Archives for the month of: November, 2012

The right-wing group called ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) has model legislation to enable a governor to appoint a commission to authorize charter schools, thus bypassing those pesky local school boards that don’t want to bring privately managed schools to their local district. The local school boards are charged with improving their schools, not with dividing up the public funds between their schools and an out-of-state corporation that wants to open a school in its district.

This is the reason for the constitutional amendment that passed in Georgia. The privatizers objected to having to get the consent of local school boards, so they got the governor and legislature to put a measure on the ballot that was inaccurately described (something like “do you want to improve student achievement by opening charter schools,” rather than an honest description of the purpose of the law, which was to remove the powers of the local school boards).

Now in Tennessee, the Republicans have a super-majority (thanks in part to campaign contributions by Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst, which invested generously in GOP candidates).

As readers of this blog may recall, the Metro Nashville school board has turned down an Arizona-based charter chain called Great Hearts because it had an inadequate diversity plan.

It turned down Great Hearts four times, and the TFA State Commissioner of Education Kevin Huffman (Rhee’s -ex) fined the Nashville schools $3.4 million for not doing what he wanted them to do.

Great Hearts now says it will not apply to the Nashville board again. Instead, it will wait until the state legislature creates an ALEC-style law creating a charter-friendly state board that won’t ask annoying questions about the lack of diversity in most of the Great Hearts charters.

In fact, the leader of Great Hearts said he was too busy to talk to the Metro Nashville board, and if the city’s director of schools wants to talk to him, he can fly to Arizona.

After Great Hearts gets approval from an “impartial” state board, then it will open “multiple” charters in Nashville.

He knows something. He knows that the governors, the state commissioner and the legislature will give him whatever he wants.

In other news from Nashville, the school board voted to close down a charter school with abysmal test scores (but powerhouse athletic teams). A KIPP school in Nashville was also in the bottom 5% in the state, but was not closed.

EduShyster has done it again.

This time she nails the Boston Globe.

This is the Boston Globe’s dream as expressed by its lead education writer:

“There’s a lot at stake in the takeover of the Gavin by UP Academy. If it succeeds at raising student achievement with an identical student population, then the main complaint of charter school critics will lose its resonance. If relatively inexperienced teachers can do what veterans can’t — namely turn around a school where only one out of four students performs at grade level — then the public cry for longer school days, merit pay, and stricter teacher evaluations will grow louder.”

How great would that be? If the test scores go up at Gavin, now taken over by UP Academy, every inner-city school could have teachers with high expectations but no professional training. All that is needed is a four-year degree, preferably from an Ivy League college or university. Every teacher could be judged by the rise or fall of student test scores. All unions would be abolished. No tenure, no seniority, just test scores. That solves all problems, right?

EduShyster explains the secret of UP’s success.

This just in from a teacher in Nebraska. The state did not get any Race to the Top funding, and therefore didn’t “win” money that would cost them more to implement than they “won.” It is taking a “wait and see” approach to Common Core standards. It doesn’t want the U.S. Department of Education to tell Nebraskans what to do. It doesn’t have any charters.

The state is trying to do what is best for children. Imagine that! The public schools are supported by the public.

Is Nebraska still part of the United States? How did we overlook the amazing common sense that still exists there? Good luck to Nebraska in keeping the privatizers at bay.

I realized when I read this letter that Nebraska belongs on our honor roll as a champion of public education. It supports its public schools. It lets teachers teach. It has not rushed to do the latest thing. It has thus far ignored the privatizers.

Welcome to the honor roll, Nebraska! Stay strong!

Come to Nebraska. A state led by a common sense dept. of education and a smart, reasonable teachers’ union. We don’t rush to jump on every new educational bandwagon (Nope, we didn’t get any Race to the Top money and the verdict’s still out on Common Core–we’re one of the few ‘wait and see’ hold out states) and try to comply with mandatory standards while doing the least amount of damage to our kids. We aren’t averse to change–indeed, we’re always looking to be on that cutting edge, however, if we’re going to spend hard earned tax dollars, it had better be worth it. I’m a high school special education teacher and co-teach algebra and geometry. I work with a tough population and my school isn’t perfect. Lots of hard work. But the difference is that public education is supported in our state. We have no charter schools. I feel appreciated by my students, my co-workers, parents and administration just about every single day. Now, it’s not a Shangra-la…I DO work with teenagers, many with behavior dsorders, and don’t always agree with administration or co-workers. Our state legislature passed a law and implented a state-wide test many educators aren’t crazy about. We are under the same gun to improve test scores as any other state and that can be stressful. However, we are encouraged and celebrated whenever we infuse creativity, active learning, and technology into our classrooms. In a nutshell, we’re held accountable, the state testing is a pain and possibly a waste of time, but overall I feel the higher ups try to stay out of our way as best as they can. The biggest threat to our educational system here is out of state money with an agenda to privatize education and run it like a business–a fate experienced by other states. I only hope we can fight them off and maintain what we have.

A reader wonders, when do we start assessing parents and caregivers?

http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/PDF/CCSS/PreK_ELA_Crosswalk.pdf

Click to access PreK_ELA_Crosswalk.pdf

Let’s not laugh too hard. I posted the links above in response to Dr. Ravitch’s post called “What are we doing to the little ones?” The links take you to draft Connecticut documents relating to CCSS for preschoolers. The introduction states that the adoption of CCSS for K-12 “has naturally led to questions regarding standards for preschool and/or prekindergarten students.” The next section talks about a work group that has been charged with the task of creating comprehensive learning standards for birth to age 5.

