The founder of a Los Angeles charter chain pleaded guilty to a felony count of misappropriating funds intended for the students at the schools.
The founder of Los Angeles charter school network Celerity Educational Group has agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to misappropriate and embezzle public funds, federal prosecutors said Friday.
The felony charge stems from Vielka McFarlane’s years-long habit of using her charter schools’ credit card to pay for expensive clothing, luxury hotel stays and first-class flights for her and her family.
According to the plea agreement made public Friday, she admitted to misspending about $2.5 million in public funds — all of which had been intended for her students.
This tally included taxpayer money meant for McFarlane’s California charter schools that she used to buy and renovate an office building in Columbus, Ohio, where she opened another charter school. At about $2.3 million, the purchase represented the bulk of the misspent funds, prosecutors said.
McFarlane, 56, who served as Celerity Educational Group’s chief executive until 2015, faces a maximum possible sentence of five years in prison. She is scheduled to appear in court Jan. 7.
“When anyone repurposes public school funds for self-serving reasons, students suffer,” said First Assistant U.S. Atty. Tracy L. Wilkison. “This case involving the former CEO of Celerity demonstrates our ongoing efforts to protect and safeguard public funds, and to hold accountable those who improperly use those funds for their own gain.”
Prosecutors chose to take a softer approach to her network of charter schools.
According to a non-prosecution agreement reached in June 2017, the government will not file charges against Celerity Educational Group, which has renamed itself ISANA Academies. The nonprofit organization continues to operate six charter schools in L.A. and Compton and has agreed to cooperate with the federal investigation.
Attorneys representing McFarlane and Celerity Educational Group did not respond to requests for comment.
It was Los Angeles Unified School District employees who first stumbled across McFarlane’s misuse of taxpayer dollars. In 2012, the district’s charter division made a routine request for financial records from Celerity.
When the charter network’s credit card statements arrived that fall, many of the transactions had been blacked out. Concerned district staff grew even more alarmed when they received the full records, which showed that McFarlane had paid for lavish meals and out-of-state travel with the nonprofit’s credit card.
The school district’s inspector general opened an investigation and the federal government eventually stepped in. Nearly two years ago, federal agents raided Celerity’s offices and McFarlane’s home, confiscating computers and copying records.
In her plea agreement, McFarlane admitted that she used public funds meant for her L.A.-area charter schools to pay for personal expenses and to start the Ohio charter school. The document details how, beginning in 2009 — five years after she founded the first Celerity charter — she began to treat her organization’s credit card as if it was her own.
Among the items she paid for with public funds were $3,347 worth of goods from luxury brand Salvatore Ferragamo in Beverly Hills, $7,742 for plane tickets to Washington, D.C., for President Obama’s second inauguration, and $9,299 for two customized recumbent bicycles for her and her spouse. There were flights to Miami and Panama and stays at high-end hotels…
She created a web of for-profit companies that did business with her charter schools. She also founded another nonprofit group, Celerity Global Development, which was ostensibly providing office services. The charter schools gave Global between 10% and 12% of their revenue for bookkeeping, payroll and other tasks.
She often traveled with board members and their spouses, whose expenses were also charged to the taxpayers.
Remember the “reform” “miracle” of a few years ago, the parent trigger, mostly promoted by an operator called Parent Revolution? (This was supposed to be the magical miracle that allowed parents to take over a school and turn it over to a charter operator.) In the first-ever parent trigger attempt, Parent Revolution (based in L.A.), by its own promoters’ description, looked around California for a school (McKinley Elementary in Compton) to target, sent paid operatives in to trick parents into signing petitions “to improve our school,” and pre-selected a charter operator to take over the school. There were great torrents of gushing publicity. Celerity was the pre-selected charter operator, touted for its track record of great success. Long story short, it didn’t work; Celerity opened a school nearby to which a small number of McKinley families transferred students; and it all fell off the radar.
