley believes she will protect his assets in investments and keep his taxes low. He will always vote Republican
Influencers in the northeast, who are Democratic voters, have been slow to understand why the nation elects Republican presidents. Without knowledge, there’s been no plan to fight the religious right in central states who I think can be persuaded (the women congregants) to fight to take power from Church leaders who promote the GOP.
LikeLike
Dear Jesus, Save us from your followers.
LikeLike
thanks for the laugh, especially followers like Robert P George, Leonard Leo, JD Vance and Adrian Vermuele
LikeLike
J.D. Vance is one scary POS. I suspect that you are right that various oligarchs are grooming him for the presidency.
LikeLike
LikeLike
The scourge of this country? Religious faith beliefs.
LikeLike