Archives for the month of: November, 2017

Stuart Egan, NBCT High School Teacher in North Carolina, writes here about the lessons learned from a TV series set in the 1980s called “Stranger Things.” Remember the 1980s? There were no charter schools, no voucher schools. Public were and still are the heart of their communities. But some communities have been ripped asunder by false notions of choice and competition, whose main goal seems to be to sow division and break community spirit.

“The fictional town of Hawkins, Indiana became the epicenter of a lot of “binge-watching” in the last month as the second season of the hit series Stranger Things was released in nine episodes.

“Following the trials and tribulations of these school-age kids and their families is rather surreal; the music, the fashion, and the hair styles are as authentically presented now as they were actually in the 1980’s, especially if you are a middle-aged public school teacher who listens to The Clash like he did growing up in a small rural town in Georgia where he rode his bike everywhere without a digital link to everything else in the world.

“He just had to be home by dinner.

“While the kids and adults in this fictional town battle forces from the “upside down” amidst a government cover-up during the Cold War, it is easy to get lost in the sci-fi aspects of this well-written show. And it is very well-written and produced. But there is one non-human entity that is foundational and serves as the cornerstone to those people in a small section of Indiana: Hawkins Middle School, Home of the Tiger Cubs…

“If there ever was a cornerstone for the characters in Hawkins, IN, then it is the public school. It serves as the greatest foundation of that community.

“The AV Room. Heathkit. School assemblies. The gymnasium. Science class. Mr. Clarke. Eleven channeling Will. Makeshift isolation tank. Portal to the Upside Down. The Snow Ball. Parents were students there. Ghostbusters suits.

“Those are tied to Hawkins Middle School.

“So is growing up, coming of age, hallway conversations, epiphanies, learning about others, following curiosities, finding answers to questions you learned to ask.

“Those are also tied to Hawkins Middle School.”

The question that we should all try to answer is how “conservatives” became devoted to the idea of destroying community institutions.conservatives used to serve on the school board and lead the PTA. When did it become conservative doctrine to oppose public schools?

This is a history of the fall and rise of public education in Philadelphia.

For years, the schools were the plaything of politicians, the business community, and civic leaders.

Failure after failure.

One disastrous experiment after another.

Many millions squandered on privatization.

Today, state control ends and a new chapter begins.

Big news!

Today state control of the schools officially ends.

A concerted effort by parents and citizens of Philadelphia ended the city’s long and disastrous trial of state control. Paul Vallas, the Edison Project, charters, a steady stream of efforts to privatize the schools and hand control over to someone else. Meanwhile, the public schools were stripped bare, to the bone.

The state-controlled School Reform Commission voted to disband itself after 16 years of running the public schools into the ground. The city now reverts to mayoral control, and the parent groups won’t rest until the city has an elected board.

Congratulations, Philadelphia!

Time to return democracy to the cradle of our democracy.

From the Alliance on November 2:

“Members of the Alliance for Philadelphia Public Schools celebrate the impending dissolution of the School Reform Commission. We thank Mayor Kenney and Council President Clarke for their leadership in bringing this state-imposed body to an end. State control of our schools has brought devastation to this city: precious funds have been diverted to non-public schools and over 30 neighborhood have seen their schools closed permanently.

“Since 2012, APPS members have attended every session of the SRC, including special meetings and Policy Committee meetings. We have spent those five years fighting and organizing against the reckless spending, lack of transparency and disregard for the public exhibited by the many iterations of the SRC. In 2014, APPS sued then-Chair Bill Green and the SRC in federal court for violating the public’s First Amendment rights when Green ordered the police to confiscate signs from members of the public—and won. The following year, we filed suit in Commonwealth Court to stop the SRC’s continual violations of the PA Sunshine Act. Our settlement resulted in significant changes in SRC policy, including posting the resolutions to be voted on two weeks before the meeting instead of only 72 hours, and allowing the public to speak on resolutions posted just before or during the meeting.

