Thom Hartman explains how Trump managed to devour the Republican Party, leaving nothing but an empty shell, without a platform or a philosophy. The internal collapse of the GOP started half a century ago….
He writes:
The Republican presidential debate wasn’t encouraging: Trump’s hold on the GOP appears stronger than ever. And that’s bad news for America.
In Robert Hubbell’s excellent Today’s Edition Newsletter on Substack, he made the point… that Trump’s relationship to the GOP is like that of one of those parasitic wasps that puts an egg into a caterpillar or spider and when the wasp larvae hatches it eats its host, leaving behind only a husk.
I’d take the metaphor a step farther: there’s a fungus, cordyceps, that infects ants and seizes control of their brains to alter their behavior ooto the fungus’ advantage. Another example is the toxoplasma parasite that’s often spread by cats: when mice are infected with the parasite, they no longer fear the smell of cats (and sometimes even want to play with them!), thus becoming easy prey. Scientists call it “fatal attraction.”
What Trump has done to the GOP is really quite impressive, worthy of either cordyceps or toxoplasma. And, frankly, it’s amazing that they didn’t even see it coming or try to stop him. (More on that in a moment.)
A registered Democrat and donor to the Democratic Party his entire life, Trump appropriated much of Bernie Sanders’ platform in 2016 to ingratiate himself with working class Americans.
He promised universal healthcare “cheaper than Obamacare,” taxes so high on the morbidly rich that “my friends won’t speak to me,” said he would bring America’s factories back home from overseas, and pledged to strengthen and expand Social Security and Medicare.
All, it turns out, were lies, although most in his base believe to this day that he did or nearly did all those things.
Having used Bernie’s policy positions (and a healthy dose of dog-whistle racism, essential for the Republican base) to win office in 2016, he proceeded to step into, take over, and then — like cordyceps or toxoplasma — alter top-to-bottom the behavior of the GOP.
Trump’s no idiot. He saw how the GOP was weakened, first by the Nixon scandals, then by Reagan’s neoliberalism that gutted the middle class, then by Bush and Cheney lying us into two unnecessary and illegal wars. The party was in a state of crisis when the nation elected our country’s first Black president, which gave Trump his opening.
Fifty years earlier, Nixon had injected the first “egg” of racism and white supremacy into the GOP with his “silent majority” and “war on drugs.”
The former was an explicit shout-out to white racists abandoned by the Democrats in 1964/1965 when LBJ pushed through and signed the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, the latter an explicit technique to disrupt the Civil Rights and anti-war movements. Abandoning all subtlety, Nixon called it his “Southern Strategy.”
A decade later, Reagan pulled southern racists even deeper into the GOP by kicking off his 1980 election campaign with a speech about “states’ rights” to an all-white audience at an obscure Mississippi county fair near the site where three Civil Rights workers were brutally slaughtered in June, 1964. While most Americans — and all major American newspapers and TV networks — missed the significance of the event, southerners heard the whistle loud and clear.
Reagan amplified it with his “welfare queen” comments and his sympathy for white people offended by a “strapping young buck” using food stamps to “buy a T-Bone steak,” while “you were waiting in line to buy hamburger.”
With the ground laid by Nixon and Reagan, that singular event of Obama’s presidency gave Trump the lever he needed to inject the larvae of his sociopathy into the moribund GOP.
He began with his claim that Obama wasn’t even a US citizen but had been born in Kenya, as clear a reference to race as his assertion earlier this week that the Black prosecutor Fani Willis and the Black judge Tanya Chutkan are both “Riggers.”
But Trump was only able to finally take over the GOP in 2016 because a group of corrupt politicians and rightwing billionaires got there first, setting up the party’s faithful to believe absurd lies and step into alternate realities.
It started with Nixon claiming he had a “secret plan” to end the Vietnam War when, in fact, he’d reached out to the Vietnamese and scuttled an actual peace treaty that LBJ had negotiated in the summer of 1968.
When President Johnson called Republican Senator Everett Dirksen to tell him about it just days before the election, Dirksen accused Nixon of “treason.”
Reagan then convinced America’s Republican voters that if they’d just cut taxes on the morbidly rich, prosperity would “trickle down” to average middle class people because it would “unleash” the “job creators.”
