Archives for the year of: 2013

A Fulton County parent sent me this notice of a meeting today: the second annual Faith Summit “to forge partnerships between schools and the faith community. The free event is for leaders of local houses of worship to join school principals and district leaders in a collaborative discussion on practical ways to provide resources benefiting both schools and houses of worship.”

The parent was disturbed by that. It seems to be part of a larger trend to eliminate the line between public and private, between church and state. We can respect all religions, don’t you think, without bringing religious ideas into the public schools.

I am speaking later today at UNC in Charlotte. I will be speaking at 7 pm at the
Cone McKnight Auditorium – UNCC campus
320 East Ninth St

Tomorrow in Raleigh. Details here.

The National Research Council is conducting a five-year review of mayoral control and the D.C. Public schools.

The committee created for this purpose will meet on March 22.

There is an open session at 1 pm to discuss test security and the validity of test scores in D.C.

This is a good opportunity to listen, learn, and perhaps determine whether the researchers intend to conduct a probe that is more thorough than the cursory reviews of two inspectors general.

Here are the details:

Committee for the Five-Year (2009-2013) Summative Evaluation of the District of Columbia Public Schools

Meeting Two
March 22, 2013
500 Fifth St., NW
Washington DC
DRAFT Agenda

OPEN SESSION

1:00 – 3:00​

Discussion of Test Security and Validity of Achievement Test Data

• Overview of test security issues and session goals

Lorraine McDonnell and Carl Cohn

• Best practices for preventing security violations

Carswell Whitehead, ETS

• Statistical tools for flagging anomalies and issues they raise

Carswell Whitehead, ETS

• Strategies and issues in forensic investigation of possible security violations

Steve Ferrara, Pearson Assessments

• Case Study: What can DC learn from events in other districts?

Heather Vogel, Atlanta Journal Constitution

Do you want to know what’s really wrong with American education? It is not about test scores. In some schools, it is about survival.

John Thompson writes about “This American Life’s” brilliant radio documentary, which describes a “turnaround” school in Chicago.

It is called “Harper High School.” Written and reported by Alex Kotlowitz, Ira Glass and Linda Lutton, it “describes a “turnaround” school as it comes off a year in which 29 current and recent students were shot. Eight died, and there were dozens of other incidents where bullets were thrown.”

It s not about the test scores.

Louisiana is the state most dedicated to wiping out public education and the teaching profession, under the leadership of Governor Bobby Jindal and state commissioner John White. Jindal and White are doing whatever they can to privatize public education with vouchers, charters, and a program to outsource as much as possible of the funding dedicated in the state constitution to the maintenance of public education.

As I have learned from many friends in that state, the governor does not like dissent. When people disagree with his policies, they risk losing their job. In conversations, I have been told again and again, “Don’t mention my name. Please.”

No matter how authoritarian or dictatorial the government may be, there are always a few brave souls who feel compelled to speak up. Some are bloggers. Some are researchers. Some are both. They are smart, they are strong, they are courageous. They can’t tolerate lies, spin, and meanness. They believe the government has an obligation to support the general well-being of the people, not to serve the corporations that fund political campaigns.

And so in this post, I want to salute the bloggers and researchers who have kept alive free speech and free inquiry and the public’s right to know what is happening in their state.

I add their names to the honor roll as champions of American public education.

In no particular order, they are:

Mike Deshotels, who blogs at Louisiana Educator. He has formed a group called Defenders of Public Education.

Research on Reforms, which has been trying to bring evidence to bear on the many false claims about a Louisiana or New Orleans “miracle.” In particular, I applaud the work of Barbara Ferguson, Charles Hatfield, and Raynard Sanders, who have maintained high standards of research in their work.

Lance Hill, who is a tireless advocate for social justice and the children and teachers of New Orleans. Lance brought me to New Orleans in 2010 to speak at Dillard University, where I met many brave researchers, parents, and teachers.

