One question that I have puzzled over again and again is why anyone who really cares about the quality of education would be a proponent of school choice, for example, vouchers for religious schools and charters run as a business. We have an abundance of evidence that these choices don’t usually produce better education. Children from low-performing schools are not being sent with public money to Exeter, Andover, Deerfield Academy, or Sidwell Friends. Instead, they are going to Backwoods Rural Evangelical Church or Mall Academy, which has few certified teachers, no curriculum, and teaches creationism; or they are going to Charter Schools, Inc., where profits matter more than education.
This article in Salon by Conor Lynch asserts that the GOP (and I would add, many Democrats who have been bamboozled as well) and corporate America (via ALEC) are complicit in the dumbing down of America. Some candidates, and he singles out Ted Cruz, willingly slander Harvard University (which he attended) as a haven for Communists (and I thought the days of McCarthyism were behind us) and ally themselves in opposition to the scientific evidence about climate change.
I have no beef with anyone’s religious beliefs as long as they leave me alone to practice my own religion (or not). But when religion and politics are intermixed, it is not a healthy blend.
Lynch writes:
Ted Cruz has already made it quite clear that, although he went to Harvard, he is as anti-intellectual as they come; embracing conspiracy theories and comparing the climate change consensus to the theological consensus of the geocentric model during the time of Galileo. Cruz has been adamantly opposed to the entire idea of climate change, and was recently named to be Chairman of the Subcommittee on Space, Science, and Competitiveness. Aside from promoting the conspiracy theory that Harvard law is a communist organization, he has promoted other conspiracies that are outright loony, like saying that George Soros was leading a global movement to abolish the game of golf.
Marco Rubio is also hostile to anything contradicting his faith, including climate change, while the leading contender for Republican nomination, Scott Walker, has taken the fight directly to academia, calling for major cuts in public university funding in Wisconsin that would add up to about $300 million over two years. He also just fired 57employees from Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources this past Earth Day. Predictably, he doesn’t believe climate change is a big issue either, and possibly has the worst record on environment out of all of the candidates.
And so the Republican primaries will be full of the usual evangelical type preaching, damning abortion and calling their Democratic contenders “elitist” snobs, while brushing off those so-called “expert” climate scientists and their warnings. But you can only blame the politicians so much. When it comes down to it, this is simply what a big part of the population expects from their leaders — religious buffoons who embrace a paranoid style of politics; where experts and academics are looked down upon as disconnected and deceitful, and where faith in Jesus and the Bible is the ultimate guiding light. Where one is expected to go with their gut rather than their head, and where “professorial” is an insult. Anti-intellectualism is an American tradition, and these new contenders denying scientific facts and calling Harvard a communist institution are simply embracing a populace that individuals like Billy Sunday and Joseph McCarthy once embraced. The alliance of religion and big business has fully incorporated America’s unfortunate anti-intellectualist culture, which has resulted in millions of people voting against their interest because of their own ignorant hostility towards anything that could be deemed elitist. It is a cycle of ignorance and poverty, and it is exactly what the real elites, like billionaire oil men, aim for.
The American writer, Issac Asimov, once said, “Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’” Unfortunately, this thread has continued to this day, and individuals like Ted Cruz and Scott Walker are here to remind us that ignorance can be quite competitive with knowledge, as long as there’s money behind it.
Several governors have slashed spending on higher education–such as Douglas Ducey in Arizona, Scott Walker in Wisconsin, and Bobby Jindal in Louisiana. Why? Do they want to stop young Americans from learning about science and history? In some states, the expansion of charter schools is coupled with the abandonment of teacher credentials. The combination of vouchers to attend religious schools, lowered standards for entry to teaching, and budget cuts for higher education is ominous.

Politicians are elected by the middle of the bell curve. It sounds harsh, but talking to voters completely unaware of what is going on in government or trying to discuss issues with rational thought against a verbal tirade of Fox News talking points is exasperating.
LikeLike
The aim of the suck-up economy is to transfer wealth and all other benefits from the bottom to the top of an ever-higher pyramid of Babel. The preliminary slash-&-burn phase serves to destroy the social institutions that people already have in place in order to replace them with commericial enterprises that serve corporate rather than democratic ends.
LikeLike
The title poses a false alternative since the long term aim of the corporate raiders has nothing to do with raising quality or reducing costs. It will always cost more in the end, in every way.
LikeLike
You are right; the destruction of public education is what they care about, cost what it may!
LikeLike
Jon Awbrey:
There’s a lot of evidence that reducing the cost of public education is one of the main goals of people like Gates, Broad, and the Waltons. They’re playing a long game that they hope will result in lower taxes for big property owners and for the wealthy in general. At the same time, they see profit in “reform” because even with relatively lower tax revenues, a new cohort of children enrolls every year. Once the opportunists tap into that public revenue stream (through privately operated charters, educational technology, data mining, real estate deals, and so on), the cash cow will keep on giving. Or so they hope.
