THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ARTICLE YOU WILL READ TODAY. SHARE IT WITH YOUR FRIENDS, YOUR SCHOOL BOARD, YOUR LOCAL MEDIA, YOUR ELECTEDS. TWEET IT. POST IT ON FACEBOOK.
In the states where teachers have engaged in walkouts and strikes, public education has been systematically starved of funding. Typically, corporate taxes have been cut so that funding for education has also been cut. The corporations benefit while the children and their teachers are put on a starvation diet.
Who are the corporations and individuals behind the efforts to shrink funding for public schools and promote privatization?
It begins like this, then details a state-by-state list of corporations and billionaires backing the cycle of austerity and school privatization.
“The ongoing wave of teacher strikes across the US is changing the conversation about public education in this country. From West Virginia to Arizona, Kentucky to Oklahoma, Colorado to North Carolina, tens of thousands of teachers have taken to the streets and filled state capitals, garnering public support and racking up victories in some of the nation’s most hostile political terrain.
“Even though the teachers who have gone on strike are paid well below the national average, their demands have gone beyond better salary and benefits for themselves. They have also struck for their students’ needs – to improve classroom quality and to increase classroom resources. Teachers are calling for greater investment in children and the country’s public education system as a whole. They are also demanding that corporations, banks, and billionaires pay their fair share to invest in schools.
“The teachers’ strikes also represent a major pushback by public sector workers against the right-wing agenda of austerity and privatization. The austerity and privatization agenda for education goes something like this: impose big tax cuts for corporations and the .01% and then use declining tax revenue as a rationale to cut funding for state-funded services like public schools. Because they are underfunded, public schools cannot provide the quality education kids deserve. Then, the right wing criticizes public schools and teachers, saying there is a crisis in education. Finally, the right wing uses this as an opportunity to make changes to the education system that benefit them – including offering privatization as a solution that solves the crisis of underfunding.
“While this cycle has put students, parents, and teachers in crisis, many corporations, banks, and billionaires are driving and profiting from it. The key forces driving the austerity and privatization agenda are similar across all the states that have seen strikes:
“*Billionaire school privatizers. A small web of billionaires – dominated by the Koch brothers and their donor network, as well as the Waltons – have given millions to state politicians who will push their pro-austerity, pro-school privatization agenda. These billionaires lead a coordinated, nationwide movement to apply business principles to education, including: promoting CEO-like superintendents, who have business experience but little or no education experience; closing “failing” schools, just as companies close unprofitable stores or factories; aggressively cutting costs, such as by recruiting less experienced teachers; instituting a market-based system in which public schools compete with privately managed charter schools, religious schools, for-profit schools, and virtual schools; and making standardized test scores the ultimate measure of student success.”
Keep reading to learn about the interlocking web that includes the Koch brothers, the Mercers, the Waltons, the fossil fuel industry, their think tanks, and much more, all combined to shrink public schools and replace them with charters and vouchers.
By the way, rightwing billionaire Philip Anschutz of Colorado was the producer of the anti-teacher, anti-public education, pro-charter propaganda film “Waiting for Superman.”

It’s amusing Wells Fargo is on the list because they are right now spending millions of dollars advertising, trying to get their customers back after the huge scandals.
They weren’t punished at all for the scandals, got off with a slap on the wrist because apparently the United States doesn’t prosecute powerful and rich people anymore.
I wonder if people know they’re working against their local public schools.
LikeLiked by 1 person
YES. And I worry that we’d all be shocked should we find out just how many large businesses and banks are funding school privatizing measures.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on NANMYKEL.COM and commented:
Glad Ohio isn’t listed.
LikeLike
The same forces at work in Ohio.
LikeLike
Why does this article leave out Gates and Zuckerberg?
LikeLike
Dienne, Little Sis offers grassroots investigative tools. It is not a comprehensive source but one with savvy contributors who have had training in the use of its influence-mapping software.
