Archives for the month of: September, 2012

I may no longer be blogging with Deborah Meier at Bridging Differences, but we continue to share and exchange ideas. Deborah comments here about the role of unions.

Unions are not primarily formed to influence reform–but, there are good reasons why the two go together.  (In short, self-interest is not always a bad thing–as our opponents note in defense of their corporate sponsors.) The most horrifying aspect of current reform is actually not what it is doing to teachers–but what it is and will do our students and the future of America. Not one of the reforms proposed by the Rahms/Kleins et al of the world has any connection to helping kids grow up to be well-educated.  The evidence is clear.  I’m proud of the CTU for making that clear and taking an enormous risk to do so.

Do you have advice for Mayor Rahm Emanuel?

How can he end the impasse and do what is right for Chicago’s children?

Let him know.

http://www.facebook.com/ChicagoMayorsOffice

Dear Readers,

Today I ended my five-year association with Bridging Differences, the blog I shared with Deborah Meier. This is my farewell letter on that blog.

I did so because I am devoting all my blogging time to this space.

In less than four months, the blog has had nearly 1 million page views.

I am having way too much fun, and I love the community that we are building together of people who care passionately about the future of education.

I hope you will take the time to read my farewell to Bridging Differences.

Now let’s get on with our work.

Diane

Sabrina Stevens answers the question here.

Who worked to get children out of the factories and into school?

Who worked for a shorter work day for women?

Who worked to help poor people enter the middle class?

Not the Wall Street hedge fund managers.

Not the equity investors.

Not the big corporations.

One guess.

Listen here for a good interview about the Chicago teachers strike.

Link was broken.  I fixed it.

Norm Scott, a retired teacher who is a blogger and film producer (“The Inconvenient Truth Behind ‘Waiting for Superman'”), wrote a provocative explanation of the Chicago strike and its political implications.

He says that President Obama can’t support the Chicago teachers because they are striking against his Race to the Top policies. And he can’t oppose the teachers because he needs the votes of teachers in the election. So he supports the kids.

The real difference between the CTU and Mayor Rahm Emanuel is not money. By all accounts, the union and the mayor are close on compensation.

The real differences are about the corporate reform agenda. The mayor wants merit pay, more charters, evaluation of teachers by test scores, and all the other components of the national corporate reform agenda.

But little noticed by the national media is that none of these so-called reforms works or has any evidence to support it. Merit pay has failed wherever it was tried. Teacher evaluation by student test scores is opposed by the majority of researchers, and practical experience with it has led to confusion and uncertainty about whether student scores can identify the best and worst teachers. The charters in Chicago and elsewhere do not get better test scores than the regular public schools. Even in Detroit, only 6 of 25 charter high schools got better scores than the much-lamented Detroit public schools.

A researcher in Louisiana notes that John White and his fellow advocates for vouchers were overjoyed by the latest study by voucher advocate Paul Peterson of Harvard and Matthew Chingos of the Brookings Institution.

Here, they hoped, was proof that the Louisiana voucher program would boost college enrollment rates for African American students!

But, Noel Hammatt of Baton Rouge points out that they ignored some inconvenient facts.

The voucher-receiving group of black students had a 24% increase in college enrollment, but the voucher-not-receiving group had a 20% increase in college enrollment.  Hmm. Not so amazing, after all.

And the African American students in the study, in comparison to Hispanic students, were more likely to be children of college-educated parents and only children.

Overall, the study found NO significant effects. (See my own post here.)

But this what happens when politicians politicize research and researchers give them ammunition to do it.

Jon Pelto has placed an order for a comfortable pair of walking shoes for President Obama, so he can walk alongside the striking teachers in Chicago.

He even paid for priority shipment from L.L. Bean.

Mr. President, remember when you said that “workers deserve to know that somebody is standing in their corner”?

So far, President Obama has had no comment. Like Mitt Romney, he is on the side of the students.

President Obama, the teachers are on the side of the students. They want the students to have smaller classes, art classes, access to a social worker, a library, and the help they need to succeed.

Mr. President, please join CTU on the picket line to show your support for the students and teachers of Chicago.

The Broad Center–established by billionaire Eli Broad–runs an unaccredited training program for school leaders, where aspiring superintendents learn Broad’s philosophy of school management. Eli Broad is a businessman who made his billions in home-building, mortgage lending, and insurance (AIG). The Broad Center has a powerful network.

By happenstance, a memo from the Center fell into the hands of critics, who wrote about the Center’s plans to produce more disruptive and transformative leaders. The critics wrote about the memo; the Center responded; and the critics responded to the Center’s response.

If you want an insight into the thinking of the Broad Center, read on:

Today’s Washington Post Answer Sheet column includes the latest in a series of posts and exchanges about the Broad Foundation’s education “reform” efforts in NJ and across the nation. As Post reporter Valerie Strauss writes: “The Chicago teachers strike has made school reform national news, and here’s a piece that helps explain some of the controversy. This is a follow-up to a post I published last month about plans by the California-based foundation of billionaire Eli Broad to expand its influence in school reform initiatives that include charter schools, merit pay and other market-based reforms. The original piece and the following one were written by Ken Libby, a doctoral student at the University of Colorado at Boulder, and Stan Karp, director of the Secondary Reform Project for New Jersey’sEducation Law Center and an editor of Rethinking Schools magazine.”

 

 

Broad’s misleading response to critics

The Washington Post Answer Sheet

The Broad Center’s efforts to “accelerate” disruptive reform do not improve school districts. Instead they destabilize them, promote the privatization of public policy and undermine the common ground public education needs to survive and improve. Broad’s support for charter expansion, school closings, test-based teacher evaluation, merit payTeach for America, hostility to teachers unions and top-down business management of school districts is wreaking havoc in urban districts across the country. Our “interest” in the Broad Center’s programs is in stopping them from doing further damage to our schools, students and communities.

 

Commentary

The Broad Center for the Management of School Systems

What the Aug. 21 Answer sheet blog post doesn’t tell you is that nowhere in the memo referred to are the words “privatize public schools,” “run schools like businesses,” “corporate school reform” or “influence schools.” That is because these are not our goals.  We don’t believe in these things, which is why you won’t see that language in any correspondence we produce. 

 

Broad Foundation’s plan to expand influence in school reform

The Washington Post Answer Sheet

A recentmemo from The Broad Center (TBC) proposes a series of strategic shifts in the foundation’s education programs designed to “accelerate” the pace of “disruptive” and “transformational” change in big city school districts, and create a “go to group” of “the most promising [Broad] Academy graduates, and other education leaders, who are poised to advance the highest-leverage education reform policies on the national landscape.”

ELC Obtains Confidential NJDOE School “Turnaround” Plan

In response to a request under the NJ Open Public Records Act (OPRA), Education Law Center has obtained a confidential proposal prepared for the Broad Foundation by the NJ Department of Education (NJDOE) to “turnaround,” take control, and potentially close over 200 public schools over the next three years. 

 

A Parent Guide to the Broad Foundation’s training programs and education

Parents Across America

The question I ask is why should Eli Broad and Bill Gates have more of a say as to what goes on in my child’s classroom than I do? – Sue Peters, Seattle parent

__._,_.___