Peter Greene read the annual UCLA survey of college freshmen and discovered a depressing fact: the proportion of students planning to major in education has dropped precipitously.
“The percentage of probable education majors stands at 4.2%, the lowest percentage ever since the question was first asked in 1971. And that 4.1% comes at the end of a fifteen-year decline– at the turn of the century, the figure hovered around 11%.” [Just a guess, but I expect that the difference between 4.1 and 4.2 is a typo.]
Now it is possible that future teachers are getting their major in a subject they plan to teach and will go to graduate school for teacher education. But it is also true that future elementary teachers often major in education since they expect to teach many subjects.
But the shrinking enrollments have been reported in both undergraduate and graduate education programs.
Greene writes:
“Many local districts and many states have done their utmost to make teaching as unattractive as it could possibly be. No respect, no autonomy, low pay, no job security, poor work conditions, no control over your professional fate, and treated as if you’re a child. What could be more appealing?
“I keep waiting for Free Market Acolytes to read the writing on the wall. After all, the invisible hand is very clear on this– when people don’t want to buy what you’re selling, when people do want to take your job under the conditions you’ve set, that is a clear sign that you have undervalued the merchandise.
“It has always been an oddity of teacher-related education policy– there is always the presumption that teachers must be teachers, that they cannot choose to be anything else. This is not true. People may choose to be teachers. Or they may choose not to be. Right now, a whole lot of college freshmen choose not to be.
“If you want to buy a Lexus for $7.95 and nobody will sell one to you for that price, that is not a sign of a automobile shortage. If you want to hire a surgeon to cut your grass for $1.50 an hour and nobody will apply for the job, that is not a surgeon shortage. If you want people to become teachers under the current job conditions (and that is a large-ish if because it’s possible that some folks think it would be easier to run education if teachers would all just go away), and fewer and fewer people are biting, that is not the sign of a teacher shortage– it’s a sign that you need to make your job more attractive. This seems obvious to me. We’ll see if anybody in power can figure it out.”
Heckuva job, Arne Duncan! Bill Gates! Eric Hanushek! Raj Chetty! Michelle Rhee! Campbell Brown! Democrats for Education Reform! StudentsFirst! Students Matter! And the rest of the corporate reformers!

“No respect, no autonomy, low pay, no job security, poor work conditions, no control over your professional fate, and treated as if you’re a child.” Yup, that’s my life in a nutshell.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
Based on personal observations and reading, the current trend is to whip the jockey(teachers) and expect the horses(students) to run(perform) better.
https://davidrtayloreducation.wordpress.com/2014/10/29/education-a-three-legged-stool/
LikeLike
drext727:
TAGO!
😎
LikeLiked by 1 person
TA….thank you
LikeLike
The Free Marketers will simply import H1bs or lower the quality of instruction for all but the wealthy.
LikeLike
and their profit margin will be high.
LikeLike
The Free Marketers love free markets, which are neither free nor really markets, until they have to experience personally the effects of the “invisible hand”. When Tesla wanted to use an online, factory-direct sales model in our state, the establishment car dealers suddenly had a change of heart, decided free markets aren’t such a great idea, and lobbied lawmakers for protections. This is a common theme in free market circles. Either that or they are career politicians like Kasich and Ryan telling the rest of us to “just deal with it”.
But I did get some guilty satisfaction watching PM Cameron squirm in Parliament trying to defend his involvement in the Panama Papers scandal.
LikeLike
At this point they can skip the H1B step and give students Bridge International tablets and HS grad facilitators.
LikeLike
“Gulen Rulin’ ”
A Gulen on every block
A Turk in every class
Should come as little shock
When this has come to pass
LikeLike
“Gulen Ruin” also works
LikeLike
Don’t you love it when a plan comes together?
LikeLike
So sad… but not unexpected…
LikeLike
The first college of education dean to become a Pahara Aspen Institute Fellow, is USC’s Karen Symms Gallagher. (David Koch is on the Board of the Aspen Institute.) The founder of Pahara, Kim Smith, lists in her bio: co-founder of Bellwether and New Schools Venture Fund, Rocketship Board member and, founding team member of TFA.
