Archives for category: Unions

Earlier today, John Merrow posted a blog in which he asked, “Who Created Michelle Rhee?”

From the context, I assume he means who was responsible for making her the face of the corporate reform movement? Why was she praised by both Barack Obama and John McCain in their 2008 debate only a year after she started work as DC superintendent of schools? Why was she featured on the cover of Time and Newsweek? Why was she lionized in the national media?

All this, even though as Merrow now says, “I am also reporting that, after five years of Rhee/Henderson, the DC schools are worse off by almost every conceivable measure: graduation rates, truancy, enrollment, test scores, black-white gap and teacher and principal turnover.”

How did the national media miss these developments? Why did they turn Rhee into a superstar despite the lack of any accomplishments?

Merrow puts the blame on four suspects:

First, Rhee herself because she inflated her credentials (no Ne in the mainstream media noticed).

Second, he blames himself because he aired twelve (12!) different episodes on national gelb
Vision chronicling her progress in “reforming” the DC schools. Now, he acknowledges that there was no progress but he didn’t know it at the time.

Third, according to “conspiracy theorists,” THEY, the funders of the far-right created her, by pouring millions of dollars into her one-woman campaign to smash the unions, tenure, and pensions, while promoting charters and vouchers. On the list of THEY, he includes the Waltons, the Koch brothers, ALEC, Eli Broad, and Joel Klein.

Fourth, he blames the unions. If they had not been so intransigent, then there would have been no Michelle Rhee to battle them. This seems to be a stretch. Fred Klonsky takes issue with Merrow here.

Last weekend the California Democratic Party passed a resolution that forthrightly criticized corporate education reform, including high-stakes testing and privatization. The resolution specifically singled out Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst and the Wall Street hedge fund managers’ Democrats for Education Reform as organizations that are fronts for corporate interests and Republicans.

But this upset the Los Angeles Times editorial board, which is known for its contempt for teachers’ unions. The Times apparently thinks that giving public funds to entrepreneurs, corporations, and hustlers with no oversight or accountability is “school reform.”

They neglected to mention that most of the candidates supported by StudentsFirst are Republicans, not Democrats.

This letter comes from three teacher educators at the State University of New York

In the assault on public education, New York State is in the midst of a battle. The growing movement to opt out of state testing has caught the attention state leaders and school administrators, who have a stake in supporting assessments. The New York State Teacher Union (NYSUT) represents public school educators. As a public union, it claims to support the best interests of students. In fact, NYSUT has sponsored a petition to limit high stakes testing and a forum for teachers to “tell it like it is” about testing. And on April 13, NYSUT Vice President Maria Neira led a rousing call for teachers to “ratchet up our collective voice.”

But earlier in the week, NYSUT President Richard Ianuzzi sent a memo to local union leaders. This memo acknowledges the growing opt out movement, as well as the complex role of teachers in this era of “over-emphasis on standardized testing.” However, the memo goes on to inform local leaders that:

• Locals and individual union members who advise parents or students to “opt out” of state tests may face risks.

• A teacher who, in conversations with students or parents, takes a position on testing contrary to the school district’s educational program may potentially be charged with misconduct or insubordination and could be subject to disciplinary action.

• A local speaking as a union or an individual member speaking as a parent or citizen about educational concerns over standardized testing for instance, in a letter to the editor or in a statement to the Board of Education is protected as long as they are not encouraging parents or students to opt out from a scheduled test.

As activists, scholars, and teacher educators who are working with parents and teachers to inform the public about the current “reform” movements, we find this memo chilling. How easy would it be to perceive that a teacher speaking out about the negative effects of high-stakes testing would be encouraging parents or students to opt-out?

Public educators have always occupied a complicated place in society. We are agents of the state who are working to improve the system. To improve the system, we must critique it. These critiques can be perceived as insubordinate; this perspective explains the importance of academic freedom. Teachers are experts in the field of education. As Neira states, their voices must not be silenced: they should be invited and amplified. NYSUT, as the union representing teachers, must support the needs of students by supporting the expertise of teachers. They should be encouraging teachers to speak out and giving every level of support to those who do.