essential to know reality as it unfolds: “…sent paid operatives in to trick parents into signing petitions “to improve our school”…”
This was surreal. The Los Angeles Weekly, a paper viewed as “alternative” but with a big right/libertarian streak, embedded a reporter with the Parent Revolution operation in Compton. The reporter was an entertainment writer with zero knowledge of the education landscape, and he diligently wrote a long feature in detail from an advocacy (pro-Parent Revolution) POV, but he clearly had no idea that those details were absolutely damning to them. His coverage made it clear that the parents in the school had nothing to do with their “parent trigger” and that they were tricked by paid operatives into signing the petition. (Or, alternatively, maybe he was under orders to write an advocacy piece that was pro-Parent Revolution, and he was actually appalled by them and put in the damning details deliberately.) Anyway, that article was a GREAT source of information on how they operated. But we critics who were calling all that out at the time didn’t have enough information to know that Celerity was crooked!
Caroline,
Now that California is testing again after hiatus, what’s happened to Desert Trails, the only parent trigger takeover? What about the school where Ben Austin engineeredfiring the principal and the entire staff resigned?
Sadly, I’ve lost the thread of those stories (I’m in San Francisco and they’re 400-plus miles away in Southern Calif.) and the press of course instantly stopped covering them. I’ll ask some Southern California contacts, though.
A max of 5 years for stealing $2.5 million? A slap on the wrist is all that she gets? How about she has to sell ALL her assets, homes, jewelry etc to pay off the debt AND serve her 5 years.
LisaM you are a tad hard, although she deserves a bit more than five years. It is sad that the politicians do not act to set up regulations which would deter people from using government funds for themselves. They have had much time in which to make tighter rules and yet they stand still.
The Charter movement started out as a good idea but it has been taken over by for profit people who care little for education. And the children and parents suffer.
When millions of dollars are handed out without regulation andoversight, fraud and embezzlement are inevitable.
It’s worse than that.
From the L.A. TIMES piece:
“Prosecutors wrote that in 2013, Global spent thousands of dollars (of LAUSD / taxpayer money intended for the classroom) to lease and renovate a recording studio in Canoga Park. The charter schools rarely used the studio but McFarlane had her own plans for it, which included using it to launch her for-profit media-production business, The Muse Collective.”
WTF?
The kind of criminal mindset that could perpetrate such an abomination was enabled and encouraged by The California Charter Schools Association (CCSA) and other backers such as Reed Hastings, Eli Broad, etc.
In a similar case —- Los Angeles’ Ivy Academia charters — CCSA not never condemned or criticized in the least the husband-and-wife CEO’s/founders who engaged in the same larceny as Celerity’s CE0 did.
No, CCSA’s Jed Wallace had their backs, and lashed out at the prosecutors for even daring to prosecute these crooks, arguing that no prosecutorial entity had any legal right to prosecute, nor investigate, nor even question how a charter CEO handles public money.
In Jed’s deranged mind, the husband-and-wife charter crooks are the victims, not the taxpayers or the students who had this money robbed from them:
https://www.dailynews.com/2013/10/04/ivy-academia-founders-sentenced-in-fraud-case/
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
L.A. DAILY NEWS:
“The case attracted the attention of the California Charter Schools Association, which filed a brief in support of the couple Thursday.
“This unprecedented prosecution has sent shock waves throughout the charter school community and has stifled charter school operational freedoms. With no guidelines or set of rules on what is an ‘allowed’ or ‘disallowed’ expenditure, no recognition of the rules and regulations applicable to nonprofit corporations, and district attorneys and courts second guessing nonprofit corporate board’s spending decisions years after the fact, charter schools are now forced to forgo their operational flexibility and make only the basic expenditures (e.g., books, salaries etc.) out of fear of future prosecution,” the brief argued.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
What a bunch of baloney!
This prosecution was almost ten years ago.
Is it any wonder that Vielka McFarlane thought that Jed Wallace was giving her the green light to do the same? Aren’t LAUSD’S CCSA backed board members continuing to give corrupt charter operators the same green light to this day?
