Mitch Randal, a pastor in Norman, Oklahoma, and CEO OF Good Faith Media, published his opposition to the state’s recent decision to fund a religious virtual charter school.
Randal wrote:
The Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board voted 3-2 to approve using state funds to support a new Catholic school this week. One of the board members voting “yes” was installed to their post last Friday, according to Tulsa World.
The board’s actions began creating the first religious charter school supported by taxpayer dollars in the United States. The online school, St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, will be managed and operated by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa.
Oklahoma’s previous Attorney General, John O’Connor, issued a non-binding 15-page opinion in December 2022 suggesting that Oklahoma’s restriction of taxpayer funds from being used for religious schools would most likely be found unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court.
Education Week reported, “O’Connor had concluded that recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions authorizing the inclusion of religious schools in choice programs such as tax credits for scholarship donations, and tuition assistance meant that the high court would likely not ‘accept the argument that, because charter schools are considered public for various purposes, that a state should be allowed to discriminate against religiously affiliated private participants who wish to establish and operate charter schools.’”
St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School’s application asked for $2.5 million to serve a potential 500 students in the first year. That will be $2.5 million taken away from public schools to support private religious education.
O’Connor’s successor, Gentner Drummond, withdrew the opinion earlier this year, stating, “Religious liberty is one of our most fundamental freedoms.”
Drummond continued: “It allows us to worship according to our faith, and to be free from any duty that may conflict with our faith. The opinion as issued by my predecessor misuses the concept of religious liberty by employing it as a means to justify state-funded religion.”
While some Christian conservatives, such as Oklahoma’s State Superintendent Ryan Walters, praised the board’s decision, other politicians and faith leaders criticized its actions, characterizing them as unconstitutional and a direct violation of the Establishment Clause.
After the 3-2 vote in favor of funding St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, Drummond reiterated his opinion that this decision was improper. “The approval of any publicly funded religious school is contrary to Oklahoma law and not in the best interest of taxpayers,” he said.
“It’s extremely disappointing that board members violated their oath in order to fund religious schools with our tax dollars,” Drummond said. “In doing so, these members have exposed themselves and the State to potential legal action that could be costly.”
Clark Frailey, executive director for Pastors for Oklahoma Kids, commented: “By authorizing a public school that is explicitly affiliated with a particular religion, Oklahoma is endorsing that religion and entangling the government in religious affairs.”
“In addition,” Frailey continued, “the proposed school is to be funded by taxpayer dollars. This clearly misuses public dollars, as it would fund religious indoctrination of children.”
Historically, Oklahoma has been notoriously guilty of using taxpayer dollars to indoctrinate children with religious doctrines. Many times, Good Faith Media has called attention to the misguided and violent actions occurring at Chilocco Indian Agricultural Boarding School.
Thousands of Indigenous children were taken from their families and provided “Christian” education using taxpayer funding. Hiding behind a compassionate mission to educate Indigenous children, the actual objective was to assimilate them into white Protestant doctrines.
While no one suggests the Oklahoma Catholic Diocese is following this model, the dangers of using taxpayer dollars are ominous. Besides taking precious funding away from public education to fund private religious charters, using taxpayer money violates the religious liberty of others not wanting to support religious teachings.
Should taxpayers be forced to support religious teachings contradictory to their belief systems? Will there be any oversight of the use of taxpayer money used at religious schools?
Like public schools, do religious schools have to accept all students or can they discriminate? Will religious schools need curriculum to be approved? If so, who decides? Can any religious sect apply for funding?
Americans United for Separation of Church and State responded, “It’s hard to think of a clearer violation of the religious freedom of Oklahoma taxpayers and public-school families than the state establishing the nation’s first religious public charter school.”
AU went on to point out the unconstitutionality of the action: “State and federal law are clear: Charter schools are public schools that must be secular and open to all students. No public-school family should fear that their child will be required by charter schools to take theology classes or be expelled for failing to conform to religious doctrines. And the government should never force anyone to fund religious education.”
“Funding private religious schools with public dollars violates core legal principles protecting religious freedom for all,” said Amanda Tyler, executive director of BJC (Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty).
Paul Brandeis Raushenbush, CEO of Interfaith Alliance, told The Independent that this would “open the floodgates for taxpayer-funded discrimination.” He added: “Taxpayer money should never be used to fund religious instruction, and it is now up to the state to at least ensure St. Isidore abides by the federal nondiscrimination protections guaranteed in public schools.”
The decision by the Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board is clearly a disregard for the democratic principles established by the nation’s founders.
Thomas Jefferson’s words in his letter to the Baptists of Danbury, Connecticut, are as crucial today as they were in 1802: “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”

CEO of Good Faith Media.

The growing hubris brought on by the Catholic Theocrats in the Supreme Court. I keep wondering at what point the libertarians in the Republican Party will catch on. All these culture war initiatives require litigation that cost state governments significant tax payer dollars. Talk about government waste.