Expectations for professionalism or propriety, such as those supported in this union memo, silence teachers. To silence teachers prevents educators from being activists in their own field. It dismisses their expertise and their commitment to the public good.

Imagine if doctors, lawyers, or engineers were discouraged from sharing knowledge that would benefit their clients? This would not be tolerated, and it should not be tolerated in the profession of education. Our future depends on it.

– Julie Gorlewski, Barbara Madeloni, and Nancy Schniedewind

The Chicago Teachers Union is planning a mass protest rally on Wednesday. The schools closings in Chicago are the largest in American history. Never has any district closed so many schools at the same time. Only since the passage of George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind and Arne Duncan’s Race to the Top has the public been told that school closings are “reform.” They are not. They are an abandonment of responsibility by those at the top.

NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Stephanie Gadlin
March 25, 2013 312/329-6250
StephanieGadlin@ctulocal1.com

As Thousands Plan to Rally against School Closings downtown this Wednesday, the Board of Education erects barricades

CHICAGO—Apparently officials at the Board of Education (BOE) are getting the message: The parents, educators and clergy of more than 30,000 Chicago Public School (CPS) students do not want their schools closed.

Today, BOE security began erecting metal barricades around the building as thousands of people plan to rally this Wednesday in protest of CPS’ plan to shutter 50 schools and disrupt 50 others. Some have noted this is the largest school closing campaign in the history of the United States.

CPS officials and the mayor continue to spew confusing propaganda as justification for closing schools. School bureaucrats claim there is a $1 billion deficit while simultaneously promising incentives to 50 or more schools that will serve as receiving campuses for students displaced by school actions.

Using the district’s own financial metrics, these incentives such as new air-conditioning, libraries, counselors and social workers will cost over $700 million.

On Saturday, Mayor Rahm Emanuel tried to confuse the public even further by stating school closures would somehow benefit students academically. While admitting the city has failed its fiduciary responsibly to provide all of its students with an adequate education, the mayor stopped short of acknowledging the huge racial implications of these closures.

Thousands of parents have accused the schools CEO Barbara Byrd-Bennett and the mayor of lying about a pretend “underutilization crisis” in order to open more charter operations and privatize public education in the city. Most of the schools targeted for closure are in the African American community.

In the meantime, the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) will join with other labor organizations, parent groups, churches and community-based organization in a mass march and rally on Wednesday, March 27 at 4 p.m.

People will gather at Daley Plaza at rush hour before heading to City Hall and BOE headquarters at 121 S. LaSalle Street.

Participants will include CTU Local 1 President Karen Lewis, SEIU Local 1 President Tom Balanoff, Unite HERE Local 1 President Henry Tamarin, parents, clergy, students, rank-and-file teachers, paraprofessionals, school clinicians, lunchroom and custodial workers, community activists, and others.

###

The Chicago Teachers Union represents 30,000 teachers and educational support personnel working in the Chicago Public Schools and, by extension, the students and families they serve. CTU, an affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers and the Illinois Federation of Teachers, is the third largest teachers local in the country and the largest local union in Illinois. For more information visit CTU’s website at http://www.ctunet.com
SG:oteg-743-tr

Randi Weingarten and Vicki Phillips of the Gates Foundation have jointly written an article bout teacher evaluation.

At a time when teachers and the teaching profession and teachers’ unions are under attack in states across the nation, how important is teacher evaluation?

What do you think?

This is a stunning analysis of the relationship between labor unions and the Democratic Party.

It is a must-read.

Many in education have been baffled by the bipartisan consensus around Republican ideology. Micah Uetricht is not baffled. He says without hedging that “Democrats have swallowed the Right’s free market orthodoxy whole. Much of the party appears to have given up on education as a public project.”

Teachers unions, he writes, have been unable to articulate a coherent response to their abandonment.

