Denis Smith writes here about the past, present, and hoped-for future of West Virginia. He urges West Virginians to throw out the leaders who undermine their health, safety, and well-being. He reminds us and them of the state’s past progressive leaders. A lifelong educator, Smith retired as an official in the Ohio State Department of Education, where he oversaw charter schools.
He writes:
In her earlier post, West Virginia: The Battle of Blair Mountain, Diane Ravitch not only reminded us about the emergence of the labor movement but also shed light on how, a century later, the coal industry, though greatly diminished in activity from earlier times, still maintains a grip on the state through the misfeasance of its political leadership in the governor’s office and by its representatives in the Congress.
The story goes back to 1921, when 10,000 coal miners, in reaction to the murder of a union-friendly local sheriff, joined together to check the power of coal companies and the low wages, unsafe working conditions, and horrific housing they provided in company towns situated near the mines operated by these representatives of corporate America.
Inasmuch as I completed almost all of my graduate work in West Virginia and lived there for nearly 20 years, I was familiar with the Blair Mountain story and the sad history of exploitation of the land and workers by extractive industries like coal companies. Unfortunately, I thought that this tale of labor history was widely known but learned otherwise about eight years ago.
At that time, I was asked to teach a number of American history courses for Ohio public school teachers so they could meet the then-new content area Highly Qualified Teacher requirements. A review of the draft course syllabus showed, however, that additional content was needed to bolster the students’ knowledge of the Progressive Era and the emerging American labor movement. In particular, there was no treatment of the horrific Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire as well as the Battle of Blair Mountain, which remains the largest labor uprising in American history.
I soon learned that none of the students in my class in suburban Columbus, Ohio had any knowledge of either event, and the Blair Mountain post, with its spotlight on West Virginia, sheds light on that state’s history of exploitation by energy companies and the lack of political leadership today to ensure the health, safety,and welfare of its citizens based on that past history.
But in light of the state’s challenges in the past, and with the neglect of the health, safety, and welfare shown by its top political leaders, are West Virginia residents also unknowing of its past history? Or have they been bamboozled by their politicians in not realizing what is at stake in the current political climate?
That lack of leadership to ensure the health and welfare of the populace is shown in the misfeasance and conflicts-of-interest manifested by West Virginia’s Governor Jim Justice and its senior U.S. Senator, Joe Manchin, who also served as the state’s governor before his election to Congress.
As the owner of several coal companies, Justice has a history of exploiting not only the land but of the communities affected. Moreover, like his friend Donald Trump, he also has a history of tax avoidance. In 2019, for example, Justice companies paid $1.2 million in back taxes owed to Knott, Pike, Harlan and Magoffin counties in Kentucky, with more delinquent taxes to be paid at a later date. A review of his tax delinquency showed that he had additional obligations to be paid in Virginia and West Virginia, along with past due mine safety fines.
Yes, mine safety fines owed by companies owned by the governor of the state where 10,000 miners revolted against unsafe working conditions exactly a century ago. But that was then, right? Or are we back to the future and the past simultaneously?
Then we have the case of Senator Joe Manchin, a predecessor of Jim Justice in the West Virginia governor’s office. The current Build Back Better legislation would provide funds to deal with climate change, expand Medicare, and assist families with lower costs for child care and elder care. Yet Manchin, who has interests in the energy industry and a daughter who formerly was the CEO of Mylan, a pharmaceutical company, seems to have a conflict-of-interest when it comes to supporting lower prescription drug costs and dealing with the environment.
When many communities lack safe drinking water caused by years of mining and health consequences caused by such mineral extraction activity in West Virginia, wouldn’t you think that the political leadership on both sides of the aisle would support legislation that would protect the health, safety, and welfare of residents?
If you have financial interests in a top industry, as Manchin and Justice do, that’s asking far too much.
