Archives for the year of: 2013

Last week, the New York City media and the Department of Education exulted in a new CREDO study showing that charter schools outperform public schools in New York City.

But, as usual, no one bothered to look behind the curtain.

Bruce Baker shows in this post that NYC charter schools enroll significantly fewer students who are English language learners and others who might pull down their scores. This creates “peer effects” that benefit those who are admitted, while overloading the public schools with the neediest students.

But charter schools are different from public schools in other significant ways, and Baker has the data:

Charter schools have smaller classes.
Charter teachers are paid more.
Charters have longer school days.
Charters spend more than public schools.
Charters limit the poorest and most disabled students.
Which of these lessons should public schools learn and apply?

Please, someone, tell that to the New York Times, the New York Daily News, and the New York Post, as well as the TV stations.

What is happening in education today is so hard to believe, so completely outrageous, that it is hard to write satire.

Twenty years ago, suppose you read a story about school officials closing down public schools and handing them over to private entrepreneurs. You would think that was really funny, right?

Suppose you read a story about for-profit schools getting public money. Ridiculous, right?

Suppose you read something predicting that Wall Street hedge fund managers had a plan to reform public education. You would laugh out loud.

No one is laughing now. It is all happening.

But here is a satire about a teacher who dares to assign a book.

Is this funny or ridiculous?

Gary Rubinstein wrestles with the issue of language and rhetoric of reform.

Long ago, a reformer was someone who wanted to improve the public schools.

Now, a “reformer” advocates closing them and replacing them with privately managed schools.

Once upon a time, a reformer was someone who wanted to raise standards for new teachers.

Now, a “reformer” wants to hire teachers who have only five weeks of training.

The word “reform,” he suggests, has become hopelessly tainted among educators by those who now claim it.

The question today is what to call those who object to the punitive methods of the “reformers”?

They say we are “defenders of the status quo,” when in fact we are opponents of failed ideas.

Gary says we are people who care about evidence.

But what is the one- or two-word description that positively defines those who want to improve schools and teaching, not demolish them?

Read it here! And here.

Read how Superintendent John Kuhn said, “There are 5 million kids in Texas waiting for this legislature to keep our forefather’s promises, and to those who want to take away that promise, I’m with the moms and the trustees and local business people who will say what brave Texans have said before, come and take it. Just try to kill that promise of our Constitution.”

Read how State Senator Kirk Watson said, “The verdict is in, and it says the Texas school system is inadequate, unfair and isn’t even constitutional,”

Read how Former State Commissioner of Education Robert Scott said that some people think that the $488 million contract to Pearson was , “the tail wagging the dog…. [but] I don’t. I look at it as the flea at the end of the tail of the dog trying to wag the dog.”

He said, “I had to turn in my reformer card because I looked at it as a flea circus,” he said. “They are selling two ideas and two ideas only: No. 1, your schools are failing, and No. 2, if you give us billions of dollars, we can convince you [of] the first thing we just told you.”

And I said, among other things, “The testing vampire started here,” meaning NCLB. “Kill it.”

download

Diane and Bill Betzen of LULAC, who took these photos

download3

Diane receives a T-shirt from students of Houston Independent School District, where she went to school, K-12

download2

Dr. Frederick Haynes exhorts the crowd, “Education, not incarceration!”

Here is a great article about Georgia’s “tax credit scholarship” program by Myra Blackmon of the Athens Banner-Herald.

Blackmon writes:

“I’m just sick about all this. My beloved Georgia has gone from being a shining beacon of educational innovation in the 1990s to a “me and my kid first” basis for decision-making and funding. We are resegregating our schools by race and class, making the quality of a child’s education dependent on his ZIP code or his parent’s income.

“Don’t talk to me about choice. That’s a euphemism for “just us.” Don’t talk to me about failing schools; talk to me about a failing legislature and corporate “reformers” who understand everything about education except teaching and learning. Don’t talk to me about “bloated budgets.” Since 2008, Georgia’s public schools have gained 37,000 students and lost 5,000 teachers.”

The letter-grading system that is spreading across many states originated in Florida during Jeb Bush’s tenure as governor. His goal was to show how poorly public schools were doing and to blame schools if students had low test scores, thus diverting attention from the social and economic causes of poor performance in school. Red states love letter grades, as does Mayor Bloomberg in New York City, who has advanced privatization as much as he could during this three terms in office.

This reader writes about the sham of the Indiana letter grade system:

 

Can you imagine taking your child to a doctor who knowingly and willfully misdiagnoses your child with cancer and recommends immediate, intense chemotherapy?

Further, even though you questioned the doctor and he could not explain how he came up with the diagnosis; he could not point to any direct source of cancer; he demanded you subject your child to intense chemotherapy anyway? Can you imagine being forced to purposely intervene with toxins to slowly poison your child even though you know the diagnosis is invalid?