That is, until last September, when the Chicago Teachers Union went on strike. He writes:

“The union has been unafraid to identify the education reform agenda pushed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel and his party nationally as an attempt to exacerbate inequalities within the education system, strip teachers of power and erode their standards of living, and chip away at public education as an institution, and to call such Democrats enemies. Rather than continuing an insider strategy that has netted so little for the rest of labor over the years, the CTU has entered into open opposition with the neoliberal wing of the party.”

This is an important development. And this is an essay you must read.

For more than a week in September, the nation was astonished to see thousands of Chicago teachers on strike.

The media treated it as an old fashioned dispute over wages and hours, which it was not.

Many of us who follow education issues knew that the teachers were striking against nearly 20 years of nonstop ill-considered “reforms” imposed on teachers by politicians and uninformed policymakers.

The bottom line: Enough is enough.

This excellent article explains the teachers’ strike and puts it into a larger context.

The UNO charter chain has been in the news lately and not for good reason.

Its number two official resigned amid accusations that he steered contracts worth millions to relatives–his own plus relatives of lobbyists who managed to help UNO get a $98 million state appropriation for three new buildings.

Now UNO is in the news again.

It has decided that it will allow its teachers at its 13 charters to join a union, if they want to.

Here is the funny line in the article:

“Typically,  privately run charters hire non-union teachers, which supporters say allows them to be more innovative and successful.”

Have you noticed how innovative and successful the schools are in the states than ban collective bargaining? You know, like the Deep South, and now the Midwest?

Some states have never had unions, but they don’t seem to be the most successful or innovative.

A teacher in Douglas County, Colorado, reports that the school board and superintendent are determined to wreck the public school system for which they are responsible.

The teacher writes:

I can’t begin to tell you how your sharing the information about the LA school district victory for kids is boosting the morale of fighters for public education in Douglas County, Colorado. We’re in a fight for our public school life here too. The school board elections in November will determine the future of our public schools.

The school board was elected, partly in 2009 and partly in 2011, by money from sources outside of the district and heavily connected with the GOP and ties to ALEC. The purpose seems to be to conduct a corporate experiment to on an affluent, not broken, school district south of Denver.

The school board in turn has proudly broken all ties with the union. While the union still exists there is no collaborative, working relationship, or no collective bargaining agreement between the district and the union. And it seems that every time someone disagrees with them, these opponents are called “union thugs.” If this weren’t so serious, their tactics would look downright silly. At the last board meeting, the BOE supporters dressed up as Grinches in their interpretation of the union, and passed out inaccurate pamphlets about the union.

The school board hired a corporate reform superintendent in 2010. Some of her first contacts with the community involved traveling to community public schools to praise the charter school movement and the important of choice. If you want to listen to her speak, contact the Milton Friedman Foundation. http://www.edchoice.org/Foundation-Services/Speakers/Elizabeth-Celania-Fagen.aspx

The school board has also forced a voucher program currently tied up in litigation thanks to the group, Taxpayers for Public Education- http://www.facebook.com/pages/Taxpayers-for-Public-Education/165645363470905?fref=ts. The lawsuit is on its way to the Colorado Supreme Court. The community voted down funding for merit pay, but they have still spent the money from elsewhere to implement a merit pay program that is basically behavior modification for teachers. And they are extremely proud of the fact that they have reduced the teachers’ salary in this district. Polls show teacher morale at an all time low.

More about the voucher program. The right wing of our Republican party is now going after the head of our public libraries for his participation in supporting the lawsuit. http://www.ourcoloradonews.com/castlerock/news/douglas-county-commissioners-push-for-library-changes/article_11d11136-850d-11e2-9323-001a4bcf887a.html

And now they are moving on with a new era in charter school relations. http://www.9news.com/news/article/321642/222/Douglas-County-Schools-signs-unique-charter-school-deal?fb_action_ids=10200721010176750&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_ref=artsharetop&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%5B499626156739696%5D&action_type_map=%5B%22og.recommends%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%22artsharetop%22%5D

They have an $83 million reserve while students sit in unheated classrooms; parents have to pay for student busing, among other things a free public education is supposed to provide. http://strongschoolscoalition.org/dougco-finances-crystal-ball/

And just like the LA elections, the corporate reformers are continuing to spend money on commercials, and the Republic party headquarters here has no qualms about spending over $1 million on November’s elections. The air here is thick with propaganda.