On Sunday, Manchin announced, appropriately enough, on Fox News that he does not support the Build Back Better Act. This is what Bernie Sanders had to say about his colleague, Joe Manchin:
“Well, I think he’s going to have a lot of explaining to do to the people of West Virginia, to tell him why he doesn’t have the guts to take on the drug companies to lower the cost of prescription drugs,” he said. “West Virginia is one of the poorest states in this country. You got elderly people and disabled people who would like to stay at home. He’s going to have to tell the people of West Virginia why he doesn’t want to expand Medicare to cover dental, hearing, and eyeglasses.”
When it comes to drug companies and Manchin’s lack of courage in dealing with them, Bernie Sanders is certainly knowledgeable about some family history. And then some. He went on to add this observation:
“If he doesn’t have the courage to do the right thing for the working families of West Virginia and America, let him vote no in front of the whole world.”
Manchin used the canard of not wanting to increase the national debt as one of his arguments in opposing Build Back Better. But he does not acknowledge that West Virginia greatly benefits from all types of federal spending. A study several years ago demonstrated that a number of red states, including West Virginia, receive much more in federal dollars than they receive from the treasury. As examples, West Virginia receives $2.07, Kentucky $1.90, and South Carolina $1.71 for every dollar sent to Washington.
In light of his concern about the national debt, would Manchin favor West Virginia being treated on a par with states like Massachusetts and New York, which receive far less than a dollar back from the treasury for every dollar sent to Washington?
So as I reflect a bit more about the Mine Wars and the Battle of Blair Mountain, I am puzzled by the descendants of these mine workers offering such enthusiastic support to the likes of Governor Jim Justice and Senator Joe Manchin, who obstruct legislation that would improve the health, safety, nutrition, and educational opportunities for West Virginia, one of the poorest states in the union.
There are two great West Virginia Senators who must be turning in their graves as they view the likes of the state’s present political leadership. The first, Jennings Randolph, entered the U.S. Senate in 1933 at the start of FDR’s New Deal and was a champion of Social Security, Medicare, voting rights and the abolition of the Poll Tax. Then there was Robert Byrd, who served with Randolph as the long-time Senate leader who distinguished himself as a check on many of Ronald Reagan’s policies, opposed the Iraq War, and in his last days championed the Affordable Care Act from a wheelchair on the Senate floor.
In a Senate speech on February 12, 2003 that attacked the march toward war with Iraq, Byrd said that “We are truly “sleepwalking through history.” In my heart of hearts I pray that this great nation and its good and trusting citizens are not in for a rudest of awakenings.”
In the same vein, it’s past time for the people of West Virginia to emerge from their sleepwalking and support leaders, unlike Manchin and Justice, who will put the interests of the people first and not those of the pharmaceutical industry and energy interests.
One more thing. Dear West Virginians, the next time you vote, remember your ancestors who fought for justice (small j, of course) and basic human rights at Blair Mountain. It’s now the 21st century. Jennings Randolph and Robert Byrd might be pleased with your awakening.
Are there even any progressive politicians in West Virginia? It appears that they are all bought off by the big corporations and the coal barons/politicians.
This is just me, so correct me if I’m off-base. I have tended to think of these folks as having learned to keep their mouths shut about coal-mining atrocities because it’s forever been the only game in town, without which they have less than nothing. Do you watch the BBC (PBS) series “The Indian Doctor”? Illustrates the same point, though it’s Wales in the 1960’s. Villagers watching their sole industry on the wane, unwilling to take lung XRays tho colleagues die of black lung disease– convinced by the local rep of Big Mining [which has refused to institute even the then-current mitigations used in some mines] that it’s part of a govt plot to deprive them of their subsistence.
For the sake of argument, let’s agree that all provisions of the Build Back Better proposal are worth enacting. The problem remains that BBB relies on accounting trickery and flimflam. It aggregates increased tax receipts over ten years and applies them to pay for only a few years of projected BBB spending. All politically aware people know that the new entitlements to child care, Medicare benefits, child tax credits, etc. would never be repealed; Democrats intend for these supposed short-term programs to continue forever. That’s why a realistic accounting of the 10 year costs for BBB show an increased national debt of $3 trillion, not the few hundred billion that the original Congressional Budget Office analysis concluded.