The Walton family fortune is based mainly on cost reduction (that and inventory control via technology and breakneck expansion). The Walton billionaires are billionaires because Walmart learned how to squeeze both suppliers and employees. In the process they put thousands of local merchants out of business. The Waltons are trying to undermine American institutions such as public schools and labor unions. To imagine that these efforts have nothing to do with cost reduction doesn’t square with company history. (If you want to know more about how the family stays so rich, google “Walton tax avoidance.”)
While Eli Broad is said to favor higher taxes for the rich, cost reduction is a big part of the Broad efforts. Broad wants fewer schools, larger class sizes, more charters. Charter expansion is one of his big goals, and of course many charter teachers work in sweatshop conditions for relatively low pay. Some of this cost saving is diverted to marketing and high administrative salaries. But the long term idea is to spend less on schools, not more. Presumably, free market incentives will spur “higher achievement.”
Here’s what Bill Gates said about education and technology (and cost reduction) at the 2013 Davos Conference:
“Well, we’re taking the Internet revolution and we’re applying it in more areas. So, for example, in education the idea that not only are the best lectures online, but you can interact with people, talk to other students, that we ought to be able to deliver education that’s higher quality but dramatically lower cost. There’s a lot of excitement about that.
“MOOC means Massively Online Open Courseware and a lot of good pioneers that are learning and making that stuff better and better. The [Gates] Foundation is the biggest funder of that activity ’cause we see so much promise and the increasing price of education just doesn’t work. You know, a lot of our unemployment is because kids aren’t well educated enough. If you’re a college graduate, unemployment is very low. We’ve got to increase access to education, but letting the price go up won’t allow that.”
Anytime you hear someone say, “You can’t solve the problem by throwing money at it,” that person wants to reduce the cost of (that is, underfund) public schools, particularly the ones in poor urban neighborhoods and areas of rural poverty. Gates often used to preface his education remarks by stating that we spend way more than we used to but have little to show for it. He never took inflation into account, nor did he mention special education mandates.
Sure, the “reformers” want to “transform” public education by destroying it, but cost reduction is built into their overall scheme.
LikeLike
Check your cable bill and get back to me 😱
LikeLike
I’ll get back to you when you respond to the substance of a comment instead of trying to dismiss it with an enigmatic taunt.
LikeLike
Joh,
RIGHT ON, comment … TRUE! The entire situation is ridiculous. We jail teachers because they were set up to cheat on the test with the threat of being fired and , and the FEDs only “FINE” Wall Street for their horrid deeds. This is gross. Those folks on Wall Street are the ones who should be in jail on a chain gang.
LikeLike
1) Which do reformers really care about?
a) The quality of k – 12 education
b) Cutting costs to taxpayers
c) Testing as a civil right
d) Their ROI
My apologies for writing an MC item that is too easy. I could not think of a single “plausible” distractor.
LikeLike
The thought that reformers are anti-intellectual is really frightening. It explains the dysfunction we are seeing now, as well as setting the stage for some truly destructive actions down the road.
LikeLike
Ignorance is bliss, and also useful to profiteers.
LikeLike
Few legitimate ideological zealots are left in the “reform” movement. Today’s group is all about profit at any price, and testing is the weapon of mass destruction. Our political leaders turn a blind eye to the ever expanding profit potential of charter schools while they allow corporate interests to exploit those already under served.
LikeLike
Yes, it’s sick.
LikeLike
Who were the legitimate ideological zealots? I must have missed them.
LikeLike
The high profile ones I can think of are educated African Americans that were concerned with the problems of urban public education. Oprah, John Legend, and a few others common to mind. They were all on the charter bandwagon at the start. I don’t know about Cory Booker and Obama; it’s hard to tell what a politician really thinks or feels.
LikeLike
Cory Booker brought Cami Anderson to Newark. Barack Obama is responsible for RttT. Oprah Winfrey was involved in the Zuckerberg gift.
LikeLike
John Legend is a supporter of Turnaround for Children, which is a complete joke.
LikeLike
Conor Lynch’s essay is one of the most gorgeous pieces of persuasion I have read to date. It is akin to the book “What’s the Matter with Kanas?”
We the people are our own biggest enemy in a snese. But it is par for the course and reflective of the growing pains we will have to go through if we are to ever become a self actualized society for all and not for the few.
It’s as simple and as complex as that . . . .
LikeLike
I think cutting costs is exactly it. Or there is the perception that choice offers more bang for the buck.
LikeLike
Cutting costs? Cami Anderson has run up a $70 million deficit on consultants and lunches. Now each school in Newark is being required to cut $500 thousand on average from its budget. Meanwhile, I am purchasing pencils out of pocket.
LikeLike
A lot of charters hire a lost cost teaching staff, and then they over pay the people at the top. Charters often waste because the people in charge don’t really know what they are doing, and they have spend more per capita on their fixed costs. They have to spend money on advertising and recruiting.. Then, of course, some charters have the garden variety fraud problem. The bottom line is that there are no savings, and we are probably spending more. http://populardemocracy.org/news/report-millions-dollars-fraud-waste-found-charter-school-sector
LikeLike
My answer: they don’t. These folks in ‘American Institution for National Fundamentalists’ are treating teachers and public schools like “unwanted immigrants” spreading contaminated disease. They are behaving quite similarly to xenophobic conservatives and nationalists in such country like Japan, who call out “foreigners” for potential criminal that undermines public safety, mock tens of thousands of protesters in Okinawa over relocation of US military base as ‘pro-shimin’ (pejorative term for ‘professional citizens’), or slam any media journalists and academics(both domestic and international) for challenging Abe government’s policy or national system.
