Heather Cox Richardson has the gift of synthesis, which is the mark of a good historian. Very likely, we all saw the headlines about missile attacks on Houthi bases in Yemen. In all probability, few of us had ever heard of this group before October 2023. They are doing Iran’s dirty work. Her piece also cites Politico, which reported that in 2020 Trump warned the president of the EU that if Europe was invaded, the U.S. would not come to its aid and that NATO was dead.
She explains:
“Today, at my direction,” President Joe Biden said this evening, “U.S. military forces—together with the United Kingdom and with support from Australia, Bahrain, Canada, and the Netherlands—successfully conducted strikes against a number of targets in Yemen used by Houthi rebels to endanger freedom of navigation in one of the world’s most vital waterways.”
The strikes came after the Iran-backed Houthi militia launched 27 attacks on vessels in the Red Sea, including merchant shipping vessels that carry about 12% of the world’s oil, 8% of its grain, and 8% of liquefied natural gas, as well as other commodities.
While the Houthis claim their attacks are designed to support the Palestinians in Gaza, they are also apparently angling to continue and spread the Hamas-Israel war into a wider conflict. Hamas, the Houthis, and Hezbollah, all nonstate actors backed by Iran, would like very much to extend and enlarge the war to enhance their own power and win adherents to their ideologies.
The Arab states do not want the conflict to spread. Neither does the U.S. government, and Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken have worked hard to make sure it doesn’t, sending two carrier groups to the region, for example, to deter enthusiasm for such an extension.
On October 19, shortly after the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, Houthis launched cruise missiles and drones designed by Iran at Israel, but when the USS Carney and Saudi Arabia shot the weapons down, they turned to attacking shipping. Fifty or so ships use the Red Sea waterway every day.
On November 19, Houthis seized a Japanese-registered vessel, the Galaxy Leader, along with its 25-member international crew, prompting the United Nations Security Council to condemn “in the strongest terms” the “recent Houthi attacks” and “demanded that all such attacks and action cease immediately.” The Security Council “underlined the importance of…international law.”
On December 3, Houthis struck another three ships.
On December 19, the U.S., the European Union, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and a group representing 44 allies and partner nations condemned the Houthi attacks, noting that such attacks threatened international commerce, endangering supply chains and affecting the global economy. Also on December 19, the U.S. and partners announced a naval protection group for maritime shipping in the waterway, dubbed Operation Prosperity Guardian.
When the attacks continued, the governments of the U.S., Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Singapore, and the United Kingdom warned the Houthis on January 3, 2024, that their attacks were “illegal, unacceptable, and profoundly destabilizing,” delaying the delivery of goods and “jeopardizing the movement of critical food, fuel, and humanitarian assistance throughout the world.” They called for an end to the attacks and the release of the detained vessels and crew members, and they warned that the Houthis would bear responsibility for the “consequences” if the attacks continued.
“We remain committed to the international rules-based order and are determined to hold malign actors accountable for unlawful seizures and attacks,” the statement said.
Administration officials told the press the U.S. would strike the Houthis militarily if the attacks didn’t stop, although Biden has not wanted to destabilize Yemen further than it already is after a decade of civil war. “The president has made clear the U.S. does not seek conflict with any nation or actor in the Middle East,” John Kirby, spokesperson for the White House National Security Council, said. “But neither will we shrink from the task of defending ourselves, our interests, our partners or the free flow of international commerce.” An administration official said: “I would not anticipate another warning.”
On Tuesday, January 9, the Houthis launched 21 drones and missiles in the most significant attack yet—one that directly targeted U.S. ships—and on January 10 the U.N. Security Council passed UNSCR 2722, a resolution condemning the attacks “in the strongest terms.” Eleven members voted in favor and none opposed it. Four countries—China, Russia, Algeria, and Mozambique—abstained, but neither China nor Russia, both of which have veto power, would veto the resolution.
Today the U.S. and the U.K., with coalition support, responded. Military strikes came from the air, ocean, and underwater, according to a defense official, and they hit weapons storage areas and sites from which the Houthis have been launching drones and cruise missiles.
The governments of Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, the U.K, and the U.S. announced the “precision strikes,” saying they were “in accordance with the inherent right of individual and collective self-defense, consistent with the UN Charter” and “were intended to disrupt and degrade the capabilities the Houthis use to threaten global trade and the lives of international mariners in one of the world’s most critical waterways.”