His cutting the top tax bracket from 74 percent to 27 percent unleashed them, all right: it unleashed them to buy thousands of politicians at both the state and federal level; to flip more radio stations, TV stations, and newspapers hard right; to purchase yachts and mansions around the world, and even to build their own spaceships.
Reagan told Republicans if they stopped enforcing the anti-trust laws that Republicans had fought for in the 1890s and Republican presidents Teddy Roosevelt and Robert Taft had used, prices would drop and America’s small towns would prosper. Instead, the average American family pays $5,000 a year more than citizens of countries that still enforce their anti-monopoly laws and small-town America has been gutted, with literally millions of local retailers and small employers put out of business by Big Box stores.
Reagan sold Republicans (and a few Democrats) on the idea that “free trade” would lower costs for Americans and, to some extent, it did: our stores were quickly filled with cheap, disposable junk. But the price we paid was 50,000+ factories and over 16 million good-paying union jobs moving to Asia and Mexico.
Reagan promised us if we’d just follow Milton Friedman’s advice (when he was secretly being paid off by the real estate lobby) and end rent controls, cut home mortgage subsidies like those through the FHA and VA, and throw our housing markets open to unrestrained speculation and both corporate and foreign ownership, every American could live the American Dream.
Instead, foreign investors and massive hedge funds run by Wall Street billionaires are buying up America’s housing stock and turning it into rental properties, both exploding the price of houses and rents. The clear and measurable result is an epidemic of homelessness and tent cities.
Reagan promised us if we’d just end “oppressive regulations” — designed to keep our food supply safe, our drugs affordable, clean up our air and water, and protect our children from death by firearms — the “magic of the free market” would provide all those things in spades.
Instead, our food supply is filled with chemicals, microplastics, and heavily processed faux foods that have produced two generations of obesity and related metabolic disorders in children along with an explosion of cancer, birth defects, and other once-rare diseases.
Reagan promised us if we’d just stop funding public schools and stop teaching civics and instead direct that money to private for-profit or church-run voucher and charter schools it would grow the levels of literacy, civic engagement, and healthy political dialogue.
Instead, about half of all American adults cannot read a book written at an eighth-grade level, according to the U.S. Department of Education and the National Institute of Literacy. Only 39 percent of Americans can name all three branches of government, leaving our nation vulnerable to racist white nationalists and fascists wanting to transform the democratic experiment our Founders began with our American republic.
The next Republican president, George W. Bush, nakedly lied to America about the “threat” presented by Saddam Hussein and Iraq to justify a war that cost our nation dearly in both blood and treasure, just to enrich the failing Halliburton (former CEO: Dick Cheney) and other oil companies in Bush and Cheney’s orbit.
Bush also pushed through a plan to clear-cut forests he called the “Healthy Forests Initiative,” and a plan to deregulate pollution controls he called the “Clear Skies” legislation.
By 2010, Republican voters were primed to believe pretty much anything party politicians told them. That was the year the billionaires really got busy taking control of the party’s base.
They started by funding the Tea Party, theoretically a response to President Obama’s effort to provide affordable healthcare for all Americans. Tri-cornered hats and bizarre signs saying things like “Keep Your Government Hands Off My Medicare” popped up all over America, as the billionaires’ Astroturf movement rented high-end busses to bring gullible retired boomers to staged media events across the nation.
That morphed into the “freedom agenda,” branding everything in sight with the word. From trashing queer people, to calls for more tax cuts for billionaires, intimidation of teachers and librarians, massive Red-state-by-Red-state voter purges, legalizing open carry of assault weapons, criminalizing abortion, and a campaign to end the teaching of Black History, “freedom” has spread across the GOP.
This week we even learned that the billionaire-funded Freedom Caucus in the House intends to try to crash the US economy just in time for the election (knowing Biden will get the blame) by refusing to fund the government for the 2024 fiscal year.
Republicans have taken their “freedom agenda” to such extremes that they’re actively suppressing dissent to promote it. When a group of moms of children who died or barely survived a mass shooting at the Covenant Elementary School wanted to testify before the Tennessee General Assembly, they were escorted out by state police the Republican leader, Rep. Lowell Russell, had called.
In today’s GOP, fully in the thrall of Donald Trump and his authoritarianism, dissent is not allowed. Just ask Justin Amash or Liz Cheney.