Republicans for the last 40 years have had their own accounting flimflam: the claim that tax cuts in all circumstances generate so much additional economic activity that tax revenues actually increase so much that the tax cuts are paid for and the annual deficit declines. That has NEVER happened in the last 40 years.
I lived in Minnesota during the tenure of Gov. Mark Dayton, a very unimpressive person who only made his way in politics by virtue of his family name and money. But although being ultra-liberal, he was a fiscal conservative. He proposed major new spending programs – and the tax increases to pay for those programs. His Republican predecessor (Tim Pawlenty) relied on accounting trickery to avoid spending cuts while also reducing some taxes.
Can we finally have honesty from both major parties, or is the public too far gone in wanting the proverbial free lunch: more goodies from government topped off with tax cuts, and to hell with fiscal responsibility?
Bill, how much money is it worth to lift millions of children out of poverty? What’s it worth to stop climate change, such as the dissolving polar ice caps? What’s it worth to lower the insane price of prescription drugs, at least to no more than Canada and UK pay? Ideas?
I intentionally do not take a position on the merits of BBB. My point is that almost all of its spending proposals are – in accounting terminology – current expenses, not long-term investments. Most BBB costs should be paid for by current taxes, not by issuing more long-term bonds that are purchased by the Federal Reserve as it monetizes the new debt, effectively creating new digital money and fueling more inflation.
I’ve said the same thing to conservatives who sincerely believe(d) that the defense budget should be increased. I credit them with sincerity but not with seriousness. It’s always cut other programs that a large majority of the public wants, trim waste/fraud/abuse – but never any sacrifice from anyone, even the most affluent, via tax increases.
I disagree with Bernie Sanders on numerous issues, but all credit to him for being honest about fiscal reality. An interviewer once asked him if having the type of European-level social democracy that he favors would require the middle class – not just high income people – to pay much more in taxes. He said yes, the only left-of-center elected official I’ve ever come across who was that honest.
Bill, Sanders was indeed correct about that. The idea that we can finance the kind of spending required for M4A or a “Green New Deal” simply by taxing billionaires is fantasy.
Excuse me, but if we had medicare for all, there would be huge savings for the consumer, not having to pay the high private insurance premiums. Not to mention the tens of millions of Americans with no health insurance whatsoever. Somehow ALL the other rich democratic countries have universal health care but not the USA. STOP with the crap we can’t afford it, we can afford it. And whatever higher taxes paid would be returned with universal health care. Japan, Taiwan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Germany, France, Holland, Italy, etc., have universal health care. It can be done, we already have universal health care for those 65 and older. I’m so sick of these stupid games that we can’t afford it in this country, blah, blah, blah.
Joe, that’s exactly the argument Sanders made.
Of course the novel approach to that would be to have progressive tax increases to pay for the things most Americans want. How did that work for Walter Mondale.
Part of the trickle down argument is that the velocity of money would pay for the tax cuts. The problem was that the wealthy can only spend so much. However putting money in the hands of the working class whether by direct subsidy the child tax credit or transferring costs , pre k , childcare , eldercare … will generate economic activity and in turn tax dollars to offset some of the costs.
How much larger will the American economy be 10 years from now without BBB. I suspect that number would then make the debt to GDP ratio look a bit better. And how much bigger will GDP be with BBB.
Our children will not be burdened by the debt. But hey Manchin opposed the tax increases that would pay for this and the infrastructure bill. .
The 10-yr costs of Trump admin’s tax cut for the wealthy have been calculated at $5.5 trillion, if permanently extended– just as inevitable as permanent extension of BBB entitlements. Funding for BBB claws some of that back. As originally proposed it would claw all of it back.