Dr. Gallagher has picked up a public paycheck as Director of Ohio’s Commission of Education Improvement, as a professor at the University of Kansas and, now, as Dean at USC-Rossiter.
Smith, in an interview, said, “Education is a huge market with great potential for return…”
Why are taxpayers paying Gallagher’s s salary? Those who train with those who seek to privatize the common goods should, ethically, join the private sector.
LikeLike
“We’ll see if anybody in power can figure it out.”
CAN?
“Culture is the expression of consciousness” Franz Fanon
LikeLike
My former student teacher told me that enrollment is down 50% in her education program in NYS. Why am I not surprised?
I think the reformers actually believe that pirate joke, “The floggings will continue until morale improves!” It doesn’t work that way in real life!
LikeLike
This is The HUNGER GAMES at work. Can you name the characters?
LikeLike
It is all part of the plan. No teachers guarantees states will need to turn to Competency Based Education and other computer based instruction models that sell a lot of educational software and computers. Quality education? Not so much.
LikeLike
Teacher shortage? TFA to the rescue!
LikeLike
I am trying to convince my son, who has high functioning autism with mid-range social anxiety, not to go into teaching. That is what he is taking at ASU. He loves history and knows a lot about history, especially Arizona history. I’m not sure he can handle the workload or the discipline. He tends to overreact if things don’t go his way. I have told him a million times, that he can’t overreact to a student, or he will be fired. My son-in-law has two Masters. One in public history and one in education. He worked a year at a charter school and didn’t like it. My daughter and he had a new baby, and they were constantly adding more work on–like fundraisers he was required to attend. Now he has been working in a local public school district. The first half of the year, they had him doing history, math, and science in a middle school. They hired a certified teacher, but they found him another job in another school as the gifted teacher. He has been making less than $100 per day. ASU neglected to tell him that he had to teach two years at a charter school for his student teaching. His diploma says “with certification”. This doesn’t make sense when TFA only requires their future teachers to take a 5 week course. He has already taught one year in a charter and now this year in a public school. He wasn’t a sub in the public school that was constantly changing classes. By the way, some of his middle school students cried when he left in December. I student taught for one semester. I think the person from ASU came 3 or 4 times to watch me teach. He has already had principals watch him teach. This is the state of AZ. My other topic of concern is Prop. 123. I am torn between voting for it for teachers to get more pay (maybe) and not voting for it because I think Ducey (governor) is trying to do away with the trust fund, so he can get rid of public education. Comments, ideas, please.
LikeLike
P.S. Someone just sent this to me. Our wonderful state of AZ–not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOTTkPCprjA&feature=youtu.be
LikeLike
Well, apparently there are still some people in AZ who not only are not wacko but have a sense of humor as well.
LikeLike
The next video is also fun https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqa9UYWke9E
LikeLike
This is exactly what the autocratic, dictatorial, for-profit worshiping corporate public education reformers want — to get rid of costly and/or difficult to manage humans as professional teachers and replace them with personalized learning machines with computer programs that respond to correct and incorrect answers on endless tests between computerized lessons in vast factory classrooms filled with hundreds of students in front of computer monitors following directions written by someone who never taught.
In addition, the children will be required to wear helmets that scan their brain activity in real time and punish students with incorrect thinking patterns during hours of monotonous computerized personalized learning without human interaction of any kind.
LikeLike
That is close to what I imagine Mark Zuckerberg and Dr. Priscilla Chan’s private school for the needy will be like. Mark will be able to test new education software on the kids before selling it to privatized public schools. Priscila will be able to conduct psychological assessments on the families and test out new psychiatric medications on the kids in order to control their behavior.
LikeLike
Have you seen the piece in The Economist about Zuckerberg’s (or was that Suckerberg) Imperial ambitions?
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21696521-mark-zuckerberg-prepares-fight-dominance-next-era-computing-imperial-ambitions
LikeLike
“Mission Accomplished!”
Mission Accomplished!