But just like LA, and so many other areas in this country, we have a brilliant and dedicated community that wants its public schools back. Here are just a few of the very information blogs and organizations created by our communities. http://douglascountyparent.com/ and http://strongschoolscoalition.org/ While we don’t have their money, we can only hope that the truth will also prevail here in Douglas County.

When I heard about Strongsville, I thought I was reading a children’s storybook about a wonderful, all-American city, a city where all the families are happy and have nice houses, and the children play in well-equipped playgrounds, and go to wonderful schools.

Think of it: Strongsville. It evokes Wheaties and Jack Armstrong, the all-American boy, the town where everything is just fine.

But then I got this letter from a teacher:

My name is Christina Potter and I have taught in the Strongsville City Schools in Strongsville, Ohio for the last eight years.

When I was hired in Strongsville, a great community with excellent schools, many other teachers said I was lucky, and they were jealous of my new job, and during the first two years, they were right; things were great with all sides working together,and we earned Ohio’s highest ranking, Excellent with Distinction.

As time went on a division started to occur between the administration and the teachers. During our 2010 contract negotiations the school stated that times were difficult and they needed the teachers to make concessions. In good faith, and promise of a levy, we agreed to an additional two year pay freeze on top of the three years we had already taken. We also increased our medical expenses, took on an additional duty period, and agreed to work two days unpaid. Times were tough, but everyone was striving to make Strongsville great.

Then, everything went haywire. With the ink still drying on our contract, the Board tried to take the levy off the ballot but failed, so instead, they informed the community to vote the levy down. Then we learned that while the district cried broke in 2010, it spent $500,000 to hire an attorney who publicizes himself as a union breaker. Every school district in this area that has hired him has either gone on strike or threatened to. Needless to say, the teachers, who negotiated in good faith, were outraged.

When our contract ended in June 2012, the district asked for extra time before negotiating to get its finances in order, so on July 19th, the first negotiation session took place. Upon walking in, their attorney put a contract down on the table and told us it was a take it or leave it offer and refused to negotiate one item at a time. After months of failing to negotiate a contract, our Education Association declared an impasse, and a Federal Mediator came in to oversee negotiations. Here is the timeline of recent events:

1. On February 15th, 2013 the teachers of the Strongsville Education Association (SEA) overwhelmingly passed a strike authorization.

2. On February 22nd, SEA submitted a 10-day notice of our intent to strike.

3. On March 1st, I had to hand in my I.D. badge and keys and have all of my personal belongings out of the building by 3:15 p.m. After 3:15, the doors would be locked, and anyone still on school property would be arrested even though we had not taken a final strike vote; we also had another negotiation session scheduled for Saturday morning. For all intense purposes we were not on strike yet but we were being locked out of the buildings, our email accounts and our grade books.

4. On March 2nd, both negotiating teams and the School Board members met with the federal negotiator. At that time the school gave its final offer which was only slightly different than their original.

And that takes us to where we are today, on strike. Many of my fellow teachers are also Strongsville residents, who have children in the system. They fear we are destroying our great public schools by trashing the teaching profession within them, instead of working toward a settlement. They feel the Board has chosen to waste tax payer money and painted teachers as greedy; meanwhile, it has forked over another $500,000, for a total of $1 million, to an attorney instead of using the money for books and technology.

Why are we striking in the cold, wind, and snow from 5:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. We, the Strongsville teachers, feel we are not just standing for the SEA, but for all of our fellow public school teachers in the Ohio and across the nation during this statewide/national epidemic of privatizing our public schools. If this contract goes through other school districts may soon go after their teachers, and we cannot in good conscience allow that to happen. As a teacher and a parent of two, I believe in public education and its hard working teachers, who too often are the brunt of undeserved bashing.

The teachers of Strongsville will hold a rally this afternoon at 4 pm in the center of Strongsville, at the gazebo, at the corners of Pearl Rd. and Rt 82.