Archives for category: Bloomberg, Michael

The NYC public is tired of Mayor Bloomberg’s policies of testing, school closings, and privatization. But for 12 years he has had the constant support of the city’s three major newspapers.

The editorialists have supported and cheered him at every turn.

But WOW, today the Néw York Times has an editorial today that agrees that the critics have a point. Will wonders never cease?!

The other papers regularly insist that any dissent from the mayor’s policies–no matter how ruinous to students they may be–comes from the teachers union or from paid shills for the union. The tabloids are quite certain that parents don’t have brains or ideas of their own.

The irony is that the tabloids continue to lambaste the quality of the schools despite the fact that Mayor Bloomberg has had total control of them for 11 years. If children don’t pass tests, the mayor is accountable. How do citizens hold our billionaire mayor accountable? As he once memorably said, you can always boo him at parades.

Here is an excerpt from the Times’ startling editorial:

“But after 12 years, this mayor’s ideas are due for a counterargument. The critiques the candidates are offering hardly shock the conscience, and their complaints about the Bloomberg administration can be heard from teachers and parents in any school in the city.

“The school system has indeed gone overboard in relying on standardized testing. Tests need to be a means to the end of better instruction, not the pedagogical obsession they have become. Yes, Mr. Bloomberg has shown disdain for consultation, as in his rush to close underperforming schools without the full and meaningful involvement of affected communities.

“The system needs to strengthen neighborhoods’ connection to schools and reconnect with parents who feel shut out. And while charter schools can be a path to excellence, they can also cause problems. Shoehorning them into existing school buildings over local objections can alienate parents and reinforce among students a harmful sense of being separate and unequal.”

Now this is an interesting idea that needs to be deconstructed. Mayor Bloomberg, reputedly worth $20 Billion, suggests that some young people should skip college and be a plumber.

On one hand, that’s good advice for young people who are not interested in going to college. Many, even some who should go to college, can’t afford to go because the cost is so prohibitive. In recent years, the states have shifted the costs to students and made college unaffordable for students unless they are willing to take on heavy debt.

On the other hand, if Mayor Bloomberg really believes this, he should not have gutted so many of Néw York City’s fine vocational programs.

If the mayor is serious, he might look into the German apprenticeship system, which seems to work well. Germany has taken care not to outsource its manufacturing base (as our corporations did), and it has far fewer college graduates than we do.

In this new world of high technology, will there be any private space for anyone?

Bloomberg made his billions by leasing high-tech terminals that contain up-to-the-minute financial news from all over the world.

Now the story emerges that Bloomberg reporters were spying on Bloomberg’s clients.

The New Yorker magazine has a contest each week. On the last page of each issue is a cartoon without a caption. Readers are invited to dream up a caption, and the best one wins.

Now here is our contest. Jeb Bush, Bill Gates, Mike Bloomberg, and Oprah are meeting at a swank island resort off the coast of South Carolina. The news story suggests it is a secret conference convened by Bill.

Question: Why are they meeting?

Ready, set, go.

Almost everything you need to know about “reform” in New York State is explained in this fable by Arthur Goldstein, who blogs at NYC Educator.

As usual, Arthur is very funny trying to decipher the mysteries of reform and the personalities of reformers.

For the past two years plus, Mayor Michael Bloomberg fought legal battles to try to avoid releasing a series of emails written about the time that he named publisher Cathie Black as chancellor of the New York City public schools.

The mayor finally lost in court, and the emails were released.

They are surprisingly banal.

There is no bombshell, no smoking gun. Just a frenzied PR campaign to figure out how to build the appearance of public support for a person who had no qualifications for the job.

Many emails were written to and from Gayle King, Oprah’s confidante, to persuade Oprah to endorse Black as the person best qualified to lead the nation’s largest school district. Oprah agreed, and the Chicago talk show host’s praise appeared on page one of Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post.

Black suggested that they enlist Ivanka Trump’s support, but a mayoral aide wisely shot that idea down.

Then it was on to Caroline Kennedy, with the assurance that she was a member of the DOE team and could be counted on.

The PR people decided to play the gender card. They drew up a long list of prominent women who would be asked to sign a statement endorsing Black. Gloria Steinem endorsed her, though of course Steinem had no connection to the New York City schools.

At one point, a City Hall advisor makes the telling comment that Joel Klein was a male prosecutor who had no educational experience, and Cathie Black was a female publisher with no educational experience. Implication: Rank sexism. (Maybe neither should have gotten a waiver from the State Commissioner since both were clearly unqualified and neither had the experience or education credentials that the law required.)

Then there was a flurry of emails about her donations to a charter school called Harlem Village Academy and her participation with the school leader in showing “Waiting for ‘Superman,'” an anti-public education film. That burnished her connection to education.

The most amazing part of the dossier is the cluelessness of the mayor’s team about who really counts in building credibility for someone chosen to be chancellor. They focused on high society and celebrity, but it never occurred to them to find educators or parents to support her candidacy. Of course, that might have been impossible because Cathie Black probably did not know any educators or public school parents.

PS: Black lasted three months. Then Bloomberg yanked her.

The Néw York Daily News has been jumping for joy at the prospect that the Common Core tests will show just how hopelessly dumb the students of NYC are.

Its latest editorial practically gloats about what is surely (the editors think) bad news. The writer also seems to believe that the harder the tests, the smarter the students will be (someday).

But wait a minute! This is the same editorial board that has cheered every twist and turn of Mayor Bloomberg’s high-stakes testing regime for 12 years! Don’t they realize that if the scores are low, Bloomberg is accountable? Every child in the public school system was educated on Bloomberg’s watch.

Isn’t it time to do what the mayor asked, and hold him accountable?

Leonie Haimson and I wrote an article for The Nation reviewing the Bloomberg legacy in education.

It is no longer behind a paywall. It is online and free.

Leonie Haimson and I have written an article in the current issue of The Nation about Mayor Bloomberg’s 12-year control of the public schools.

The article unfortunately is behind a pay wall. If you can find a copy at your newsstand or library, I hope you read it. You will find a perspective quite different from the tabloids.

The billionaires and moguls and titans are at it again.

They desperately want to buy the last seat on the Los Angeles school board, which will be decided in a run-off on May 21.

The contenders are Monica Ratliff, a teacher, and Antonio Sanchez, who used to work on the staff of L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

The Big Money wants Sanchez. Just as they assembled a war chest to beat Steve Zimmer, they are now piling up dough to crush underfunded Ratliff.

NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg put in $350,000. Los Angeles billionaire Eli Broad added $250,000. Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst added $100,000. It is expected that they will collect $1 million or more to beat Ratliff.

“In the primary, money spent by or for Sanchez outpaced Ratliff’s spending by a ratio of about 84 to 1.”

The UTLA endorsed both candidates and gave Ratliff $1,000.

Zimmer beat the billionaires. Can Ratliff pull off an upset too? She will probably be outspent this time 100-1.