“Our aim remains to de-escalate tensions and restore stability in the Red Sea,” the statement read, “but let our message be clear: we will not hesitate to defend lives and protect the free flow of commerce in one of the world’s most critical waterways in the face of continued threats.” Biden’s statement sounded much the same but added: “I will not hesitate to direct further measures to protect our people and the free flow of international commerce as necessary.”
As the January 3 statement from the governments of the U.S., Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Singapore, and the U.K. made clear, one of the key things at stake in standing against the Houthi attacks is the international rules-based order, that is, the system of international laws and organizations developed after World War II to prevent global conflicts by providing forums to resolve differences peacefully. A key element of this international system of agreements is freedom of the seas.
Also central to that rules-based international order is partnerships and allies. Two days ago, one of Europe’s leading politicians revealed that in 2020, former president Trump told European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen: “You need to understand that if Europe is under attack, we will never come to help you and to support you.” According to the politician, Trump added that “NATO is dead, and we will leave, we will quit NATO,” a threat he has made elsewhere, too.
In contrast, as soon as he took office, President Biden set out to support and extend U.S. alliances and partnerships. While that principle shows in the international support for today’s strike on the Houthis, it has also been central in the administration’s response to Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, managing migration, supporting African development, building the Indo-Pacific, and reacting to the Middle East crisis in general.
Today, Secretary of State Blinken finished a week-long trip to Türkiye, Greece, Jordan, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Israel, the West Bank, Bahrain, and Egypt, where he met with leaders and reaffirmed “the U.S. commitment to working with partners to set the conditions necessary for peace in the Middle East, which includes comprehensive, tangible steps toward the realization of a future Palestinian state alongside the State of Israel, with both living in peace and security.”

I may be stretching, but I suspect that Putin is somehow involved in what is happening in that area of the world, as he spreads his war with help from the Axis of Evil: Ali Khamenei’s Iran, Putin’s Russia, and Kim’s North Korea (all ruthless leaders).
I think that what the Houthis are doing may even be Putin’s idea. It’s no secret that Putin has wanted to destabilize the west (EU and North America) economically, for decades as part of his goals to rebuild a Russian Empire that he rules. The Ukraine war is not the only battlefield. Israel, the only reliable allie the US has in that area, may also be one of Putin’s targets.
LikeLike
The Eonomist had an article yesterday saying that Putin was behind all of the diversions and attacks. The more diverted we are, the less aid to Ukraine, which he desperately wants.
LikeLike
Trita Parsi: “The Houthis have made it clear that if there is a ceasefire, they will cease their attacks. Now, we have evidence of that, as well, because when there was a ceasefire in the end of November of last year for six days, there were no attacks whatsoever from the Iraqi militias. They completely stopped their attacks. There were six attacks the day before the ceasefire. But once there was a ceasefire, they were completely stopped. When it comes to the Houthis, there’s only one attack during that period that we can attribute to them, instead of daily attacks. So we have some clear evidence that if there is a ceasefire, there will be a deescalation.”
https://www.democracynow.org/2024/1/8/gaza_israel_wider_war_trita_parsi
LikeLike
That would be great if Hamas wanted to end the war but they don’t. They want it to widen, get Hezbollah involved.
Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthi’s are all supplied by Iran.
There must be an end to the war, not just a ceasefire.
Hamas has never stopped firing rockets.
They must release all the hostages and agree to negotiations.
Otherwise a ceasefire is merely a cessation of the war for a few days.
The war can only end with negotiations.
LikeLike
From this vantage point–retired history teacher and veteran–I see it as more of the US trying to run the world, mostly for corporate gain. WE destabilized that region with our wars against Iraq. WE overthrew the government in Libya and are still trying to do that in Syria. WE funded the Arabian bombings of Yemen. WE withdrew from the agreement with Iran to not go nuclear. We have extended our “Monroe Doctrine” to the whole world, as in telling China what to do, etc. Let’s remember Einstein’s words about nuclear weapons. He said they “change everything.” We’ll be lucky if we don’t help blow up the world. I’ve seen up close what explosions do to people. It’s not pretty and it’s not patriotic. We must have international, multilateral solutions to these problems, not unilateral force by single parties.