Trump has done his work, and the Republican Party is no longer a legitimate political party. Like a cat with a toxoplasma-infected mouse, he’s eaten the party whole.
It has no platform, no moral compass, and no loyalty to the Constitution or America’s historic ideals. Instead, it does whatever the billionaires who own it tell it to do (with the ability to bribe given them by five Republicans on the Supreme Court who legalized political bribery in Citizens United).
This grift, started by Richard Nixon’s treason and lies and exploited over the years by the morbidly rich, has now so completely absorbed the party that it’s hard to see it returning to the conservative-but-willing-to-compromise entity it was during the Eisenhower presidency. Hell, most Republican voters today don’t even remember Eisenhower, much less venerate him.
As the esteemed Republican activist and constitutional scholar J. Michael Luttig told CNN a few weeks ago:
“A political party is a collection and assemblage of individuals who share a set of beliefs and principles and policy views about the United States of America. Today, there is no such shared set of beliefs and values and principles or even policy views as within the Republican party for America.”
Mourning the loss of the party he was once proud to be part of, Luttig added:
“American democracy simply cannot function without two equally healthy and equally strong political parties. So today, in my view, there is no Republican Party to counter the Democratic Party in the country. And for that reason, American democracy is in grave peril.”
A return to some semblance of normalcy in theGOP is essential to restoring a normal, functioning government to our nation, as Luttig points out. Odds are, however, it’s first going to take a widespread destruction of that party — provoked by huge Democratic wins in 2024 — to come about.
And, given the bizarre spectacle we witnessed in the Republican presidential debate, that can’t come soon enough.

Rump’s hold appears stronger than ever.
The “know-that” strategy appears to
be as effective, as blowing the
democracy dog whistle, or trying to
change what is, by reviewing what was.
Go figure, same strategies,
same business as usual.
LikeLike
DJT actually IS an idiot. But he has a savage instinct for the jugular.
And has grown up surrounded by advisers & behind-the-scenes controllers & financiers. He is adept at taking orders.
A Puppet pretending to be self-made.
But there IS a playbook in hand. It is global. It is taking strategic, patient aim at Public Schools everywhere. Multiple arrows sent directly into the Heart of Democracy. And over in the UK it unravels and is revealed through inferior, crumbling concrete.
Pupils at schools across England could once AGAIN be forced to take lessons at home next week. As school buildings are “Suddenly” found to contain potentially dangerous concrete.
Chaos has erupted as 104 sites have been found to contain the outdated building material, known as reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac). Several have been ordered to remain closed until the material has been replaced amid concerns it could collapse.
The schools confirmed to be affected so far are:
Ferryhill School (County Durham)
Willowbrook Mead Primary Academy (Leicester)
Parks Primary (Leicester)
Mayflower Primary School (Leicester)
Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School (London)
Crossflats Primary school (Bradford)
Eldwick Primary School (Bradford)
Cockermouth School (Cumbria)
Kingsdown School (Southend)
Abbey Lane Primary School (Sheffield)
Follow The Money. Follow The Playbook.
LikeLike
Trump’s mentor was the mob’s lawyer who was also heavily involved in McCarthy’s red scare before working for the mafia. His name was Roy Cohn who taught Traitor Trump how to cause and spread chaos to his advantage.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/06/donald-trump-roy-cohn-relationship
LikeLike
Hillary and Joe Biden’s mentor was Robert Byrd KKK leader, shhhhhhh Lloyd put that mush brain of yours to bed.
LikeLike
“Reagan promised us if we’d just stop funding public schools and stop teaching civics and instead direct that money to private for-profit or church-run voucher and charter schools it would grow the levels of literacy, civic engagement, and healthy political dialogue. Instead, about half of all American adults cannot read a book written at an eighth-grade level, according to the U.S. Department of Education and the National Institute of Literacy. Only 39 percent of Americans can name all three branches of government, leaving our nation vulnerable to racist white nationalists and fascists wanting to transform the democratic experiment our Founders began with our American republic.”
Here’s a graph of public school spending over time. Spoiler is that K-12 spending has not been falling or even flat since Reagan. It’s gone up, a lot.
And do people really believe public schools were better, and students were better educated, in the 70s and prior? I feel like that myself sometimes, but is it really true?