Here’s more about the Ivy Academia scandal and CCSA’s appalling defense of the crooks involved:
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/oct/04/local/la-me-ln-charter-founder-sentenced-20131004
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
L.A. TIMES:
“The California Charter Schools Assn. filed a brief with the court seeking a new trial, contending that ‘there was no crime here.’
” … ”
“Defense attorneys argued that charter schools — California has about 1,000 — should be treated as nonprofits, which have flexibility in spending money, provided they are furthering the mission of the organization.”
(eehhh, not so fast, CCSA … what do prosecutors say?)
” ‘The operators of charter schools cannot use public funds for their own personal use or else they will be prosecuted,’ said Los Angeles County Deputy Dist. Atty. Dana Aratani.”
She should have to pay double what she stole and get 10 years in prison.
There are people serving 5 years (and more) for victimless drug possession.
And what this woman did was not a victimless crime. She stole the education from school children, something that can not be returned to them.
But I’d be surprised if she has to serve more than a few months in jail (if that). The judge will feel sorry for her and slap her on the wrist.
“Attorneys representing McFarlane and Celerity Educational Group did not respond to requests for comment.”
I wouldn’t either if I were them.
“According to a non-prosecution agreement reached in June 2017, the government will not file charges against Celerity Educational Group, which has renamed itself ISANA Academies.”
Why the-frick not?
“The nonprofit organization continues to operate six charter schools in L.A. and Compton and has agreed to cooperate with the federal investigation.”
Why? Seriously, why aren’t all of Celerity charters permanently shut down?
I mean if you were … say … running a business, and you checked the security camera footage, and found a certain employee was stealing from the cash register, or cracking the safe and stealing money from there, would you say…
“Okay, we’re not happy with what we saw on the video. However, we’re not going to fire you, but you have to promise that you will never ever steal again, if you’re going to keep working here.” … ?
or….
Let’s say you had children, and you checked the nanny-cam you hid on the mantle, and you discovered that hour children’s nanny or baby-sitter was physically abusing (beating)
and/or molesting your children. In this case, would you say,
“Okay, we’re not happy with what we saw on the video. However, you have to promise that you will never ever again beat or molest my child f you’re going to keep taking care of my children.” … ?
Essentially, that’s what the pro-Charter school boards are doing.
The Celerity financial scandal was not the work of some lone individual, and now that’s she’s been removed and convicted, all’s right with Celerity. This was the malfeasance of multiple individuals working in concert with Vielka.
What message does this send to corrupt charter school operators who are, as we speak, engaging in similar larceny .. or are tempted to do so?
The timing on this, here in Los Angeles, couldn’t have been better. Time to stop the charter infestation in California.
Yes and no.
The timing of the release of this — on a Saturday, three days before Christmas, in the middle of a holiday — seems suspicious, or at least, inadvertently favors the charter crooks and charter industry in general.
Yes, that’s a well-known ploy of publicity professionals, and make no mistake, the charter movement has really high-powered publicity professionals carrying its message.
You always have to wonder about a news release on a Friday afternoon or in the middle of a holiday weekend. Way to bury a story.
It’s not a scientific study, but I would say an equal number of people, in the last couple days, have wished me Happy Holidays and wished me luck on strike. People are thinking about education right now (at least when they’re talking to me). The union just called for a charter cap. I call that auspicious timing. If the publication of the guilty plea was planned to minimize publicly, I would say it wasn’t a very good plan. Oh and, Happy Holidays.
That’s why I said “Yes and No.”
Overall, yeah, the timing’s great.
Specifically, owever, it would have been better timing had this hit the media last Saturday, or say, Monday January 7th, after the holiday break ends. Hitting me media today, as opposed to those dates, does favor the charter industry.
I understand. Maybe sentencing will coincide with the strike. I should put up Ref Rodriguez Wanted posters too, “Ref Rodriguez: Wanted! for criminal Beutner imposition”.
Did they ban her from working in the education industry or owning any part of it — for life?
Did they send her to prison?