To the Children of the Middle East
by Jack Burgess
I know it’s not worth much, but
this is an apology. I saw
the bombers leaving from our naval base
as we relaxed at the ocean—
their sound ripping through the
whoosh of surf, wind, and the talk
of walkers by.
We’re all pretty happy here, and most folks
think the planes—practicing bombing runs—
are keeping us safe.
No.
Kathleen and I were glad they weren’t your planes
after us, feeling guilty as we said it.
Back in the day, when the war against
fascism was won, and a loud jet would fly over,
we’d look up and say, “Come on down,
the war’s over!”
Today, though, we know this war on “terror”—
which really is a war for us to control you—
will never be over, and
I’m sorry.
LikeLike
While your analysis could be true, it would be prudent to explain the ambitions of those in the long list of other countries who have signed off on holding back the Houthis. The US is not acting alone in this.
LikeLike
I would say we are playing into the hands of Hamas by widening the war. Just what Diane says Hamas wants.
LikeLike
Jack, is this your message?
Dear Jews and Romany people of Western and Eastern Europe,
Sorry, but we can’t think of any way to stop your entire ethnic group from being annihilated because we keep asking Hitler to stop but he just won’t listen. Since he knows that our primary goal is not to hurt anyone, we feel smug knowing that your deaths at the hands of other people are not our fault, and we feel so much joy and pride and often celebrate our existence as superior upright and moral people who would never cause any harm or death.
Dear Socialists in Western and Eastern Europe,
As we told the Jews before the last Jewish child was slaughtered, we can’t think of any way to stop Hitler from slaughtering every person who refuses to accept the socialism and progressive thinking is the greatest evil in the world. We have shaken our fingers very vigorously at Hitler, but even that brave action needs to stop, as Hitler might bomb our country in retaliation, and it would be hard to stop him without causing some harm, which we are far to upright and moral to cause. Our primary goal is not to hurt anyone, so we feel smug knowing your deaths at the hands of fascists are not our fault and we continue to celebrate the joy and pride in our superior morality.
Dear Germans in 1943 and 1944,
Please forgive us. We are the evil ones for all the civilian deaths we have caused so far to stop Hitler. We have now listened to the far superior and moral America First Committee and your government may go ahead and continue to wage violent war until there are no people but (non-Socialist) Aryans left. It was America’s fault for supporting the Versailles treaty, so therefore we must sit back and allow the evil person who rose to power because of our decisions decades ago to wipe out everyone who is not an Aryan. Because that is what makes us moral.
LikeLike
My message is one of compassion and love for people of all races and religions. I was the little boy who cheered the creation of Israel, and sent contributions to the children there. I cheered Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms, “for everybody in the world,” and the creation of his United Nations. I was the soldier who willingly served America, as I thought we stood for freedom and self-determination. But I was also the young man who went to college and met people who had been to Israel–but also to Russia, and Iran. (I witnessed the news as our govt. overthrew the elected leader of Iran–and as we tested nuclear weapons in the Pacific). I was the history major who discovered the surprising story of the US invasion of Russia, in an effort to abort its socialism, in 1917. I was the history teacher who read “Overthrow,” by Kinzer, and “Desert Mirage” by Yant, telling the stories of our many coups around the world and our subterfuge in Iraq. Later, I was the citizen who–along with my son, and friends of various religions and ethnicities–demonstrated against Bush II’s planned invasion of Iraq, a nation that had done nothing to us. Later, I was a poet for peace in Ohio, and had peace flags ripped off our house and a pipe gun fired at my children’s bedroom. I was an older man who was a signatory of Obama’s petition to get on the Ohio ballot, and cheered as he admitted our overthrow in Iran (but not as he expanded the use of drone warfare on Middle East against “insurgents,” people accused but not tried, and wedding parties).
Friends, we cannot run the world, for good or otherwise. And Eisenhower warned us—and he certainly knew—way back in ’53, about the dangers of the military-industrial complex. It’s good business to make more and more guns, bullets, bombs, fighters, tanks, cannons, hand grenades, tents, uniforms, etc., etc. But one nuclear bomb could kill all of the people in New York city or most of the people in Ohio. (Russia has 6000 of them). And what’s to stop folks who feel they have nothing to lose from flying a plane into a tall building in a big city? Just because they haven’t done so since 9/11 doesn’t mean they won’t.