To answer your question, go to Little Sis and search for Mark Zuckerberg, e.g., https://news.littlesis.org/2011/01/03/facebook-and-goldman-already-good-friends/
go to Little Sis and search for Bill Gates, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, and Melinda French Gates
See also the just published article “Converging on Choice: The Interstate Flow of Foundation Dollars to Charter School Organizations” with maps showing the geographic distribution of foundation funding aggregated across 2009, 2012, and 2014 and a chart that clearly shows the saturation of money in almost every state from the Walton Family Foundation.
See also the references for charter school effectiveness (some are from belief tanks) and other studies bearing on the increasing role of deep pocket foundations in privatizing education.
http://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/default+domain/pjMtjAAVxzhzE6pfmQJa/full
LikeLike
Little Sis is a fantastic resource for activists of every description who want to follow the money and lines of influence.
LikeLike
Possibly because it is focused on corporations in three states.
LikeLike
What these states are doing is investing in “trickle down” economics, which we know, never pays off. Last night Vice News had a story about Seattle. Many residents are protesting Amazon’s expansion in the city. Jeff Bezos is unpopular there while so many other states are offering all kinds of give backs and tax abatements in order to land Amazaon’s regional hub. The people in Seattle said they do not need any more $17 per hour jobs (the salary average at Amazon). Seattle is also proposing a tax on large corporations to help with their growing homeless problem. Red states keep disinvesting in the common good to “help” business.
LikeLike
Jeff Bezos, poster boy for megalomania, sociopathy and avarice on steroids.
LikeLike
Washington state has no corporate tax and no income tax.
LikeLike
Yes, and Amazon was given immense government subsidies by being exempt from sales taxes for years, while “legacy” brick and mortar retail had to continue charging it…
Yep, let’s all hail and idolize those Rugged Individualists who succeed entirely on their own (except for a little help from compliant governments and slave wages in the distribution centers).
LikeLike
At least many people in Seattle understand there is a need for corporations to contribute more. They need to vote for representatives that expect corporations to pay their fair share.
LikeLike
I posted this here https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/A-Guide-to-the-Corporation-in-General_News-Children_Corporations-Religious_Diane-Ravitch_Education-180515-620.html#comment700436
with the followingg comments… I urge you to go to the above address to read them, as they have embedded links to Diane’s books, and to info at this blog, and my series at Oped, which chronicle the destruction. Go, add a comment at OPED a news site, which discusses so many importatn issues, but NEEDS VOICES THAT SHOW THAT EDUCATION IS THE ISSUE OF THE MOMENT.
COMMENT ONE:
What is important to me, is that our people learn what is happening as the privatization goes on!Look at Kentucky RIGHT NOW… Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin is moving fast to smash public schools. First, he ousted several members of the state board of education, which promptly ousted the state commissioner of education. The board hired Wayne Lewis, an outspoken charter school advocate as interim state commissioner. Lewis announced that he recommends a state takeover of the state’s largest school district, Jefferson County, which includes Louisville. Lewis is an education professor, with no prior experience as a superintendent.
COMMENT 2 ( I HAVE ADDED A FEW LINKS TO THIS ONE.
The speed is dizzying. The news media will not tell you of the enormous coordinated assault on the 15,880 SEPARATE SCHOOL SYSTEMS IN 52 STATES.
New National Map Shows That Education Privatizers Have Burrowed into Almost All 50 States https://www.alternet.org/education/new-national-map-shows-how-k-12-education-privateers-are-almost-every-state
Shared knowledge that MAKES DEMOCRACY POSSIBLE. An ignorant citizenry is the goal. Here at Oped is my Series Page for 15,880 Districts in 50 States: already divided for conquering.
https://www.opednews.com/Series/15-880-Districts-in-50-Sta-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-140921-34.html?f=15-880-Districts-in-50-Sta-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-140921-34.html
Go to the series page on legislative takeovers, or privatization, ETC
https://www.opednews.com/Series/legislature-and-governorsL-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-150217-816.html?f=legislature-and-governorsL-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-150217-816.html
https://www.opednews.com/Series/PRIVITIZATION-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-150925-546.html?f=PRIVITIZATION-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-150925-546.html
Go to the series page on legislative takeovers, or privatization, or charter fraud. etc.