Did the fine, if there was one, match the theft?
If not, nothing has changed. She will return and do it again. If she learned to cover her trail, she’ll be harder to catch next time. They say success in business comes from learning from your failures. Her failure was getting caught.
Sentencing is early January
Here’s some old Celerity stuff:
https://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-edu-celerity-response-20170321-story.html
This includes the newsletter sent to parents attacking the L.A. Times’ expose:
https://us15.campaign-archive.com/?u=099f212261c264994e1126e5b&id=94a012afb1
EXCERPT:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
CELERITY MANAGEMENT:
“There is however one point the newspaper did get right. The founder of the Celerity Schools(convicted embezzlement felon Vielka MdFarlance) does routinely say ‘Education is a business.’ That is how we look at it. We treat our parents and students like every school should – like valued customers who want the very best education possible. And that is what we provide!”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
As Ace Ventura says:
In the wake of what’s happened, it’s funny to read this March 2017 propaganda response from Campbell Brown’s L.A. School Report, attempting to defend Celerity:
http://laschoolreport.com/whats-behind-the-federal-raids-on-celerity/
1) There’s nothing to see here. Just keep movin’.
L.A. SCHOOL REPORT: “A Celerity spokesman, attorney Maurice M. Suh of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, insisted there is no wrongdoing involving Celerity and its affiliates. He stressed that Celerity has not been found guilty of any charges, and indeed a month after the raids, Celerity remains unclear on what the investigation entails.”
(NOT ANYMORE … as of December 2018)
2) In spite of the L.A. Times’ claims that Celerity refused dozens and dozens of times to provide answers to questions, Celerity claims they’ll cooperate and answer whatever is asked of them:
L.A. SCHOOL REPORT: ” ‘We remain cooperative with any of the questions we are getting or will get, but the warrants remain sealed by the court and that is difficult for us,’ Suh said.”
3) You jerks! You’re hurting our parents & kids, and the school staff by making all of them suspect Celerity’s leaders, and you’re keeping us from expanding into other states.
L.A. SCHOOL REPORT: “He also said the raids have caused a cloud of suspicion that is hurting the organization, its staff and teachers, as well as the families and students. Already, it has cost the charter group from expanding into Nevada, and it could result in schools in Louisiana from pulling away from Celerity, Suh said.”
4) You jerks! You’re keeping us from educating children, and you’re victimizing us with your investigation and evil FBI raid:
L.A. SCHOOL REPORT: “Celerity educators said they worry that the negative publicity is damaging the organization’s ability to educate children.”
” ‘There was a much better and more professional way to handle this(than an FBI raid),’ Suh said. ‘We are prepared to answer all the questions they ask, but coming in and taking our computers and everything like they did put us at a disadvantage and in an unfair light.’
“One family has already requested to transfer out of a Celerity school based on the raids, and at least half a dozen others are making inquiries about transferring, Suh said.”
5) And you’re putting on a real buzz kill for our upcoming fundraiser:
L.A. SCHOOL REPORT: “A letter that went out to parents soon after the raids noted that the administration doesn’t know much about the federal investigation and that the schools will operate as usual. But he added that the annual Celerity fundraiser planned for the end of March could be hurt by the negative publicity.”
6) This is all just a silly misunderstanding that will be cleared up soon:
“ ‘Celerity has a record that we are proud of and have produced outstanding students,’ Suh said. ‘We look forward to clearing up any misunderstanding and addressing any concerns in public as soon as possible.’ ”
The Federal prosecutors did a good job of clearing things up earlier this week.
Also, last June, the pro-Charter LAUSD Board Members Melvoin, Garcia, Gonez, and (since-resigned crook) Ref Rodriguez voted to remove the inspector general — the one person who was the main mover in uncovering and investigating Celerity, and the one person would uncover charter school scandals such as the one that embroils Celerity:
https://dianeravitch.net/2018/06/07/lausd-will-not-renew-contract-of-inspector-general-who-was-too-tough-on-charters/
NOTE: the silence from these same Board Members on this latest news about Celerity.