We need negotiated solutions to our world problems, not Pac Americana–which will never happen. No one nation can rule the world today, but one nation or a handful of angry people could destroy most of it. Peace, Jack B.- Soldier, teacher, parent, Chief of Arbitration, State of Ohio, Human Being
LikeLike
“We need negotiated solutions to our world problems…”
How did that Munich Agreement work out again? Remember how everyone not in Czechoslovakia celebrated that a peaceful solution to war had been worked out?
Well, they celebrated until Hitler decided to invade Poland. Do you believe another “negotiated peaceful solution” was called for? The Soviet Union negotiated a great peaceful solution with Hitler. Until it wasn’t peaceful anymore.
If one side is not interested in a peaceful solution and the other side is willing to do anything — including sacrificing the lives of tens or 100s of thousands or millions of people — for “peace”, then democracy is over.
The most repressive, fascist governments have “peace”. At least temporarily. Until they have war.
I agree with you that America has supported some bad people with their military power in the past. But they have also supported some good people.
I don’t understand why you seem to be saying that America should no longer fight for what is right because in the past it fought for what was wrong.
To me, that is nihilism, not peace.
LikeLike
Chuck,
It’s not a good idea to allow Iran to block commercial shipping in the Red Sea. For all the reasons Richardson stated.
LikeLike
Sadly it may be that wars have to be fought to a conclusion as sad as that sounds. And we can only hope that the winner is better than the defeated party.
Certainly US foriegn policy has put National Interest above human rights FOREVER. National Interest is almost always the interest of the ruling elites.
No where is this more apparent then when we look at the disaster that we have turned much of Latin America into. Which is driving the refugee crisis we face.
The question is what is or were the better alternatives. Certainly there have been missed opportunities since the beginning of the Cold War.
But now once again the Union of Concerned Scientists has reset the doomsday clock forward .
As China threatens Taiwan. Putin invades Ukraine ranting about the use of Nuclear weapons and Kim tests ICBMs capable of reaching this country. Threatening war every other day while starving and brutalizing his people.
Do the Taiwanese want to be invaded / liberated by China. Have they ever expressed the desire to conquer or liberate the main land since the end of the Korean War or before. Have the Ukrainians expressed the desire to invade Russia since they turned the third largest Nuclear arsenal over to Russia at the fall of the USSR. Or have the South Koreans another recent Democracy ever express the desire to liberate the North.
So which parties have caused that doomsday clock to be move forward. Should we blame the defenders or the aggressors.
As disturbing as that is, how do you think it would be dealing with a Nuclear armed Iran? Does anyone think this ends with Israel. If this was about Israel there would not be a fraction of the response to the war that there has been through out the Muslim World . There was practically no response to 500k deaths in Syria, 300k in Sudan and 300k in Yemen. So it is not about human suffering.
There is a portion of Islam that sees an attack on any Muslim as an attack on all.
From day one cries of genocide while justifying a brutal criminal attack on Civilians. As much as one can detest the Israeli right wing’s treatment of Palestinians. Sadly this is a battle against an ideology where compromise does not seem to be in the language. The thought of adding the Saudis to the list of other MUSLIM Arab Nations compromising with Israel was what caused Oct 7. This after rejecting compromise in 2000 and opportunity in 2005. Gaza could have been the Hong Kong of the Middle East. Which I believe even since 2005 would have led to statehood including the West Bank.
Instead they spent 18 years building 300 miles of concrete fortified tunnels to hide in after 30,000 rocket attacks in those 18 years before Oct 7 . Some as deep as 70 meters /230′. The deepest subway tunnel in NY is up at Washington Heights and 191st, it is deep! But only 173′ deep.
No leader of any Muslim Country even if they desired to can speak publicly for fear of retribution from the mob.
Iranian extremists and their proxies do not want a negotiated solution. Most of the leaders of Arab Nations do.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fighting our current wars to a conclusion would mean the probable conclusion of civilization and much of the human race. Russia has 6000 nuclear weapons, China has an untold number, as do we. If we all fight, there won’t be much left of Israel, NY, Ohio, Peking, Moscow, etc.
