Jack Hassard taught science and science teachers for many years.
He clings to the old-fashioned idea that “facts are facts.”
He is offended by the idea of “alternative facts” or the charges of “fake news” used to discredit anyone that Dear Leader disagrees with.
A fact is verifiable. An opinion is not.
He writes:
As science teachers, we think of facts as a repeatable observations or measurements. In short, they can be verified.
For instance, observations and measurements are dependent upon the observers and instruments used to make the measurements.
The Uncertainty Principle
There are limitations in our ability to observe.
There are limitations in our ability to observe. Werner Heisenberg worked out this idea in 1927. He proposed the Uncertainty Principle. The Uncertainty Principle meant that there was a limit to measuring very small particles in the quantum world. Moreover, Heisenberg said that there was always an uncertainty if one measures the momentum and the position of particles.
In the same vein, the classical world that we live in, there are still limitations to our ability to describe and measure. For example, if we say that the temperature outside is 35º C, the temperature can be verified. However, you could ask where was the temperature taken, in full sunlight or in the shade. What kind of instrument did you use.
In any of these cases, the statement can be considered a fact (and not an opinion). But, if you said that it’s very hot outside. That’s an opinion. Another person could say the temperature is fine with me. That’s another opinion.
Pay attention. Facts are facts. A dictator tries to control what is fact and what is opinion. Hold to truth.

AMEN to “A dictator tries to control what is fact and what is opinion.”
And this is why the FREE PRESS and TEACHERS are attacked … CONTROL the information by PUBLISHING LIES and MUZZLING teachers with the SCRIPT.
How fascist is Donald Trump? There’s actually a formula for that.
Grading the billionaire on the 11 attributes of fascism. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/10/21/how-fascist-is-donald-trump-theres-actually-a-formula-for-that/
LikeLike
That WP Op-Ed piece said, “Trump does — while shocking by the standards of American politics — fall far short of the genuinely murderous violence endorsed and unleashed by authentic fascists.”
I think this is because he doesn’t have the same total power as Hitler and other fascist dictators from history have had.
The U.S. Constitution with help from the courts, while being challenged almost daily by Trump and his want-to-be thugs, has managed to stop Trump from getting that power … so far.
I’m also convinced that if Trump had the same power as other fascist dictators like Hitler, he would work overtime to be more brutal than all of them.
LikeLike
Don’t compare Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler. It belittles Hitler.
One was a psychopath who believed his raving rants. The other is a con man
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/09/13/dont-compare-donald-trump-to-adolf-hitler-it-belittles-hitler/
How does Donald Trump stack up against American literature’s fictional dictators? Pretty well, actually.
Sinclair Lewis’s ‘It Can’t Happen Here’ and Philip Roth’s ‘The Plot Against America’ anticipate a Trump-like leader — and challenge how we would respond.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/book-party/wp/2016/06/09/how-does-donald-trump-stack-up-against-american-literatures-fictional-dictators-pretty-well-actually/
LikeLike
Ocasio-Cortez Knocks Buttigieg: He Has Adopted a ‘GOP Talking Point’ on Education
https://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/60015-ocasio-cortez-knocks-buttigieg-he-has-adopted-a-gop-talking-point-on-education
LikeLike
Buttigieg is basically a megaphone for billionaires.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He’s their waterboy.
LikeLike
sadly exact point: he would be a willing conduit for ALL current and past “reformer” invasions
LikeLike
I dunno why Heisenberg was brought in; it just clouds the idea: facts shouldn’t be treated as opinions and opinions shouldn’t be treated as facts.
LikeLike
I agree.
Bringing up Walter White just clouds the issue.
LikeLike
Or maybe turns it blue.
But opaque, nonetheless.
LikeLike
More damning is the presentation of opinions as if they were facts gleaned from hours studying security briefings instead of minutes glancing at stock holdings.
LikeLike