COMMENT 3
if you want the truth READ RAVITCH. How Not to Fix Our Public Schools as she details the ongoing Demolition of American Education!The EDUCATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. owns the media… all of it— but they do not own HER!Learn the truth from the writing of this brilliant educator, who is Politico’s choice for AMERICA’S 50 MOST IMPORTANT AMERICANS.
Dr Diane Ravitch–FORMER Assistant SECRETARY OF STATE is a research professor of education at New York University and the co-founder of the Network for Public Education, a grassroots advocacy organization.
Shared knowledge MAKES DEMOCRACY POSSIBLE. An ignorant citizenry is the goal of the corporations
LikeLike
The article is about a war of privatizers on public education. This is a very real war, but I hope that no one on this forum forgets that parents are not fighting THIS war. Parents care less about WHO controls their schools and more about WHAT and HOW is being taught. The article posits right from the start that the districts are being underfunded, and because of this the quality of education suffers, which the privatizers claim to be a sign of crisis. I think parents would be more sympathetic to this explanation of why their kids have low-grade or completely missing programs if what they do see were good, albeit not encompassing. For example, if the school had a decent math program with good curriculum, good textbooks, knowledgeable teachers, but the books were ten-year old, and there were not enough rulers or compasses, or there was a clear shortage of teachers, then one would look and this and think: yes, they are trying to do everything right, all they need is more money to buy newer textbooks, to hire a couple of more teachers. But when a school uses a horrendous curriculum to begin with, when whatever extra money it gets goes into buying “technology”, when a school has a huge sports field and track, but does not use it much and neigher opens it to public during off-school hours – which I think every public school should do, becuse they are PUBLIC – one may stop in their tracks and think: what exactly the school will do with extra money? Buy more crappy textbooks? Print out more useless worksheets? Buy more tablets and computers?
To me, the first step a school that asks for more funding should do, is to have open meetings with local parents, to admit all their wrongdoings, which probably were imposed on them like certain curricula or testing. Assert their will to change the system they operate in, like: They want to replace the bogus math curriculum. They want to introduce mandatory foreign language. They want to have proper science courses like physics and chemistry and biology not just “science”. Because if all they are saying “give us more money and we will improve”, this does not woo a regular parent. People in my area get their kids into Heritage charter system and think they are much better off than in a local public school, despite that the charter school does not have a large soccer field nor does it have a theater. One of the reasons – Saxon math at Heritage. These parents will not support the public school in its fight, because to these parents the public school does not exist.
LikeLike
There is so much to write about here that I don’t know quite where to start, so I will take the easy way out:
“…when a school has a huge sports field and track, but does not use it much and neigher opens it to public during off-school hours – which I think every public school should do, becuse they are PUBLIC…”
I wonder why they don’t use it much. Could it be that they cannot afford to use it? i wonder why they don’t open it to the public. H-m-m-m, could it be that they cannot afford the supervisory and custodial costs not to mention the infrastructure costs?
Your schools sound like they are seriously underfunded. Spending money they don’t have to provide programs they can’t afford might be considered fiscally irresponsible. You seem very focused on what you believe is THE math program that will solve all math curriculum problems (there is healthy debate among professionals about that) as well as other essentials of a solid curriculum. Even a solid basic science continuum costs big bucks. Textbooks just don’t do it alone. Labs are expensive and staffing isn’t cheap. Technology has an important role in providing quality programs although I agree it has been far oversold, especially with the testing ballyhoo. No one debates the fact that public schools in general are being systematically starved of resources. Public school board meetings are required to be open by law as are all their financial records. Go educate yourself. Run for the school board.
If all you want out of Heritage is Saxon math, then that is where you belong. Just pay for it yourself and fund your public schools, so they can actually educate kids. Your charter is helping to drain the public education system of funds.
I sound incredibly patronizing here. For that I am sorry. I am making assumptions about you that I have no right to make. I can hear the frustration in your voice.