And did Reagan stop schools from teaching civic? I had civics classes during Reagan’s second term.
LikeLike
Not sure how useful this graph is. It actually raises a lot of questions that makes me wonder how much it is comparing apples to oranges. For instance:
The biggest increase BY FAR was between 1959-1960 and 1969-1970 when spending more than doubled. Why?
Following that huge increase in spending on public schools in the 1960s, the percentage increases were much smaller.
And (From a Pew Research report): “In the six decades from 1950 to 2010, the U.S. population had increased from 157.8 million to 312.2 million”. Of course spending increases as population increases.
And while I can’t be bothered to look up the stats, I know for a fact that the percentage of public school students in poverty is significantly higher than it ever was now. And back when I was in public school, it was possible to drop out at 16. Now EVERYONE stays in school until they are at least 18, and sometimes older. Public schools are mandated to educate students with all kinds of severe disabilities (or pay for private schools) and teach a hugely increased number of students who do not know English.
Public schools have mandated full day Kindergarten in many states. They sometimes even have universal full day pre-k.
Plus, “public school spending” in this chart almost certainly includes charters, which have taken a disproportionate share of per student revenue to teach the students who can be taught for the least amount of money. That forces public schools to spend more money, since the costs of teaching the most expensive students used to be spread amongst a larger number of students, but now a lot of that excess money goes to charter operating costs, including advertising, high salaries, promotion, and providing the additional luxuries to attract parents of the cheapest to teach kids to draw them out of the public school system.
Plus the fact that so many school buildings have been left to rot over the years – and yet require all kinds of upgrades simply to handle the basic technological needs – is clear.
I would like to see a chart that showed:
Public school spending on technology and other private “education” companies from 1960 – 2020. Wanna bet that the percentage increase in technology spending during that time is huge?
Public school spending on every cost associated with testing. All costs of administering tests, all materials for testing, all consulting fees, etc.
In fact, I would like to see a charter that shows what percentage of public school spending is directly on classroom teachers from 1960 to 2020 and what percentage of public school spending goes to consultants, technology costs, testing materials, education materials, etc.
What would probably be more shocking is the percentage of public school funding that goes to private entijries, whether charters, their CEOs, advertising and marketing, etc.
Diane Ravitch posted the latest tax return for Success Academy, and it was shocking to see that “marketing/PR firms” and “staffing firms” and other private firms were paid millions.
LikeLike
The key increase in spending, as Richard Rothstein documented some years ago, is for special education.
Some countries do not include it in the cost of public schooling. We do.
LikeLike
Diane, if someone can show me data showing that gen-ed spending has decreased since 1980, I’m all eyes and I would be very surprised to see it. I haven’t seen it yet.
In my city, education spending is approaching $40,000 per student, and is around 35% of the entire city budget. And the city budget is over $100 billion per year. How much is enough? I strongly suspect that if NYC spent $50,000 per student, $60,000, or spent half the entire city budget, I would hear the same complaints that we are not fully funding education.
Remember too that the US spends more on K-12 education than all but a handful of countries, including the sainted Finland. Are we to believe that’s because Finland is shortchanging special ed students relative to the US?
I am not saying that this is a simple issue. Where and how money is spent surely matters, matters a lot. But the idea that schools are starved by austerity in the US is not supported by any numbers I’ve seen.
LikeLike
I did not say that spending has decreased. Everything has increased.
LikeLike
“Some countries do not include it in the cost of public schooling. We do.”
Interesting. I passed over this sentence when I wrote my response. Do you have a link or citation for this statement? I hadn’t heard this and haven’t considered it.
LikeLike
I have been told this by ministry of education officials in my travels. I considered them a reliable source. In Russia, the department that oversees special Ed is called the Dept of Defectology.
LikeLike
“I did not say that spending has decreased. Everything has increased.”
That’s correct. To be clear, all my comments here have been in response to Hartmann’s suggestion that spending has decreased.
LikeLike
The child poverty rate is nearly the lowest it has been since 1990. See https://www.statista.com/statistics/200474/us-poverty-rate-among-children-under-18-since-1990/#:~:text=Child%20poverty%20rate%20in%20the%20United%20States%201990%2D2021&text=In%202021%2C%20about%2015.3%20percent,which%20stood%20at%2020.6%20percent.