Again, think of how people fight: Don’t we always look to see who started it?
The Houthis didn’t start these problems. Neither did Russia. WE invaded Russia to stamp out their revolution in 1917. They didn’t invade us. WE overthrew the government of Iran in 1953, they didn’t overthrow their neighbors. WE overthrew Iraq and had their leader executed. WE (USA, sorry to say) have embargoed and attacked Cuba. WE have destroyed the economy of Venezuela–and these are just the “highlights” of that sad history. (Read Kinzer’s “Overthrow”). At times, we’ve tried to help turn it around–as when FDR created the UN; when Carter returned the Panama Canal and brokered peace between Israel and Egypt.
Now, today, as we remember Martin Luther King Jr., and words such as, “The bombs we drop abroad, explode at home in poverty and unemployment,” let’s think about how we could scale down the conflicts in the Middle East and Eastern Europe (and Syria and Venezuela and…). Let’s devote at least just one day to thinking about how to end some of the conflict:
How War Ends
by Jack Burgess
…and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.
Isaiah
This is how war ends:
The guns stop everywhere.
Fifty-ton tanks roll to a stop,
war ships dock,
fighters and bombers come down from the sky,
and two moments of silence follow.
The war dead honored by the first,
the 2nd silence is for reflection,
for hearing frogs, and your own breath.
This is followed by a single voice,
then a murmur. Screwdrivers and crow bars
come out, and the green tanks are
dismantled, gas siphoned for school buses.
Troop ships sail home from a hundred shores,
so that husbands and wives can kiss unvirtually,
and children see the strong eyes of their fathers,
feel their hands and arms about them.
Uniforms become keepsakes and relics.
All flags are fine and flying.
Those in congresses clear their throats
apologetically and say, “What shall we do with
the leftover money?” Children with swollen bellies,
working as lobbyists, shout, “Food!” Others say,
“Let’s build a thousand new schools and parks.”
Lots of people hug and dance
and make love. Some cry.
The news is good at 6:00 o’clock.
More at 11:00.
LikeLike
If Europeans and Americans were pacifists in 1941, we would all be speaking German now.
LikeLike
But World War 1 was a terrible and pointless loss of life.
As to the Soviet Union, I’m sorry that it wasn’t destroyed in 1917.
Millions and millions of innocent people died because of Stalin and Mao. For their vanity. Millions starved to death in Stalin-created famine in Ukraine. Millions killed in China in Great Leap Forward and several other insane ventures.
Jack, please read “The Black Book of Communism” by French historians.
LikeLike
I will read–or at least skim that source–IF you’ll read or skim “Overthrow” by Kinzer, “Desert Mirage” by Yant or “Ignorant Armies” by Halliday.
LikeLike
Jack, Diane is absolutely right. Had the United States and the nations of Western Europe fought against and eliminated the Bolsheviks at the very beginning–if they had caught this cancer early–there would been no torture and murder and imprisonment campaigns by the Cheka, OGPU, NKVD, NKGB, MVD, etc. There would have been no Holodomor. There would have been no brutal subjugation of the nations and peoples of Eastern Europe and no Iron Curtain. There would have been no show trials and no gulag. Countless MILLIONS AND MILLIONS would have been saved (though the Black Book of Communism attempts such a count).
LikeLike
Bob, thanks for that comment about the crimes of Stalin. I couldn’t help but think of the poets, artists, and independent thinkers who never survived the Gulag.
LikeLike
We did fight in 1918, trying to “eliminate the Bolsheviks,” and failed. Got off to a terrible start. No matter all that. What about all our invasions of a dozen nations, our subjugation of American Indians, Black Americans, etc. Did Russia invade Iraq (who did nothing to us).
Did they do Abu Grabe? What about the thousands of nukes all round the world? Frankly, you seem to have a Russophobia, which isn’t amenable to reason. I give up. You win. I’ll go dust off my plans for a bomb shelter.
LikeLike
ROFL. OMG. All your whataboutism, Jack, will not change the ugly reality of Russian history, from Lenin’s purges and perversion of the Communist ideal to create a dictatorship right down to the destruction of civilians and civilian infrastructure and cultural monuments and widespread rape and murder being conducted by Putin in Ukraine using untrained actual criminals as troops right now. But go ahead, bask in your imagined moral superiority, Jack, in the glow of an ideology that blinds.