LikeLike
Republican libertarians already see the contradiction. They accept it because they are libertarians of convenience rather than conviction. They are perfectly satisfied to surrender to a form of government based on business, but reject government based on the organization of the social contract
LikeLike
Yes, Paul, there is (1) hubris by politicized right wing Catholics Their agenda is enabled by (2) media (3) influencers (4) liberal and conservative tribalists and (5) by Church cover-up.The influencers and media operate out of either loyalty to the Catholic church’s reputation or fear of the wrath associated with being labeled anti-Catholic when one calls out public square actions for the right wing by the Church et al. The type of libel can be witnessed. It appears in comments at this blog. The result of the list of 5 is Catholic organizations have become the nation’s 3rd largest employer, through the taxes received. And, one very large Catholic organization segment has been able to prevent their personnel from having the protections afforded through civil rights employment law. (Biel v St. James Catholic school)
Below, in a comment I provide illustration of the expansion of taxpayer funding for the Catholic agenda, from reporting by the St. Louis Post Dispatch, albeit with no mention of Catholic.
LikeLike
It ain’t growing, it was fully conceived when he was nominated. Ironically, kind of like the so-called pro-lifers claim happens once an egg hooks up with sperm. 🤯
LikeLike
Charter schools frequently discriminate against students on various grounds, despite the fact they should be open to all. Religious charter schools would give them one more factor on which they can discriminate. We should not be using public funds that enable discrimination against protected classes of people in our society.
LikeLike
t is rather interesting that religious organization claim to be non-profit or not for profit; therefore, claiming the right NOT to pay taxes. There thousands upon thousands of religious buildings and other properties on which absolutely NO taxes on paid. No taxes are paid on money collected from the rich but mainly the middle and lower classes on which no taxes are paid.
Yet they want all the benefits of what tax dollars pay for daily: police and fire protection, streets, water and sewer systems, more social services, a military so their religious freedoms are protected, etc., etc. Now they want the taxpayer, which does not include them, to pay for children to go to their religious schools so they can further indoctrinate their minds to the various religious organization way of thinking.
They want it all but pay for nothing. They want their religious cake and eat it too. I, for one, have given up on organized religion.
LikeLike
SICKENING, SICKENING, SICKENING!
FRAUDS, ALL FRAUDS.
You are correct, Eugene.
LikeLike
“…do religious schools have to accept all students or can they discriminate?”
Is this a rhetorical question? By doctrine, any branch of Christianity is discriminatory based on belief. Even if the institution decided to refrain from the doctrinaire, as did many educational institutions started by mainstream churches in the 1950-60s, there still exists the fundamental notion of specifically Christian mission. To fund this is to make the wall between church and state into a sheet of gauze.
LikeLike
We have been on a slippery slope with regard to providing services to religious schools for decades. In my career an an ESL teacher, I can recall being sent to a Roman Catholic school to screen students for eligibility to this service in the late 1980s in New York State. Our ESL teachers were partly funded by Title 1. We ended up supplying the school with a full-time ESL teacher that started out working in a mobile classroom and later working in the building. We were also required to give them access to psychological, library services and a district social worker as well, although I do not remember that legal precedent that decided these assignments. In addition, one of my former student teachers, funded by Title 1, became an ESL teacher in Kiryas Joel, an isolated ultra-orthodox Jewish community in Orange County, NY. We have been gradually taking the wall between church and state down brick by brick.
LikeLike
The St. Louis Post Dispatch wrote yesterday, in editorial opposition, to a $1 mil. state contract awarded to Choose Life Marketing. The marketing firm is described as religiously focused. At the site, CatholicJobs.com, there is a listing for a Client Services Manager at Pregnancy Center West in Cincinnati. In the description section it says, “All info., educational programs and services must be … consistent …with Catholic Church…” Duties include, “take phone calls and respond to Choose Life Marketing inquiries.”
LikeLike
Charter School authorizers are going to have a religious battle on their hands. Every Christian denomination, the Islamic Religions, Jews, etc., etc. will all want to open charter schools based on their theology.
The authorizer will not have the option to pick and choose which theology to bless with a charter school. First of all, authorizers will not have the intestinal fortitude to deny a religious organization a charter. That is “go to court” time. Once a religious charters school application of any kind is granted then the authorizer has boxed itself into corner. All applications will have to be approved or there will be endless court battles.
We all know that these charter schools will want to be totally free from any oversight. This country is going to be in a world of hurt if religious charter schools take over. We will end up like Iraq and Iran.
LikeLike
Eugene Gant Nice analysis of what has become a “charter school “scandal.”
My guess is that if they don’t SOON come to understand what they are doing to their own freedoms (rooted in the very secularity they are encroaching on), then the movement will take its natural course to self-destruction.
As an aside, I wonder what will happen to Montessori Schools and the like in the aftermath. CBK
LikeLike
It will open up the floodgates to any denomination including grifters seeking access to public funds, and, as you note, it has the potential to further divide us as a nation.
LikeLike
**retired teacher* . . . as an aside, the substance of your note sounds like the defense industry. ” grifters seeking access to public funds.” CBK
LikeLike
And Now this…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y1xJAVZxXg
LikeLike
Agreed!
LikeLike