So it goes in many Indiana schools today.

From the IDOE to the Statehouse, everyone admits the current A-F grading system is invalid and unreliable. No one at the state can explain exactly how the grades were calculated. Yet those schools doing great work and still receiving D’s and F’s, must give evidence to the state that they are attempting major interventions to improve student test scores.

How are they doing this? More testing. More data-analysis. They are purposefully increasing toxic interventions that are poisoning the natural desire to learn in our most vulnerable students.

Do you know how demoralizing it is for teachers in these buildings to witness such malpractice?

When will this madness stop?

SAVE PUBLIC EDUCATION

George Schmidt is the quintessential fiery fighter for workers and teachers rights. His analysis oh how the CTU got to where it is today and the challenges it faces in the coming months is below:

George Schmidt

by George Schmidt, Chicago Teachers Union/ Substance News http://www.substancenews.net/

One of the most important things about the past 13 years in the Chicago Teachers Union is that all of us — including those of us at Substance — have a record to stand on (or fall on our faces with). In August 2000, the Chicago Board of Education, at its monthly meeting, voted to fire me, on a motion (“Board Report”) from Paul G. Vallas. At that time, the President of the Chicago Teachers Union was Tom Reece, of the United Progressive Caucus. A year before the Board fired me, Reece had stood up at a Board meeting (February 1999) and told the Board and the world that Paul Vallas and Gery Chico were “the best Board we had ever worked with.”

In May and June 2001, Deborah Walsh (soon, Lynch) and Howard Heath and their slate of candidates defeated the UPC (and Reece) by a wide margin (57 percent of the vote) and the union’s members, after nearly ten years of relentless attacks by corporate “school reform” and mayoral control had high hopes. Sadly, in May (a four way race with no one winning the majority) and June (a two-way runoff) 2004, the union’s members voted against Debbie Lynch and PACT and returned the UPC to power.

On August 31, 2007, the UPC, under Marilyn Stewart, brought in its first post-PACT contract, proclaiming it a great one. But at the union’s August 31, 2007 House of Delegates meeting, the union’s delegates experiences the infamous “No No Vote Vote…” What happened was that Marilyn Stewart called for the “Yes” votes on the proposed contract, then refused to call the “No” votes and ran downstairs at Plumbers Hall to hold a press conference. The result was raucous. But Stewart had been re-elected that year. And the CTU had become a kleptocracy, as the record shows, where the union’s officers and staff were padding their pockets to the point where the union had to borrow $3 million when it faced problems. (The best place to see who profited from those years is to read the list of retired union officials we’ll be publishing at substancenews.net in April, along with their annual pensions, which tell the tale…).

The reign of Marilyn Stewart’s UPC by 2010 led to a union election with five caucuses (out of a promised six) running for election. In the May 2010 voting, Stewart got the largest number of votes, but not a majority, so in June 2010 it was Marilyn Stewart and the UPC in a runoff versus Karen Lewis and CORE. CORE won even more decisively in 2010 than PACT had in 2001. But the nearly ten years of contracts that were negotiated without a fight had done a great deal of damage to the union, and the failure of the leaders of the first decade of the 21st Century to fight strongly against charter school expansion and privatization had done almost fatal damage to the union.

When CORE came into office, lots had to change fast, and it did. The unconscionable pay and benefits of the union’s officers and staff ended. (Again: a check of the annual pensions of those people who have since retired will tell the tale of that era). The hiring of a scab as a very unsuccessful CTU lobbyist ended. And a lot of cleaning up had to begin — while the new officers had to rebuild the union and negotiate a contract which was set to expire in June 2012. Then came Rahm, whose job was to declare war on the union and continue the privatization attack on public institutions that his version of the Democratic Party had been doing for nearly 20 years.

The rebuilding of the Chicago Teachers Union required enormous work, both by union staff and by hundreds (ultimately thousands) of union members. But by September 2012, the union was ready to lead the Chicago Teachers Strike of 2012. Despite the sabotage of the strike preparations tried by the remnants of the UPC and some remnants of PACT, the strike was as successful as it would have been, and the members of the union returned to work on September 19, 2012 with the strongest contract — at the local school level — in union history. Not everything had been won, but more had been won during the two years of CORE than during the previous 15 years of PACT and UPC.

I know. I was there for all of it, and we at Substance were reporting it monthly at first, and then daily as our staff and website matured. Now we are facing the odious attacks on the leadership that has literally saved the union (and many of the hopes of unionism) by a coalition that claims it wants to “save” the union! For what? To return union officers to salaries that leave them with pensions of $120,000 to $140,000 per year? To hire lobbyists who are known scabs? To hire research “directors” who not only don’t know how to use computers, but who refuse to learn!?

