Jennifer Berkshire (aka EduShyster) is a funny, affable, charming person who often visits reformer gatherings, to learn more, get to understand the reformer ideas, and engage reformers face to face. Not in a hostile way, but as an interested observer who listens and learns.
In this remarkable post, she explains what Betsy DeVos wants. She first encountered Betsy DeVos at a Republican candidates’ parley in the summer of 2015. The candidates spoke, each outlining their bipartisan views on school choice, and DeVos spoke, and Berkshire wondered:
“Could the education reform coalition’s major selling point, its bipartisan-ness, really stretch to incorporate the extreme right-wing views of DeVos?”
Some reformers are less than thrilled with DeVos, says Berkshire, especially because of her personal role in torpedoing efforts to bring some order and accountability to the charters in Detroit. Other reformers did not appreciate the “outsized role she has played in shaping Detroit as an, um, education laboratory in which an out-of-control lab fire now burns.” Detroit is hardly an advertisement for educational reform via school choice.
For a brief moment in time, there was a genuinely broad-based coalition that wanted to save Detroit. It formed in 2014, and it seemed to be heading towards a hopeful conclusion. But the effort collapsed in the summer of 2016:
The feel-good story screeched to a halt last summer thanks to a wall of GOP opposition. Except that *wall* and *opposition* make it sound as though there were a whole bunch of people involved in the kneecapping that went down. There was a single family: Betsy and Dick DeVos. The bill that ultimately passed, with the DeVos’ blessing and with the aid of the lawmakers they bankroll, did virtually nothing to regulate Detroit’s *wild west* charter school sector, and will likely hasten the demise of the Detroit Public Schools. While Michigan’s burgeoning charter lobby was well represented in the final negotiations, elected representatives from Detroit were missing; in a clear violation of House rules, they weren’t even allowed to speak on the bill. And in a final twist of the shiv, the legislation that emerged lets uncertified teachers teach in Detroit, something not allowed anywhere else in Michigan. Oh, and don’t forget the new punishments for teachers who engage in *sick outs* to call attention to the appalling conditions in the city’s schools.
There is a queasy, racialized undertone to much of the education reform debate, with its constant implication that students of color fare best in schools over which their communities have little say. In Michigan, though, that argument has been taken by reform advocates, Betsy DeVos chief among them, to its extreme conclusion. The official message of DeVos’ organization, the Great Lakes Education Project, during last summer’s legislative battle was that dissolving the Detroit Public Schools would *protect kids and empower parents,* a cause that came with its own hashtag: #EndDPS. But what GLEP really meant was hard to miss. Detroit is a tax-hoovering abyss whose residents are too corrupt and incompetent to oversee their own schools.
After the GOP took control of Michigan in 2010, the charter cap was lifted, then eliminated. The state, once home to the nation’s industrial unions, became a right-to-work state. The legislature passed a law allowing “emergency managers” to take control of financially stressed districts, with unlimited powers. Voters passed a refendum eliminating the emergency managers, but the legislature revived it in a budget bill.
Guess whose districts and and schools were taken over by emergency managers and turned over to charter operators?
You’ve heard about Detroit, and Flint, with its poisoned water, but there are other less well known cases—like Benton Harbor, Muskegon, and Highland Park, which at last count was down to a single public school. Within a few years of Public Act IV’s enactment, half of Michigan’s Black population was living under some form of emergency management. *The municipalities and school districts that have been taken over are predominantly African American and poor,* David Arsen, an economist at Michigan State University, told me when I interviewed him last summer. *The optics are not good, especially in the context of the long civil rights struggle for voting rights.*
Berkshire realized that the real danger of the Trump era is that he is “moldable clay,” amenable to the plans of others.
The terrifying thing about the dawning of the Trumpian era isn’t just the specific awfulness of the President-elect’s policies. It’s that Trump is what the long gamers think of as *moldable clay,* receptive to whatever plots and plans they’ve spent years dreaming and scheming up. In Michigan, the long game has long been about making over the state’s schools: breaking up the government monopoly over education and getting rid of that pesky prohibition that keeps public monies from following kids to private schools, especially private schools of the religious variety. When Detroit-based writer Allie Gross set out this summer to document the long history of the efforts of the DeVos family and its allies to remake Detroit’s schools, she dug up an archival piece that a reporter at her paper, the Metro Times, wrote in 1995. Gross’ predecessor described a *relentless attack* on Michigan’s public education system, and a *Trojan horse* meant to blur the distinction between public and private schools en route to realizing the real goal: public funding for parochial schools.
Betsy DeVos is playing the long game, and she knows what she wants. What others want is irrelevant.
seems to be the wrong link, though that article is of interest as well
I REPLACED THE LINK!
Thanks!
It is very good. In addition- for a Michigan perspective on DeVos go here:
http://www.eclectablog.com/
Can we get some kind of letter-writing campaign going to force Donald Trump and Betsy DeVos to address what they plan for public schools?
There is piece after piece on the planned vast expansion of charters and private school vouchers but not ONE WORD on public schools.
Is anyone ever going to ask them about the public schools that 90% of kids attend?
I’d like a head’s up before DeVos parachutes in and leases our building to a Rocketship franchise.
Are public schools not of interest to our elected representatives? Unfashionable? Does anyone in DC care what happens to the schools that 90% of kids now attend under Trump
Chiara,
The Network for Public Education has generated over 100,000 emails to senators, who will vote on DeVos’ confirmation.
Each email was sent to two senators. That is 200,000 contacts.
Please join our campaign. If enough of us speak out, maybe the Senate will hear us.
Thanks.
Is anyone talking about how huge 20 billion dollars diverted from public schools to private schools is?