Educators for All, a group of researchers and parents who remain anonymous, but have used public information to exposé public lies about the schools.

Crazy Crawfish, a blogger who uses wit and research to exposé the manipulation of data by the State Education Department.

Mercedes Schneider, a <;;a href="http://“>;;blogger who is fearless in skewering the powerful. She has a Ph.D. In statistics but chooses to teach high school in her native state.

Tom Aswell at Louisiana Voice, a blogger who writes about “graft, lies, and politics: a monument to corruption,” in Louisiana and never runs out of material. He is an invaluable resource as Jindal finds ingenious ways to sell off or give away public assets to powerful corporations. When Tom turns to education, he sees right through Jindal’s smoke and mirrors, the same raid on the public treasury.

I feel honored to have met these brave men and women and i am privileged to post their work here. When the day comes that people of the state see how they have been hoodwinked by their elected officials, they will owe a debt of gratitude to those I honor now. And when that day arrives, no one will be fearful of speaking out and using their own names.

No more career teachers in North Carolina. That’s the goal of legislation introduced by Phil Berger, the President Pro Tem of the State Senate in North Carolina.

The experienced, high-performing teachers would get a four-year contract.

Others would get shorter contracts.

No tenure for any teachers.

Lots of performance pay built in.

Bonuses would be tied to new teacher evaluation programs now under development.

Apparently, Senator Berger has no idea that merit pay has never worked anywhere.

Nor does he know that there is no successful teacher evaluation program anywhere, despite the hundreds of millions expended on creating one.

His goal seems to be to make North Carolina teachers teach to the test at every possible moment of the school day.

North Carolina was once a progressive state.

No more.

Teacher salaries in North Carolina now rank 46th in the nation.

School spending has fallen to 48th.

This is sad. Sad for the children. Sad for the teachers.

 

This comment from one of the professionals who took the test in Rhode Island, at the invitation of the Providence Student Union. He raises the question: When will those at the top be held accountable for failure of their policies?

“I am one of those “irresponsible adults” who took the test…and failed, predictably enough. I found the content of the test to be outrageously irrelevant for the lives of the vast majority of people (80% or more?). To me, what is truly “irresponsible” and morally indefensible is attaching high stakes consequences to a test for students who know they were never taught the material through no fault of their own!

“Let’s hold Gist accountable for the costly failures of her policies before she consigns thousands of students to a grim and limited future.”

The results are in.

Most of the adults who took the test would not be able to graduate.

Are we a failed nation of illiterate professionals or are the tests unreasonable?

Here’s a thought: Michelle Rhee, Bill Gates, and Arne Duncan should take the test.

This is the press release from the Providence Student Union:

PRESS RELEASE

March 19, 2013

CONTACT: Aaron Regunberg | Aaron@ProvidenceStudentUnion.org | 847-809-6039 (cell)

STUDENTS RELEASE “TAKE THE TEST” RESULTS –

SUPER MAJORITY OF ACCOMPLISHED PROFESSIONALS SCORE BELOW DIPLOMA THRESHOLD

Providence, Rhode Island – March 19, 2013 – Members of the student activist group the Providence Student Union (PSU) released the results of this weekend’s “Take the Test” event today. Of the 50 accomplished adults who took a shortened, sample version of the Math NECAP exam, 60% scored at a level that would put them at risk of not graduating under Rhode Island’s new diploma system.

“In total, 50 people—successful elected officials, attorneys, scientists, engineers, reporters, college professors, and directors of leading nonprofits—took a sample version of the Math portion of the New England Common Assessment Program that we put together from released items on RIDE’s website,” said Darren Fleury, a junior at Central High School and a member of PSU. “According to RIDE’s scoring guidelines, 4 of these 50 people would have scored ‘proficient with distinction,’ 7 would have scored ‘proficient,’ 9 would have scored ‘partially proficient,’ and 30 individuals—or 60%—would have scored ‘substantially below proficient,’ meaning they did not get a high enough score to receive a diploma.”