LikeLike
Actually the census is a better source. In 1959 27% the people under the age of 18 lived in poverty. From 1981 until 1996 the under 18 poverty rate was over 20% for all but two years. In 2021 the under 18 poverty rate was 15.3%. The last time it was over 20% was 2014. See https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/tables/time-series/historical-poverty-people/hstpov3.xlsx
LikeLike
What is the population of the Country in the 43 Years since 1980? 226 million 1980, 334 million 2023 . 63 million children in 1980 , 74 million school aged children in 2023 .
“$1 in 1980 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $3.71 today ”
So pleas adjust those spending figures to reflect spending per child in 1980 dollars and get back to us.
If the funding per child is less and Districts have to allocate resources accordingly what courses do they drop!
As well as several other factors in the assault on Public Schools started by Reagan’s” A Nation at Risk ” (fraudulent assault). Factors discussed on this blog in detail that have diminished resources for programs like Civics .
That before we discuss the amount of money diverted to children with disabilities a decision that a caring society chooses to do. I suspect that spending was a fraction of the amount in 1980. When institutionalization or a failure to educate was more the norm.
The most effective forms of propaganda are the ones that are not patently obvious .
LikeLike
Agree. I wrote a comment being held in moderation that asked similar questions.
LikeLike
As the chart says, those are all 2017 dollars, so already inflation adjusted.
I don’t have enrollment figures at my fingertips, but K-12 enrollment has been basically flat over the last 25 years. Per-student spending has increased massively in NYC since 1990, and I would assume it’s the same trend nationwide.
Of course feel free to provide data showing that per pupil inflation adjusted K-12 spending has decreased since 1980. I’ll give you infinite time since no such data exists.
LikeLike
I hope my previous reply to this posts. I had noted the amount was in inflation adjusted dollars so that was not part of my critique. Instead, I noted a myriad of other reasons why the chart was meaningless, including that by far the largest percentage increase in funding occurred between 1960 and 1970.
LikeLike
In terms of that NYC spending chart, it appears that spending hugely increased when Mayor Bloomberg started directing public funding to charters. And obviously de Blasio’s massively successful (in terms of the extraordinarily high number of students using it) pre-k/3K initiatives costs more since there are mandates to how many students can be in a pre-k class. The pandemic-affected 2021/22 spending is not relevant.
LikeLike
Lol, the chart is not “meaningless.” I presented that chart as evidence that education spending has been trending higher, not lower, since 1980. That’s what it shows. If you think education spending is lower today than it was in 1980, you are not dealing with reality.
The same is true of the NYC chart. It shows without any doubt that per inflation adjusted, pupil spending has trended higher, not lower, over the last 30 years. Stripping out the charter spending (and the charter students) wouldn’t change that. And taking Covid funding out of the most recent year of the chart wouldn’t change that story either. Surely people must be able to grasp this.
Still waiting for someone to show me that public school spending — whether per pupil, whether gen-ed only—has declined in the US since 1980. Haven’t seen that demonstrated yet, and I don’t expect to see it.
for the last 30 years in NYC.
LikeLike
Joel, the point on spending, which is simple and I believe irrefutable, is that to the extent Hartman is suggesting that spending on K-12 has decreased since 1980, he is wrong.
LikeLike
FLERP!
You are splitting hairs on what Hartman said. Certainly there are States that have diverted large sums of education dollars to.
” private for-profit or church-run voucher and charter schools it would grow the levels of literacy, civic engagement, and healthy political dialogue.”
Money that could be spent educating students in Public Schools.
Does he imply that those cuts took place when Reagan was President or that he advocated those cuts and diversions of Public dollars to non Public Schools.
JFK advocated landing a man on the moon in 1961. It did not happen till 1969. Was Kennedy responsible for that moon landing or was Nixon.
Hartman is referring to the political economics of Reagan. Reaganomics more so than the man himself. Which he said was adopted by even some Democrats. “The Age of Big Government is over ” I personally get ill when I get campaign literature from Democrats touting cutting or holding down taxes. Something about “the real thing ” baby.
So NYC spends 40 k per child . How do NY and other states spending large some affect a National average.