All of RttT was 4.3 billion. Trump/DeVos are talking about diverting more than 4X all of RttT from public schools.
That’s a huge payday for private schools, taken directly FROM public schools. 38 states and Congress have already cut public school budgets since 2008. Ed reformers are planning more giant cuts to our schools?
What they intend for public education is death and destruction if Detroit is an example of their handiwork. The link you posted from the Economic Policy Institute is significant. We cannot keep robbing from Peter to pay Paul. Eventually, everyone is destitute. Uncontrolled charter expansion is dangerous, and it will borrow from the future of our young people; it is a reckless policy.
When communities fund local public schools, they have control over how much debt they carry. When charters enter a community, they spend and borrow taxpayers’ money without local control in many cases. What was a closed responsible system becomes a reckless, unmanaged open ended system. It’s like a family that buys a car, and they know they can handle the loan. If they have a lot of children that all want cars, and the parent then holds the loans for multiple cars, they will reach a point when the parents can no longer handle the debt. This is what is happening in many cities and why Moody’s is downgrading them. This is the impact expanding charters have on a community. Charter debt has the potential to become our next big financial crisis unless policymakers start to manage the financial burden of charters, and stop the waste and fraud.
retired teacher: with no disrespect to the many folks that have posted illuminating observations on this blog since it’s inception but—
This is one of the most incisive comments (and so succinctly stated!) that I have read.
I cannot thank you enough for this contribution.
Krazy props.
😎
Chiara, and all here:
Not only a letter writing campaign but also calling the offices of your two senators and letting them know in person your displeasure with the nominee. It’s my understanding that the senators give more credence to the number of phone calls and written letters than to an email campaign.
It takes about two minutes per senator. If one doesn’t have five minutes to call, well. . . I won’t tell you what I think of you as it is very inappropriate here.
Follow the directions as given on the link and then follow the prompts from the Senate office:
http://civilrights.org/action_center/resources/calling-congress.html
“We’re losing ground — a troubling prospect when, in today’s knowledge-based economy, the best jobs can go anywhere in the world. Students in Massachusetts, Maryland and Minnesota aren’t just vying for great jobs along with their neighbors or across state lines, they must be competitive with peers in Finland, Germany and Japan,” Education Secretary John King will say Tuesday at an event in Boston, according to prepared remarks.
Get ready for more attacks on public schools.
The scores come out, ed reformers than use the falling scores to double down on the same stale slogans they’ve been selling for 20 years.
Weren’t we told these people were about “improving” public schools? Isn’t that what they were hired to do? When do they try something other than scolding and punishing public schools and promoting charters and vouchers. It’s been 2 decades now.
Money to be made- the incentive for the rephormers to keep failing the taxpayer, the nation, and the kids.
Diane has probably mentioned it before but, Nevada’s President of the State Board of Education is the former wife of gambling magnate, Steve Wynn. Now, that’s a stellar credential. She’s quoted in Town and Country (Dec. 2016), “I’ve come to believe (she’s 74) that the richness of our lives depends on extending ourselves, pushing into new dimensions.” In other words, she’s another bored housewife, who is no longer the baggage of a powerful man. She buys herself amusement, via the kids in public schools. And, as she says, “I get to indulge in the marshmallow.”
If the public took up a pot to pay Trump to let us keep our schools, how much money would we need to raise?
So what do we do to stand up for public schools, besides write letters?
Protests, demonstrations, solidarity with others in your region who don’t want their public schools replaced by vouchers and charters.
Speaking of NPE’s letters to senators, here’s the response I received from Lamar Alexander:
Thanks very much for getting in touch with me and letting me know what’s on your mind regarding President-elect Trump’s selection of Betsy DeVos to become the next Secretary of Education.
Betsy DeVos is an excellent choice. The Senate’s education committee will move swiftly in January to consider her nomination. Betsy has worked for years to improve educational opportunities for all children. As Secretary, she will be able to implement the Every Student Succeeds Act, the new law fixing No Child Left Behind, just as Congress wrote it, reversing the trend to a national school board and restoring to states, governors, school boards, teachers, and parents greater responsibility for improving education in their local communities. Under the new law, the federal government may not mandate or incentivize states to adopt any particular standards, including Common Core.
I also look forward to working with her on the upcoming reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, giving us an opportunity to clear out the jungle of red tape that makes it more difficult for students to obtain financial aid and for administrators to manage America’s 6,000 colleges and universities.
Improving our schools has been one of my top priorities in public service, both as a U.S. Senator and during my earlier service as governor, president of the University of Tennessee, and U.S. Secretary of Education. Better schools mean better jobs, which is why I have worked to support states and school districts in improving education so that our students have the tools they need for success.
We are unleashing a new era of innovation and excellence in student achievement—one that recognizes that the path to higher standards, better teaching and real accountability is classroom by classroom, community by community, and state by state—and not through Washington, D.C. I appreciate your taking the time to let me know where you stand. I’ll be sure to keep your comments in mind as this issue is discussed and debated in Washington and in Tennessee.
Sincerely,
Lamar
Susan, he never saw your letter.
I doubt that Betsy knows much about higher education, since her passion has focused on privatizing K-12
Oh, I don’t think he read my letter either. His unequivocal praise for DeVos, though, is far more troubling.
The long game has been the conservative strategy for years…
https://www.wired.com/1993/04/hyperlearning/
Oh… and the term “government schools” was coined by Ms. DeVos husband in the early 2000s… it’s certainly achieved it’s intended purpose…
Yes, that has been the strategy. For those of tracking the machinations of the religious xtian fundamentalist evangelical far-right over the last four decades we are seeing the fruition of a long term strategy to make this country into a christo-fascist state. Privatizing public education is just one of their tactics.