Thanks to Diane for teaching us about the Battle of Blair Mountain and its importance to this day. My apologies for a small error in the fourth paragraph from the end of this piece. The sentence should read “Jennings Randolph entered the U.S. Congress (not the Senate) in 1933 …”
It was an excellent contribution thank you . The question I have is what will it take to wake enough voters in the state of West Virginia. Being on the receiving end of Government spending has not done it. Krugman had a good piece last week pointing out the similar statistics for Kentucky.
Concluding :
“We want individuals who for whatever reason are hurting financially to receive support from the more fortunate, which necessarily implies large transfers from rich states like New Jersey to lower-income states like Kentucky.
What’s not OK is when states that are huge net beneficiaries of progressive taxation and the social safety net preen and posture about self-reliance and the evils of big government. It’s even worse when they assert some kind of moral superiority over the metropolitan areas that pay their bills.”
As for those Children of Union Miners voting for people who among other things recently enough made the State Right to Work . The problem is not limited to WV. Nor is it limited to the children of Union workers and communities . As far too many active Union members do the same. Some of them among the most empowered workers in the country. Thirty five years ago a NYC labor leader was asked on his death bed when he thought this would change . He said: “when it gets bad enough”
I say maybe.
Manchin continues a long tradition among some but not all elected officials.
He might as well do what homeless people do and wear a cardboard sign around his neck, but his sign says, “Hello, I’m Senator Joe Manchin and I’m for sale!”
Amen. What a magnificent article! And thank you, Diane, for posting it.
Here’s my fear: By killing BBB, Manchin makes Biden look ineffectual to voters, and he hands victory in 2022 and 2024 to the current fascist instantiation of the Republican Party. In hindsight, this might well be the avoidable catastrophe, the event that brought about the collapse of the U.S. experiment in democracy.
In 50 years, the approved textbooks will hail Manchin as a savior, one who finally exposed American government to be an inefficient sham: His glorious vote set the events for the prosperity, order, and predictability we have today. We are not bothered by the details of government because we have the people in place to take of that for us, so that we can get about the business of business.
And the state apparatus (all states are predicated on monopolies on violence) will concentrate its energies on its five Prime Directives: enriching members of the Inner Party via “public-private partnerships,” crushing non-acquiescence to that enrichment, indoctrination of the next generation in the new national mythology, feeding the people circuses and enemies to hate, and protecting the Fatherland from enemies foreign and domestic (with emphasis on domestic). Capitalism does not necessarily contain the seeds of its own destruction. It can be maintained via violence and the threat of violence.
For a time
“Hasta la vista, BBB” — The Manchinator
I’ll be back” (after the break, to kill BBB and the John Lewis voting rights act)– The Manchinator
Hat tip to Diane for the term “Manchinator”
“I need your clothes, your boots, and your Mazerati.” –(from Manchinator 2)
Many people don’t realize it , but Manchin actually played the evil Terminator in Terminator 2 (under the pseudonym Robert Patrick)
A big career move, given his previous occupation: garden gnome. Still hasn’t been able to shed the appearance, though.
The Manchinator
The evil Manchinator
Is made of liquid metal
A kind of liquidator
The witch in Hans and Gretel
Who liquidates the bills
With money for the children
And thereby simply kills
Society we’re building
Lots of excellent letters to NYT editor on this today. The observation that Manchin owes his power to 50 Republicans was quite a good. And though I disdain off topic comments on posts, here is, in my opinion, an exception that kind of fits here.
Officer Mike Fanone resigned from the Capitol Hill police. Here was a very chilling excerpt from the story I just read:
“Clearly there are some members of our department who feel their oath is to Donald Trump and not to the Constitution,” he said. “I no longer felt like I could trust my fellow officers and decided it was time to make a change.”
This is precisely what worries me when I think of the future in which my grandchildren will live.
