Jennifer Berkshire writes in this post about the educational awakening in Arizona, the result of #red4ed and the teachers’ revolt of 2018.
Proposition 208 is on the ballot. It calls for a 3.5% tax increase on people earning over $250,000 a year, to be used to raise teachers’ salaries and hire more teachers. Surprisingly, 60% of voters appear to favor the measure, including a sizable number of Republicans.
She writes:
That taxing the rich to pay for schools would emerge as a cause with bipartisan support in 2020 is not a complete surprise. More Arizonans now identify education, not immigration, as the top priority facing the state, reflecting mounting concern with schools that are notoriously underfunded, teachers who are poorly paid, and a teacher shortage crisis so severe that 28 percent of the state’s classrooms lack a permanent teacher.
Education has become a potent political issue since #RedforEd protests shone a harsh light on the condition of Arizona’s schools in 2018. After a historic teacher strike, educators doubled down on electoral organizing. Democrats gained four seats in the state House of Representatives that year. Now they’re poised to tip the House and possibly the Senate in their favor. If they succeed, voter dissatisfaction with the GOP’s embrace of controversial policies aimed at dismantling, defunding, and privatizing education will be a major reason.
A similar pattern is playing out in other key battleground states, including Michigan and Texas. In these states and others, the gulf between voters who believe in taxpayer-funded public education and GOP candidates who are hostile to it has created an opening for Democrats.
For decades, Arizona has been a petri dish for free market education experiments. Charter schools, publicly funded private schools, education savings accounts that allow parents to spend taxpayer funds on a dizzying array of education “options” with little state oversight or accountability—the Grand Canyon State has them all...
As school choice offerings in the state have ballooned, they have increasingly competed for funding with traditional public schools. “It all comes out of the same funding bucket, and the bucket wasn’t that big to begin with,” said Sharon Kirsch, research director for the grassroots public education advocacy group Save Our Schools Arizona...
That hands-off, regulation-free vision is precisely what an array of deep-pocketed interest groups in Arizona are pushing. Organizations like the Americans for Prosperity, funded by Charles Koch and the American Federation for Children, founded by Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, are a major presence in the state. More recent arrivals to the school choice lobbying space include Yes Every Kid, which is another Koch project, and Love Your School, an offshoot of the right-wing Center for Arizona Policy.
Said Kirsch: “I’m not sure most people have any idea that these groups are essentially running education policy in Arizona...”
Berkshire points out that teachers are running for office, and their prospects look good. Arizona may be about to throw off the shackles of one-party rule that has crippled the state’s public schools and turned it into a free-market for privatizers, religious zealots, rightwing nuts, libertarians, and profiteers.
Many Californians are moving to Arizona and Texas. While some of these people are retirees, many of them are younger families that are looking for quality public schools. Close to 500,000 Californians moved to Arizona between 2010 and 2018. New companies are opening in Arizona as well. If they do not have enough local skilled workers, they will be looking to import them from other states. This past year it has been reported that more than 68,000 Californians moved to Arizona. I am sure that the many new residents accustomed to decent public services are contributing to demands to improve funding to schools.https://azbigmedia.com/business/economy/lots-of-californians-moving-to-arizona-but-its-not-a-one-way-street/
Dear Diane, All …
Maybe tangential but related …
In a Facebook conversation springing from the above post, a Canadian friend remarked, “Um … yeah … small note from those of us in other countries … you guys never really got the whole “democracy” thing right. The republic thing is bad enough but the unbound electors thing is really not how you do it.”
I responded, “When I went to school, way back in the last millennium, even in Texas, we got a year of Government (they called that Civics in other States) and a year of History every grade from the 6th through the 12th. And they were very clear about the definition of Republic as Representative Democracy. All that BS about Republic = What Any High-Priced Law Firm Can Pull Out Of Their Asses Under The Rules Of Hasbro Monopoly®™ is a much later doctrine promulgated by the wave of White Flight Academies and Home-Schooled Evangelisnts which came later.”
He then asked, “Is civics even taught in American schools anymore?”
I said, ldquo;Don’t actually know. The problem is the rise of charter schools and home schools outside the Public School System. When I got to college, the kids I met from all over the country, from both public and private schools, had gotten pretty much the same curricula in all subjects as I did. Most all States I ever heard of dictated appropriate curricula for (1) all prospective citizens, (2) the “We Who Are About To Be Gainfully Employed”, and (3) college-bound students. I will pose your question over on Diane Ravitch’s blog.”
So I thought it would be useful to get some input from present company …