LikeLike
Russophobia. What utter bullshit, Jack.
Has it ever occurred to you, Jack, that perhaps it is BECAUSE I love Russian culture (literature, music, art, architecture, dance, and so on) and Russian people that all this ugly history angers me? That perhaps it is BECAUSE I treasure and long for worker empowerment that I loathe this history of totalitarianism in the Soviet Union and in Russia since the collapse? Lenin and every leader of Russia since except Gorbachev betrayed Socialism. A gang of utterly amoral thieves and plunderers and users and murderers and traitors. Big time. And you and Dienne, peas in a pod, defend them. Sickening.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am tempted to give up. I keep hoping you’ll actually think about what I’m saying, so I keep trying. But we don’t know what kind of Russia we would have had IF we had not invaded and tried to run their country. What would our nation have been like if the Russians had come to the British side in our Revolution? I love Russian culture, too. The music is some of my very favorite. And I hate Stalinism.
But all that is a bit beside the point. The point is what that brilliant old guy, Einstein, said: Nuclear war “changes everything.” I think he meant, and it’s true, No one can win a nuclear war. Whether we’re the good guys, or they’re the bad guys, is irrelevant in a nuclear war. Sure, we could just have a brief “exchange,” killing only a million or two on each side. But, we could also mostly wipe out civilization if we have an all-out war.
So (let’s assume you’re right about Putin and his friends), you’re facing an evil madman with a big pistol pointed at your head. You have one too. Talking might be a more reasonable approach than shooting. And in this model, only you and the bad guy are involved. But in the real world, a brief “exchange” of only a nuke or two, might kill several million men, women, and children. Poison the region for a generation (Japanese folks were still dying from our (much less powerful) A-bombs, years later. Btw, today’s local Ohio papers are carrying the story of hundreds of OUR “goodguy” nuke warriors-workers who are sick and dying from the residual poisons).
I also remember the thaws in relationships with Russia, when Louis Armstrong and others went there, to great success–when that old Cold Warrior, Reagan, made peace with Gorbachev. (We also apparently made some promises that we didn’t keep).
Peace, brother–and I mean it!
Jack
LikeLike
The Houthis lob missiles at Israel and ships for months, with no intention of stopping, and your reaction to a counter-strike on drone and missile sites is “oh it’s all for corporate gain”?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No. My reaction is ‘we started it.’ And, with so much killing–on all sides (except wealthy corporate executives) more killing will not end the killing. Please, try to reason before it’s too late.
LikeLike
“Terrorists,” “rebels,” “bad guys,” whatever we call them, they live there, and we in the West have been trying to run their region for profit for generations.
“An eye for an eye” just makes everybody blind. Let’s try something else.
LikeLike
Jack, it’s clear that few care about Yemen. But when pirates attack commercial shipping in international waters, it concerns everyone who doesn’t grow their own food.
LikeLike
We didn’t start anything like this. To criticize your own country for striking drone and missile sites that were being used to attack commercial ships, how much self-flagellation can one man take?
LikeLike
Give it up. Trying to reason with a brainwashed ideologue is like trying to reason with a wall.
LikeLike
Here are some links to further show tragedy in Yemen.
https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/1/25/shakespeare-in-yemen-tragedy-offers-respite-from-war
https://arabstages.org/2014/12/now-i-will-believe-that-there-are-unicorns-the-improbable-history-of-shakespeare-in-yemen/
Sad world we live in.
LikeLike
Thanks for the readings, Chuck. I hope others will read these views. Sadly, it seems most Americans just read “mainstream” views–which reflect traditional corporate interests. And, also sadly, most of us cannot get alternate views on TV or radio. I cannot get Al Jazeera or RTV, though they used to be available here in Ohio.
LikeLike
TRump called the houthis terrorists which they are, Biden who sucks at everything took away the name of terrorists. The moron with million stories diane doesnt want to cover, so all the sick trump people can get their fake fix.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/in-foreign-policy-shift-biden-lifts-terrorist-designation-for-houthis-in-yemen
LikeLike
I believe Biden will make a better president than the former reality show host who tried to subvert the presidential election process.
https://imgur.com/gallery/2iVbPpo
LikeLike
Once more…with coherence, please.