More proof that Joe Manchin is to Joe Manchin as Donald Trump is to Donald Trump:
https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/west-virginians-ask-joe-manchin-which-side-are-you-on
Joe Manchin continues the long tradition of exploiting one’s public office for personal gain.
The headline citing “selfish Joe Manchin” prompts some reflection about selfishness — selfcenteredness — in our society today: Looking back now on 2021 as it draws to its close and with December 7, Pearl Harbor Day, just past, it’s clear that today’s generation of Americans would have lacked the stamina to fight the nearly five long, hard years of World War II…they would have caved in and made peace with the Nazis and the war lords of Japan after only a year or two of the initial bitter battles that America mostly lost badly in those years. Today’s generation would never have lasted through the years of domestic sacrifices, such as food and gasoline rationing, let alone the human cost paid by families on every street in every neighborhood in every American town and city.
Today’s generation would be shouting that no one can mandate food rationing or gasoline rationing, or mandate that they be drafted to fight and die in the military services against their will. After all, they would shout, “I have my rights!”
“I”. “I’. “I”.
Today’s self-centered generation just doesn’t have what it takes.
Right after the writing of our Constitution was completed, a member of the public asked Benjamin Franklin what kind of nation he and our other Founding Fathers had created; he replied: “A republic — if you can keep it.”
Keeping a republic is hard, constant hard work with never an end to it. Past generations were up to that task — today’s self-centered generation is not up to that hard, never-ending task.
Today’s self-centered generation wave their little pocket editions of our Constitution in the air and shout “I have my rights!” — never bothering to notice that our Constitution begins with the word “We”; not “me”, not “my”, not “I’. “We”.
Nor have they read the most important part of our Constitution — The Preamble — in which our Founding Fathers who wrote our Constitution spell out for future generations what the purpose of our Constitution is. The purpose is unity and the Common Good, not to establish a nation of individuals who put “me” ahead of “we”.
Founding Father John Adams, who played such a key role in writing our Constitution that he is honored with the title “The Architect of American Government,” made that very clear: “Government is instituted for the Common Good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the People; and not for the profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men.”
Our Founding Fathers didn’t even think it was necessary to include any mention of individual rights in the Constitution because they knew that if everyone in our new nation was working for the Common Good, for the good of their neighbors, then everyone’s individual rights would be able to grow and flourish. The Bill of Rights amendments to the original Constitution that spell out a few key individual rights had to be added because even back then there were too many self-centered “I/me” people who just didn’t “get” how the Common Good worked because they couldn’t think in terms of “we”.
And just think of how selfless our Founding Fathers themselves were: They were men of the landed gentry upper class and men of business and commerce and of the professional class. They didn’t need a Revolution because they had everything they wanted. But — they saw that others were struggling under a system that exploited them, and so our Founding Fathers launched a Revolution based on the ideal that all men are created equal and should not be exploited.
Our Founding Fathers risked everything — all their lands and possessions and even their lives — for others because if the Revolution had failed, they would have been hanged as traitors to the king: And they knew that the chances of winning the Revolution were dismal because they were going up against the world’s greatest superpower with a huge, well-trained, well-supplied army and a navy that ruled the seas around the globe…going up against all that military might with a rag-tag army of volunteer farmers and no navy.
Were our Founding Fathers crazy? Who in today’s generation of Americans would do such a thing — risk their own riches and lives for some abstract ideal that would benefit people they didn’t even know?
But our Founding Fathers didn’t think of “me” — they thought of “we”…We the People.
Today’s generation of Americans think only of “I/me” and won’t even get a vaccination or wear a mask for the Common Good. They don’t know or care that George Washington mandated vaccinations for every soldier in his Revolutionary Army and that if he had not done that, we would have lost the war because a smallpox epidemic was raging in the colonies and among the soldiers. Here’s what General Washington wrote in his order on February 5, 1777, that mandated vaccinations, called “inoculations” back then, for the troops: “I have determined that troops shall be inoculated. This expedient may be attended with some inconveniences and some disadvantages, but I trust its consequences will have the most happy effects. Necessity not only authorizes but seems to require this measure, for should the disorder infect the army in the natural way and rage with its virulence, we should have more to dread from it than from the sword of the enemy.”