LikeLike
The elite send their kids to private schools. As far as I know they are not subject to CC demands and value added tests but instead get a good well rounded education. What better way to ensure they are advantaged over their public school competitors than to dumb down the public school curriculum. Let the public school students waste valuable class time by practicing how to take exams, or learn about creationism, or how the U.S. is exceptional, or deny global warming, etc. You get the idea.
LikeLike
Michael Brocum: simple truths stated in plain language.
Which is exactly why there was a post on this page of 3-23-2014, “Common Core for Commoners, Not My School!”—
[start entire posting]
This is an unintentionally hilarious story about Common Core in Tennessee. Dr. Candace McQueen has been dean of Lipscomb College’s school of education and also the state’s’s chief cheerleader for Common Core. However, she was named headmistress of private Lipscomb Academy, and guess what? She will not have the school adopt the Common Core! Go figure.
[end entire posting]
And just what does that non-rheephorm education look like? That is, to the rheephormsters themselves?
Hmmmm… Bill Gates, speech of 9-23-2013 to his alma mater Lakeside School, and where his two children currently go. He lists three R’s, from (IMHO) least to most important, i.e., Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships. So cutting directly to the chase…
[start excerpt]
Classes were small. You got to know the teachers. They got to know you. And the relationships that come from that really make a difference. If you like and respect your teacher, you”re going to work harder.
[end excerpt]
Link: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/media-center/speeches/2005/09/bill-gates-lakeside-school
No mention of high-stakes standardized test scores driving curriculum, teacher evaluations, and quality of student learning. But surely it was a total failure, right, with small class sizes and other negatives too numerous to mention? Uh, he says elsewhere in the speech: “One reason I’m so grateful to Lakeside is that I can directly trace the founding of Microsoft back to my earliest days here.”
So in practical in-your-face measurable terms it was a huge success?
Mr. Bill, say it isn’t so!
It only makes sense when self-proclaimed “education reform” is for OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN and places like Lakeside School are for THEIR OWN CHILDREN.
Now it makes a lot of ₵ent¢…
😎
LikeLike
The anti-intellectuals, ideologues and sincere but naive are useful for those whose goal is simply making boatloads of money.
The strategy of the latter is to create doubt in the mind of the public (eg, about the dangers of tobacco, the reality of climate change or the state of education in the US)
“School Sale”
Their product is disruption
Their pitch is “failing schools”
With lots of rank corruption
And loads of testing tools
Their goal is liquidation
And everything must go
The essence of the Nation
The public schools we know
From “A DAMthology of Deform” (compilation of poems appearing on this blog)
LikeLike
Um…no.
LikeLike
The attempt to conflate different issues is counterproductive. Climate change and education “reform” are NOT connected. The claim that the reform movement is anti-intellectual does not hold water. Are you claiming President Obama is anti-intellectual. Because he IS pro-“reform.” Since most people on the left automatically think that those who don’t agree with them are somehow mentally defective, I say the anti-reform movement is anti-intellectual. That statement is no less absurd than the climate change premise. As long as you continue to see the world as Republican vs. Democrat, right vs. left, conservative vs. liberal/progressive, us vs. them, you will continue to participate in a false dichotomy that is meant to trap the world in an endless spiral of BS. Keep bleating sheople; sheering season is coming or maybe the political elites intend to thin the flock more aggressively than a simple sheering.
Lynch’s attack on people of faith is misguided too. Maybe preachers and professors tend to disagree so ardently because both groups are zealous proselytizers. Lynch’s bias against the religious is ignorant, but we all know that professors/scientists ALWAYS practice their brand of truth with the greatest integrity (sarcasm).
If Lynch’s diatribe against those who do not think like he does constitutes “intellectualism,” I will proudly remain among the unwashed, ignorant masses.
LikeLike
Indeed. The bottom line for corporations: money.
Bottom line for educators: educating in its best sense.
Incredible that people choose money over education.
But such is the power of propaganda. Hitler understood its power.
So does ALEC.
LikeLike
If Marco Rubio is Catholic, there is nothing in Catholicism that he can point to, that says climate change, or evolution, or the Big Bang, are wrong. So he is pandering to other fundamentalist Christians. Or Catholics who are uninformed.
LikeLike
To businesses that create the problem
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
Also ominous is Cami Anderson’s move to require Newark PS teachers to obtain graduate credits from Relay (a teacher training enterprise that does Not have PhDs w experience at accredited education universities, housed in a charter school) if they want salary credit for grad courses.
LikeLike
booklady, you are correct. Relay is called a “graduate school of education” but its faculty contains no scholars, no researchers, no one with a Ph.D., just charter teachers teaching test-taking tricks. Might as well read Doug Lemov and skip the course.
LikeLike