When they were running for office last year, current LAUSD and pro-charter Board Members Melvoin and Gonez (and presumably Garcia and Ref Rod would have if they ran) insisted that they were were anti-Devos, and anti-Trump, to play to their progressive base.
But can anybody deny the similarity between this move — removing the inspector general who holds charters accountable — and Devos gutting the departments that monitor …
1) for-profit college corruption
and
2) civil rights violations?
Just as Devos is, Melvoin, Garcia, and Gonez are dutifully following the marching orders of their corporate masters who poured millions and millions into their campaigns.
Melvoin, Gonez, and Garcia are sending a signal to the current charter operators:
“Steal all you want! We won’t be stoppin’ you. We’ll look the other way, and get your backs if you ever get caught!”
Melvoin, Gonez, and Garcia are simultaneously sending a message to corrupt charter operators outside of Los Angeles, yet to open charters in La-La Land:
“Hey, you wanna get rich stealing taxpayer money running corrupt charters? Since we got elected. L.A.s’ now the place for that. Come on over to L.A., open a charter, and get rich!”
Here’s something about Celerity leaders’ rebranding Celerity as “ISANA” ( not an acronym, “isana” means “sun” in Eastern Ugandan language):
http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/3895296
Here’s Celerity’s / ISANA’s release:
(this comes out coincidentally, just before its founder / CEO is about to be convicted of a felony, and sent to the slammer … of which no mention is made, of course …
… though it does say the rebranding’s goal is to “rejuvenate the organization’s overall perception with the public” …. hmmm … why the need for such *”rejuvenation”?)
http://www.releasewire.com/press-releases/celerity-announces-launch-of-new-brand-identity-1028620.htm
An easy start to writing regulations for charters-
Ban them…. if not that, the following
Can’t change their names without approval in the form of a state ballot referendum – can’t hire felons- can’t lie by calling themselves “public”- must refund taxpayers when money is not spent directly for student benefit- must be governed (board elections) by the community that funds the charter,… failing to comply results in jail time for the charter administrators.
Adding another layer of regulation-
Reformers like those receiving funds from the Gates Foundation must spend a percentage of their work week in a classroom. The amount of time required would be on a sliding scale in direct proportion to the dollars they receive from tech tyrants and unproductive Wall Street blow hards and discount retailing heirs.
I’m for banning charters, except that I’ve spoken so strongly against closing schools because of how disruptive that is to students and communities that I can’t call for closing them. A ban on new charters would work for me, but there should be a phase-out process on the charter operation of existing charters, so that each one brought under the democratic control of the community.
My primary rule is that school boards must have final say over whether a charter opens in their community — no appealing to the county board or state board, which has little to no stake in the community. And school boards’ reasons for rejecting a charter operator must not be limited. A school board should be able to reject a charter proposal for any reason whatsoever. I recognize that this opens school board members up to bribery and other corruption, but that’s already a wide-open possibility, and school boards still very often reject charter proposals (or would if they didn’t know they’d be overruled).
Ohio’s legislators know a lot about charter operators financing/bribing the state Republican Party and, the billion dollar charter fleecing of the state’s citizens.
the party of MONEY=LOGIC
I so agree with you…if the local school board does not want a charter, they should not have to have one forced on them. The impact on local funding can very hurtful.
If you want a deep dive into the insanity that was Celerity’s corruption and Celerity’s intentionally convoluted governance, go to the Comments section of this article:
https://dianeravitch.net/2017/06/17/california-two-scandal-ridden-charters-closed-then-reopen-with-new-names/
I wrote tons of stuff that is still there at the ABOVE link. I ain’t moving it all over here (though it’s all riveting stuff … I recommend reading it, when State Board Member says, in reference to Celerity CEO McFarlane,
“I smell a rat.”).
However, I moved over this one bit BELOW, including a video of a California Board of Education meeting relating to Celerity, and a partial transcript.