I personally am interested in the learning standards for infants. What do you think? Should the first assessments be at 6 weeks or 3 months? We probably need both formative and summative assessments in math and language arts. Since Connecticut is launching new teacher evaluations, we should probably apply the same standards to parents and caregivers. A full 45 percent of a parent’s score should be based on the results of these assessments. If the baby naps during an assessment, we probably should wake him/her up. I’m not quite sure how to deal with the diapering issue though. Maybe Michelle Rhee or Jeb Bush have some thoughts on this.

Jersey Jazzman describes here the Newark teachers contract, which was just ratified.

The central feature of the contract is merit pay. This particular gimmick is a fixation of billionaire Eli Broad, who calls the shots in the Garden State through Acting Commissioner Chris Cerf and Newark’s Superintendent Cami Anderson, both of whom were “trained” to think the Broad Way in the uncertified Broad Superintendents Academy.

Cerf has probably forgotten the New York City bonus plan that failed when he was Deputy Chancellor; the city blew away $50 million on it before the RAND corporation declared it a failure.
Anderson believes in bonuses. In addition to her salary of $247,500, she stands to get a bonus of another $50,000 if the district meets certain performance targets.

As the nation faces a so-called fiscal cliff, how can Newark afford bonuses? The plan is being financed by Mark Zuckerberg’s gift of $100 million.

Why not try merit pay one more time? Who cares that it has been tried repeatedly for decades and never worked? Just in recent years, it failed in Nashville, it failed in New York City, it failed in Chicago. If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. Ditto for the 100th time.

“Success” would be a kind of failure, too, though I know of no examples of success. Success would mean more teaching to the test, more narrowing of the curriculum to what is tested, more focus on tests as the goal of schooling rather than as a diagnostic measure.

So Newark will do education the Broad Way, which has seen no success anywhere it’s been tried.

The Broad Way means a fervent belief in carrots and sticks as tools of control by management. It means management by numbers and targets and return in investment. It is the ethos of billionaires and management consultants.

It is totally inappropriate for professionals. Professionals always do their best. If they don’t, they should not be hired or they should be fired.

I’m on an airplane about to take off. Should I offer the pilot a bonus to get me to Chicago safely? That’s his job.

What happens when the Zuckerberg money is exhausted? Will Eli Broad promise to keep it going?

You may have thought that the biggest problems facing the world were things like war, terrorism, poverty, and growing inequality. If you thought that, you are wrong. What is really needed in every country is an organization prepared to recruit a few dozen smart college graduates and groom them to take over the nation’s education system. From their positions as leaders, they can advance an agenda of testing and privatization. And then, one day all children will get an excellent education, and all the other problems will be solved. Just as we have done in the US in the past twenty years.

The greatest education blogger ever was Eduwonkette.

For some 22 months, the masked woman fired off sharp missives, dissecting bad ideas with hard data and incisive questions.

She started her blog at Education Week in January 2007 and kept it going until October 2009, when she figuratively “hung up her cape.”

Her stuff was spectacular, and no one knew who she was.

Here is a sample of her writing,

Eventually she felt compelled to reveal her identity, and soon after she closed down her blog.

She was a graduate student in sociology, working on her doctorate.

Once she lost her anonymity, she stepped away from what was the most popular education blog ever.

She promised to return when she is needed.

But she never did.

The Detroit School Board voted to withdraw from the State’s Educational Achievement Authority after voters repeal the act granting broad powers to emergency managers.

Seems that the people in Detroit think they should have something to say about what happens to their public schools and their children. They probably don’t like the idea of turning over Detroit’s schools to a reactionary governor and his designee.

This makes my day.

Michael Vanveckhoven, a reader of this blog sent me a photo of children in Meridian, Mississippi, collecting warm hats and gloves for children in Rockville Center on Long Island in New York.

Michael read here a note from high school principal Carol Burris about students whose homes were severely damaged by Hurricane Sandy.

The south shore of Long Island took the full force of the hurricane and experienced a huge surge and flooding.

Carol said many of the children were living without power and were cold and damp. She said they needed hats and gloves.

And the children in Meridian collected hats and gloves to send to Carol’s school to distribute.

Excuse me, I am crying.

I don’t have a category marked “the goodness of the human spirit.”

photo.JPGphoto.JPG
128K   View   Download

Conservatives can’t believe their hero Tony Bennett lost.

Bennett had the support of the national conservative establishment.

The Thomas B. Fordham Institute had crowned him the American Education Idol.

He had nearly $1.5 million to spend.

Republicans loved his attacks on unions.

The Obama administration loved his support for the Common Core standards.

He is president of Jeb’s group of rightwing superintendents called Chiefs for Change.

He is on the board of directors of the Council of Chief State School Officers (its president is Tony Luna of Idaho, whose teacher-bashing laws were repealed by the voters).

Education Week invited Bennett to lead a forum on “Road Maps to Success” in implementing the Common Core in March 2013 (that should be a hoot, especially since one of the session will be held in Indianapolis!).

And he got shellacked in the election by a political novice.

Glenda Ritz received 100,000 votes more than Mike Pence, who was elected Governor.

The pondering goes on and on.

How did David beat Goliath?

Here is one effort to explain it.

Let’s see: teachers, principals and superintendents were angry, but that would not be enough to beat him.

The unions were angry, but that would not be enough to beat him.

Parents were angry at the avalanche of testing. There are lots and lots of parents. That would matter.

Hoosiers who graduated from public schools, who loved their teachers, who respect the importance of public education figured out that he was doing his best to turn it over to entrepreneurs.

Maybe that’s what did it.