Send in computers
Teachers are vanquished
Bots are our suitors
Contracts were written
For soft-ware and hard-
Teachers were smitten
By Gates and his guard
LikeLike
“Heckuva job, Arne Duncan! Bill Gates! Eric Hanushek! Raj Chetty! Michelle Rhee! Campbell Brown! Democrats for Education Reform! StudentsFirst! Students Matter! And the rest of the corporate reformers!”
Forgot to praise
“The Maestro”
Chetty picked his VAMdolin
At Nobel-chasing speed
Duncan played the basket rim
And Rhee, she played the rheed
Coleman played his Core-o-net
Moskowitz,the lyre
Billy Gates played tête-à-tête
With Duncan and with higher
Sanders beat his cattle drum
Devalue Added Model
Pseudo-science weighted sum
Mathturbated twaddle
John King played his slide VAMbone
But Maestro was Obama
Who hired the band and set the tone
For corporatic drama
LikeLike
You’re a national treasure.
LikeLike
Poet: “For corporatic drama”
🙂 🙂 This is music to my ears.
My musical dictionary defines “corporatic” or “corporatical” music as the best organized, most efficient music ever produced by top level humans.
LikeLike
Bravo, on your poem!
LikeLike
SomeDAM Poet: words fail me—
So I turn to a very dead and very old and very Greek guy:
“All men owe honor to the poets – honor and awe; for they are dearest to the Muse who puts upon their lips the ways of life.” [Homer]
On this blog, you wear the laurel wreath of the ancient Greeks.
😎
LikeLike
One of your best.
LikeLike
But this was the plan all along of the Friedmanists, worshippers of the economy.
The following email was accidentally posted on Chalkbeat last night, and it was taken down immediately, but I saved it.
Dear Bill,
As you are painfully aware, our economy badly needs a trillionaire. What, you may not know is that everything is going so smoothly and according to plan that we have every reason to believe that the American people will have the honor to crown not one but three trillionaires in 2025. Guess who we had in mind for these three spots. 🙂
In this short email, we just want to outline for you the most recent version of the fundamental basis of the “drive to 2025” trillionaire plan: the establishment of modern, democratic, publicly funded indoctrination centers in place of the outdated, undisciplined and inefficient public school system.
As customary in our market circles, our innovative focus has been the establishment of the language that describes and praises the product.
Here is the revised version of the outline as we submitted it to ALEC.
By 2020, all public schools must be called Individualized Learning Centers. The children attending an ILC will be called scholar subjects though scholar subjects will be permitted to informally call each other subjects. Parents of scholar subjects will be called patrons or donors. Once a scholar subject graduated, members of the public, including their patrons, will refer to them as scholar products.
Teachers will be replaced by so called Learning Achievement Guards. LAGs will undergo an intense training during two weekends, which consists of 4×4 hours of innovative, hands on instruction in disciplinary theory, moves and tools.
LAGs hourly pay will be uniformly $2. We make this economy friendly pay work out by allowing the LAGs to collect tips from scholar subjects and patrons.
LAGs will be the only employees of an ILC who are in personal contact with the scholar subjects.
Scholar subjects will be required to sit and achieve in their individualized, sound and escape proof cubicles for 12 hours a day, 6 days a week.
Each ILC chain will be named after a billionaire whose friendly, larger than life picture will be displayed in the cupola of the ILC chapel. Scholar subjects are expected to attend the mass on every Sunday in the chapel, and will declare their allegiance to the Economy as their ILC’s billionaire looks down on them approvingly from the larger than life picture.
Please let us know if you have any question suggestions.
With appreciation and brotherly love,
Charlie and Dave
LikeLike
Máté Wierdl:
As I am sure you are well aware, Learning Achievement Guards (LAGS) replaced/displaced the Eduproduct Deliver Specialists (EDPs) that had replaced/displaced teachers.
Rheeally! And it all happened in a most Johnsonally sort of way too…
It was called Blended Burn and Churn (BBC). Although there was a dispute over the acronym since BBC also stands for “Billionaire Boys Club.”
😏
LikeLike
No surprise here. I teach recent immigrants, some of whom express interest in becoming teachers, and I’ve been warning them away from the field for a few years now.