In it, LAUSD Charter Schools Dvision official Robert Perry details what happened when LAUSD asked for information from Celerity about Celerity’s governance, operations, structure, and how Celerity’s corporate entity was related to various other entities. According to Perry, Celerity officials’ provided a deliberately dishonest and misleading response to LAUSD Charter Schools’ Division’s request of information.
In response, Celerity officials provided a document that Perry claims deliberately and deceptively omitted numerous other different affiliated Celerity entities on a supposedly “transparent document”, only to discover, JUST THIS LAST WEEK (May 2017), the existence all these OTHER hidden Celerity entities that also do business with Celerity CEG/
Furthermore, Perry and LAUSD discovered, for the first time ever, that one of these entities affiliated with Celerity — Celerity Attenture — was and is a for-profit company with Vielka McFarlane listed as its CEO!!!
These affiliated entities include: Celerity Development, Celerity Attenture, Orion Schools, The Rohn Group, Student Learning Pathways, Celerity Contracting Services’ … all of them deliberately omitted by Celerity from the chart — what Celerity insisted was a totally transparent chart, supposedly — that Celerity provided back in November 2016.
Again, these are Celerity entities that, in premeditated move, Celerity CEG deceptively withheld from LAUSD on the supposedly “transparent chart” — Perry holds up that chart — that Celerity provided LAUSD back in November 2016.
According to the Secretary of State’s website, all of these entities list one — and only one — officer (CEO) :
Viellka McFarlane.
Perry then goes into a full-on Perry Mason-Clarence Darrow mode … again, riveting stuff:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
( 2:37:38 – 2:38:56 )
( 2:37:38 – 2:38:56 )
ROBERT PERRY:
“Our question for this (California State) Board (of Education) is…
— (frustrated, emotional)
” ‘When will we EVER get to THE TRUTH… *about the inter-connectivity (of all the Celerity entities)?!’
“We’ve had (failed) promise after (failed) promise after (failed) promise (from Celerity CEG).
“We’re NOT THERE. (i.e. gotten to the truth about Celerity).
“We talk about Celerity Global. We KNOW that $2.2 million, approximately, was transferred from (Celerity) CEG into (Celerity) Global. That (misappropriation of funds) can happen with the sole statutory (structure) that was talked about a few moments ago.
“Part of our job (in LAUSD’s Charter Schools Division) as overseers of the public trust is to:
” — monitor public funds;
” — watch where they go;
and
” — hold the entities accountable for them.
“If the State Board continues to approve (charter school) organizations (such as Celerity) with such complex and intricate structures, (then) in a de facto way, it’s making it a tacit approval of those (corrupt practices) and that makes us on the ground have an EVEN MORE difficult job to oversee.
“Because we believe that you can’t OVER-see what you CAN’T SEE, and I”ll turn the rest of my time over to Ms. Long, and Ms. Navarro-Reed (sp?).”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Ms. Long, Perry’s colleague from LAUSD then takes over and points out that all these separate Celerity entities that do business with Celerity CEG — Celerity Attenture, Celerity Development LLC, Celerity Contracting Services etc. — all of these organization have one — and only one — person listed as just one officer (CEO) on the Secretary of State’s website: Vielka McFarlane!!!
Ms. Navarro-Reed (sp?) chimes in with more details of Celerity’s corruption, talking about how, according to the by-laws, Celerity Global is the “sole, statutory member” of Celerity CEG, and exercises total control over Celerity CEG. Celerity CEG transferred the day-to-day management of Celerity schools to Celerity Global. Since Celerity Global is totally unaccountable to LAUSD, that totally removes the mandatory “local control” that must be exercised over any charter school, according to the 1992 California Charter Schools Act.
Later on in the meeting, an exasperated Perry interjects and says to the State BOE:
“We’ve been talking here FOR THREE HOURS trying to figure out the whole Celerity structure, and we’re STILL confused. Doesn’t THAT tell you something??!!”
Yeah, that they’re all crooks.
Charters are set up for fraud…you would have to be stupid not to commit fraud when running a charter school.