If America back then was like it is today, Washington’s mandate would have been protested against and ignored by many troops — and today’s generation of Americans would be pledging allegiance to the Queen of England.
What a sad state of selfishness America is in today. Our Constitution, our nation, is failing because “We” has been replaced by “me”.
Seneca Versified
The nature of greed
Is “more than we need”
And Nature as feed
Is little indeed
Great post. A little heavy handed on the deification of the founders, but much of merit here. Thank you.
Democracy is about “We”
Competition (the free market) is about “Me”
“We” made our choice and “We” didn’t choose Democracy….”we” chose greed.
Good essay. I am not sure I completely agree that the founding fathers were acting selflessly. To some extent, you are right, but I also see the American Revolution as the beginning of a new struggle between the authoritarian and the idea of representation. Discussion of this dichotomy would continue until today.
Those who support some degree of representation are acting selflessly by definition, I suppose, but it is also a perceived self interest that those who support representation feel. They have internalized the value, so they feel personal freedom to be a value worth fighting for. If you internalize the value of authoritarianism, you will selflessly give up your life to defend it, as we witnessed in Nazi Germany.
You are right, however. Being willing to act selflessly in a time of relative peace seems very difficult.
Ok boomer
Flerp– quickwrit seems to be coming from “The Greatest” rather than the boomer generation.
Bada-bada-bing Dennis! Wonderful piece, I can see you now back at ODE razzing around lighting the place up with your energy and humor. The picture you paint of extreme inequality with Justice/Manchin sitting atop an exploited populace struggling upon a destroyed landscape is a stark reminder of what is at stake – Earth herself. Bless you ad happy holidays
In reading/hearing about & having known of joe manchin’s (doesn’t deserve title of senator or capital letters, for that matter) long history of “selfish” (i.e., having NEVER served his constituents), the name Manchin struck me as being on par with Manchurian, as in “Manchurian candidate.” Saw both excellent movies (the original, w/Frank Sinatra & Angela Lansbury the better), I had to look up the definition & wanted to post it for y’all:
“a person, especially a politician, being used as a puppet by an enemy power.” Also “commonly used to indicate disloyalty or corruption, whether intentional or unintentional.”
So, yes, we might call it (for I consider j.m. on a par with it45, considering this manchinurian an inhumane being) it j. manchinurian, NOT a public servant, owning a Maserati & a yacht & all sorts of wealth it continues to accumulate on the backs of the people of WVA, & now the whole of America.
Most certainly disloyal AND corrupt.
Intentionally.
Have to admit I wasn’t taught about the Blair Mountain uprising in long-ago [‘60’s] jr or srhi. I remember learning a mere rough outline of the coal-mining labor struggle, which was lumped into a general outline of the labor movement.
But.
I was really caught short hearing that in 2013 there was no Ohio curriculum on the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, nor had students heard of it. That was most definitely part of our curriculum. Perhaps because we were in NYS? (but way upstate) It electrified me. I would have been equally moved learning of Blair Mountain. Clearly, the stories of individual events are crucial to imprinting memory. A rough outline of a movement’s historical development doesn’t do it. I can relate it to my K12 ed in Jim Crow, which was spotty, and would have been left as segregated buses drinking fountains and lunch counters, plus a few lynchings, had I not read TKAM (on my own, at age 11). Had the Black Wall St, Rosewood, Ocoee and other massacres been included, I would have had a better understanding.
Ginny, about ten years ago, I reviewed the most widely used U.S. history textbooks to see what they said about unions and the labor movement. Some mentioned Samuel Gompers, but overall these subjects got short shrift or no mention at all.