Wornie Reed explains why Martin Luther King, Jr., is beloved today, despite the fact that he was reviled during his lifetime. He was a provocateur and a “rabble rouser” when he was alive, but over time the radicalism of his message was washed away (“whitewashed). Wornie Reed is Professor of Sociology and Africana Studies at Virginia Tech.
Professor Reed writes:
Two decades after his assassination, Martin Luther King, Jr., was highly regarded. His favorability rating was 76 percent among white Americans. By then, of course, we had the national holiday established in his name, quite a change from 1966, two years before his death, when his favorability rating among white Americans was only 28 percent. We should remember that while he lived and worked, the majority of white America reviled Martin Luther King.
Whites framed their malice toward King as something other than racism. They did not oppose MLK because he struggled for black freedom and equality. Rather they detested him—they said—because he was a rabble-rouser, a Communist, and a lawbreaker. J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI director, called him the most dangerous man in America, and there was rejoicing at his death.
Millions of white Americans hated Martin Luther King. All over the country, many celebrated his death.
Young whites, absorbing the hatred of their parents, also celebrated. Archives in the library at the University of Memphis tell the story of a Memphis-area high school class. The teacher asked his students to write about their responses to King’s assassination. Most of the students responded with satisfaction or jubilation. One student described his immediate reaction to King’s murder: “I thought it was one of the greatest feats of Americanism I have ever heard of.” Another explained that because of King’s death, the country would be “better off in the long run.”
Here at Virginia Tech, where I currently teach, some students were saddened by King’s assassination, while others were not. There was a demonstration against lowering the American flag “for a nigger.”
Now they love him. What happened? What caused the change of heart among whites? One thing, of course, was his death. Although there was a significant amount of celebration at his assassination, with him no longer around, there was less hatred toward him, but not enough for a positive favorability rating.
Undoubtedly the whitewashing of Martin Luther King did the trick. King, the rabble-rouser, who got arrested 30 times, has been scrubbed clean. Now he is depicted as a dreamer, something opposite of the activist he was. He is widely viewed as a person who mildly promoted peace – no activism, no strife, no confrontations, no defying unjust laws.
So what? You may ask. What difference does it make that now whites love MLK where previously they hated him. It matters a lot. They love the person they made him, in death—a peace-loving dreamer. If we follow this person, we do nothing. We hope for better relations. We dream of a better day, thinking that time will erase the oppression. That is what we did for decades. For some 40 years—from the mid-1970s to the mid-2010s–there was no national black movement. During this time, racial progress came to a grinding halt, possibly going backward.
It is way past time to bring back our deceased icon, the real Martin Luther King, the man who was leading the Poor People’s Campaign when he was struck down, the man who vowed to close down the Nation’s Capitol if the government did not heed our demand to eliminate poverty and hunger in this wealthy nation, the man who continued this effort in the face of death. If we bring back the memory of this MLK, we may be inspired to do what he asked us to do when he would no longer be with us, “Continue this movement. Do this work.”

WReed: “For some forty years — from the mid-1970s to the mid-2010s — there was no national black movement.” I guess Jesse Jackson and the Rainbow Coalition didn’t count?
LikeLike
Activism is not a nonprofit organization. Just as the Network for Public Education aids the fight to save public schools but doesn’t define it, the Rainbow Coalition was not a movement. An activist movement is only powerful, only exists, when large numbers of people confront injustice with acts of civil disobedience. Huge sacrifices are made and risks are taken. People walk miles instead of riding buses in Montgomery. Workers go on strike when bosses and superintendents and legislators are threatening to fire them all. People go to jail for disrupting social norms to protest unjust laws. A civil rights movement does not consist of a few political and business leaders supporting one another, although that can be a part of it. It’s much more. It’s a struggle. (And when we fight, we win.)
LikeLike
I guess I share a little bit with each of you. I think it was Crane Brinton in one of his studies of revolutions who posited that there was a period of consolidation and reflection after intense revolutionary activity called, again my memory may be blurry, thermidor. If that’s correct and I think it is, then I suspect “no national black movement” is too stark, especially when citing Jackson as an obvious omission. But that period also had a great deal of activism and contemplation—random examples include Roots (the miniseries and book), Public Enemy and the emergence of hiphop, which was very political in its infancy, histories of the Civil Rights movement like those of Taylor Branch, prominent black writers and journalists, and the resurgence of smaller communities ranging from the arts to community gardens to public education, etc. So it’s been a mixed bag. Has, for example, the ascension of John Lewis’s stature been counter-revolutionary?
While I can understand why someone would write “racial progress came to a grinding halt, possibly going backward”, I cannot agree with such a sweeping statement. And I take a backseat to no one about pessimistic about our current national and international tragedies.
LikeLike
https://www.yourtango.com/2017299164/20-martin-luther-king-jr-quotes-white-people-need-read?fbclid=IwAR1cAI5XPPIJel4cdfi9YJc4tcoR3aQY3DRQ28AzdZ-2g1Xr5erzLvMG7NA
LikeLike
It is interesting to posit the sanctification of King as the non-violent influence in the Civil Rights movement. There were several times when King saw the movement moving along without him, sometimes in a radical direction. Once he was quoted as saying “there go my people, I better catch up.” Every leader finds him or herself pushed along with the events, and King was certainly no different in this regard.
The thing that underscores his good historical reputation is his ability to teach the movement to push hard without striking out in hostility and wrath. There were many who were glad to see him go, but no one could point to people he harmed. The conflict he caused always tended to reflect on his own strength in non-violent protest. So he could write from a jail cell with authority.
Luckily, he died at a time when truth was admired and authority upheld. We will know those in this day by their attacks on King if they start.
LikeLike
This.
Enough of the pablum MLK. Today I went on Twitter and was dismayed, but not surprised to see so many RWNJs claiming dear departed Martin. They love him. Because he’d be a Trump man. Because he wasn’t a socialist. Because he wasn’t a racial divider.
I responded with videos of the him speaking about wealth distribution. About his support of affirmative action. Not sure if any will watch the videos and say goodbye to the MLK they invented. As always, I was horrified at how so many people can be so willfully ignorant.
I blame public education. #sarcasm
LikeLike
Were King alive today
Were King alive today
He’d criticize the greed
He’d criticize the pay
Of those without a need
He’d rail on buying sprees
For phones and other stuff
For “Latest, if you please.
Can never have enough”
He’d rail on billions spent
For bombs and guns and war
While kids are hungry sent
In morning out the door
Were King alive today
They’d tell a different tale
Instead of holiday
They’d throw him in a jail
LikeLike
Yes, Poet.
LikeLike
For proof , one need look no further than how Chelsea Manning has been treated by Trump and Obama alike.
In the true spirit of Dr. King , Chelsea revealed American war crimes in Iraq, but instead of being celebrated as the American hero that she is, she was jailed under Obama (who proclaimed Mannings “guilt” to the world even before she was tried in a military court, where she was subsequently ” convicted” — surprise! After all, What military court would/ could disagree with their boss, the Commander in chief? — And a Harvard Law school trained Constitutional expert, no less. it is a fact known only to a few elite scholars of the Constitution that “guilty until proven innocent” is in the Bill of Rights in very fine (microscopic) print.
To be sure, Obama eventually pardoned her , but only after the UN high commissioner declared her near year in solitary confinement to be tantamount to torture. And after a few months of freedom, Chelsea was again jailed under Trump for not saying what was demanded of her about wikileaks and Julian Assange.
So,There is little or no doubt that King would be sitting in jail (or worse) were he alive today.
LikeLike