“We now have a unique opportunity to end the disenfranchisement of the people of Philadelphia. The stakeholders in our public school system—that is, every person who benefits from a thriving public school system—should have the same rights as those in every other district in the commonwealth to elect the officials who will be entrusted to represent them in matters of school governance.

“The dissolution of the SRC is not contingent on changing the City Charter. The Charter now provides for mayoral control, as it did before SRC. The Mayor can select an interim school board for a year, during which time the city should hold community forums, as it is presently doing for the Rebuild initiative, to hear from the people whose voices were shut out during the reign of the SRC about how best to create a truly representative body for the critical task of educating our children.

“Trading in one unelected, unaccountable board for another is not a progressive solution to the problems facing the district.”

If you read the previous post, you know that the Sackler family became fabulously wealthy by developing, manufacturing, and marketing a painkiller called OxyContin, an opioid. You also know that there is an opioid crisis in the nation that kills 50,000 people a year.

Sarah Darer Littman here explains how Jonathan Sackler has used his wealth to destroy and privatize public schools, replacing them with privately managed charter schools.

Littman, a journalist in Connecticut, write that Sackler:

“founded the charter school advocacy group ConnCan, progenitor of the nationwide group 50CAN, of which he is a director. He is on the Board of Directors of the Achievement First charter school network. Until recently, Sackler served on the board of the New Schools Venture Fund, which invests in charter schools and advocates for their expansion. He was also on the board of the pro-charter advocacy group Students for Education Reform.

“Through his personal charity, the Bouncer Foundation, Sackler donates to the abovementioned organizations, and an ecosystem of other charter school promoting entities, such as Families for Excellent Schools ($1,083,333 in 2014, $300,000 in 2015 according to the Foundation’s Form 990s) Northeast Charter School Network ($150,000 per year in 2013, 2014 and 2015) and $275,000 to Education Reform Now (2015) and $200,000 (2015) to the Partnership for Educational Justice, the group founded by Campbell Brown which uses “impact litigation” to go after teacher tenure laws. Earlier this year, the Partnership for Educational Justice joined 50CAN, which Sackler also funds ($300,000 in 2014 and 2015), giving him a leadership role in the controversial—and so far failing cause—of weakening worker protections for teachers via the courts.

“Just as Arthur Sackler founded the weekly Medical Tribune, to promote Purdue products to the medical professional who would prescribe them, Jon Sackler helps to fund the74million.org, the “nonpartisan” education news website founded by Campbell Brown. The site, which received startup funding from Betsy DeVos, decries the fact that “the education debate is dominated by misinformation and political spin,” yet is uniformly upbeat about charter schools while remarkably devoid of anything positive to say about district schools or teachers unions.”

Purdue Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of OxyContin, was masterful at marketing OxyContin. According to a critical GAO REPORT, IT handed out “lavish swag” for health care professionals.

The charter movement has adopted some of the same techniques.

“The description of “lavish swag” will sound familiar to anyone who has witnessed one of the no-expenses-spared charter school rallies that are a specialty of Sackler-funded organizations like Families for Excellent schools. Then there is the dizzying array of astroturf front groups all created for the purpose of demanding more charter schools. Just in Connecticut, we’ve had the Coalition for Every Child, A Better Connecticut, Fight for Fairness CT, Excel Bridgeport, and the Real Reform Now Network. All of these groups ostensibly claim to be fighting for better public schools for all children. In reality, they have been lobbying to promote charter schools, often running afoul of ethics laws in the process.

“Take Families for Excellent Schools, a “grassroots” group that claims to be about parent engagement, yet was founded by major Wall Street players. In Connecticut, the group failed to register its Coalition for Every Child as a lobbying entity and report a multimillion-dollar ad buy expenditure and the costs of a rally in New Haven.

“In Massachusetts, Families for Excellent Schools-Advocacy (FESA) recently had to cough up more than $425,000 to the Massachusetts general fund as part of a legal settlement with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance, the largest civil forfeiture in the agency’s 44-year history. Massachusetts officials concluded that FESA violated the campaign finance law by receiving contributions from individuals and then contributing those funds to the Great Schools Massachusetts Ballot Question Committee, which sought to lift the cap on the number of charter schools in the state, in a manner intended to disguise the true source of the money. As part of the settlement, the group was ordered to reveal the names of its secret donors. Jonathan Sackler was one of them.”