LikeLike
That was for Hal, by the way.
LikeLike
Trump wanted the EU to pay their obligations to NATO. Period. Trump had designated the Houthis as terrorists and One of the first acts of the Biden/Obama administration was to remove that designation.
LikeLike
Numerous high-level personnel who worked in the Trump maladministration have written books now in which they report on his REPEATED expression of his desire to “get the U.S. out of NATO.” Over the objections of his Joint Chiefs and his SECDEF, Trump unilaterally chose to dramatically reduce U.S. NATO troops stationed in Germany and to with draw from Northern Syria, abandoning our allies, the Kurds, who had helped us to destroy ISIS, and leaving the area to the Russians and Assad. Trump also unilaterally, and again, to the dismay of his military chiefs, withdrew the U.S. from the Open Skies and INF Treaties at the very time that his handler, Putin, was fielding hypersonic nuclear missiles. That’s just the beginning of the great dividends that Putin’s investment in his dog Donnie paid out to the Kremlin.
Trump is a traitor. And a seditionist. And only the profoundly uninformed defend him.
LikeLike
And, ofc, he withheld arms for Ukraine in an attempt to blackmail the Ukrainian government into investigating Hunter Biden, a crime for which he was impeached. More stroking of his handler, the indicted international war criminal and avid Trump supporter Tsar Vladimir the Defenestrater.
LikeLike
Bob, you forget that Trump abandoned the agreement with Iran in which they agreed it to build atomic bombs.
Not sure why. They are close to having them now.
LikeLike
Really, Ms. JQH, you should inform yourself. This will mean venturing beyong the Reichwing press that you obviously consume with such reckless and uncritical abandon.
LikeLike
cx: beyond
LikeLike
A poem about the crisis in Ukraine. To understand it and this poem, it helps to be aware, as most folks sadly are not, of the allied invasion of Russia at the end of World War I.
Strangelove II: Battle On the Ice: An Open Poem to the President
“And we are met as on a darkling plane, where ignorant armies clash by night.” From “Dover Beach” by Matthew Arnold
Please, before we send anything to Holy Kiev, or flaming Donetsk–
defensive killing machines, or Adam and Eva’s boots on the ground–
before we smite the Rus, before we try that again—
remember our battles on the ice,
of the Great War, when Rus came out of the fog,
and buried our boys from Detroit.
Cossacks, Kulaks, murdering monarchs,
White and Red, hating us
after that grim fight in the snow.
Archangel looks down,
a half-remembered nightmare,
with tears that turned to steel and ice.
Long before that, Bonaparte marched east, to Moscow,
to destruction, and centuries before,
Tatars and Teutons, had faced off, not just rattling sabers.
Deutschland had three tries, and millions died.
Hearts heavy for the dead, again, again.
Our mutual fire balls can fill the sky,
Can sweep around the world—
Immediate global warming,
Duck-and-cover-time again.
And this fight would leave no
ballets, or Tchaikovsky’s.
Prokofiev’s music will be dead.
Mussorgsky’s Pictures
Will not be heard again.
Nor is there likely to be a
Slaughterhouse story, this time–
or anyone to read it.
(Recommended reading: “Overthrow,” by Kinzer; “Soviet Foreign Policy After Stalin,” by Dallin; “Desert Mirage,” by Yant; “The Ignorant Armies,” by E.M. Halliday.
Jack Burgess – M.A. Ohio State University; Student of “Russian Foreign Policy,’
Veteran of U.S. Army – Teacher of “American & Global Studies,” Chief of Arbitration Service, State of Ohio, (retired from above).
LikeLike
Jack, this is well written, but it is a little bizarre that you are obsessed by this ancient and minor skirmish, ill planned and ill equipped by our side. It has NOTHING to do with Ukraine.