I feel fortunate and privileged to have worked in my school, and am pleased that I’ve lasted as long as I have, but there’s no way that young people coming into the field will be able to stay long enough to receive a decent pension – one of the motivations of so-called reform – and the hoops that new teachers must jump through and the obstacles they must continually overcome make not worthwhile.
It’s a literal crime: the students are beautiful, and even the difficult ones are lovable, but the adults in change have poisoned just about everything.
LikeLike
I steered my son away from teaching for practical reasons. What was was once a secure, public service career is morphing into a low paying job with minimal benefits.
LikeLike
with maximum abuse.
LikeLike
A friend of mine is struggling to pass the Illinois state test–5 hours long, math he hasn’t studies and will never use (for Special Ed or EL A), answer choices for questions very similar and all arguably correct….Though he has been admitted into a Fellows program already, he might not be able to pass some of the sections of this test. Yet another obstacle…
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads and commented:
Who would want to go into teaching today? I can’t blame the young people who are turning away from education as a career path. Teachers are denigrated and marginalized, punished, pay and benefits are being slashed, they are being replaced by the minimally-trained who stay in teaching for a couple of years.
Eventually, kids will all be plugged into total “computerized learning,” and all that will be required is, not even a five-week trained “teacher,” but a minimum wage proctor to enforce discipline and make sure the kids keep their eyes glued to their computer screens. 😦
LikeLike
We are all seeing the end of the career educator. The politicians no longer value us or want us. The turnover is already happening in our school district. We have many teachers in the 15-25 years experience level. However, we are having fewer and fewer teachers who are staying with our district in the 0-10 years experience level. They are moving on and doing different things. I’ve never observed anything like this before in my career. When I retire next year, I am positive that I will not be replaced with one person who will stay in that classroom for 32 years. There will be several teachers, staying 1-2 years, rotating in and out of this same classroom.
I agree that all of this is part of the deformers’ plan. They have made teaching so miserable that no one in their right mind would want to do it. The deformers have piled on so much paperwork that I have to work 7 days a week to get it all done. However, my paycheck is never bigger to help my family. Instead, I have to do piles of paperwork to prove over and over again that I deserve to keep this abusive job. It is all very sad. I would never recommend this profession to anyone. I still love teaching new concepts, and I love my students….but, it is just not worth having an abnormal life….and doing this to my family. They need me and do not deserve an exhausted mother and wife. I want my life back!
LikeLike
Sad Teacher: only you can decide what is best for you and those closest to you.
Please let me add…
The purveyors and enforcers of corporate education reform have tried to convince the general public that folks like you are the problem. Thank you for trying to do the right thing even under very difficult circumstances:
“If you do good, people will accuse you of selfish ulterior motives. Do good anyway.” [Mother Teresa]
And I am glad that you found this blog:
“Walking with a friend in the dark is better than walking alone in the light.” [Helen Keller]
On this blog, in general, you are among friends. Glad to have your company.
Thank you for all you have done and are doing.
😎
LikeLike
But of course–why spend $100,000 (or more) without the prospect of getting a job in this dried up profession where you have to go up against TFA for jobs (and when you’re a novice teacher, with ed degrees, certifications and licenses, most places don’t even want to hire you if they have contracted with the 5-week wonders from TFA). Also, if you are lucky (usually after a few years) to land that teaching job, your salary is $40,000 to $50,000, and you’ve still got your loans to pay off. Lastly, generally as a last resort, you might interview at a charter school since plenty of the traditional public schools are…gone, gone, gone.
The reformers want you gone. They spend lavishly on themselves, and pay themselves hefty “non-profit” salaries of $200,000 plus, and they begrudge the $40,000/$50,000 teachers earn. Shame on them.
Unless you have a “calling” to go into teaching, you should do something else. Even opening up a daycare/preschool is better than being a teacher nowadays – AND – the reformers are going after daycares too, with the TFA universal pre-k works.
LikeLike
To Dottie in AZ: Sadly, it all started with right-to-work (yeah, r.t.w., but not a right to make a decent living!) states like AZ. I’m so sorry for your family.
But–as if Diane’s readers didn’t already know–coming soon to a state near you (maybe YOUR state)!
LikeLike