LikeLike
“You seem very focused on what you believe is THE math program” – You are wrong. There is no math program in my state right now that is even remotely decent. There was a small independent publisher that offered decent – not perfect, but decent – textbooks for middle school, but it is gone now, because the state standards have been replaced with Common Core. Its website is gone too, so all the “technology” crap is not accessible anymore – another reason why I am a firm believer in the good old physical textbooks. Bigger publishers are in, with programs ostensibly aligned with Common Core, but tracing back right into 1989 NCTM standards. With so many programs developed for NCTM specs, whichever you choose, you get yourself into a groupwork, investigation, integrated pile of steaming dung.
It is not just math. There is no proper physics, not just in my district or state, but nationally. At best you can have one year physics course, which is laughable, in other countries you have three, four, five years of physics. Chemistry? I’ve heard there are places where you can have two years of chemistry. Biology? This is a more frequently occuring animal than physics. Foreign language, mandatory, starting from middle school – are you kidding me? As I said multiple times, the whole system is dysfunctional, from its over-reliance on worksheets instead of textbooks to overuse of computers.
I am trying to do my best, but I don’t have much power, and frankly, not really inclined to fight for everyone’s bright future. I am venting on this forum because it is frequented by people better known and respected in the world of education than I, so my hopes are that some of my complaints will be heard and understood. I do not feel fighting for public schools simply because they are public, because in their current form they are not much worth fighting for. You are right that releasing my grief in a forum is not productive. Ah, well, at least I can type a word or two, kilobytes are free.
“Your charter is helping to drain the public education system of funds.” – Look at it from the other point of view: the charter uses traditional math, the district uses NSF/NCTM/CCSSM math – parents choose the charter. Many parents made this choice, there is a lottery. Are they all idiots? Why the district chose the math program it deemed unsuitable twenty years ago? Why the district sticks to its guns despite people choosing the charter? I don’t know, but either of sheer incompetence of because of kickbacks behind the curtain. Or maybe they really believe into that program, which is strange, because it did not change much in twenty years. But this program makes comeback all over the state, the Asians in the Bay Area are not happy with this at all. They used to have algebra in 6th grade if they wanted to, now they will have it in 9th grade, diluted.
LikeLike
Ah,…you are in California! Where the billionaire boys club has been pushing charters big time at the expense of public schools. I don’t know if you have read the archives from this blog but California has featured prominently in the charter industry shenanigans. When big bucks can purchase the Los Angeles school board, so they will literally vote to destroy their own schools, you are right about the payoffs. I can understand not wanting to fight; it is a battle that will last for a long time. If you can deal with a privatized school system where your only vote is your feet, I don’t have much to say to you except that I wish you understood the consequences. Unfortunately, education is being turned into a commodity. It is no longer viewed as a common good. Forget the idea of it being a benefit to a democratic society to have an educated population. Those with resources have decent schools; the rest are left to molder in the underfunded public schools that are left to serve those the charters don’t want. It is a cycle being perfected in poor urban districts across the country. I can understand looking out for your own children and trying to find them at least a halfway decent education. Just don’t complain about what the public schools aren’t doing when you really have little interest in doing anything about it. My kids are out of school and I am retired, so my taxes are paid to the schools for the good of other peoples’ children now. If you have read anything about the charter industry, you have got to understand why I do not want one single penny to go them. I could go on and on, but I have a feeling that you don’t really want to hear right now. I hope you wake up and educate yourself before it is too late.
LikeLike
I discovered Little Sis (so named to counter the name “Big Brother”) some weeks ago and have since been roughing out “Deforming Atlanta Public Schools” and intending to have the pro-school choice Atlanta superintendent at the center. As the working copy stands right now, Gates, Kochs, Waltons, UNCF, TFA, KIPP, Relay, State Policy Network, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and many others are represented. I hope to organize the final version into related story maps that make it convenient to consume the whole thing or just some of it “a bite at a time,” as in eating the proverbial elephant. You might ask “Did you include …?” or see I’ve not included other relevant deformers. If so, let me know here or at edwjohnson@aol.com.
https://littlesis.org/maps/2988-deforming-atlanta-public-schools-wc#
LikeLike
You’re absolutely right, Diane, that was the most important article I read today. Actually, the most important article I read in a longer time period than one day.
LikeLike