Here’s the story with Ukraine. Putin, the ex-KGB guy, found the fall of the Soviet Union humiliating to his pride (though it gave him his opportunity). He calls that fall the worst event to befall Russia in all its history. He was very clear in his imperialist tract, with its utterly fanciful and fantasized history, that Putin had the intention of being the second Vladimir the Great and recreating the Greater Russian Empire by swallowing up his neighbors. He says that EXPLICITLY. And, of course, the pretexts he created to justify the war on the world stage were ludicrous, as everyone except a few apologists understands. That Ukraine, led by a Jew, was a Nazi state. That there was genocide going on against ethnic Russians. That Ukraine was holding Pride Parades and thus embodying disgusting Western values. That he had to do this because of NATO encroachment on his borders. (If he actually succeeded in capturing Ukraine, he would have as a result an EVEN MORE EXTENSIVE border with NATO.) And, of course, NATO is a defensive alliance. And, of course, far from being a threat to Russia, Ukraine had VOLUNTARILY given up its nuclear weapons.
The fact is that we made a HUGE MISTAKE by not responding militarily when Russia first sent little green men (soldiers without insignia), in violation of international law, into the Donbas and Crimea. So, Putin thought he could get away with going for the whole shebang. And, having spent ENORMOUSLY to modernize his military, he thought he could take Kiev and topple the Ukrainian government in a few days. But Putin has been running an autocratic and kleptocratic state ever since he was put in place by Yeltsin to cover Yeltsin’s handing off former Soviet assets to cronies. And his military leaders, all up and down the line, learned from him. They filled the tanks of aircraft with water instead of fuel. They bought retreaded tires from China instead of new ones for military vehicles. They used substandard parts in their missiles and field communications equipment. And so, when the imperialist would be Tsar of a Greater Russia illegally invaded Ukraine, nothing worked. 66 percent of his missiles hit the ground unexploded. The tires on all the military vehicles blew up. Many aircraft couldn’t be used because they had been ruined by the water. Ground communication systems didn’t work and Russian commanders had to depend on freaking cell phones, which the Ukrainians could intercept and listen to. And so on. So, Putin’s grand triumph turned into an utter farce in which hundreds of thousands of Russian boys have died stupidly, needlessly. And those troops weren’t trained and weren’t disciplined and so carried out widespread campaigns of rape and murder of civilians.
Putin invaded a sovereign UN member state. In doing so, he violated THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE of international law. He is, today, an indicted international war criminal. And the Ukrainian people, including ethically Russian Ukrainians, will have a LONG, LONG memory of the rapes and pillaging, of the missile attacks on civilian infrastructure and hospitals and apartment and museums and parks and freaking schoolhouses.
The Ukrainian people rose up and threw out, with a UNANIMOUS vote in its parliament, the Rada, a president who had proven himself to be a Russian stooge, had stood in the way of better relations with Europe and the rest of the world, and had ordered goons to fire upon and MURDER protesting students. And then they demanded their freedom. And then Putin the war criminal chose instead to carry out this illegal war in which entire cities and villages have been reduced to rubble and grandmothers and little girls have been raped and murdered.
LikeLike
And I take that back about its being well written. It’s kinda stupid, actually.
LikeLike
Bob,
What Putin said was that the disintegration of the USSR was “the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century.”
Worse, in his view, that the world wars. Of course he wants to restore the Empire.
LikeLike
Yes, thanks, Diane.
LikeLike
So, what’s at stake in Ukraine?
THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW is what’s at stake: the idea the UN member states are to enjoy freedom from violent assaults on their territorial integrity.
And, as Timothy Snyder put it so eloquently, our neighbor’s house is on fire. We have a water hose. Simple morality requires that we help our neighbor.
I am utterly sickened by these defenses of Putin and his illegal, murderous campaign. If, that is, Putin is even still alive. The kleptocratic siloviki might just be waiting until after the fake election (yet another faked election) to announce Putin’s death. Then they can ship the body doubles off to Siberia or throw them in the basement of Lubyanka Prison or whatever it is they do these days with folks who are no longer useful to them.
LikeLike
I’m sorry, Jack, but stuff like this really gets my blood boiling. How many Ukrainian grandmothers and toddlers have to be raped and murdered by drunken Russian convict “soldiers”? And how is appeasing the dictatorial psychopath who sent those marauders in going to help anything? You don’t negotiate with terrorists. Give him Ukraine, and next it will be Moldavia. And Poland.
LikeLike
Goodbye, Bob. I wish you well. Thanks for the kind comments you made earlier about my poems.
Jack
LikeLike