Rahm Emanuel now has his candidates for the leadership of the Chicago Teachers Union, and the members will be voting twice in the next 90 days. For the next month, the members will be able to decide whether to sign nominating petitions for the new “Coalition” and for CORE. There may be other caucuses, may not. We will know that when nominating petitions are turned in to the union’s financial office at the end of March.

Then, on May 17, the union’s active duty members will get to vote for the officers to serve from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2016.

CORE has stood for a kind of democracy rarely seen in any union, and I have stood with CORE since the beginning. We had confidence in the CTU members during the harrowing years that led up to the legal strike of September 2012, despite the attacks from right wing politicians, on the one hand, and union saboteurs, on the other. And the strike was successful — as successful as any contract fight could be in the USA in 2013. My brothers and sisters are going to hear a lot of pseudo-history and many faux militancy in the next couple of months, but the fun of publishing the facts and analyzing them every day makes my job one of the best in Chicago, whether I am working as editor of Substance or helping with research as a consultant for the Chicago Teachers Union.

But one thing will be very clear by the time the members of the CTU face the choice of reinstating those who held power and “disappointed” (that’s putting it mildly) them between then and now is a promised. Whether we are reporting about the end of the Reece UPC era (2000 – 2001), the machinations of the Lynch PACT era (2001 – 2004) or the the odious and corrupt kleptocracy and scab regime of Marilyn Stewart and the last gasps of the UPC (2004 – 2010) the facts will be available by the two times the members get to vote: first over the next four weeks as they decide to sign petitions, and then on May 17 when we decide who leads the most militant union in the USA for the next three years.

A report from Bridgeport, Connecticut:

Connecticut Working Families Party
30 Arbor Street, Suite 210, Hartford, CT 06106
(860) 523-1699 http://www.connecticutworkingfamilies.org

For an event occurring on
February 25th, 2013, 4 pm

Advisory – Parents Call on Bridgeport Board of Education not to renew Paul Vallas’ Contract as Superintendent

For more information contact Taylor Leake at (860) 670-1408 or tleake@workingfamilies.org.

Parents of students at schools run by corporate reformer Paul Vallas – including Bridgeport, Connecticut, where he is the current Interim Superintendent, and Chicago, where he was CEO of Public Schools from 1995 to 2001 – will speak out about the negative impact he has had on their children’s education. They will urge the Bridgeport Board of Education not to renew Vallas’ contract, which the Board is scheduled to vote on at the March 11th meeting.

Paul Vallas is paid a quarter-million dollars a year in a city where the average household income is barely an eighth of that – as a part time job. He is also paid exorbitant fees for consulting. He has a $1 million contract with the Illinois state department of Education, and a $18 million contract with the City of Indianapolis. He has awarded $13 million in no-bid contracts to his friends and former coworkers while demanding cuts to the schools. He has cut supply budgets in half, and run up huge legal bills.

** Press Conference to highlight Paul Vallas’ broken promises in Bridgeport **

What: ​
Parents of students at schools run by corporate reformer Paul Vallas speak out about his failings, and call on the Bridgeport Board of Education not to renew his contract as Interim Superintendent.

Who:
Gloria Warner, parent of Chicago public school student
JoAnn Kenedy, parent of 2 Bridgeport public school students
Former State Senator Ed Gomes
Sauda Baraka, Member of the Board of Education

Where:
Warren Harding High School
1734 Central Ave.
Bridgeport, CT 06610

When:
4 pm, February 25, 2013
###

Reporter Colin Woodard’s brilliant exposé of the profitable ties between Jeb Bush, Maine’s Governor Paul LePage, and the online industry won the prestigious George Polk award for reporting in 2012.

If you have not read it, do so now. You will be an informed citizen.

More about this great journalist:

Colin Woodard, an award-winning author
and journalist who writes for Washington
Monthly, The Christian Science Monitor,
and The Chronicle of Higher Education.
He is currently State and National Affairs
Writer for the Portland Press Herald /
Maine Sunday Telegram, where he
received a 2012 George Polk Award for
his investigative reporting. A native of
Maine, he has reported from more than
fifty foreign countries and six continents,
and lived for more than four years in
Eastern Europe.

He is the author of the New England
bestseller The Lobster Coast: Rebels,
Rusticators, and the Struggle for a
Forgotten Frontier (Viking Press, 2004),
a cultural and environmental history of
coastal Maine; Ocean’s End: Travels
Through Endangered Seas (Basic Books,
2000), a narrative non-fiction account of
the deterioration of the world’s oceans;
and The Republic of Pirates: Being The
True And Surprising Story Of The
Caribbean Pirates And The Man Who
Brought Them Down , on which the
forthcoming NBC series “Crossbones” is
based.

His fourth book, American Nations: A
History of the Eleven Rival Regional
Cultures of North America (Viking, 2011)
was named one of the Best Books of 2011
by the editors of The New Republic and
The Globalist and won the 2012 Maine
Literary Award for Non-Fiction.

He lives in midcoast Maine.