Why does Jonathan Sackler hate public schools?

You might enjoy reading this very informative article in Esquire magazine about the Sackler family.

This is one of the richest families in America, and their name is attached to museums and universities, to perpetuate their philanthropy and greatness.

Their fortune is built on the success of Oxycontin, the painkiller to which many people have become addicted.

Fifty thousand people die per year because of their addiction to Oxycontin.

The Sacklers are also very generous contributors to charter schools.

They funded ConnCAN, and they funded 50CAN. Both organizations demand more privatization of public schools for the benefit of charter operators.

A member of the Sackler family made a movie called “The Lottery,” celebrating the Success Academy charter schools. A great big advertisement.

One of the Sacklers also invested in AltSchool, the faltering attempt to reimagine school as a high-tech environment.

Someday, as the deaths are added up, family members of the deceased may start picketing the museums and universities to take the Sackler name off buildings.

Jeff Bryant

If you live anywhere near Rochester, New York, you will have the opportunity to see the amazing anti-privatization film, “Backpack Full of Cash.” Don’t miss it!

Screen Shot 2017-11-02 at 9.19.54 PM

Bill Gates plunked down $80 Million to buy 25,000 acres in Arizona to build a model city.

It will incorporate his ideas about how the world ought to be.

It is less than an hour from Phoenix.

He will call it Belmont.

470 acres will be set aside for public schools. I wonder which charters will be invited to run those “public schools.”

The big unanswered question: Will he live there?

Or is this just another opportunity to try out a bold idea that he had on the treadmill one morning?

New Republican Governor Eric Greitens has gained control of the state board of education, and he is pressuring them to fire the state commissioner, Margy Vandeven, who has some centrist nonpolitical ideas about helping improve the public schools.

One of the new board members is balking at the pressure from the governor. He doesn’t think he knows enough to fire the state commissioner.

The governor wants to bring in a chum who is committed to opening charter schools.

The state constitution says the board is supposed to be independent and nonpolitical.

The governor is politicizing the board so he can push the DeVos agenda. Apparently he wants to bring in a friend named Kenneth Zeff, who is allegedly a charter school expert. The two of them worked together as White House Fellows during the second Bush administration. Jeff has his BA in economics from the University of Michigan and an MBA in business from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a Broadie who worked in the Fulton County (Atlanta) schools and before that for the Green Dot Charter chain in Los Angeles.

The Missouri Association of School Administrators is unhappy about the governor’s effort to take control of the state board.


Melissa Randol, executive director of the Missouri School Boards’ Association, said the governor’s moves are “troubling.”

She said Zeff’s apparent support for charter school expansion “could have a negative impact on all public schools, but especially in rural areas where charter expansion would encourage school district consolidation.”

“We must preserve the integrity of our state constitution to ensure the commissioner does not become a political appointee of the governor,” Randol said.

Vandeven, who earns $191,544 annually, took the helm as commissioner in January 2015, replacing Chris Nicastro. Her goals then included expanding access to early childhood education, improving teacher quality and increasing accountability for teaching colleges.

In recent months, Vandeven, the state education department and state board have also taken a hard hand in demanding charter school quality by heightening pressure on charter school sponsors.

Just today: a challenge to the governor on his removal of state board members:

http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/the-buzz/article184779833.html

Mercedes Schneider reports that Betsy DeVos is giving $13 million to New Orleans to fix the problem of high teacher attrition and to increase diversity.

Schneider points out that the grant is ironic since pre-Katrina had a teaching staff that was 72% black, with deep roots in the community and they were all fired en masse.

Now, with the young inexperienced TFA staying for s couple of years, then leaving, NOLA has a teacher retention problem.

USDOE Pays Shallow Ed Reform Orgs to Address NOLA Teacher Retention Issues