“Idaho ($9,053), Utah ($9,095), Arizona ($9,611), Mississippi ($10,170) and Florida ($10,401)”
How do the S—Hole states affect the National average of ignorant voters. Ignorant about Civics and Government. Well you see who they overwhelming voted for. A treasonous and seditious grifter. And a party that screws those working class voters the most.
LikeLike
You’re splitting hairs on what I said, which is irrefutable and obvious.
LikeLike
FLERP!
The problem is what you said is not what Hartman said . And
Does any of the data differentiate between spending on Education for traditional K-12 Public Schools vs Spending on Education in total including Charters , Vouchers , Private Religious Schools for Transportation and other expenditures.
I will concede the overall picture may be that spending on education has increased. However it has done so with a lot of qualifiers that make that graph a bit disingenuous without more details.
Nearly a quarter of Education spending in NYS is spent on Special Education more in the City than Upstate Counties .
Where Special Education Programs existed at all in 1980, to what degree were they funded?.
If NYS State were to somehow magically spend a Trillion dollars on Education and every other State cut to zero. National Education spending would go up by 200 billion by those 2017 . That would not do you much good if you were not in NY. The Majority of the Nation is not NY.
LikeLike
Comparing Trump to a parasitic wasp is a good analogy. In basic terms, the man is a user that will say and do what he believes will get him access to more power and wealth. When there is an ideological void in a political party, there is an opening for extremists, crackpots, racists, and other assorted opportunists. The GOP today is a party that stands for little other than serving the wealthy, dismantling institutions, scapegoating their targets and bias.
It is also unfortunate that the corporate arm of the Democratic party still operates under the banner of failed Reaganomics as they solicit donations from wealthy groups and individuals. As Robert Reich has said, the Democrats need to embrace economic populism, and we do see such token moves during an election cycle. If they want to bring blue collar workers back to the party, they will have to do better than that.
LikeLike
Reagan was just a “mouthpiece.” He could read the script and look sincere…while laughing at democracy.
LikeLike
Re: Thom Hartman explains how Trump managed to devour the Republican Party, leaving nothing but an empty shell …
He didn’t leave nothing butt an empty shell — the end result of T-rump’s ail-i-mentation is One Big Pile Of 💩
LikeLike
“…branding everything in sight with the word. From trashing queer people, to calls for more tax cuts for billionaires, intimidation of teachers and librarians, …”
Of course they are. This began in the post Cold War era with the elimination of the communist issue. If the American left did not exist, the right would need to invent one.
And they did. Being unable to cope with life without a bugbear, conservatives began to advocate drug testing teachers and catching drug dealers so people would not be thinking about who had a hand reaching for the wallet.
LikeLike
Roy,
As you know, the GOP now refer to centrist Democrats as “radical left wing Communists, socialists, fascists.”
LikeLike
It’s rough for centrist democrats (I consider myself one). We sometimes get called fascists by the progressive wing of the Dem party, too.
LikeLike
Exactly. It took thirty years for them to convince their base that anyone who sees a role for government at all is a communist. Sure is a relief to be able to go back to the tried and true.
LikeLike
I’m reminded of the trolls who show up here almost daily to kvetch that this is a “far-left extremist blog.”
Yeah. Thinking that poor kids should get good schools, too. Extremist. Thinking that decent healthcare is a right for everyone. Extremist. Thinking that someone who tries in multiple ways to overthrow the elected government is guilty of sedition. Extremist. Having a brain. Extremist.
LikeLike
“It’s rough for centrist democrats (I consider myself one). We sometimes get called fascists by the progressive wing of the Dem party, too.”
I haven’t seen that at all. The people who call centrist (and even progressive) democrats fascists are those who hate the entire Democratic party. They aren’t the “progressive wing” of the Democratic party — they are the people advocating that we vote third party because they would rather soundly defeating the evil “fascist” Dems than defeat the far right Republicans (since they claim there is an immeasurable difference between the two parties).
LikeLike
Go on Twitter or Reddit and engage with a DSA person on the topic of policing and prisons and you’ll see the fascist charges start flying.
Tell a soi-disant progressive you’re opposed to affirmative action, you’ll often be told you’re a white supremacist.
LikeLike
flerp!,
I believe you. I just don’t believe that the folks you just described identify as Democrats. They may identify as progressives, but Democratic Socialists (bar a very few) don’t identify themselves as a wing of the Democratic party, they often hate Democrats far more progressive than you are.