The Providence Student Union’s “Take the Test” event was the latest component of a campaign that students—along with parents and other community members—have been organizing against a new Rhode Island policy that turns the state’s main standardized test, the NECAP, into a make-or-break barrier to graduation.

“My eyes have been opened,” said Teresa Tanzi, a State Representative from Wakefield and a participant in Saturday’s “Take the Test” event. “As one of the many capable and relatively accomplished participants who scored ‘substantially below proficient’ on this exercise, I do believe this points to a problem with our state’s new diploma system. The fact that a majority of very successful adults—nearly all of whom have completed college and many of whom have advanced degrees—cannot meet this requirement should make us reconsider whether a NECAP score, on its own, is an appropriate arbiter for a high school graduation decision.”

“This is a fundamental misuse of this measurement tool,” explained Tom Sgouros, a policy analyst who also took the test. “The original goal of NECAP was to evaluate schools, and, to some extent, students within the schools. In order to make a reliable ranking among schools, you need to ensure that the differences between one school and another are statistically significant. To do that, the statistics demand that you design it to ensure that a significant number of students will flunk. If every student passed this test, they would redesign it. That’s what it means to be a diagnostic tool. To attach high-stakes to such an exam is simply an abuse of the tool, and one that will have real consequences for many young people.”

Priscilla Rivera, a junior at Hope High School and a PSU member, offered additional context to the results. “Of course, it is true that many of these professionals who participated in our event had not been prepared to take the test,” she said. “But our point is, neither have we. For 10, 11, or 12 years we have been taught to different standards. We have not been following a curriculum aligned with this test, and we are trapped in an education system that is failing to give us the education we deserve. If it does not make sense to punish adults for not being prepared to take this particular test, we believe it does not make sense to punish us for not having been effectively taught this material over a period of years. Give us a good education, not a test!”

“We know different people show their knowledge in different ways,” said Dulari Tahbilder, the executive director of Breakthrough Providence. “I did not do very well on that test. But I am more than a single test score, and I think our students are too.”

###

I previously named Zack Kopplin to the honor roll for his outspoken opposition to schools teaching creationism. A native of Louisiana, Zack criticized Governor Bobby Jindal’s voucher plan for using public funds to send students to schools that teach creationism.

Zack, a student at Rice University, recently appeared on the Bill Moyers show to talk about vouchers and creationism.

The show featured an interactive map that pinpoints every school teaching creationism with public funding. Most are concentrated in Florida and Louisiana.

If Governor Haslam in Tennessee gets his way (abetted by State Commissioner Kevin Huffman [ex-TFA]), there will be many more creationist schools funded by taxpayers. Even more taxpayer dollars will flow to such schools in Alabama and Georgia, and don’t discount their spread into Indiana, Ohio, and other states.

Is this the STEM education that will propel our nation into the 21st century?

Good news for Wall Street! More school closings!

Does Wall Street think it would be a good idea to close down all public schools? Think of the savings to municipalities if we just stopped offering free public education!

A reader writes:

And Bloomberg reports this about Philadelphia school closures:

Closing 12% of Philadelphia Schools Creates Winners: Muni Credit

from Bloomberg


“The nation’s fifth-largest city anticipates saving $24.5 million a year by shutting 29 of its 249 buildings in June. The average building is 64 years old, according to a financial audit. More than 82 percent of students are “economically disadvantaged,” meaning they receive free or reduced-price lunches, school data show.


“It’s very likely” more schools would be closed over the next five years, said Fernando Gallard, a district spokesman, who said he couldn’t estimate how many.
 “We are wasting money maintaining empty seats and empty space in our buildings,” Gallard said. “There is a better use for that money.”
 Bond buyers view officials as trying to get a handle on their finances, said John Donaldson, director of fixed income at Radnor, Pennsylvania-based Haverford Trust Co., who manages $750 million in munis.


http://tinyurl.com/cgynj3t