LikeLike
FLERP!
I don’t care what your relatively few acquaintances on the left call you!
Can you quote one elected progressive who called a Center-est or even a Right Wing elected Democrat (these things are relative ) a fascist ! Last time I checked corrupt and Fascist do not even start with the same letter.
Joe Schmoe on Instagram or Tik Tok does not count.
I’ll wait.
LikeLike
Trump is meaningless to 2024. The Koch’s AFP (some hold meetings in Catholic Churches) is targeting him in ads in Super Tuesday states like N.C., Ark. and Tenn. Previously, the AFP targeted him in other states during this primary season.
The LA Times reported that the AFP performs the role typical of state and national political parties. The AFP is one of 15 groups that makeup 3/4 of the anonymous cash following Citizens United.
The Koch/Catholic power broker choice will be Youngkin. He’ll move in after the other candidates have been bloodied.
Bloggers should start promoting the case against Youngkin now, before it’s too late.
LikeLike
Youngkin is polished. He’s a dedicated rightwinger without the crazy.
LikeLike
NOBODY WANTS BLACKFACE, TRUMP IN A LANDSLIDE LINDA, GO CRY ME A RIVER IT IS HAPPENING LOL.
LikeLike
“Only 39 percent of Americans can name all three branches of government”
Count Senator “Coach” Tommy Tuberville (R-lives in Florida, but represents Alabama) among the 61 percent who can’t.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/13/alabama-senator-elect-tommy-tuberville-botches-historical-facts/6283806002/
https://www.al.com/news/2023/08/can-tommy-tuberville-represent-alabama-in-us-senate-if-he-lives-in-florida.html
LikeLike
“all three branches of government”
The Father, the Son and the Holy Goats?
LikeLike
“How Trump Ate and Swallowed the GOP.” Ted Hughes was prescient, for he wrote this poem:
Theology
“No, the serpent did not
Seduce Eve to the apple.
All that’s simply
Corruption of the facts.
Adam ate the apple.
Eve ate Adam.
The serpent ate Eve.
This is the dark intestine.
The serpent, meanwhile,
Sleeps his meal off in Paradise –
Smiling to hear
God’s querulous calling.”
LikeLike
Bob-
glad you survived the storm.
LikeLike
Thanks, Linda!!!!
LikeLike
The author, Mr. Hartman, appears to discuss Reagan’s education budget in the context of, well, Reagan. During his tenure, he definitely was all in for cutting the ed budget by billions of dollars. The Dept. of Ed had proposed from $14.9 billion to $10 billion. In the end, they didn’t cut it by much, mostly because of the demand for higher education programs.
From 1982 NYT: “The fact that Federal expenses for higher education have continued to climb upward while the overall budget has declined slightly has meant that as a result of Reagan Administration policies the focus of Federal spending has shifted slightly. ‘The percentage of Federal funds going to elementary and secondary education has dropped from 43 to 40 percent, mainly because of student financial assistance,’ said Mr. Jones, the Education Department Under Secretary. ‘When you have an entitlement program that continues to grow, something has to go.'”
LikeLike
“Mourning the loss of the party he [Luttig] was once proud to be part of”
When was he proud to be part of the GOP?
Up until 2023 when he left the party?
Ha ha ha
LikeLike
SO worried about Trump, ohhhhh its hysterical. Who do the dems have lol nobody!!!!!! Michael Obama??? Your party is done done done. You have no future. Trump is crushing the deep state and showing the great awakening to all the normies sleeping. Diane, BOb, LLoyd and the rest are already far gone brainwashed, very slow, and controlled.
LikeLike
“But their is no system of justice. Our Court System is rigged against me!”
–Stable Genius Donald J. Trump, truthing on Friday.
All this gives me an idea. Why not use a bunch of Trump Tweets (Xes?) and Truths to prepare a grammar and spelling diagnostic test for 3rd graders?
LikeLike
cx: a diagnostic test in grammar, usage, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling for third graders?
LikeLike
Trump tweets = ChaffGOP
LikeLike
Trump tweets could also be used as a diagnostic test for insanity.
If you believe them, you are definitely insane.
LikeLike